Development of a DNP measurement grid to increase the rigor of doctor of nursing practice students' data collection and analysis methods

Journal of Professional Nursing

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2020, Pages 666-672

  Costa, Linda L ^a   Bingham, Debra ^a,b   Storr, Carla L ^a   Hammersla, Margaret ^a   Martin, Jeffrey ^a   Seckman, Charlotte ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

^b Institute for Perinatal Quality Improvement   (United States)

Author keywords

Data analysis; Data collection; Doctor of nursing practice; Doctoral education; Measurement

Indexed keywords

CURRICULUM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING STUDENT;

CURRICULUM; DATA COLLECTION; EDUCATION, NURSING, GRADUATE; HUMANS; STUDENTS, NURSING;

EID: 85091520270     PISSN: 87557223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2020.09.006     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. AdvISE Summit, https://www.nursing.umaryland.edu/news-events/events/advise, 2019.
2. AdvISE Summit Video Summary, https://youtu.be/yUc4UiNq9A8, 2020.
3. American Association of Colleges of Nursing, Defining scholarship for academic nursing: Task force consensus position statement. https://www.aacnnursing.org/Portals/42/News/Position-Statements/Defining-Scholarship.pdf, 2018.
4. American Association of Colleges of Nursing ACN, The essentials of doctoral education for advanced nursing practice. https://www.aacnnursing.org/Portals/42/Publications/DNPEssentials.pdf, 2006.
5. Baily, M.A., Bottrell, M., Lynn, J., Jennings, B., Special report: The ethics of using QI methods to improve health care quality and safety. The Hastings Center Report 36:4 (2006), S1–40, 10.1353/hcr.2006.0054.
6. Beeber, A.S., Palmer, C., Waldrop, J., Lynn, M.R., Jones, C.B., The role of doctor of nursing practice-prepared nurses in practice settings. Nursing Outlook 67:4 (2019), 354–364, 10.1016/j.outlook.2019.02.006.
7. Bingham, D., Boisvert, M.E., Webb, A., Muri, J., Feasibility of AWHONN's immediate and continuous skin-to-skin nursing care quality measures. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing 48:5 (2019), 516–525.
8. Council on Accreditation of Nurse Anesthesia Educational Programs, Position statement on doctoral education for nurse anesthetists. Retrieved from https://www.coacrna.org/about-coa/position-statements/, 2009.
9. Embree, J.L., Meek, J., Ebright, P., Voices of chief nursing executives informing a doctor of nursing practice program. Journal of Professional Nursing, 34(1), 2018, 10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.07.008.
10. Grey, M., The doctor of nursing practice: Defining the next steps. Journal of Nursing Education 52:8 (2013), 462–465, 10.3928/01484834-20130719-02.
11. st century. 2001, National Academies PressMaryland HSCRC 2020 https://hscrc.maryland.gov/Pages/hscrc-workgroup-performance-measurement.aspx.
12. National Association of Clinical Nurse Specialists, Position statement on the nursing practice doctorate. Retrieved from http://www.nacns.org/docs/PositionOnNursingPracticeDoctorate.pdf, 2009.
13. National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties, Statement from the NONPF Board of Directors. Retrieved from http://www.nonpf.org/?page=83, 2002.
14. National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties, Clinical doctorate initiative. Retrieved from http://www.nonpf.org/?page=83, 2002.
15. Ogrinc, G., Headrick, L., Barton, A., Dolansky, M., Madigosky, W., Miltner, R., Fundamentals of health care improvement. 3rd ed., 2018, Joint Commission Resources, Oak Brook Illinois.
16. QSEN Institute, https://qsen.org, 2020.
17. Root, L., Nuñz, D.E., Velasquez, D., Malloch, K., Porter-O'Grady, T., Advancing the rigor of DNP projects for practice excellence. Nurse Leader 16:4 (2018), 261–265, 10.1016/j.mnl.2018.05.013.
18. Roush, K., Tesoro, M., An examination of the rigor and value of final scholarly projects completed by DNP nursing students. Journal of Professional Nursing 34:6 (2018), 437–443, 10.1016/j.profnurs.2018.03.003.
19. Sun, G.H., Cherry, B., Using the logic model framework to standardize quality and rigor in the DNP project. Nurse Educator 44:4 (2018), 183–186, 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000599.
20. Terhaar, M.F., Sylvia, M., Scholarly work products of the doctor of nursing practice: One approach to evaluating scholarship, rigour, impact and quality. Journal of Clinical Nursing 25:1–2 (2015), 163–174, 10.1111/jocn.13113.
21. VanderKooi, M.E., Conrad, D.M., Spoelstra, S.L., An enhanced actualized DNP model to improve DNP project placements, rigor, and completion. Nursing Education Perspectives 39:5 (2018), 299–301, 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000384.
22. Waldrop, J., Caruso, D., Fuchs, M.A., Hypes, K., EC as PIE: Five criteria for executing a successful DNP final project. Journal of Professional Nursing 30:4 (2014), 300–306, 10.1016/j.profnurs.2014.01.
23. Weiskopf, N.J., Weng, C., Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: Enabling reuse for clinical research. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 20:1 (2013), 144–151, 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000681 January.