A review of urban ecosystem services research in southeast asia

Land

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2021, Pages 1-21

  Lourdes, Karen T ^a   Gibbins, Chris N ^a   Hamel, Perrine ^b,c   Sanusi, Ruzana ^d   Azhar, Badrul ^d   Lechner, Alex M ^a,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM MALAYSIA CAMPUS   (Malaysia)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY PUTRA MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LINCOLN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Blue green infrastructure; Global South; Natural capital; Tropical cities; Urban environmental challenges

Indexed keywords

EID: 85099853727     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2073445X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/land10010040     Document Type: Review

References (121)

1. United Nations. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352); Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division: New York, NY, USA, 2014.
2. Nagendra, H.; Bai, X.; Brondizio, E.S.; Lwasa, S. The urban south and the predicament of global sustainability. Nat. Sustain. 2018, 1, 341–349. [CrossRef]
3. Yuen, B.; Kong, L. Climate change and urban planning in Southeast Asia. SAPIENS 2009, 2. Available online: http://journals. openedition.org/sapiens/881 (accessed on 10 December 2020).
4. Jacobs, A.; Appleyard, D. Toward an Urban Design Manifesto Toward an Urban Design Manifesto. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 1987, 53, 37–41. [CrossRef]
5. Jones, G.W. Urbanisation and development in Southeast Asia. Malaysian J. Econ. Stud. 2014, 51, 103–120.
6. Mahmoudi, M.; Ahmad, F.; Abbasi, B. Livable streets: The effects of physical problems on the quality and livability of Kuala Lumpur streets. Cities 2015, 43, 104–114. [CrossRef]
7. Morillas, J.B.; Gozalo, G.R.; González, D.M.; Moraga, P.A.; Vílchez-Gómez, R. Noise Pollution and Urban Planning. Curr. Pollut. Rep. 2018, 4, 208–219. [CrossRef]
8. Harun, Z.; Reda, E.; Abdulrazzaq, A.; Abbas, A.A.; Yusup, Y.; Zaki, S.A. Urban heat island in the modern tropical Kuala Lumpur: Comparative weight of the different parameters. Alex. Eng. J. 2020, 59, 4475–4489. [CrossRef]
9. Jusuf, S.K.; Wong, N.H.; Hagen, E.; Anggoro, R.; Hong, Y. The influence of land use on the urban heat island in Singapore. Habitat Int. 2007, 31, 232–242. [CrossRef]
10. Laeni, N.; Brink, M.V.D.; Arts, J. Is Bangkok becoming more resilient to flooding? A framing analysis of Bangkok’s flood resilience policy combining insights from both insiders and outsiders. Cities 2019, 90, 157–167. [CrossRef]
11. Padawangi, R.; Douglass, M. Water, Water Everywhere: Toward Participatory Solutions to Chronic Urban Flooding in Jakarta. Pac. Aff. 2015, 88, 517–550. [CrossRef]
12. Li, L.; Cao, R.; Wei, K.; Wang, W.; Chen, L. Adapting climate change challenge: A new vulnerability assessment framework from the global perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 217, 216–224. [CrossRef]
13. ADB. The Economics of Climate Change in Southeast Asia: A Regional Review; Asian Development Bank: Mandaluyong, Philippines, 2009.
14. Yusuf, A.A.; Francisco, H. Hotspots! Mapping Climate Change Vulnerability in Southeast Asia; Worldfish Philippine Country Office: Laguna, Philippines, 2010.
15. Savage, V.R. Ecology matters: Sustainable development in Southeast Asia. Sustain. Sci. 2006, 1, 37–63. [CrossRef]
16. Arfanuzzaman, M.; Dahiya, B. Sustainable urbanization in Southeast Asia and beyond: Challenges of population growth, land use change, and environmental health. Growth Chang. 2019, 50, 725–744. [CrossRef]
17. Lechner, A.M.; Gomes, R.L.; Rodrigues, L.; Ashfold, M.J.; Selvam, S.B.; Wong, E.P.; Raymond, C.M.; Zieritz, A.; Sing, K.W.; Moug, P.; et al. Challenges and considerations of applying nature-based solutions in low-and middle-income countries in Southeast and East Asia. Blue Green Syst. 2020, 2, 331–351. [CrossRef]
18. ASEANStats. Indicators ASEAN Member States 2020. Available online: https://data.aseanstats.org/(accessed on 2 December 2020).
