The Distinctions Between Theory, Theoretical Framework, and Conceptual Framework

Academic Medicine

Volumn 95, Issue 7, 2020, Pages 989-994

  Varpio, Lara ^a   Paradis, Elise ^b,d,e   Uijtdehaage, Sebastian ^a   Young, Meredith ^c  

^a UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d Wilson Centre   (Canada)

^e FACEBOOK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPT FORMATION; EDUCATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL PROFESSION; METHODOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; THEORETICAL MODEL;

CONCEPT FORMATION; HEALTH OCCUPATIONS; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 85087893753     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: 1938808X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003075     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Reeves S, Albert M, Kuper A, Hodges BD. Why use theories in qualitative research? BMJ. 2008;337:a949.
2. Nimmon L, Paradis E, Schrewe B, Mylopoulos M. Integrating theory into qualitative medical education research. J Grad Med Educ. 2016;8:437-438.
3. Kuper A, Whitehead C. The practicality of theory. Acad Med. 2013;88:1594-1595.
4. Davidoff F, Dixon-Woods M, Leviton L, Michie S. Demystifying theory and its use in improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24:228-238.
5. Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Bordage G. Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: A systematic review. Med Educ. 2007;41:737-745.
6. Research Grant Awards. AMEE. https://amee.org/awards-prizes/research-grant-awardprogramme. Accessed October 30, 2019.
7. Durning SJ, Carline JD, eds. Review Criteria for Research Manuscript. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2015.
8. Albert M. Understanding the debate on medical education research: A sociological perspective. Acad Med. 2004;79:948-954.
9. Albert M, Hodges B, Regehr G. Research in medical education: Balancing service and science. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007;12:103-115.
10. Albert M, Paradis E, Kuper A. Interdisciplinary promises versus practices in medicine: The decoupled experiences of social sciences and humanities scholars. Soc Sci Med. 2015;126:17-25.
11. Kerlinger F. Foundations of Behavioral Research. Chicago, IL: Holt, Rinehart & Winston; 1986.
12. Varpio L, Aschenbrener C, Bates J. Tackling wicked problems: How theories of agency can provide new insights. Med Educ. 2017;51:353-365.
13. Grant C, Osanloo A. Understanding, selection, and integrating a theoretical framework in dissertation research: Creating the blueprint for your "house." Adm Issues J: Connect Educ Pract Res. 2014;4:12-26.
14. Maxwell, JA. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications; 2013
15. Park YS, Konge L, Artino AR Jr. The positivism paradigm of research. Acad Med. 2020;95:690-694.
16. Young M, Ryan A. Post-positivism in health professions education scholarship. Acad Med. 2020;95:695-699.
17. Rees C, Crampton P, Monrouxe V. Revisioning academic medicine through a constructionist lens. Acad Med. 2020;95: 846-850.
18. Paradis E, Nimmon L, Wondimagegn D, Whitehead C. Critical theory: Broadening our thinking to explore the structural factors at play in health professions education. Acad Med. 2020;95:842-845.
19. Creswell JW. The use of theory. In: Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications; 2009:61-66.
20. Glaser B, Strauss A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company; 1967.
21. Stewart D, Klein S. The use of theory in research. Int J Clin Pharm. 2016;38:615-619.
22. Yin RK. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications; 1994.
23. Merriam S. Qualitiative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1998
24. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. The Constructivist Credo. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press; 2013.
25. Mertens DM. Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity With Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications; 1998.
26. Young M, Varpio L, Uijtdehaage S, Paradis E. The spectrum of inductive and deductive research approaches using quantitative and qualitative data. Acad Med. 2020;95:1122.