Methodological and interdisciplinary stance in Corpus Linguistics

Studies in Corpus Linguistics

Volumn 48, Issue , 2011, Pages 81-98

  Gries, Stefan Th ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85105511817     PISSN: 13880373     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/scl.48.06gri     Document Type: Note

References (16)

1. Firth, J. R. 1951. Papers in Linguistics, 1934-1951. Oxford: OUP.
2. Fries, C. C. 1952. The Structure of English: An Introduction to the Construction of English Sentences. New York NY: Harcourt Brace.
3. Gilquin, G. & Gries, St. Th. 2009. Corpora and experimental methods: A state-of-the-art review. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 5(1): 1-26.
4. Gries, St. Th. 1999. Particle movement: A cognitive and functional approach. Cognitive Linguistics 10(2): 105-145.
5. Gries, St. Th. 2003. Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics: A Study of Particle Placement. London: Continuum Press.
6. Gries, St. Th. 2005. Null-hypothesis significance testing of word frequencies: A follow-up on Kilgarriff. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(2): 277-294.
7. Gries, St. Th. 2006. Exploring variability within and between corpora: some methodological considerations. Corpora 1(2): 109-151.
8. Gries, St. Th. 2010. Corpus Linguistics and theoretical linguistics: A love-hate relationship? Not necessarily… International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15(3): 327-342.
9. Harris, R. A. 1993. The Linguistics Wars. Oxford: OUP.
10. Harris, Z. S. 1970. Papers in Structural and Transformational Linguistics. Dordrecht: Reidel.
11. Käding, F. W. 1897. Häufigkeitswörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. Steglitz: no publ.
12. Kilgarriff, A. 2001. Comparing corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 6(1): 1-37.
13. Kilgarriff, A. 2005. Language is never, ever, ever, random. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(2): 263-276.
14. Pullum, G. K. 1978. Assessing linguistic arguments by Jessica R. Wirth. Language 54(2): 399-402.
15. Schlüter, N. 2006. How reliable are the results? Comparing corpus-based studies of the present perfect. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 54(2): 135-148.
16. Teubert, W. 2005. My version of Corpus Linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10(1): 1-13.