Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing

PLoS ONE

Volumn 15, Issue 12 12, 2020, Pages

  Holcombe, Alex O ^a   Kovacs, Marton ^b   Aust, Frederik ^c,d   Aczel, Balazs ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b EÖTVÖS LORÁND UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAREER; BIBLIOMETRICS; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; PROCEDURES; SOFTWARE; WRITING;

AUTHORSHIP; BIBLIOMETRICS; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; SOFTWARE;

EID: 85099052598     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244611     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Sonnenwald DH. Scientific collaboration. Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2008, 41, 643–681.
2. Patience GS, Galli F. Patience PA, Boffito DC. Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117 PMID: 30650079
3. Authorship policies. (2009). Nature, 458(7242), 1078. https://doi.org/10.1038/4581078a PMID: 19407745
4. CISAC (4 February, 2019). CISAC launches major project to upgrade the international musical work identifier. Retrieved June 29, 2020, from https://www.cisac.org/Newsroom/News-Releases/CISAClaunches-major-project-to-upgrade-the-international-musical-work-identifier.
5. Gilliéron P. (2006). Performing Rights Societies and The Digital Environment. bepress Legal Series, 1436.
6. Allen L., Scott J., Brand A., Hlava M., & Altman M. (2014). Publishing: Credit where credit is due. Nature News, 508(7496), 312. https://doi.org/10.1038/508312a PMID: 24745070
7. Fennell C. (2019, 5 July). Fully agree, Elsevier is offering CRediT for close to 200 journals now, with great response from authors & editors. We’re busy getting ready to expand thanks to @AriesMarketing making CRediT even easier for authors & editors. [Tweet]. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/CatrionaFennell/status/1147119169831350272.
8. McNutt M. K., Bradford M., Drazen J. M., Hanson B., Howard B., Jamieson K. H., et al. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 1715374115 PMID: 29487213
9. Macaluso B., Larivière V., Sugimoto T., & Sugimoto C. R. (2016). Is Science Built on the Shoulders of Women? A Study of Gender Differences in Contributorship: Academic Medicine, 91(8), 1136–1142. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001261 PMID: 27276004
10. Kovacs, M., Aust, F., Holcombe, A. O., & Aczel, B. (2020). tenzing: Documenting contributions to scientific scholarly output with CRediT (Version 0.1.0). Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3993411.
11. Marušić A, Bošnjak L, Jerončić A. A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines. PLoS One. 2011; 6(9):e23477. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023477 PMID: 21931600
12. Nylenna M, Fagerbakk F, Kierulf PJBME. Authorship: attitudes and practice among Norwegian researchers. BMC Med Ethics. 2014; 15(1):53. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-53 PMID: 24989359
13. Okonta P, Rossouw T. Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a group of researchers in Nigeria. Dev World Bioeth. 2013; 13(3):149–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00339.x PMID: 22994914
14. Bhopal R, Rankin J, McColl E, Thomas L, Kaner E, Stacy R, et al. The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ. 1997; 314(7086):1009. PMID: 9112845
15. Fisk C: Credit where it’s due: the law and norms of attribution. Duke Law School Faculty Scholarship Series 2006:Paper 39.
16. Albert T, Wager E. How to handle authorship disputes: a guide for new researchers. In: Committee on Publication Ethics; 2003.
17. Wilcox LJ. Authorship: the coin of the realm, the source of complaints. JAMA. 1998; 280(3):216–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.3.216 PMID: 9676658
18. Hanson SMH. Collaborative research and authorship credit: beginning guidelines. Nurs Res. 1988; 37 (1):49–51. PMID: 3340580
19. Bozeman B., & Youtie J. (2016). Trouble in paradise: Problems in academic research co-authoring. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22, 1717–1743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9722-5 PMID: 26573303
20. Phillippi JC, Likis FE, Tilden EL. Authorship grids: Practical tools to facilitate collaboration and ethical publication. Res Nurs Health. 2018; 41:195–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21856 PMID: 29603766
21. Aust, F., & Barth, M. (2020). papaja: Create APA manuscripts with R Markdown. Retrieved from https://github.com/crsh/papaja.
22. Regalado A. (1995). Multiauthor papers on the rise. Science, 268 (5207) (1995), p. 25. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7701334 PMID: 7701334
23. Fanelli D., & Larivière V. (2016). Researchers’ Individual Publication Rate Has Not Increased in a Century. PLOS ONE, 11(3), e0149504. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149504 PMID: 26960191
24. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. Updated December 2018. Available online: http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf (accessed on 20 June 2019).
25. Holcombe, A.O., Vazire, S., Chartier C., Ebersole, C., Giner-Sorolla, R., Haroz, S., et al. (2019). [Conference session]. Replace journals’ writing-based authorship guidelines with a contributorship model. 2019 Annual Meeting of the Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science.
26. Fontanarosa P, Bauchner H, Flanagin A. Authorship and Team Science. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2017; 318(24):2433–2437. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.19341 PMID: 29279909
27. Gadd E (2020). CRediT Check–Should we welcome tools to differentiate the contributions made to academic papers? [blog post]. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2020/01/20/credit-checkshould-we-welcome-tools-to-differentiate-the-contributions-made-to-academic-papers/.
28. Vasilevsky N. A., Hosseini M., Teplitzky S., Ilik V., Mohammadi E., Schneider J., et al. (2020). Is authorship sufficient for today’s collaborative research? A call for contributor roles. Accountability in Research, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1779591.
29. Vasilevsky NA (2019). Introducing the Contribution Role Ontology: Developing a Sustainable Community-driven Approach to Attribution. [blog post] https://www.force11.org/blog/introducing-contributionrole-ontology-developing-sustainable-community-driven-approach.
30. Ilik V., Conlon M., Triggs G., White M., Javed M., Brush M., et al. (2018). OpenVIVO: Transparency in Scholarship. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2017.00012.
31. [Author unknown]. Authorship determination scorecard. Available: https://www.apa.org/science/leadership/students/authorship-determination-scorecard.pdf. Retrieved 20 December 2020.
32. Soltanlou M. Authorship_credit.xlsx. Available: https://osf.io/zd84r/. Retrieved 20 December 2020.
33. Wynne RCD (2019). “Got a DOI? Claim and Give Some CRediT” https://figshare.com/articles/Got_a_DOI_Claim_and_Give_Some_CRediT_/9733595/1.
34. Haak L. L., Fenner M., Paglione L., Pentz E., & Ratner H. (2012). ORCID: a system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264.
35. Wynne RCD (2020, June 24). Who uses ORCID IDs anyway? [post]. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/who-uses-orcid-ids-anyway-richard-wynne/.
36. Colomb J, Vasilevsky N (2020, January 23). open-science-promoters/contibutor_manager: MVP: from 1 orcid to 1 yaml (Version v.0.1-alpha). Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3625804.