Understanding the process from perception to cultural ecosystem services assessment by comparing valuation methods

Urban Forestry and Urban Greening

Volumn 57, Issue , 2021, Pages

  Tian, Tian ^a,b,c   Sun, Lin ^d   Peng, Shengjing ^e   Sun, Fengyun ^a,b,c   Che, Yue ^a,b,c  

^a EAST CHINA NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Shanghai Key Laboratory of Urbanization and Eco restoration   (China)

^c Shanghai Institute of Eco Chongming   (China)

^d FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^e KUNMING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Cultural ecosystem services; Method comparison; Social media photograph analysis; SolVES; Visitor employed photography

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; MAPPING METHOD; PERCEPTION; PHOTOGRAPHY; SOCIAL MEDIA; VALUATION;

EID: 85098469138     PISSN: 16188667     EISSN: 16108167     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126945     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Affek, A., et al. CICES V5.1 classification. Ecosystem Service Potentials and Their Indicators in Postglacial Landscapes. 2020, 113–115.
2. Bateman, I., Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Assessments: Application for the UK National Ecosystem Assessment (NEA). Working Paper - Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment. 2009.
3. Brown, G., Hausner, V., An empirical analysis of cultural ecosystem values in coastal landscapes. Ocean Coast. Manag., 2017, 142.
4. Chan, K.M.A., et al. Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. BioScience 62:8 (2012), 744–756.
5. Chan, K.M.A., et al. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol. Econ. 74 (2012), 8–18.
6. Cheng, X., et al. Evaluation of cultural ecosystem services: a review of methods. Ecosyst. Serv., 2019, 37.
7. Costanza, R., et al. Valuation and management of wetland ecosystems. Ecol. Econ. 1 (1989), 335–361.
8. Dramstad, W.E., et al. Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure. Landsc. Urban Plan. 78:4 (2006), 465–474.
9. Fisher, B., et al. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol. Econ. 68 (2009), 643–653.
10. Gee, K., Burkhard, B., Cultural ecosystem services in the context of offshore wind farming: a case study from the west coast of Schleswig-Holstein. Ecol. Complex. 7:3 (2010), 349–358.
11. Ghermandi, A., Sinclair, M., Passive crowdsourcing of social media in environmental research: a systematic map. Glob. Environ. Chang. Part A 55 (2019), 36–47.
12. Glenberg, A.M., et al. Studies of the long-term recency effect: support for a contextually guided retrieval hypothesis. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 9:2 (1983), 231–255.
13. Gosal, A.S., et al. Comparison of methods for a landscape-scale assessment of the cultural ecosystem services associated with different habitats. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 14:1 (2018), 91–104.
14. Heikinheimo, V., et al. Understanding the use of urban green spaces from user-generated geographic information. Landsc. Urban Plan., 2020, 201.
15. Hinrichs, JamesV., A two-process memory-strength theory for judgment of recency. Psychol. Rev. 77:3 (1970), 223–233.
16. Hirons, M., et al. Valuing cultural ecosyste services. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 41:1 (2016), 545–574.
17. James, G.K., et al. Social valuation of mangroves in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 9:4 (2013), 311–323.
18. Jeon, H., Herriges, J.A., Combining revealed preference data with stated preference data: a latent class approach. Environ. Resour. Econ. (Dordr) 68:4 (2016), 1053–1086.
19. Johnston, R.J., Russell, M., An operational structure for clarity in ecosystem service values. Ecol. Econ. 70:12 (2011), 2243–2249.
20. Katz-Gerro, T., Orenstein, D.E., Environmental tastes, opinions and behaviors: social sciences in the service of cultural ecosystem service assessment. Ecol. Soc., 20(3), 2015.
21. Keddy, P.A., et al. Wet and wonderful: the world's largest wetlands are conservation priorities. BioScience, 59(1), 2009.
22. Kenter, J.O., et al. The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing countries—evidence from the Solomon Islands. Glob. Environ. Chang. Part A, 2011.
23. Maes, J., et al. An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Ecosyst. Serv. 17 (2016), 14–23.
24. Malterud, K., et al. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual. Health Res. 26:13 (2016), 1753–1760.
25. Marshall, N.M., Sampling for qualitative research. Fam. Pract., 1996.
26. Martínez Pastur, G., et al. Spatial patterns of cultural ecosystem services provision in Southern Patagonia. Landsc. Ecol. 31:2 (2015), 383–399.
27. Mason, M., Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qual. Soc. Res. 11:3 (2010), 1–9.
28. MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. 2005 http://www.millenniumassessment.org.
29. Milcu, A.I., et al. Cultural ecosystem services: a literature review and prospects for future research. Ecol. Soc., 18(3), 2013.
30. Mooney, H.A., Ehrlich, P.R., Ecosystem services: a fragmentary history. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems., 1997.
31. Patton, M., Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Nurse Educ. Today, 23(6), 2003 467-467.
32. Pharo, E., Daily, G.C., Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Bryologist, 101(3), 1999, 475.
33. Plieninger, T., et al. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 33 (2013), 118–129.
34. Raymond, C., et al. Engaging multiple disciplines in ecosystem services research and assessment. BioScience 63:12 (2013), 913–914.
35. Sagie, H., et al. Cross-cultural perceptions of ecosystem services: a social inquiry on both sides of the Israeli–jordanian border of the Southern Arava Valley Desert. J. Arid Environ. 97 (2013), 38–48.
36. Sandelowski, M., Sample size in qualitative research. Res. Nurs. Health 18 (1995), 179–183.
37. Sander, H.A., Haight, R.G., Estimating the economic value of cultural ecosystem services in an urbanizing area using hedonic pricing. J. Environ. Manage. 113 (2012), 194–205.
38. Schaich, H., et al. Linking ecosystem services with cultural landscape research. Gaia - Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc. 19:4 (2010), 269–277.
39. Scholte, S.S.K., et al. Integrating socio-cultural perspectives into ecosystem service valuation: a review of concepts and methods. Ecol. Econ. 114 (2015), 67–78.
40. Sherrouse, B.C., et al. A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Appl. Geogr. 31:2 (2011), 748–760.
41. Sherrouse, B.C., et al. An application of Social Values for Ecosystem Services (SolVES) to three national forests in Colorado and Wyoming. Ecol. Indic. 36 (2014), 68–79.
42. Sherrouse, B.C., et al. Analyzing land-use change scenarios for trade-offs among cultural ecosystem services in the Southern Rocky Mountains. Ecosyst. Serv. 26 (2017), 431–444.
43. Spangenberg, J.H., Settele, J., Precisely incorrect? Monetising the value of ecosystem services. Ecol. Complex. 7:3 (2010), 327–337.
44. Sun, F., et al. Mapping the social values for ecosystem services in urban green spaces: integrating a visitor-employed photography method into SolVES. Urban For. Urban Green. 38 (2019), 105–113.
45. Termansen, M., et al. Modelling and mapping spatial heterogeneity in forest recreation services. Ecol. Econ. 92 (2013), 48–57.
46. Wang, Y., et al. Assessment of the social values of ecosystem services based on SolVES model: a case study of Wusong Paotaiwan Werland Forest Park, Shanghai. China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 027:006 (2016), 1767–1774.
47. Westman, W., How much are nature's services worth. Science 197 (1977), 960–964.