19. UNdata. Statistics. 2020. Available online: https://www.data.un.org (accessed on 1 December 2020).
20. Asian Development Bank. Key Indicators Database. 2020. Available online: https://kidb.adb.org/(accessed on 2 December 2020).
21. WorldBank. DataBank. 2020. Available online: https://databank.worldbank.org/databases/page/1/orderby/popularity/direction/desc?qterm=grossnationalincomerank (accessed on 2 December 2020).
22. WGI. Worldwide Governance Indicators, Interactive Data Access, 2020. Available online: https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/Home/Reports (accessed on 2 December 2020).
23. El-Baghdadi, O.; Desha, C. Conceptualising a biophilic services model for urban areas. Urban For. Urban Green. 2017, 27, 399–408. [CrossRef]
24. Xue, F.; Gou, Z.; Lau, S. The green open space development model and associated use behaviors in dense urban settings: Lessons from Hong Kong and Singapore. Urban Des. Int. 2017, 22, 287–302. [CrossRef]
25. Kabisch, N.; Qureshi, S.; Haase, D. Human–environment interactions in urban green spaces-A systematic review of contemporary issues and prospects for future research. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2015, 50, 25–34. [CrossRef]
26. Baharuddin, Z.M.; Rusli, N.; Ramli, L.; Othman, R.; Yaman, M. The Diversity of Birds and Frogs Species at Perdana Botanical Lake Garden, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Adv. Sci. Lett. 2017, 23, 6256–6260. [CrossRef]
27. Cortinovis, C.; Geneletti, D. A performance-based planning approach integrating supply and demand of urban ecosystem services. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2020, 201, 103842. [CrossRef]
28. Haase, D.; Larondelle, N.; Andersson, E.; Artmann, M.; Borgström, S.; Breuste, J.; Gomez-Baggethun, E.; Gren, Å.; Hamstead, Z.; Hansen, R.; et al. A Quantitative Review of Urban Ecosystem Service Assessments: Concepts, Models, and Implementation. Ambio 2014, 43, 413–433. [CrossRef]
29. 2 in South of Peninsular Malaysia. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2018, 63, 13–18.
30. Keeler, B.L.; Hamel, P.; McPhearson, T.; Hamann, M.H.; Donahue, M.L.; Prado, K.A.M.; Arkema, K.K.; Bratman, G.N.; Brauman, K.A.; Finlay, J.C.; et al. Social-ecological and technological factors moderate the value of urban nature. Nat. Sustain. 2019, 2, 29–38. [CrossRef]
31. Bolund, P.; Hunhammar, S. Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecol. Econ. 1999, 29, 293–301. [CrossRef]
32. Gomez-Baggethun, E.; Gren, Å.; Barton, D.N.; Langemeyer, J.; McPhearson, T.; O’Farrell, P.; Andersson, E.; Hamstead, Z.; Kremer, P. Urban Ecosystem Services. In Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 175–251.
33. Braat, L.C.; de Groot, R. The ecosystem services agenda:bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy. Ecosyst. Serv. 2012, 1, 4–15. [CrossRef]
34. Burls, A. People and green spaces: Promoting public health and mental well-being through ecotherapy. J. Public Ment. Health 2007, 6, 24–39. [CrossRef]
35. Gascon, M.; Triguero-Mas, M.; Martínez, D.; Dadvand, P.; Forns, J.; Plasència, A.; Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J. Mental Health Benefits of Long-Term Exposure to Residential Green and Blue Spaces: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 4354–4379. [CrossRef]
36. Müller-Riemenschneider, F.; Petrunoff, N.; Sia, A.; Ramiah, A.; Ng, A.; Han, J.; Wong, M.; Tai, B.C.; Uijtdewilligen, L. Prescribing Physical Activity in Parks to Improve Health and Wellbeing: Protocol of the Park Prescription Randomized Controlled Trial. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1154. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
37. Cilliers, S. Social Aspects of Urban Biodiversity: An Overview. In Urban Biodiversity and Design; Müller, N., Werner, P., Kelcey, J.G., Eds.; Zoological Society of London: London, UK, 2010; p. 626.
