The Standard Family Life Course: An Assessment of Variability in Life Course Pathways

Life Course Research and Social Policies

Volumn 1, Issue , 2013, Pages 35-52

  Thomson, Elizabeth ^a,b   Winkler Dworak, Maria ^c   Kennedy, Sheela ^d  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c VIENNA INSTITUTE OF DEMOGRAPHY   (Austria)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Educational Difference; Family Experience; Family Life; Parental Separation; Welfare Regime

Indexed keywords

EID: 85103722238     PISSN: 22117776     EISSN: 22117784     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-8912-0_3     Document Type: Chapter

References (61)

1. Percen70 60
2. 50
3. 40
4. Aassve, A., Burgess, S., Propper, C., & Dickson, M. (2006). Employment, family union, and childbearing decisions in Great Britain. Journal of Royal Statistical Society series A, 169, Part 4, 781–804.
5. Andersson, G. (2002). Dissolution of unions in Europe: A comparative overview. Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft, 27, 493–504.
6. Andersson, G., Duvander, A.-Z., & Hank, K. (2004). Do child-care characteristics influence continued child bearing in Sweden? An investigation of the quantity, quality, and price dimension. Journal of European Social Policy, 14(4), 407–418.
7. Andersson, G., Rønsen, M., Knudsen, L., Lappegård, T., Neyer, G., Skrede, K., Teschner, K., & Vikat, A. (2009). Cohort fertility patterns in the Nordic countries. Demographic Research, 20, 313–352.
8. Baizan, P., Arnstein, A., & Billari, F. (2003). Cohabitation, marriage, first birth: The interrelationship of family formation events in Spain. European Journal of Population, 19, 147–169.
9. Becker, G. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
10. Biddlecom, A., & Martin, S. P. (2006). Childless (or childfree) in the United States. Contexts, 5(4), 54.
11. Bracher, M., & Santow, G. (1998). Economic independence and union formation in Sweden. Population Studies, 52, 275–294.
12. Brien, M. J., Lillard, L. A., & Waite, L. J. (1999). Interrelated family-building behaviors: Cohabitation, marriage and nonmarital conception. Demography, 36, 535–551.
13. Bumpass, L., & Lu, H.-H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children’s family contexts in the US. Population Studies, 54, 29–41.
14. Cassan F., Héran, F., & Toulemon, L. (2000). Study of family history. France’s 1999 Family survey. Courrier des statistiques, English series, No. 6, 7–19.
15. Coppola, L. (2004). Education and union formation as simultaneous processes in Italy and Spain. European Journal of Population, 20, 219–250.
16. Coppola, L., & Di Cesare, M. C. (2008). How fertility and union stability interact in shaping new family patterns in Italy and Spain. Demographic Research, 118(4), 117–144.
17. Elder, G. H., Jr., Johnson, M. K., & Crosnoe, R. (2003). The emergence and development of life course theory. In J. T. Mortimer & M. J. Shanahan (Eds.), Handbook of the life course (pp. 3–19). New York: Kluwer.
18. Ellwood, D., & Jencks, C. (2004). The spread of single-parent families in the United States since 1960. In D. P. Moynihan, L. Rainwater, & T. Smeeding (Eds.), The future of the family (pp. 25–65). New York: Russell Sage.
19. Ermisch, J. (2001). Cohabitation and childbearing outside marriage in Britain. In L. Wu & B. Wolfe (Eds.), Out of Wedlock: Causes and consequences of non-marital fertility (pp. 109–139). New York: Russell Sage.
20. Goldscheider, F., Turcotte, P., & Kopp, A. (2001). The changing determinants of women’s first union formation in industrialized countries: The United States, Canada, Italy and Sweden. Genus, 57(2), 107–134.
21. Goldstein, J., Lutz, W., & Testa, M. R. (2003). The emergence of sub-replacement family size ideals in Europe. Population Research and Policy Review, 22, 479–496.
22. Hank, K. (2001). Changes in Swedish women’s individual activity status and the subsequent risk of giving birth in the 1980s and 1990s: An extension of studies by Gunnar Andersson and Britta Hoem. Demographic Research, 125–132.
23. Härkönen, J., & Dronkers, J. (2006). Stability and change in the educational gradient of divorce: A comparison of seventeen countries. European Sociological Review, 22, 501–517.
24. Hoem, J. M. (1997). Educational gradients in divorce risks in Sweden in recent decades. Population Studies, 51, 19–27.
25. Hoem, J. M., Prskawetz, A., & Neyer, G. (2001). Autonomy or conservative adjustment? The effects of public policies and educational attainment on third births in Austria, 1975-96. Population Studies, 55, 249–261.
26. Hoem, J., Neyer, G., & Andersson, G. (2006a). Education and childlessness: The relationship between educational field, educational level, and childlessness among Swedish women born in 1955–59. Demographic Research, 14(15), 331–380.
27. Hoem, J., Neyer, G., & Andersson, G. (2006b). Educational attainment and ultimate fertility among Swedish women born in 1955–59. Demographic Research, 14(16), 381–404.
28. Jalovaara, M. (2002). Socioeconomic differentials in divorce risk by duration of marriage. Demographic Research, 7(16).
29. Kantorová, V. (2004). Education and the entry into motherhood: The Czech Republic during state socialism and the transition period (1970–1997). Demographic Research Special Collection 3, Article 10.
30. Kennedy, S. (2004). Education and the formation of new families: a comparative study of cohabitation and nonmarital fertility in western nations. Paper presented at the 2004 annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Boston.
