A framework for (under)specifying dependency syntax without overloading annotators

7th Linguistic Annotation Workshop and Interoperability with Discourse - Proceedings of the Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 51-60

  Schneider, Nathan ^a   O'Connor, Brendan ^a   Saphra, Naomi ^a   Bamman, David ^a   Faruqui, Manaal ^a   Smith, Noah A ^a   Dyer, Chris ^a   Baldridge, Jason ^b  

^a Carnegie Mellon University ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85092342640     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Timothy Baldwin and Su Nam Kim. 2010. Multiword expressions. In Nitin Indurkhya and Fred J. Damerau, editors, Handbook of Natural Language Processing, Second Edition. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL.
2. Benjamin K. Bergen and Nancy Chang. 2005. Embodied Construction Grammar in simulation-based language understanding. In Jan-Ola Östman and Mir-jam Fried, editors, Construction grammars: cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions, pages 147-190. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
3. Ann Bies, Justin Mott, Colin Warner, and Seth Kulick. 2012. English Web Treebank. Technical Report LDC2012T13, Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia, PA.
4. Alena Böhmová, Jan Hajič, Eva Hajičová, Barbora Hladká, and Anne Abeillé. 2003. The Prague Dependency Treebank: a three-level annotation scenario. In Treebanks: building and using parsed corpora, pages 103-127. Springer.
5. Seth Chaiken and Daniel J. Kleitman. 1978. Matrix Tree Theorems. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 24(3):377-381.
6. Noam Chomsky. 1957. Syntactic Structures. Mouton, La Haye.
7. Stephen Clark and James Curran. 2006. Partial training for a lexicalized-grammar parser. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the NAACL (HLT-NAACL 2006), pages 144-151. Association for Computational Linguistics, New York City, USA.
8. William Croft. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
9. Marie-Catherine de Marneffe and Christopher D. Manning. 2008. Stanford typed dependencies manual. http://nlp.stanford.edu/downloads/dependencies_manual.pdf.
10. Kitty Burns Florey. 2006. Sister Bernadette's Barking Dog: The quirky history and lost art of diagramming sentences. Melville House, New York.
11. Victoria Fossum and Roger Levy. 2012. Sequential vs. hierarchical syntactic models of human incremental sentence processing. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics (CMCL 2012), pages 61-69. Association for Computational Linguistics, Montréal, Canada.
12. Jennifer Foster, Ozlem Cetinoglu, Joachim Wagner, Joseph Le Roux, Stephen Hogan, Joakim Nivre, Deirdre Hogan, and Josef van Genabith. 2011. #hardtoparse: POS Tagging and Parsing the Twitter-verse. In Proceedings of the 2011 AAAI Workshop on Analyzing Microtext, pages 20-25. AAAI Press, San Francisco, CA.
13. The PDTB Research Group. 2007. The Penn Discourse Treebank 2.0 annotation manual. Technical Report IRCS-08-01, Institute for Research in Cognitive Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
14. Jan Hajič. 1998. Building a syntactically annotated corpus: the Prague Dependency Treebank. In Eva Hajičová, editor, Issues of Valency and Meaning. Studies in Honor of Jarmila Panevová, pages 12-19. Prague Karolinum, Charles University Press, Prague.
15. Jan Hajič, Barbora Vidová Hladká, and Petr Pajas. 2001. The Prague Dependency Treebank: annotation structure and support. In Proceedings of the IRCS Workshop on Linguistic Databases, pages 105-114. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
16. Richard A. Hudson. 1984. Word Grammar. Blackwell, Oxford.
17. Rebecca Hwa. 1999. Supervised grammar induction using training data with limited constituent information. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-99), pages 73-79. Association for Computational Linguistics, College Park, Maryland, USA.
18. Richard Johansson and Pierre Nugues. 2007. Extended constituent-to-dependency conversion for English. In Joakim Nivre, Heiki-Jaan Kaalep, Kadri Muischnek, and Mare Koit, editors, Proceedings of the 16th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics (NODALIDA-2007), pages 105-112. Tartu, Estonia.