38. Nath, T.K.; Han, S.S.Z.; Lechner, A.M. Urban green space and well-being in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Urban For. Urban Green. 2018, 36, 34–41. [CrossRef]
39. Sandifer, P.A.; Sutton-Grier, A.E.; Ward, B.P. Exploring connections among nature, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human health and well-being: Opportunities to enhance health and biodiversity conservation. Ecosyst. Serv. 2015, 12, 1–15. [CrossRef]
40. Potschin, M.B.; Haines-Young, R.H. Ecosystem services. Prog. Phys. Geogr. Earth Environ. 2011, 35, 575–594. [CrossRef]
41. Luederitz, C.; Brink, E.; Gralla, F.; Hermelingmeier, V.; Meyer, M.; Niven, L.; Panzer, L.; Partelow, S.; Rau, A.-L.; Sasaki, R.; et al. A review of urban ecosystem services: Six key challenges for future research. Ecosyst. Serv. 2015, 14, 98–112. [CrossRef]
42. De Groot, R.S.; Wilson, M.A.; Boumans, R.M. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 41, 393–408. [CrossRef]
43. Martínez, A.J.C.; García-Llorente, M.; Martín-López, B.; Palomo, I.; Iniesta-Arandia, I. Multidimensional approaches in ecosystem services assessment. Earth Obs. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 441–468.
44. Bennett, E.M.; Peterson, G.D.; Gordon, L.J. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12, 1394–1404. [CrossRef]
45. La Notte, A.; D’Amato, D.; Mäkinen, H.; Paracchini, M.L.; Liquete, C.; Egoh, B.; Geneletti, D.; Crossman, N.D. Ecosystem services classification: A systems ecology perspective of the cascade framework. Ecol. Indic. 2017, 74, 392–402. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
46. Conte, M.N. Valuing Ecosystem Services. Encycl. Biodivers. 2013, 7, 314–326. [CrossRef]
47. Costanza, R.; de Groot, R.; Braat, L.; Kubiszewski, I.; Fioramonti, L.; Sutton, P.; Farber, S.; Grasso, M. Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosyst. Serv. 2017, 28, 1–16. [CrossRef]
48. Gomez-Baggethun, E.; Gren, Å.; Barton, D.N.; Langemeyer, J.; McPhearson, T.; O’Farrell, P.; Andersson, E.; Hamstead, Z.; Kremer, P. Urban Ecosystem Services. Urban. Biodivers. Ecosyst. Serv. Chall. Oppor. 2013, 175–251.
49. Pascual, U.; Balvanera, P.; Díaz, S.; Pataki, G.; Roth, E.; Stenseke, M.; Watson, R.T.; Dessane, E.B.; Islar, M.; Kelemen, E.; et al. Valuing nature’s contributions to people: The IPBES approach. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2017, 26–27, 7–16. [CrossRef]
50. Brown, G.; Stricklandmunro, J.K.; Kobryn, H.; Moore, S.A. Stakeholder analysis for marine conservation planning using public participation GIS. Appl. Geogr. 2016, 67, 77–93. [CrossRef]
51. Zoderer, B.M.; Tasser, E.; Carver, S.; Tappeiner, U. An integrated method for the mapping of landscape preferences at the regional scale. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 106, 105430. [CrossRef]
52. TEEB. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity Ecological and Economic Foundations; Earthscan: London, UK; Washington, DC, USA, 2010.
53. TEEB. TEEB Manual for Cities: Ecosystem services in Urban Management. TEEB Man. Cities Ecosyst. Serv. Urban Manag. 2011, 2–41.
