-
3
-
-
85018956007
-
Data authorship as an incentive to data sharing
-
Bierer, B. E., Crosas, M., & Pierce, H. H. (2017). Data authorship as an incentive to data sharing. New England Journal of Medicine, 376, 1684–1687. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb1616595
-
(2017)
New England Journal of Medicine
, vol.376
, pp. 1684-1687
-
-
Bierer, B.E.1
Crosas, M.2
Pierce, H.H.3
-
4
-
-
66949131866
-
Guidelines for writing manuscripts about community-based participatory research for peer-reviewed journals
-
Bordeaux, B. C., Wiley, C., Tandon, S. D., Horowitz, C. R., Brown, P. B., & Bass, E. B. (2007). Guidelines for writing manuscripts about community-based participatory research for peer-reviewed journals. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 1, 281. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2007.0018
-
(2007)
Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action
, vol.1
, pp. 281
-
-
Bordeaux, B.C.1
Wiley, C.2
Tandon, S.D.3
Horowitz, C.R.4
Brown, P.B.5
Bass, E.B.6
-
5
-
-
84947087361
-
Trouble in paradise: Problems in academic research co-authoring
-
Bozeman, B., & Youtie, J. (2016). Trouble in paradise: Problems in academic research co-authoring. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22, 1717–1743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9722-5.
-
(2016)
Science and Engineering Ethics
, vol.22
, pp. 1717-1743
-
-
Bozeman, B.1
Youtie, J.2
-
6
-
-
84948666343
-
-
. (, , Retrieved from, Accessed April 26, 2017
-
Committee on Publication Ethics. (2014). What constitutes authorship? COPE discussion document. Retrieved from http://publicationethics.org/files/Authorship_DiscussionDocument.pdf. Accessed April 26, 2017.
-
(2014)
What constitutes authorship? COPE discussion document
-
-
-
7
-
-
84948187119
-
-
. (, Washington, DC, National Academies Press
-
Committee on the Science of Team Science. (2015). Enhancing the effectiveness of team science. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
-
(2015)
Enhancing the effectiveness of team science
-
-
-
8
-
-
84941941781
-
Writers blocked: On the wrongs of research co-authorship and some possible strategies for improvement
-
Cutas, D., & Shaw, D. (2015). Writers blocked: On the wrongs of research co-authorship and some possible strategies for improvement. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21, 1315–1329.
-
(2015)
Science and Engineering Ethics
, vol.21
, pp. 1315-1329
-
-
Cutas, D.1
Shaw, D.2
-
9
-
-
84868620902
-
Authorship: Who's on first
-
Dance, A. (2012). Authorship: Who's on first? Nature, 489, 591–593. https://doi.org/10.1234/12345678
-
(2012)
Nature
, vol.489
, pp. 591-593
-
-
Dance, A.1
-
10
-
-
40949147823
-
The qualitative content analysis process
-
Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62, 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
-
(2008)
Journal of Advanced Nursing
, vol.62
, pp. 107-115
-
-
Elo, S.1
Kyngas, H.2
-
11
-
-
1242331407
-
Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness
-
Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
-
(2004)
Nurse Education Today
, vol.24
, Issue.2
, pp. 105-112
-
-
Graneheim, U.H.1
Lundman, B.2
-
12
-
-
85044652337
-
-
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (, Recommendations for the conduct, report in g, editingpublication of scholarly work in medical journals Roles and responsibilities of authors, contributors, reviewers, editors, publishersowners Defining the role of authors and contributors, Retrieved from
-
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2015). Recommendations for the conduct, report in g, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals: Roles and responsibilities of authors, contributors, reviewers, editors, publishers, and owners: Defining the role of authors and contributors. Retrieved from http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf
-
(2015)
-
-
-
13
-
-
85044674119
-
-
International Conference on Harmonisation. (, Guidance for industry. E6 good clinical practice Consolidated guidance, Retrieved from
-
International Conference on Harmonisation. (1996). Guidance for industry. E6 good clinical practice: Consolidated guidance. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/./Guidances/ucm073122.pdf
-
(1996)
-
-
-
14
-
-
84922395237
-
Honorary and ghost authorship in nursing publications
-
Kennedy, M. S., Barnsteiner, J., & Daly, J. (2014). Honorary and ghost authorship in nursing publications. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 46, 416–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12093
-
(2014)
Journal of Nursing Scholarship
, vol.46
, pp. 416-422
-
-
Kennedy, M.S.1
Barnsteiner, J.2
Daly, J.3
-
15
-
-
84965184782
-
Along with the privilege of authorship come important responsibilities
-
Moher, D. (2014). Along with the privilege of authorship come important responsibilities. BMC Medicine, 12, 214. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0214-2
-
(2014)
BMC Medicine
, vol.12
, pp. 214
-
-
Moher, D.1
-
16
-
-
78650793546
-
PRISMA statement
-
Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Liberati, A., & Tetzlaff, J. (2011). PRISMA statement. Epidemiology, 22, 128. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181fe7825
-
(2011)
Epidemiology
, vol.22
, pp. 128
-
-
Moher, D.1
Altman, D.G.2
Liberati, A.3
Tetzlaff, J.4
-
17
-
-
85044626927
-
-
National Institutes of Health. (, NIH Data Sharing Information—Main Page, Retrieved from
-
National Institutes of Health. (2016). NIH Data Sharing Information—Main Page. Retrieved from http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing/.
