A challenge in teaching scientific communication: academic experience does not improve undergraduates’ ability to assess their or their peers’ writing

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2021, Pages 809-820

  Biango Daniels, Megan ^a,b   Sarvary, Mark ^a  

^a Cornell University ^*  (United States)

^b TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

grading bias; Peer review; scientific communication; self assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 85090441216     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1812512     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Adachi, C., J. H.-M., Tai, and P., Dawson. 2018. “ Academics’ Perceptions of the Benefits and Challenges of Self and Peer Assessment in Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (2): 294–306. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2017.1339775.
2. Anelli, C., 2011. “ Scientific Literacy: What is It, Are we Teaching It, and Does It Matter.” American Entomologist 57 (4): 235–244. doi: 10.1093/ae/57.4.235.
3. Brewer, C. A., and D., Smith. 2011. “ Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action.” Chapter 2: 10-19. American Association for the Advancement of Science
4. Coil, D., M. P., Wenderoth, M., Cunningham, and C., Dirks. 2010. “ Teaching the Process of Science: Faculty Perceptions and an Effective Methodology.” CBE Life Sciences Education 9 (4): 524–535. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-01-0005.
5. Deane-Coe, K. K., M. A., Sarvary, and T. G., Owens. 2017. “ Student Performance along Axes of Scenario Novelty and Complexity in Introductory Biology: Lessons from a Unique Factorial Approach to Assessment.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 16 (1): ar3. doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-06-0195.
6. Dunlosky, J., and K. A., Rawson. 2012. “ Overconfidence Produces Underachievement: Inaccurate Self Evaluations Undermine Students’ Learning and Retention.” Learning and Instruction 22 (4): 271–280. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.003.
7. Dunning, D.,. C., Heath, and J. M., Suls. 2004. “ Flawed Self-Assessment: Implications for Health, Education, and the Workplace.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest: a Journal of the American Psychological Society 5 (3): 69–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x.
8. Ehrlinger, J., K., Johnson, M., Banner, D., Dunning, and J., Kruger. 2008. “ Why the Unskilled Are Unaware: Further Explorations of (Absent) Self-Insight among the Incompetent.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 105 (1): 98–121. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.05.002.
9. Hoffmann, F., and P., Oreopoulos. 2009. “ A Professor like Me the Influence of Instructor Gender on College Achievement.” Journal of Human Resources 44 (2): 479–494. doi: 10.1353/jhr.2009.0024.
10. Huisman, B., N., Saab, P., van den Broek, and J., van Driel. 2019. “ The Impact of Formative Peer Feedback on Higher Education Students’ Academic Writing: A Meta-Analysis.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (6): 863–880. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1545896.
11. Kararo, M., and M., McCartney. 2019. “ Annotated Primary Scientific Literature: A Pedagogical Tool for Undergraduate Courses.” PLoS Biology 17 (1): e3000103 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000103.
12. Killpack, T. L., and L. C., Melón. 2016. “ Toward Inclusive STEM Classrooms: What Personal Role Do Faculty Play? ” CBE—Life Sciences Education 15 (3): es3. doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-01-0020.
13. Kruger, J., and D., Dunning. 1999. “ Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (6): 1121–1134. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121.
14. Lee, C. J., and D., Moher. 2017. “ Promote Scientific Integrity via Journal Peer Review data.” Science (New York, NY) 357 (6348): 256–257. doi: 10.1126/science.aan4141.
15. Li, H., Y., Xiong, C. V., Hunter, X., Guo, and R., Tywoniw. 2020. “ Does Peer Assessment Promote Student Learning? A Meta-Analysis.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (2): 193–211. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1620679.
16. Libarkin, J., and G., Ording. 2012. “ The Utility of Writing Assignments in Undergraduate Bioscience.” CBE Life Sciences Education 11 (1): 39–46. doi: 10.1187/cbe.11-07-0058.
17. Lindblom-Ylänne, S., H., Pihlajamäki, and T., Kotkas. 2006. “ Self-, Peer-and Teacher-Assessment of Student Essays.” Active Learning in Higher Education 7 (1): 51–62. doi: 10.1177/1469787406061148.
18. Meaders, C. L., E. S., Toth, A. K., Lane, J. K., Shuman, B. A., Couch, M., Stains, M. R., Stetzer, E., Vinson, and M. K., Smith. 2019. “What Will I Experience in My College STEM Courses?” An Investigation of Student Predictions about Instructional Practices in Introductory Courses?” CBE Life Sciences Education 18 (4): ar60. doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-05-0084.
19. Miller, J. D., 1998. “ The Measurement of Civic Scientific Literacy.” Public Understanding of Science 7 (3): 203–224. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/7/3/001.
20. National Research Council. 2003. BIO 2010: Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press.
21. Porter, J. R., 2005. “ Information Literacy in Biology Education: An Example from an Advanced Cell Biology course.” Cell Biology Education 4 (4): 335–343. doi: 10.1187/cbe.04-12-0060.
22. Quitadamo, I. J., and M. J., Kurtz. 2007. “ Learning to Improve: Using Writing to Increase Critical Thinking Performance in General Education Biology.” CBE Life Sciences Education 6 (2): 140–154. doi: 10.1187/cbe.06-11-0203.
23. R Core Team. 2019. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
24. Reynolds, J. A., and R. J., Thompson, Jr.2011. “ Want to Improve Undergraduate Thesis Writing? Engage Students and Their Faculty Readers in Scientific Peer Review.” CBE Life Sciences Education 10 (2): 209–215. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-10-0127.
25. Round, J. E., and A. M., Campbell. 2013. “ Figure Facts: Encouraging Undergraduates to Take a Data-Centered Approach to Reading Primary Literature.” CBE Life Sciences Education 12 (1): 39–46. doi: 10.1187/cbe.11-07-0057.
26. Sandefur, C. I., and C., Gordy. 2016. “ Undergraduate Journal Club as an Intervention to Improve Student Development in Applying the Scientific Process.” Journal of College Science Teaching 45 (4): 52–58. doi: 10.2505/4/jcst16_045_04_52.
27. Sarvary, M. A., and K. M., Gifford. 2017. “ The Benefits of a Real-Time Web-Based Response System for Enhancing Engaged Learning in Classrooms and Public Science Events.” Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education: June: A Publication of Fun, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience 15 (2): E13–E16.
28. Zenger, T. R., 1992. “ Why Do Employers Only Reward Extreme Performance? Examining the Relationships among Performance, Pay, and Turnover.” Administrative Science Quarterly 37 (2): 198–219. doi: 10.2307/2393221.