54. TEEB. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity Challenges and responses. Nat. Balanc. Econ. Biodivers. 2014, 135–152.
55. Pierce, J.R.; Barton, M.A.; Tan, M.M.J.; Oertel, G.; Halder, M.D.; Lopez-Guijosa, P.A.; Nuttall, R. Actions, indicators, and outputs in urban biodiversity plans: A multinational analysis of city practice. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0235773. [CrossRef]
56. Warner, K.; Zommers, Z.; Wreford, A.; Hurlbert, M.; Viner, D.; Scantlan, J.; Halsey, K.; Halsey, K.; Tamang, C. Characteristics of Transformational Adaptation in Climate-Land-Society Interactions. Sustainability 2019, 11, 356. [CrossRef]
57. Remondi, F.; Burlando, P.; Vollmer, D. Exploring the hydrological impact of increasing urbanisation on a tropical river catchment of the metropolitan Jakarta, Indonesia. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2016, 20, 210–221. [CrossRef]
58. Achmad, A.; Ramli, I.; Irwansyah, M. The impacts of land use and cover changes on ecosystem services value in urban highland areas. IOP Conf. Series Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 447. [CrossRef]
59. Nguyen, L.D.; Nguyen, C.T.; Le, H.S.; Tran, B.Q. Mangrove Mapping and Above-Ground Biomass Change Detection using Satellite Images in Coastal Areas of Thai Binh Province, Vietnam. For. Soc. 2019, 3, 248–261. [CrossRef]
60. Srichaichana, J.; Trisurat, Y.; Ongsomwang, S. Land Use and Land Cover Scenarios for Optimum Water Yield and Sediment Retention Ecosystem Services in Klong U-Tapao Watershed, Songkhla, Thailand. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2895. [CrossRef]
61. Hassan, S.; Olsen, S.B.; Thorsen, B.J. Urban-rural divides in preferences for wetland conservation in Malaysia. Land Use Policy 2019, 84, 226–237. [CrossRef]
62. Belcher, R.N.; Chisholm, R.A. Tropical Vegetation and Residential Property Value: A Hedonic Pricing Analysis in Singapore. Ecol. Econ. 2018, 149, 149–159. [CrossRef]
63. Richards, D.; Fung, T.K.; Leong, R.A.T.; Sachidhanandam, U.; Drillet, Z.; Edwards, P.J. Demographic biases in engagement with nature in a tropical Asian city. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0231576. [CrossRef]
64. Kontgis, C.; Schneider, A.; Ozdogan, M.; Kucharik, C.; Tri, V.P.D.; Duc, N.H.; Schatz, J. Climate change impacts on rice productivity in the Mekong River Delta. Appl. Geogr. 2019, 102, 71–83. [CrossRef]
65. Budidarsono, S.; Susanti, A.; Zoomers, E.B. Biofuels-Economy, Environment and Sustainability; Zhen, F., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2013. Available online: https://www.intechopen.com/books/biofuels-economy-environment-and-sustainability/oil-palmplantations-in-indonesia-the-implications-for-migration-settlement-resettlement-and-local-e (accessed on 10 December 2020). [CrossRef]
66. Shevade, V.S.; Loboda, T.V. Oil palm plantations in Peninsular Malaysia: Determinants and constraints on expansion. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0210628. [CrossRef]
67. Mammides, C.; Goodale, U.M.; Corlett, R.T.; Chen, J.; Bawa, K.S.; Hariya, H.; Jarrad, F.; Primack, R.B.; Ewing, H.; Xia, X.; et al. Increasing geographic diversity in the international conservation literature: A stalled process? Biol. Conserv. 2016, 198, 78–83. [CrossRef]
68. Perez, L.P.; Santos, R.; De Almeida, G.M.J.A.; Carvalho, G.C. Spatial data in the Global South: A case study of alternative land management tools for cities with limited resources. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC), San Jose, CA, USA, 19–22 October 2017; pp. 1–10.
