The rise of adversarial legalism in the European union: Beyond policy learning and regulatory competition

International Public Policy and Management: Policy Learning Beyond Regional, Cultural, and Political Boundaries

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 351-368

  Kelemen, R Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85087098819     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (75)

1. Alter, K. (1998). Who are the ''Masters of the Treaty?": European Governments and the European Court of Justice. Int. Organ. 52(1):121-147.
2. Alter, K. (2001). Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Alter, K., Vargas, J. (2000). Explaining variation in the use of European litigation strategies: European community law and British gender equality policy. Comp. Polit. Stud. 33(4):452-182.
4. Bell, M. (2002). Beyond European labour law? Reflections on the EU racial equality directive. Eur. Law J. 8(3):384-399.
5. Betlem, G., Faure, M. (1998). Environmental toxic torts in Europe. Georget. Int. Environ. Law Rev. 10:855-890.
6. BEUC (The European Consumers' Organisation), EUC response to the Commission's Green Paper on Liability for defective products; 2000, BEUC/016/2000.
7. Borzel, T. (2003). Guarding the treaty: The compliance strategies of the European commission. In: Borzel, T., Cichowski, R., eds. The State of the European Union, Vol. 6: Law, Politics, and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 197-220.
8. Burke, T. (2002). The globalization of (disability) rights. Paper presented to the American Political Science Association Annual Conference in Boston, MA, 29 Aug.-Sept. 1.
9. Business Week Online. (March 19, 2001). Europe's Shareholders: To the Barricades. Available at http://www.businessweek.com.
10. Caporaso, J., Jupille, J. (2001). The Europeanization of gender equality policy and domestic structural change. In: Green Cowles, M., Caporaso, J., Risse, T., eds. Transforming Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 21-43.
11. Cichowski, R. (2001). Litigation, compliance and European integration: The preliminary ruling procedure and EU Nature Conservation Policy. Paper presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the European Community Studies Association, Madison, Wisconsin, 31 May-2 June.
12. Conant, L. (2001). Europeanization and the courts: Variable patterns of adaptation among national judiciaries. In: Cowles, C., Risse, T., eds. Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change.
13. Council Directive on the Approximation of the Laws, Regulations and Administrative Provisions of the Member States Concerning Liability for Defective Products, Council Directive 85/374; 1985, O.J. (L210/29).
14. De burca, G. (1995). The language of rights and European integration. In: Shaw, J., Moore, S., eds. New Legal Dynamics of European Union. Oxford: Oxford Press.
15. Dezalay, Y. (1996). Between the state, law and the market: The social and professional stakes in the construction and definition of a regulatory arena. In: Bratton, W. et al., eds. International Regulatory Competition and Coordination: Perspectives on Economic Regulation in Europe and the U.S. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 59-87.
16. European Commission. (1976). Proposal for a Directive on Strict Liability for Defective Products; 1974, O..J. (C 241).
17. European Commission. (1999a,). Financial Services Action Plan. Communication from the Commission; COM (1999) 232 final. May 11, 1999.
18. European Commission. (1999b). Green Paper on Liability for defective products. COM (1999) 396 final, 28.07.1999.
19. European Commission. (2000a). White Paper on Environmental Liability. COM (2000) 66 final.
20. European Commission. (2000b). Report from the Commission on the Application of Directive 85/374 on Liability for Defective Products. COM (2000) 893, 31.1.2001.
21. European Commission. (2002a). European Commission, Financial Services Action Plan, Sixth Report, COM (2002) 267, June 3, 2002; Internal Market Directorate General, Toward an EU Regime on Transparency Obligations of issuers Whose Securities are Admitted to trading on a Regulated Market.
22. European Commission. (2002b). Commission Proposal for a Council Directive to Improve Access to Justice in Cross-Border Disputes by Establishing Minimum Common Rules Relating to Legal Aid and Other Financial Aspects of Civil Proceedings. COM(2002) 13 final.
23. European Parliament. (1998). Opinion of 5.11.98 (O.J. No. C 359 of 23.11.98).
24. European Parliament. (2001.) Resolution on the Final report of the Committee of Wise Men on the regulation of European Securities Markets; RSP/2001/2530, March 15, 2001.
25. Fligstein, N., Stone Sweet, A. (2001). Institutionalizing the Treaty of Rome. In: Stone Sweet, A., Sandholtz, W., Fligstein, N., eds. The Institutionalization of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 29-55.
26. Flynn, L. (1999). The implications of Article 13 EC-After Amsterdam, will some forms of discrimination be more equal than others? Common Mark. Law Rev. 36:1127.
27. Franchino, F. (2001). Delegation and constraints in the national execution of EC policies: A longitudinal and qualitative analysis. West Eur. Polit. 24(4):169-192.
28. Galanter, M. (1992). Law abounding: Legalisation around the North Atlantic. Modern Law Rev. 55(1):1-24.
29. Galanter, M. (1996). The assault on Civil Justice. In: Friedman, L., Scheiber, H., eds. Legal Culture and the Legal Profession. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 79-116.
30. Goldthorpe, J. (1984). Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism. New York: Oxford U. Press.
31. Harlow, C. (1999). Citizen Access to Political Power in the European Union. EUI Working Paper RSC No. 99/2. Florence: European University Institute.
32. Hayward, J. (1982). Mobilising private interests in the service of public ambitions. In: Richardson, J., ed., Policy Styles in Western Europe. London: George Allen & Unwin, pp. 118-127.
33. Héritier, A., ed. (2002). Common Goods: Reinventing European and International Governance. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