19. Martha Kolln and Robert Funk. 1994. Understanding English Grammar. Macmillan, New York.
20. Sandra Kübler, Ryan McDonald, and Joakim Nivre. 2009. Dependency Parsing. Number 2 in Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies. Morgan & Claypool, San Rafael, CA.
21. Marco Kuhlmann and Joakim Nivre. 2006. Mildly nonprojective dependency structures. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL 2006 Main Conference Poster Sessions, pages 507-514. Association for Computational Linguistics, Sydney, Australia.
22. Mitchell P. Marcus, Beatrice Santorini, and Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: the Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313-330.
23. David Mareček, Martin Popel, Loganathan Ramasamy, Jan Štěpánek, Daniel Zeman, Zdeněk Žabokrtský, and Jan Hajič. 2013. Cross-language study on influence of coordination style on dependency parsing performance. Technial Report 49, ÚFAL MFF UK.
24. Jonathan Margoliash. 2010. Matrix-Tree Theorem for directed graphs. http://www.math.uchicago.edu/~may/VIGRE/VIGRE2010/REUPapers/ Margoliash.pdf.
25. Igor Aleksandrovič Mel'čuk. 1988. Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. SUNY Press, Albany, NY.
26. Joakim Nivre. 2005. Dependency grammar and dependency parsing. Technical Report MSI report 05133, Växjö University School of Mathematics and Systems Engineering, Växjö, Sweden.
27. Timothy Osborne, Michael Putnam, and Thomas Groß. 2012. Catenae: introducing a novel unit of syntactic analysis. Syntax, 15(4):354-396.
28. Olutobi Owoputi, Brendan O'Connor, Chris Dyer, Kevin Gimpel, Nathan Schneider, and Noah A. Smith. 2013. Improved part-of-speech tagging for online conversational text with word clusters. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 380-390. Association for Computational Linguistics, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
29. Alonzo Reed and Brainerd Kellogg. 1877. Work on English grammar & composition. Clark & Maynard.
30. Federico Sangati and Chiara Mazza. 2009. An English dependency treebank à la Tesnière. In Marco Passarotti, Adam Przepiórkowski, Savina Raynaud, and Frank Van Eynde, editors, Proceedings of the Eigth International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories, pages 173-184. EDUCatt, Milan, Italy.
31. Gerold Schneider. 1998. A linguistic comparison of constituency, dependency and link grammar. Master's thesis, University of Zurich.
32. Nathan Schneider, Brendan O'Connor, Naomi Saphra, David Bamman, Manaal Faruqui, Noah A. Smith, Chris Dyer, and Jason Baldridge. 2013. A framework for (under)specifying dependency syntax without overloading annotators. arXiv:1306.2091 [cs.CL]. arxiv.org/pdf/1306.2091.
33. Petr Sgall, Eva Hajičová, and Jarmila Panevová. 1986. The Meaning of the Sentence in its Semantic and Pragmatic Aspects. Reidel, Dordrecht and Academia, Prague.
34. Stuart M. Shieber. 1992. Constraint-Based Grammar Formalisms. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
35. Daniel Sleator and Davy Temperly. 1993. Parsing English with a link grammar. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Parsing Technology (IWPT'93), pages 277-292. Tilburg, Netherlands.
36. David A. Smith and Noah A. Smith. 2007. Probabilistic models of nonprojective dependency trees. In Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL 2007), pages 132-140. Association for Computational Linguistics, Prague, Czech Republic.
37. Rion Snow, Brendan O'Connor, Daniel Jurafsky, and Andrew Ng. 2008. Cheap and fast - but is it good? Evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2008), pages 254-263. Association for Computational Linguistics, Honolulu, Hawaii.
38. Mark Steedman. 2000. The Syntatic Process. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
39. Luc Steels, Jan-Ola Östman, and Kyoko Ohara, editors. 2011. Design patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar. Number 11 in Constructional Approaches to Language. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
40. Lucien Tesnière. 1959. Eléments de Syntaxe Structurale. Klincksieck, Paris.
41. Michael Tomasello. 2003. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.