From Argumentation Mining to Stance Classification

2nd Workshop on Argumentation Mining, ArgMining 2015 at the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL-HLT 2015 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 67-77

  Sobhani, Parinaz ^a   Inkpen, Diana ^a   Matwin, Stan ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER SCIENCE   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA MINING; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; NON-NEGATIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION; STATISTICS; TEXT PROCESSING;

LABELED DATA; LATENT DIRICHLET ALLOCATION; MACHINE LEARNING APPROACHES; NONNEGATIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION; ONE-TO-ONE MAPPINGS; ONLINE NEWS; STATISTIC MODELING; SUPERVISED CLASSIFIERS; TEXT-MINING; TOPIC MODELING;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 85097646151     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Camille Albert, Leila Amgoud, Florence Dupin de Saint-Cyr, Patrick Saint-Dizier, and Charlotte Costedoat. 2011. Introducing argumention in opinion analysis: Language and reasoning challenges. Sentiment Analysis where AI meets Psychology (SAAIP), page 28.
2. Pranav Anand, Marilyn Walker, Rob Abbott, Jean E Fox Tree, Robeson Bowmani, and Michael Minor. 2011. Cats rule and dogs drool!: Classifying stance in online debate. In Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on computational approaches to subjectivity and sentiment analysis, pages 1-9. Association for Computational Linguistics.
3. Frank R Baumgartner, Suzanna L De Boef, and Amber E Boydstun. 2008. The decline of the death penalty and the discovery of innocence. Cambridge University Press.
4. David M Blei, Andrew Y Ng, and Michael I Jordan. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. the Journal of machine Learning research, 3:993-1022.
5. Filip Boltuzic and Jan Šnajder. 2014. Back up your stance: Recognizing arguments in online discussions. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Argumentation Mining, pages 49-58.
6. Baptiste Chardon, Farah Benamara, Yannick Mathieu, Vladimir Popescu, and Nicholas Asher. 2013. Measuring the effect of discourse structure on sentiment analysis. In Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, pages 25-37. Springer.
7. Alexander Conrad, Janyce Wiebe, et al. 2012. Recognizing arguing subjectivity and argument tags. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Extra-Propositional Aspects of Meaning in Computational Linguistics, pages 80-88. Association for Computational Linguistics.
8. Kushal Dave, Steve Lawrence, and David M Pennock. 2003. Mining the peanut gallery: Opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 519-528. ACM.
9. Debanjan Ghosh, Smaranda Muresan, Nina Wacholder, Mark Aakhus, and Matthew Mitsui. 2014. Analyzing argumentative discourse units in online interactions. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Argumentation Mining, pages 39-48.
10. Kazi Saidul Hasan and Vincent Ng. 2013. Frame semantics for stance classification. CoNLL-2013, 124.
11. Kazi Saidul Hasan and Vincent Ng. 2014. Why are you taking this stance? identifying and classifying reasons in ideological debates. EMNLP 2014.
12. John Lawrence, Chris Reed, Colin Allen, Simon McAlister, Andrew Ravenscroft, and David Bourget. 2014. Mining arguments from 19th century philosophical texts using topic based modelling. ACL 2014, page 79.
13. Daniel D Lee and H Sebastian Seung. 2001. Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 556-562.
14. Wei-Hao Lin, Theresa Wilson, Janyce Wiebe, and Alexander Hauptmann. 2006. Which side are you on? identifying perspectives at the document and sentence levels. In Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 109-116. Association for Computational Linguistics.
15. Qiaozhu Mei, Xu Ling, Matthew Wondra, Hang Su, and ChengXiang Zhai. 2007. Topic sentiment mixture: modeling facets and opinions in weblogs. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 171-180. ACM.
16. Anthony B Miller, Claus Wall, Cornelia J Baines, Ping Sun, Teresa To, Steven A Narod, et al. 2014. Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the canadian national breast screening study: randomised screening trial. Bmj, 348.
17. Bo Pang and Lillian Lee. 2005. Seeing stars: Exploiting class relationships for sentiment categorization with respect to rating scales. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 115-124. Association for Computational Linguistics.
18. Bo Pang, Lillian Lee, and Shivakumar Vaithyanathan. 2002. Thumbs up?: sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In Proceedings of the ACL-02 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing-Volume 10, pages 79-86. Association for Computational Linguistics.
19. Martin Potthast, Benno Stein, Fabian Loose, and Steffen Becker. 2012. Information retrieval in the commentsphere. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 3(4):68.
20. Farial Shahnaz, Michael W Berry, V Paul Pauca, and Robert J Plemmons. 2006. Document clustering using nonnegative matrix factorization. Information Processing & Management, 42(2):373-386.
21. Swapna Somasundaran and Janyce Wiebe. 2010. Recognizing stances in ideological on-line debates. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text, pages 116-124. Association for Computational Linguistics.
22. Swapna Somasundaran, Josef Ruppenhofer, and Janyce Wiebe. 2007. Detecting arguing and sentiment in meetings. In Proceedings of the SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, volume 6.
23. Ivan Titov and Ryan McDonald. 2008a. Modeling online reviews with multi-grain topic models. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 111-120. ACM.
24. Ivan Titov and Ryan T McDonald. 2008b. A joint model of text and aspect ratings for sentiment summarization. In ACL, volume 8, pages 308-316. Citeseer.
25. Manos Tsagkias, Wouter Weerkamp, and Maarten De Rijke. 2010. News comments: Exploring, modeling, and online prediction. Advances in Information Retrieval, pages 191-203.
26. Marilyn A Walker, Pranav Anand, Rob Abbott, Jean E Fox Tree, Craig Martell, and Joseph King. 2012a. That is your evidence?: Classifying stance in online political debate. Decision Support Systems, 53(4):719-729.
27. Marilyn A Walker, Pranav Anand, Robert Abbott, and Ricky Grant. 2012b. Stance classification using dialogic properties of persuasion. In Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 592-596. Association for Computational Linguistics.
28. Marilyn A Walker, Jean E Fox Tree, Pranav Anand, Rob Abbott, and Joseph King. 2012c. A corpus for research on deliberation and debate. In LREC, pages 812-817.
29. Theresa Wilson and Janyce Wiebe. 2005. Annotating attributions and private states. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Frontiers in Corpus Annotations II: Pie in the Sky, pages 53-60. Association for Computational Linguistics.
30. Wei Xu, Xin Liu, and Yihong Gong. 2003. Document clustering based on non-negative matrix factorization. In Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in informaion retrieval, pages 267-273. ACM.
31. Ying Zhang, Yi Fang, Xiaojun Quan, Lin Dai, Luo Si, and Xiaojie Yuan. 2012. Emotion tagging for comments of online news by meta classification with heterogeneous information sources. In Proceedings of the 35th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 1059-1060. ACM.
32. Jie Zhou, Chen Lin, and Bi-cheng Li. 2010. Research of sentiment classification for net news comments by machine learning. Journal of Computer Applications, 30(4):1011-1014.