31. Kiernan, K. (2001). European perspectives on nonmarital childbearing. In L. Wu & B. Wolfe (Eds.), Out of wedlock: Causes and consequences of non-marital fertility (pp. 77–108). New York: Russell Sage.
32. Köppen, K. (2006). Second births in western Germany and France. Demographic Research, 14, 295–330.
33. Kravdal, Ø. (1992). The emergence of a positive relation between education and third birth rates in Norway with supportive evidence from the United States. Population Studies, 46, 459–475.
34. Kravdal, Ø. (1999). Does marriage require a stronger economic underpinning than informal cohabitation?”. Population Studies, 53(1), 63–80.
35. Kravdal, Ø. (2001). The high fertility of college educated women in Norway: An artefact of the separate modeling of each parity transition. Demographic Research, 5(6), 187–213.
36. Kravdal, Ø. (2004). An illustration of the problems caused by incomplete education histories in fertility analyses. Demographic Research. Special collection 3, Article 6.
37. Kravdal, Ø. (2007). Effects of current education on second-and third-birth rates among Norwegian women and men born in 1964: Substantive interpretations and methodological issues. Demographic Research, 17, 211–246.
38. Kravdal, Ø., & Rindfuss, R. (2008). Changing relationships between education and fertility – A study of women and men born 1940–64. American Sociological Review, 73, 854–873.
39. Kreyenfeld, M. (2004). Fertility decisions in the FRG and GDR: An analysis with data from the German Fertility and family survey. Demographic Research, 11(S3), 276–318.
40. Lappegård, T. (2000). New fertility trends in Norway. Demographic Research 2(3).
41. Liu, G., & Vikat, A. (2004). Does divorce risk depend on spouses relative income? A register-based study of first marriages in Sweden in 1981-1998 (MPIDR Working Paper 2004-010). Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.
42. Martin, S. P. (2000). Diverging fertility among U.S. women who delay childbearing past age 30. Demography, 37, 523–533.
43. Martin, S. P. (2004). Delayed marriage and childbearing: Implications and measurement of diverging trends in family timing. In N. Kathryn (Ed.), Social inequality (pp. 79–119). New York: Russell Sage.
44. Martin, S. P. (2006). Trends in marital dissolution by women’s education in the United States. Demographic Research, 15, 537–560.
45. Mayer, K. U. (2005). Life courses and life chances in a comparative perspective. In S. Stefan (Ed.), Analyzing inequality: Life chances and social mobility in comparative perspective (pp. 17–55). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
46. Neyer, G., & Hoem, J. M. (2008). Education and permanent childlessness: Austria vs. Sweden; a research note (MPIDR Working Paper 2008–007). Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.
47. Oláh, L. Sz. (2001). Gender and family stability: Dissolution of first parental union in Sweden and Hungary. Demographic Research, 4(2), 29–96.
48. Oppenheimer, V. K. (1994). Women’s rising employment and the future of the family in industrial societies. Population and Development Review, 20, 293–342.
49. Parr, N. J. (2005). Family background, schooling and childlessness in Australia. Journal of Biosocial Science, 37, 229–243.
50. Parr, N. J. (2007). Which women stop at one child in Australia? Journal of Population Research, 24, 207–225.
51. Raley, R. K., & Bumpass, L. (2003). The topography of the divorce plateau: Levels and trends in union stability in the United States after 1980. Demographic Research, 8(8), 245–259.
52. Santow, G., & Bracher, M. (2001). Deferment of first birth and fluctuating fertility in Sweden. European Journal of Population, 17, 343–363.
53. Statistiska centralbyrån. (1995a). Kvinnors och mäns liv, Del 2. Parbildning och separationer. Demografiska rapporter, 2:2.
54. Statistiska centralbyrån. (1995b). Kvinnors och mäns liv, Del 3. Barnfödande. Demografiska rapporter, 2:3.
55. Statistiska centralbyrån. (2002). Mammor och pappor: Om kvinnors och mäns föräldraskap 2001. Demografiska rapporter, 7
56. Testa, M. R. (2006). Childbearing preferences and family issues in Europe (Special Eurobarometer 253/Wave 65.1 – TNS Opinion & Social). Directorate General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, European Commission.
57. Thomson, E. (2005). Partnership and parenthood: Connections between cohabitation, marriage and childbearing. In A. Booth & N. Crouter (Eds.), The new population problem: Why families in developed countries are shrinking and what it means. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
58. United Nations. (2003). Population, education and development. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, New york.
59. Upchurch, D. M., Lillard, L. A., & Panis, C. W. A. (2002). Nonmarital childbearing: Influences of education, marriage and fertility. Demography, 39, 311–329.
60. Willis, R. J., & Haaga, J. G. (1996). Economic approaches to understanding nonmarital fertility. Population and Development Review, 22(Supplement), 67–86.
61. Wu, L. L., & Li, J. C. A. (2005). Historical roots of family diversity: Marital and childbearing trajectories of American women. In R. A. Settersten, F. F. Furstenberg, & R. G. Rumbaut (Eds.), On the Frontiers of Adulthood: Theory, Research and Public Policy (pp. 110–149). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.