Second births in western Germany and France

Demographic Research

Volumn 14, Issue , 2006, Pages 295-330

  Köppen, Katja ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Comparative analysis; Education; Event history analysis; Fertility; France; Germany; Second births; West Germany

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746327498     PISSN: 14359871     EISSN: 14359871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2006.14.14     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Adserà A. (2004). 'Changing fertility rates in developed countries. The impact of labor market institutions', Journal of Population Economics 17 (1): 17-43.
2. Anttonen, A., Sipilä, J. (1996). 'European social care services: is it possible to identify models?', Journal of European Social Policy 6 (2): 87-100.
3. Becker, G. S. (1985). 'Human Capital, Effort, and the Sexual Division of Labor', Journal of Labor Economics 3 (1): 33-58.
4. Becker, G. S. (1993). A treatise on the family. Enlarged Edition. Cambridge/Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
5. Blossfeld, H-P., Huinink, J., (1989). 'Die Verbesserung der Bildungs- und Berufschancen von Frauen und ihr Einfluß auf den Prozeß der Familienbildung', Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft 45 (4): 383-404.
6. Blossfeld, H-P., Huinink, J. (1991). 'Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women's schooling and career affect the process of family formation', American Journal of Sociology 97 (1): 143-168.
7. Blossfeld, H-P., Timm, A. (eds.) (2003). Who marries whom? Educational systems as marriage markets in modern societies. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
8. Brewster, K.L., Rindfuss, R.R. (2000). 'Fertility and Women's Employment in Industrialized Nations', Annual Review of Sociology 26: 271-296.
9. Council of Europe (ed) (2001). Recent demographic developments in Europe: Demographic Yearbook 2001.
10. Dingeldey, I. (2000). Begünstigungen und Belastungen familialer Erwerbs- und Arbeitszeitmuster in Steuer- und Sozialversicherungssystemen - Ein Vergleich zehn europäischer Länder. Gelsenkirchen: Institut Arbeit und Technik.
11. Ermisch, J. F. (1988). 'Purchased child care, optimal family size and mother's employment. Theory and econometric analysis', Journal of Population Economics 2: 79-102.
12. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
13. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. European Commission (2000). Wie verwenden Frauen und Männer ihre Zeit? Drei europäische Studien. Luxemburg: Amt für amtliche Veröffentlichungen der Europäischen Gemeinschaften.
15. European Commission (ed) (2002.) Europäische Sozialstatistik - Bevölkerung. Luxemburg: Amt für amtliche Veröffentlichungen der Europäischen Gemeinschaften.
16. Eurostat (2003). Labour Force Survey results 2002. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
17. Fagnani, J. (2002). 'Why do French women have more children than German women? Family policies and attitudes towards child care outside home', Community, Work and Family 5 (1): 103-120.
18. Gauthier, A. H., Bortnik, A. (2001). Comparative Maternity, Parental, and Childcare Database, Version 2. University of Calgary: On-line.
19. Glynn, P. (2004). 'Weighting and Adjusting Weights: An Example', available at: http://staff.washington.edu/glynn/adjweight2.pdf, 26.03.2004.
20. Gornick, J. C., Meyers, M. M., Ross, K. E. (1997). 'Supporting the employment of mothers: Policy variation across fourteen welfare states', Journal of European Social Policy 7 (1): 45-70.
21. Gornick, J. C., Meyers, M. M., Ross, K. E. (1998). 'Public policies and the employment of mothers: a cross-national study', Social Science Quarterly 79 (1): 35-54.
22. Grundmann, M., Huinink, J., Krappmann, L. (1994). Familie und Bildung. Empirische Ergebnisse und Überlegungen zur Frage der Beziehung von Bildungsbeteiligung, Familienentwicklung und Sozialisation', in: P. Büchner et al. (eds), Kindliche Lebenswelten, Bildung und innerfamiliale Beziehungen. Materialien zum 5. Familienbericht, vol.4. München: Verlag Deutsches Jugendinstitut, pp. 41-104.
23. Hank, K, Kreyenfeld, M., Spieß, K C. (2003). 'Kinderbetreuung und Fertilität in Deutschland', MPIDR Working Paper, WP 2003-002, available at: http.//www.demogr.mpg. de.
24. Hoem, B., Hoem, J. M. (1989). 'The impact of women's employment on second and third births in modern Sweden', Population Studies 43: 47-67.
25. Hoem B. (1993). 'The compatibility of employment and childbearing in contemporary Sweden', Acta Sociologica 36: 101-120.
26. Hoem, B. (1996). 'The Social Meaning of the Age at Second Birth for Third-Birth Fertility: A Methodological Note on the Need to Sometimes Respecify an Intermediate Variable', Yearbook of Population Research in Finland 33: 333-339.
27. Hoem, J. M. (1996). 'The Harmfulness or Harmlessness of Using an Anticipatory Regressor: How Dangerous Is It to Use Education Achieved as of 1990 in the Analysis of Divorce Risks in Earlier Years?', Yearbook of Population Research in Finland 33: 34-43.
