#hardtoparse: POS tagging and parsing the Twitterverse

AAAI Workshop - Technical Report

Volumn WS-11-05, Issue , 2011, Pages 20-25

  Foster, Jennifer ^a   Çetinoǧlu, Özlem ^a   Wagner, Joachim ^a   Le Roux, Joseph ^b   Hogan, Stephen ^a   Nivre, Joakim ^c   Hogan, Deirdre ^a   Van Genabith, Josef ^a  

^a DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY   (Ireland)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^c UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA SETS; DEPENDENCY TREES; GOLD STANDARDS; LABELLED DEPENDENCIES; PART OF SPEECH TAGGING; PHRASE STRUCTURE; POS TAGGING; STANFORD; STATISTICAL DEPENDENCIES; TEST SETS;

DATA PROCESSING; ENZYMES; PLANT EXTRACTS; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

STATISTICAL TESTS;

EID: 80054906450     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Bermingham, A., and Smeaton, A. 2010. Classifying sentiment in microblogs: Is brevity an advantage? In Proceedings of CKIM.
2. Bies, A.; Ferguson, M.; Katz, K.; and MacIntyre, R. 1995. Bracketing guidelines for Treebank II style, Penn Treebank Project. Technical Report Tech Report MS-CIS-95-06, University of Pennsylvania.
3. Bikel, D. 2004. Intricacies of Collins parsing model. Computational Linguistics 30(4):479-511.
4. Cer, D.; de Marneffe, M.-C.; Jurafsky, D.; and Manning, C. D. 2010. Parsing to Stanford dependencies: Trade-offs between speed and accuracy. In Proceedings of LREC.
5. Charniak, E., and Johnson, M. 2005. Course-to-fine n-best-parsing and maxent discriminative reranking. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACL.
6. de Marneffe, M.-C., and Manning, C. D. 2008. The Stanford typed dependencies representation. In Proceedings of the COLING Workshop on Cross-Framework and Cross-Domain Parser Evaluation.
7. Foster, J. 2010. "cba to check the spelling" Investigating parser performance on discussion forum posts. In Proceedings of HLT:NAACL.
8. Giménez, J., and Màrquez, L. 2004. SVMTool: A general pos tagger generator based on support vector machines. In Proceedings of LREC, 43-46.
9. Gimpel, K.; Schneider, N.; OConnor, B.; Das, D.; Mills, D.; Eisenstein, J.; Heilman, M.; Yogatama, D.; Flanigan, J.; and Smith, N. A. 2011. Part-of-speech Tagging for Twitter: Annotation, Features and Experiments. In Proceedings of ACL:HLT.
10. Marcus, M.; Kim, G.; Marcinkiewicz, M. A.; MacIntyre, R.; Bies, A.; Ferguson, M.; Katz, K.; and Schasberger, B. 1994. The Penn Treebank: Annotating predicate argument structure. In Proceedings of the 1994 ARPA Speech and Natural Language Workshop, 114-119.
11. McClosky, D.; Charniak, E.; and Johnson, M. 2006. Reranking and self-training for parser adaptation. In Proceedings of the 21st COLING/44th ACL.
12. Nivre, J.; Hall, J.; and Nilsson, J. 2006. Maltparser: A data-driven parser-generator for dependency parsing. In Proceedings of LREC, 2216-2219.
13. Nivre, J.; Kuhlmann, M.; and Hall, J. 2009. An improved oracle for dependency parsing with online reordering. In Proceedings of IWPT'09, 73-76.
14. Petrov, S.; Chang, P.-C.; Ringgaard, M.; and Alshawi, H. 2010. Uptraining for accurate deterministic question parsing. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2010.
15. Wu, S.; Hofman, J.; Mason, W.; and Watts, D. 2011. Who says what to whom on Twitter. In Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference Committee (IW3C2).