Modes of knowledge and patterns of power

Higher Education

Volumn 49, Issue 1-2, 2005, Pages 9-30

  Kogan, Maurice ^a  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Authority; Epistemic; Finalisation; Hermeneutics; Knowledge; Power

Indexed keywords

EID: 17544364016     PISSN: 00181560     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-004-2911-9     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Becher, T. (1989). Academic Tribes and Territories. Buckingham: Open University Press.
2. Biglan, A. (1973). 'Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments', Journal of Applied Psychology 57 (3), 204-213
3. Bourdieu, P. (1975). 'The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of progress', Social Sciences Information 14 (6), 19-47.
4. Braxton, J.M. and Hargens, L.L. (1996). 'Variations among academic disciplines: analytical frameworks and research', in Smart, J. (ed.), Higher Education Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. XI, New York: Agathon Press, pp. 1-46.
5. Buxton, M., Gonzalez-Block, M.-H, and Kogan, M., 'The Utilisation of Health Research in Policy-Making: Concepts, Examples, and Methods of Assessment'. HERG Research Report No. 28 October 2002.
6. Caplan, N. (1977). 'The use of social research knowledge at the national level', in Weiss, C.H. (ed.), Using Social Research in Public Policymaking. Lexington, DC: Heath.
7. Lindblom, C.E. and Cohen, D. (1979). Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving. New Haven: Yale University Press.
8. Cronbach, L. and Suppes, P. (eds.) (1969). Research for Tomorrow's School. A Disciplined Enquiry for Education.
9. Elzinga, A. (1985). 'Research, bureaucracy and the drift of epistemic criteria' in Wittrock, B. et al. (eds.), The University Research System, the Public Policies of the Homes of Scientists. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wicksell.
10. Elzinga, A. (1987). 'Internal and external regulatives in research and higher education systems.' in Premfors, R. (ed.), Disciplinary Perspectives on Higher Education and Research. Report No. 37. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wicksell.
11. Foucault, M. (1977). Power/Knowledge. New York: Pantheon.
12. Gibbons, M. et al. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge. London: Sage.
13. Gornitzka, A. (2004). Science, Clients and the State: A Study of Scientific Knowledge Production. Enschede: CHEPS/UT.
14. Henkel, M. (1991). Government, Evaluation and Change. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
15. Henkel, M. (1998). 'Evaluation in Higher Education. Conceptual and epistemological foundations' European Journal of Education 33 September.
16. Henkel, M. (2000). Academic Identities and Policy Change in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
17. Henkel, M., Hanney, S., Vaux, J. and Von Walden Laing, D. (2000). Academic Responses to the UK Foresight Initiative. Research Report. Uxbridge: CEPPP, Brunel University.
18. Isaac, J. (2004). 'Conceptions of power' in Hawkesworth, M. and Kogan, M. (eds.), Routledge Encyclopaedia of Government and Politics, 2nd Edition, London: Routledge, pp. 57-69.
19. Johnston, R., (ed.), (1993). 'The Effects of Resource Concentration on Research Performance.' Canberra: National Board of Employment, Education and Training.
20. Kogan, M. and Henkel, M. (1983). Government and Research. London: Heinemann
21. Kogan, M. and Henkel, M. (2000). 'Getting inside: policy reception of research', in Schwarz, S. and Teichler, U. (ed.), The Institutional Basis of Higher Education Research. Chapter 2. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
22. Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
23. Kyvik, S. (1991). Productivity in Academia. Scientific Publishing at Norwegian Universities. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
24. Kyvik, S. (1993). 'Academic Staff and Scientific Production', Higher Education Management Vol 5.2, July 1993.
25. Mendelsohn, E., Weingart, P. and Whitley, R. (eds.) (1977). The Social Production of Scientific Knowledge Vol.1 Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
26. Merton, R.K. (1957). Social Theory and Social Structure Glecoe Ill.
27. Mulkay, M.J. (1977). 'Sociology of the scientific research community', in Spiegel-Rosing, I. and de Solla Price, D. (eds.), Science. Technology and Society. London: Sage.
28. Mulkay, M.J. (1979). Science and the Sociology of Knowledge. George Allen and Unwin.
29. Nagel, E. (1961). The Structure of Science. Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. London and Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
30. Nowotriy, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2001). Rethinking Science; Knowledge, and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Oxford: Polity Press.
31. OECD (1995). Educational Research and Development. Trends, Issues and Challenges. Paris: OECD.
32. Owen-Smith, J. (2003). 'Complements and Substitutes: The Changing Institutional Environment of Public, and Private Science.' Draft paper presented at the SCANCOR Conference on Universities and the Production of Knowledge, Stanford University, April 2003.
33. Polanyi, M. (1962). 'The Republic of Science: Its political, and economic theory', Minerva, 1(1).
34. Philp, M. (1984). 'Authority' in Kuper, A. and J. The Social Science Encyclopaedia, pp. 55-56, London: Routledge.
35. Popper, K.R. (1972). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.
36. Rein, M. (1983). From Policy to Practice. New York: Macmillan.
37. Rip, A. 'A Cognitive Approach to the Relevance of Science.' Social Science Information. 36(4), pp. 615-640.
38. Storer, N.W. (1967). 'The hard sciences and the soft: some sociological observations. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 55(1): 75-84.
39. Storer, N.W. (1972). 'Relations among scientific disciplines', in Nagi, Corwin, S.Z. and R.G. (eds.), The Social Contexts of Research. New York: Wiley, pp. 229-68.
40. Storer, N.W. and Parsons, T. (1968). 'The disciplines as a differentiating force', in Montgomery, E.B. (ed.), The Foundation of Access in Knowledge - A Symposium. Syracuse: Division of Summer Sessions, Syracuse University.
41. Trist, (1972). 'Types of output mix of research organisations and their complementarity', in Cherns A.B. et al. (eds.), Social Science and Government, Policies and Problems. Tavistock Publications.
42. Van den Daele, W., Krohn W. and Weingart, P. (1977). 'The political direction of scientific Development', in Mendelsohn, E., Weingart, P. and Whitley, R.D. (eds.), The Social Production of Scientific Knowledge, vol. 1. Dordecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
43. Warnock Report (1978). Meeting Special Educational Needs: The Report of the Committee of Enquiry into Education of Handicapped Children and Young People. London: HMSO.
44. Weiss. C.H. (1977). Using Social Research in Public Policymaking Lexington, DC: Heath, pp. 183-197.
45. Weingart, P. (1977). 'Science policy and the development of science', in Blume, S. (ed.), Perspectives in the Sociology of Science. Chichester. John Wiley & Son.
46. Weiss, C. (1980). Social Science Research and Decision-Making. Columbia: Columbia University Press.
47. Weiss, C. (1982). 'Policy research in the context of diffuse decision-making', in Kosse G. (ed.), Social Science Research and Public Policy-making. London: NFER-Nelson.
48. Whitley, R.D. (1977). 'Changes in the social and intellectual organisation and social organisation of the sciences' in Mendelsohn, E., Weingart, P. and Whitley, R. op.cit.
49. Whitley, R.D. (1984). The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences.
50. Wirt, F. (1981). 'Professionalism and political conflict: A developmental model', Journal of Public Policy, 1, Part 1.