How reliable are the results? Comparing corpus-based studies of the present perfect

Zeitschrift fur Anglistik und Amerikanistik

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 135-148

  Schlüter, Norbert ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 60950645312     PISSN: 00442305     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/zaa-2006-0205     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education
2. Dubois, Betty Lou (1972). The meaning and distribution of the perfect in present-day American English writing. PhD Dissertation, University of New Mexico
3. Elsness, Johan (1997). The Perfect and the Preterite in Contemporary and Earlier English. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter
4. Herzlík, Borivoj (1976). "Some notes on the present perfect." Brno Studies in English 12, 57-83
5. Korsakov, Andrej (1969). The Use of Tenses in English. The Structure of Modern English. Part 1. Lvov: University Press
6. Mindt, Dieter (2000). An Empirical Grammar of the English Verb System. Berlin: Cornelsen
7. Panzner, Antje (1995). Das Pre-Present in Kollokation mit Temporalangaben im britischen und amerikanischen Englisch der Gegenwart. Frankfurt: Lang
8. Peterson, Barbara (1970). "Towards understanding the 'perfect' constructions in spoken English." English Teaching Forum 8, 2-10
9. Schlüter, Norbert (2002). Present Perfect: Eine korpuslinguistische Analyse des englischen Perfekts mit Vermittlungsvorschlägen für den Sprachunterricht. Tübingen: Narr
10. Sinclair, John (2004). "Introduction." John Sinclair, ed. How to Use Corpora in Language Teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1-10
11. Svartvik, Jan and Randolph Quirk, eds. (1980). A Corpus of English Conversation. Lund: Gleerup
12. Vermant, Stefan (1983). The English Present Perfect. A Dynamic-Synchronic Approach. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics nr. 32. University of Antwerp