28. Hoem J. M., Prskawetz, A., Neyer, G. (2001). 'Autonomy or conservative adjustment? The effect of public policies and educational attainment on third births in Austria, 1975-96', Population Studies 55: 249-261.
29. Huinink, J. (1989). 'Das zweite Kind. Sind wir auf dem Weg zur Ein-Kind-Familie?', Zeitschrift für Soziologie 18 (3): 192-207.
30. Huinink, J. (1995). Warum noch Familie? Zur Attraktivität von Partnerschaft und Elternschaft in unserer Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/Main and New York: Campus Verlag.
31. Huinink, J. (2002). 'Polarisierung der Familienentwicklung in europäischen Ländern im Vergleich', in: N.F. Schneider and H. Matthias-Bleck (eds.), Elternschaft heute. Gesellschaftliche Rahmenbedingungen und individuelle Gestaltungsaufgaben. Opladen: Leske+Budrich, pp. 49-73.
32. Klein, T., Lengerer, A., Uzelac, M. (2002). 'Partnerschaftliche Lebensformen im internationalen Vergleich', Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaften 27 (3): 359-379.
33. Kravdal, Ø. (1992). 'The emergence of a positive relationship between education and third birth rates in Norway with supportive evidence from the United States', Population Studies 46 (3): 459-475.
34. Kravdal, Ø. (2001). 'The High Fertility of College Educated Women in Norway: An Artefact of the Separate Modelling of Each Parity Transition', Demographic Research 5 (6), available at: http.//www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol5/6.
35. Kreyenfeld, M. (2002a). 'Parity Specific Birth Rates for West Germany: An Attempt to Combine Survey Data and Vital Statistics', Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft 27 (3): 327-357.
36. Kreyenfeld, M. (2002b). 'Time-squeeze, partner effect or self-selection? An investigation into the positive effect of women's education on second birth risks in West Germany', Demographic Research 7 (2), available at: http.//www.demographic-research.org/volumes/Vol7/2.
37. Kreyenfeld, M. (2004). 'Fertility decisions in the FRG and GDR: An analysis with data from the German fertility and family survey', MPIDR Working Paper WP 2004-008, available at: http.//www.demogr.mpg.de.
38. Kreyenfeld, M., Hank, K. (2000). 'Does the availability of child care influence the employment of mothers? Findings from western Germany, Population Research and Policy Review 19: 317-337.
39. Kreyenfeld, M., Spieß, K. C., Wagner, G. (2002). 'Kinderbetreuungspolitik in Deutschland. Möglichkeiten nachfrageorientierter Steuerungs- und Finanzierungs-instrumente', Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaften 5 (2): 201-221.
40. Langan, M., Ostner, I. (1991). 'Geschlechterpolitik im Wohlfahrtsstaat: Aspekte im internationalen Vergleich', Kritische Justiz: 302-317
41. Le Goff, J. M. (2002). 'Cohabiting unions in France and West Germany: Transitions to first birth and first marriage', Demographic Research 7 (18), available at: http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol7/18.
42. Letablier, M.-T. (2002). 'Kinderbetreuungspolitik in Frankreich und ihre Rechtfertigung', WSI Mitteilungen 3: 169-175.
43. Lessenich, S., Ostner, I. (1995). 'Die institutionelle Dynamik "dritter Wege" - Zur Entwicklung der Familienpolitik in "katholischen" Wohlfahrtsstaaten am Beispiel Deutschlands und Frankreichs', Zeitschrift für Sozialreform 47: 780-803.
44. Mincer, J., Polachek, S. (1982). 'Family Investments in Human Capital: Earnings of Women', Journal of Political Economy 2 (2): 76-108.
45. Morgan, K. (2002). 'Does Anyone Have a Libre Choix'? Subversive Liberalism and the Politics of French Child Care Policy', in: S. Michel and R. Mahon (eds.), Child care policy at the crossroads. Gender and welfare state restructuring. New York/London: Routledge, pp. 143-167.
46. Ní Bhrolcháin, M. (1986). 'Women's paid work and the timing of births. Longitudinal Evidence', European Journal of Population 2: 43-70.
47. OECD (2004). 'OECD Labour Market Statistics: Indicators', available at: www.oecd.org.
48. Oláh, L. Sz. (1996). 'The impact of public policies on the second-birth rates in Sweden: A gender perspective', Stockholm Research Reports in Demography 96, Stockholm.
49. Reuter, S. (2002). 'Frankreichs Wohlfahrtsstaatsregime im Wandel? Erwerbsintegration von Französinnen und famileenpolitische Reformen der 90er Jahre', ZeS-Arbeitspapier 12, Zentrum für Sozialpolitik, Bremen.
50. Sell, S. (2002). "Bedarfsorientierte" Modernisierung der Kinderbetreuungsinfrastruktur in Deutschland', WSI Mitteilungen 3: 147-153.
51. Tavan, C. (2005). 'Les immigrés en France: une situation qui évolue', INSEE Première 1042, Paris: INSEE.
52. Toulemon, L. (2001). 'How many children and how many siblings in France in the last century?', Population & Sociétés 374, Paris: INED.
53. Toulemon, L., de Guibert-Lantoine, C. (1998). Fertility and family surveys in countries of the ECE Region: Standard Country Report France. New York/Genf: United Nations.
54. Toulemon, L. (2004). 'Fertility among immigrant women: new data, a new approach', Population & Sociétés 400, Paris: INED.
55. Vikat, A., Thomson, E., Hoem, J. M. (1999). 'Stepfamily Fertility in Contemporary Sweden: The Impact of Childbearing before the Current Union'. Population Studies 53 (2): 211-225.