34. Hodges, C. J. S. (2002). Product liability in Europe: Evaluating the case for reform. Bus. Law Int. June 2000.
35. IMPEL (European Union Network for the Implementation and Enforcement of Environmental Law). (2000). Complaint Procedures and Access to Justice for Citizens and NGOs in the field of environment within the European Union. Report available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/impel/access_to_justice.htm accessed on July 1, 2001.
36. Jordan, A., Wurzel, R., Zito, A. (2001). European Governance and the Transfer of 'New' Environmental Policy Instruments in the European Union, Paper presented at the 2001 Biennial International conference of the European Community Studies Association, Madison, Wisconsin, 29 May-2 June.
37. Kagan, R. (1997). Should Europe worry about adversarial legalism? Oxf. J. Leg. Stud. 17(2):165.
38. Kagan, R. (2001). Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39. Karmel, R. S. (1999). The case for a European securities commission. Columbia J. Transnatl. Law 38:9.
40. Kelemen, R. D. (2000). Regulatory federalism: EU environmental policy in comparative perspective. J. Public Policy 20(2):133-167.
41. Kelemen, R. D. (2003). The EU rights revolution: Adversarial legalism and European integration. In: Borzel, T., Cichowski, R., eds. The State of the European Union, Vol. 6: Law, Politics, and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 221-234.
42. Kelemen, R. D. (2004). The Rules of Federalism: Institutions and Regulatory Politics in the EU and Beyond. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Kelemen, R. D., Sibbitt, E. (2004). The globalization of American Law. Int. Organ. 58(1):103-136.
44. Kissane, M. E. (1997). Global gadflies: Applications and implications of US-style corporate governance abroad. N. Y. Law J. Intl. Comp. Law 17:621.
45. Lannoo, K. (2001). Updating EU Securities Market Regulation: Report of a CEPS task force. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
46. Lannoo, K. (2002). Supervising the European Financial System. CEPS Policy Brief No. 21. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
47. Lehmbruch, G., Schmitter, P. C. (1982). Patterns of Corporatist Policy Making. London: Sage Publications.
48. Majone, G. (1993). The European community between social policy and social regulation. J. Common Mark. Stud. 31(2):153-170.
49. Majone, G. (1995). Mutual Trust, Credible Commitments and the Evolution of Rules for a Single European Market. EUI Working Paper RSC No. 95/1. Florence: European University Institute.
50. Mattli, W., Slaughter, A. M. (1998). Revisiting the European Court of Justice. Int. Organ. 52:177-209.
51. Pollack, M. (1997). Delegation, agency and agenda setting in the European Community. Int. Organ. 51(1):99-134.
52. Prechal, S. (1995). Directives in European Community Law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
53. Radelli, C. (2003). The Open Method of Coordination: A new governance architecture for the European Union? Report No. 1. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies.
54. Rittberger, B., Richardson, J. (2003). Old wine in new bottles? The commission and the use of environmental policy instruments. Public Admin. 81(3):575-606.
55. Schwarse, J., ed. (1996). Administrative Law under European Influence. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
56. Shapiro, M. (1992). The giving reasons requirement. University of Chicago Legal Forum, pp. 179-220.
57. Shapiro, M. (1993). The Globalization of Law. Indiana Journal of Global Studies, Vol. 1, Issue 1. Available at: http://www.law.indiana.edu/glsi/vol1/toc.html.
58. Shapiro, M. (1996). The globalization of judicial review. In: Friedman, L., Scheiber, H., eds. Legal Culture and the Legal Profession.
59. Shapiro, M., Stone Sweet, A. (1994). The new constitutional politics of Europe. Comp. Polit. Stud. 26(4):397-420.
60. Somsen, H. (2000). The private enforcement of member state compliance with EC environmental law: an unfulfilled promise? In: Somsen, H., ed., Yearbook of European Environmental Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61. Spacone, A. (2000). Strict liability in the European union-Not a United States analog. Roger Williams Univ. Law Rev. 5:341.
62. Stapleton, J. (2002). Bugs in Anglo-American products liability. S. C. Law Rev. 53:1225-1261.
63. Stone Sweet, A. (2000). Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64. Stone Sweet, A., Caporaso, J. (1998). From free trade to supranational polity: the European court and integration. In: Sandholtz, W., Stone Sweet, A., eds. European Integration and Supranational Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 92-133.
65. Suleiman, E. (1974). Politics, Power and Bureaucracy in France: The Administrative Elite. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
66. Tallberg, J. (2000). Supranational influence in EU enforcement: The ECJ and the principle of state liability. J. Eur. Public Policy 7:104-121.
67. Tallberg, J. (2003). European Governance and Supranational institutions: Making States Comply. London: Routledge.
68. Tate, C. N. Vallinder, T., ed. (1995). The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: NYU Press.
69. Trubek, D., et al. (1994). Global restructuring and the law: studies of internationalization of legal fields and the creation of transnational arenas. Case Western Law Rev. 44:407-498.
70. van Waarden, F. (1995). Persistence of national policy styles. In: Unger, B., van Waarden, F., eds. Convergence or Diversity? Aldershot: Avebury, pp. 333-372.
71. Vogel, D. (1986). National Styles of Regulation: Environmental Policy in Great Britain and the U.S. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
72. Vogel, S. K. (1996). Freer Markets More Rules: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
73. Warren, M. G. (1994). The European Union's investment services directive. Univ. PA J. Int. Bus. Law 15:181-220.
74. Wiegand, W. (1991). The reception of American law in Europe. Am. J. Comp. Law 39(2):229-249.
75. Wiegand, W. (1996). Americanization of law: Reception or convergence? In: Lawrence, F., Scheiber, H., eds. Legal Culture and the Legal Profession. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, pp. 137-152.