Evaluating automatic dialogue strategy adaptation for a spoken dialogue system

1st Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, NAACL 2000 - co-located with 6th Applied Natural Language Processing Conference, ANLP 2000 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 202-209

  Chu Carroll, Jennifer ^a   Nickerson, Jill Suzanne ^b  

^a NOKIA RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

QUALITY CONTROL; SPEECH PROCESSING;

AUTOMATIC ADAPTATION; DIALOGUE STRATEGY; EMPIRICAL EVALUATIONS; MIXED-INITIATIVE; PERFORMANCE FACTORS; SPOKEN DIALOGUE SYSTEM; STRATEGY ADAPTATIONS; SYSTEMS PERFORMANCE; THREE DIMENSIONS; USERS' SATISFACTIONS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 85119660036     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. James F. Allen, Bradford W. Miller, Eric K. Ringger, and Teresa Sikorski. 1996. A robust system for natural spoken dialogue. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 62-70.
2. S. Bennacef, L. Devillers, S. Rosset, and L. Lamel. 1996. Dialog in the RAILTEL telephone-based system. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing.
3. Jennifer Chu-Carroll and Michael K. Brown. 1998. An evidential model for tracking initiative in collaborative dialogue interactions. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 8 (3-4) :215-253.
4. Jennifer Chu-Carroll. 2000. MIMIC: An adaptive mixed initiative spoken dialogue system for information queries. In Proceedings of the 6th ACL Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing. To appear.
5. Paul R. Cohen. 1995. Empirical Methods for Artificial Intelligence. MIT Press.
6. Morena Danieli and Elisabetta Gerbino. 1995. Metrics for evaluating dialogue strategies in a spoken language system. In Proceedings of the AAA! Spring Symposium on Empirical Methods in Discourse Interpretation and Generation, pages 34-39.
7. Jean Gordon and Edward H. Shortliffe. 1984. The Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence. In Bruce Buchanan and Edward Shortliffe, editors, Rule-Based Expert Systems: The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project, chapter 13, pages 272-292. Addison-Wesley.
8. Diane J. Litman and Shimei Pan. 1999. Empirically evaluating an adaptable spoken dialogue system. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on User Modeling, pages 55-64.
9. H. Meng, S. Busayaponchai, J. Glass, D. Goddeau, L. Hetherington, E. Hurley, C. Pao, J. Polifroni, S. Seneff, and V. Zue. 1996. WHEELS: A conversational system in the automobile classifieds domain. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, pages 542-545.
10. Stefan Ortmanns, Wolfgang Reichl, and Wu Chou. 1999. An efficient decoding method for real time speech recognition. In Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology.
11. K. A. Papineni, S. Roukos, and R. T. Ward. 1999. Freeflow dialog management using forms. In Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, pages 1411-1414.
12. Patti Price, Lynette Hirschman, Elizabeth Shriberg, and Elizabeth Wade. 1992. Subject-based evaluation measures for interactive spoken language systems. In Proceedings of the DARPA Speech and Natural Language Workshop, pages 34-39.
13. Wolfgang Reichl and Wu Chou. 1998. Decision tree state tying based on segmental clustering for acoustic modeling. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.
14. M. D. Sadek, A. Ferrieux, A. Cozannet, P. Bretier, F. Panaget, and J. Simonin. 1996. Effective humancomputer cooperative spoken dialogue: The AGS demonstrator. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing.
15. Glenn Shafer. 1976. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press.
16. Andrew Simpson and Norman M. Fraser. 1993. Black box and glass box evaluation of the SUNDIAL system. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, pages 1423-1426.
17. Gert Veldhuijzen van Zanten. 1999. User modelling in adaptive dialogue management. In Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, pages 1183-1186.
18. Marilyn A. Walker, Diane J. Litman, Candance A. Kamm, and Alicia Abella. 1997. PARADISE: A framework for evaluating spoken dialogue agents. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 271-280.