-
(2016)
-
-
-
18
-
-
84908022244
-
Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations
-
O'Brien, B. C., Harris, I. B., Beckman, T. J., Reed, D. A., & Cook, D. A. (2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine, 89, 1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388
-
(2014)
Academic Medicine
, vol.89
, pp. 1245-1251
-
-
O'Brien, B.C.1
Harris, I.B.2
Beckman, T.J.3
Reed, D.A.4
Cook, D.A.5
-
19
-
-
80051642708
-
What is authorship, and what should it be? A survey of prominent guidelines for determining authorship in scientific publications
-
Osborne, J. W., & Holland, A. (2009). What is authorship, and what should it be? A survey of prominent guidelines for determining authorship in scientific publications. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(15), 1–19.
-
(2009)
Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation
, vol.14
, Issue.15
, pp. 1-19
-
-
Osborne, J.W.1
Holland, A.2
-
20
-
-
77952274419
-
CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
-
Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Medicine, 8, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-18
-
(2010)
BMC Medicine
, vol.8
, pp. 18
-
-
Schulz, K.F.1
Altman, D.G.2
Moher, D.3
-
21
-
-
84861454390
-
Authorship and responsibility in health sciences research: A review of procedures for fairly allocating authorship in multi-author studies
-
Smith, E., & Williams-Jones, B. (2012). Authorship and responsibility in health sciences research: A review of procedures for fairly allocating authorship in multi-author studies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18, 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9263-5
-
(2012)
Science and Engineering Ethics
, vol.18
, pp. 199-212
-
-
Smith, E.1
Williams-Jones, B.2
-
22
-
-
84901951546
-
Processes to manage analyses and publications in a phase III multicenter randomized clinical trial
-
Snow, K. K., Bell, M. C., Stoddard, A. M., Curto, T. M., Wright, E. C., & Dienstag, J. L. (2014). Processes to manage analyses and publications in a phase III multicenter randomized clinical trial. Trials, 15, 159. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-159
-
(2014)
Trials
, vol.15
, pp. 159
-
-
Snow, K.K.1
Bell, M.C.2
Stoddard, A.M.3
Curto, T.M.4
Wright, E.C.5
Dienstag, J.L.6
-
23
-
-
84982070016
-
Authorship inflation in medical publications
-
Tilak, G., Prasad, V., & Jena, A. B. (2015). Authorship inflation in medical publications. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 52, https://doi.org/0046958015598311
-
(2015)
INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing
, vol.52
-
-
Tilak, G.1
Prasad, V.2
Jena, A.B.3
-
24
-
-
35649019787
-
Strengthening The Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration
-
… for the STROBE Initiative
-
Vandenbroucke, J. P., Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Gøtzsche, P. C., Mulrow, C. D., Pocock, S. J., … for the STROBE Initiative. (2007). Strengthening The Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 4, e297. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297
-
(2007)
PLoS Medicine
, vol.4
-
-
Vandenbroucke, J.P.1
Von Elm, E.2
Altman, D.G.3
Gøtzsche, P.C.4
Mulrow, C.D.5
Pocock, S.J.6
-
25
-
-
83255182742
-
Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: A cross sectional survey
-
Wislar, J. S., Flanagin, A., Fontanarosa, P. B., & DeAngelis, C. D. (2011). Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: A cross sectional survey. BMJ, 343, d6128. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6128
-
(2011)
BMJ
, vol.343
, pp. d6128
-
-
Wislar, J.S.1
Flanagin, A.2
Fontanarosa, P.B.3
DeAngelis, C.D.4
-
26
-
-
84939892875
-
Social dynamics of research collaboration: Norms, practices, and ethical issues in determining co-authorship rights
-
Youtie, J., & Bozeman, B. (2014). Social dynamics of research collaboration: Norms, practices, and ethical issues in determining co-authorship rights. Scientometrics, 101, 953–962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1391-7
-
(2014)
Scientometrics
, vol.101
, pp. 953-962
-
-
Youtie, J.1
Bozeman, B.2
|