69. Karnad, D.; Martin, K.S. Assembling marine spatial planning in the global south: International agencies and the fate of fishing communities in India. Marit. Stud. 2020, 19, 375–387. [CrossRef]
70. Estoque, R.C.; Murayama, Y. Examining the potential impact of land use/cover changes on the ecosystem services of Baguio city, the Philippines: A scenario-based analysis. Appl. Geogr. 2012, 35, 316–326. [CrossRef]
71. Estoque, R.C.; Murayama, Y. Quantifying landscape pattern and ecosystem service value changes in four rapidly urbanizing hill stations of Southeast Asia. Landsc. Ecol. 2016, 31, 1481–1507. [CrossRef]
72. Balmford, A.; Chen, H.; Phalan, B.; Wang, M.; O’Connell, C.; Tayleur, C.; Xu, J.-C. Getting Road Expansion on the Right Track: A Framework for Smart Infrastructure Planning in the Mekong. PLoS Biol. 2016, 14, e2000266. [CrossRef]
73. Costanza, R.; d’Arge, R.; de Groot, R.; Farber, S.; Grasso, M.; Hannon, B.; Limburg, K.; Naeem, S.; O’Neill, R.V.; Paruelo, J.; et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387, 253–260. [CrossRef]
74. Estoque, R.C.; Ooba, M.; Seposo, X.T.; Togawa, T.; Hijioka, Y.; Takahashi, K.; Nakamura, S. Heat health risk assessment in Philippine cities using remotely sensed data and social-ecological indicators. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1–12. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
75. Wangai, P.W.; Burkhard, B.; Müller, F. A review of studies on ecosystem services in Africa. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 2016, 5, 225–245. [CrossRef]
76. Holl, K.D.; Howarth, R. Paying for Restoration. Restor. Ecol. 2000, 8, 260–267. [CrossRef]
77. Loomis, J.; Kent, P.; Strange, L.; Fausch, K.; Covich, A. Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: Results from a contingent valuation survey. Ecol. Econ. 2000, 33, 103–117. [CrossRef]
78. Liu, H.; Remme, R.P.; Hamel, P.; Nong, H.; Ren, H. Supply and demand assessment of urban recreation service and its implication for greenspace planning-A case study on Guangzhou. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2020, 203, 103898. [CrossRef]
79. Thiagarajah, J.; Wong, S.K.M.; Richards, D.R.; Friess, D.A. Historical and contemporary cultural ecosystem service values in the rapidly urbanizing city state of Singapore. Ambio 2015, 44, 666–677. [CrossRef]
80. Friess, D.A. Singapore as a long-term case study for tropical urban ecosystem services. Urban Ecosyst. 2016, 20, 277–291. [CrossRef]
81. Buyadi, S.; Wan Mohd, W.; Misni, A. Quantifying Green Space Cooling Effects on the Urban Microclimate using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques. In Proceedings of the XXV International Federation of Surveyors, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 16–21 June 2014; pp. 1–16.
82. Richards, D.; Edwards, P.J. Quantifying street tree regulating ecosystem services using Google Street View. Ecol. Indic. 2017, 77, 31–40. [CrossRef]
83. Gunawardena, K.; Wells, M.; Kershaw, T. Utilising green and bluespace to mitigate urban heat island intensity. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 584, 1040–1055. [CrossRef]
84. Heng, S.L.; Chow, W.T. How ‘hot’ is too hot? Evaluating acceptable outdoor thermal comfort ranges in an equatorial urban park. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2019, 63, 801–816. [CrossRef]
85. Beck, H. Linking the quality of public spaces to quality of life. J. Place Manag. Dev. 2009, 2, 240–248. [CrossRef]
86. Yap, K.S.; Thuzar, M. Urbanization in Southeast Asia: Issues & Impacts; Institute of Southeast Asian Studies: Singapore, 2012.
87. Lafortezza, R.; Chen, J.; van den Bosch, C.K.; Randrup, T.B. Nature-based solutions for resilient landscapes and cities. Environ. Res. 2018, 165, 431–441. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
88. Almenar, J.B.; Elliot, T.; Rugani, B.; Philippe, B.; Gutierrez, T.N.; Sonnemann, G.; Geneletti, D. Nexus between nature-based solutions, ecosystem services and urban challenges. Land Use Policy 2021, 100, 104898. [CrossRef]
89. United Nations. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, A/RES/70/1; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 13–14.
90. Geneletti, D.; Cortinovis, C.; Zardo, L.; Esmail, B.A. Planning for Ecosystem Services in Cities. In Environmental Education and Ecotourism; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020.
91. Richards, D.; Masoudi, M.; Oh, R.R.Y.; Yando, E.S.; Zhang, J.; Friess, D.A.; Grêt-Regamey, A.; Tan, P.Y.; Edwards, P. Global Variation in Climate, Human Development, and Population Density Has Implications for Urban Ecosystem Services. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6200. [CrossRef]
92. Mokondoko, P.; Manson, R.H.; Ricketts, T.H.; Geissert, D. Spatial analysis of ecosystem service relationships to improve targeting of payments for hydrological services. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0192560. [CrossRef]
93. Holt, A.R.; Mears, M.; Maltby, L.; Warren, P.H. Understanding spatial patterns in the production of multiple urban ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 2015, 16, 33–46. [CrossRef]
94. Artmann, M.; Sartison, K. The Role of Urban Agriculture as a Nature-Based Solution: A Review for Developing a Systemic Assessment Framework. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1937. [CrossRef]
95. Arif, S.; Ae, A.; Hezri, A.A. From Forest Landscape to Agricultural Landscape in the Developing Tropical Country of Malaysia: Pattern, Process, and Their Significance on Policy. Environ. Manag. 2008, 42, 907–917.
96. Gasparatos, A.; Helen. Ecosystem Services Provision from Urban Farms in a Secondary City of Myanmar, Pyin Oo Lwin. Agriculture 2020, 10, 140. [CrossRef]
97. Aerts, R.; Dewaelheyns, V.; Achten, W. Potential ecosystem services of urban agriculture: A review. PeerJ Prepr. 2016, 4, e2286v1.
98. Dressler, W.H.; Wilson, D.; Clendenning, J.; Cramb, R.A.; Keenan, R.; Mahanty, S.; Bruun, T.B.; Mertz, O.; Lasco, R.D. The impact of swidden decline on livelihoods and ecosystem services in Southeast Asia: A review of the evidence from 1990 to 2015. Ambio 2017, 46, 291–310. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
99. Eckstein, D.; Künzel, V.S.; Schäfer, L. Global Climate Risk Index 2020 Germanwatch e.V. 2020. Available online: https://www. germanwatch.org/en/17307 (accessed on 10 December 2020).
100. Hallegatte, S.; Green, C.; Nicholls, R.J.; Corfee-Morlot, J. Future flood losses in major coastal cities. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2013, 3, 802–806. [CrossRef]
101. Wells, J.A.; Wilson, K.A.; Abram, N.K.; Nunn, M.; Gaveau, D.L.A.; Runting, R.K.; Tarniati, N.; Mengersen, K.L.; Meijaard, E. Rising floodwaters: Mapping impacts and perceptions of flooding in Indonesian Borneo. Environ. Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 064016. [CrossRef]
102. Arifin, H.S.; Nakagoshi, N. Landscape ecology and urban biodiversity in tropical Indonesian cities. Landsc. Ecol. Eng. 2011, 7, 33–43. [CrossRef]
103. Uy, N.; Shaw, R. Ecosystem resilience and community values: Implications to ecosystem-based adaptation. J. Disaster Res. 2013, 8, 201–202.
104. Willemen, L. It’s about time: Advancing spatial analyses of ecosystem services and their application. Ecosyst. Serv. 2020, 44, 101125. [CrossRef]
105. McDougall, R.; Kristiansen, P.; Rader, R. Small-scale urban agriculture results in high yields but requires judicious management of inputs to achieve sustainability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 129–134. [CrossRef]
106. Matthews, T.; Wilby, R.L.; Murphy, C. Communicating the deadly consequences of global warming for human heat stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 3861–3866. [CrossRef]
107. Mora, C.; Dousset, B.; Caldwell, I.R.; Powell, F.E.; Geronimo, R.C.; Bielecki, C.R.; Counsell, C.W.W.; Dietrich, B.S.; Johnston, E.T.; Louis, L.V.; et al. Global risk of deadly heat. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2017, 7, 501–506. [CrossRef]
108. Bowen, K.J.; Ebi, K.L. Health risks of climate change in the World Health Organization South-East Asia Region. WHO South-East Asia J. Public Health 2017, 6, 3–8. [CrossRef]
109. Saulnier, D.D.; Ribacke, K.B.; Von Schreeb, J. No Calm After the Storm: A Systematic Review of Human Health Following Flood and Storm Disasters. Prehospital Disaster Med. 2017, 32, 568–579. [CrossRef]
110. Bito-onon, J.B. Climate risk vulnerability assessment: Basis for decision making support for the agriculture sector in the province of Iloilo. Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang. 2020, 13, 186–202.
111. Van Noordwijk, M.; Kim, Y.-S.; Leimona, B.; Hairiah, K.; Fisher, L.A. Metrics of water security, adaptive capacity, and agroforestry in Indonesia. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2016, 21, 1–8. [CrossRef]
112. Sun, Y.; Xie, S.; Zhao, S.Q. Valuing urban green spaces in mitigating climate change: A city-wide estimate of aboveground carbon stored in urban green spaces of China’s Capital. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2019, 25, 1717–1732. [CrossRef]
113. Hermes, J.; Tabrizian, P.; Burkhard, B.; Plieninger, T.; Fagerholm, N.; Von Haaren, C.; Albert, C. Assessment and valuation of recreational ecosystem services of landscapes. Ecosyst. Serv. 2018, 31, 289–295. [CrossRef]
114. Gómez-Baggethun, E.; Barton, D.N. Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 86, 235–245. [CrossRef]
115. TEEB. A Quick Guide to the Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for Local and Regional Policy Makers; Earthscan: London, UK, 2010.
116. Díaz, S.; Pascual, U.; Stenseke, M.; Martín-López, B.; Watson, R.T.; Molnár, Z.; Hill, R.; Chan, K.M.A.; Baste, I.A.; Brauman, K.A.; et al. Assessing nature’s contributions to people: Recognizing culture, and diverse sources of knowledge, can improve assessments. Science 2018, 359, 270–272. [CrossRef]
117. Heikkinen, A.; Mäkelä, H.; Kujala, J.; Nieminen, J.; Jokinen, A.; Rekola, H. 7 Urban ecosystem services and stakeholders: Towards a sustainable capability approach. In Strongly Sustainable Societies: Organising Human Activities on a Hot and Full Earth; Bonnedahl, K.J., Heikkurinen, P., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 116–133.
118. Kenter, J.O.; Hyde, T.; Christie, M.; Fazey, I. The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing countries—Evidence from the Solomon Islands. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2011, 21, 505–521. [CrossRef]
119. Griffin, R.G.; Chaumont, N.; Denu, D.; Guerry, A.D.; Kim, C.-K.; Ruckelshaus, M.H. Incorporating the visibility of coastal energy infrastructure into multi-criteria siting decisions. Mar. Policy 2015, 62, 218–223. [CrossRef]
120. Brown, G.; Donovan, S.M.; Pullar, D.; Pocewicz, A.; Toohey, R.; Ballesteros-Lopez, R. An empirical evaluation of workshop versus survey PPGIS methods. Appl. Geogr. 2014, 48, 42–51. [CrossRef]
121. Rambonilaza, T.; Neang, M. Exploring the potential of local market in remunerating water ecosystem services in Cambodia: An application for endogenous attribute non-attendance modelling. Water Resour. Econ. 2019, 25, 14–26. [CrossRef]