Classroom assessment

The Routledge Handbook of Language Testing

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 65-78

  Turner, Carolyn E ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85086972018     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203181287-12     Document Type: Chapter

References (73)

1. Alderson, J. C. (2005). Diagnosing Foreign Language Proficiency: the interface between learning and assessment. London, UK: Continuum.
2. Arkoudis, S. and O’Loughlin, K. (2004). Tensions between validity and outcomes: Teacher assessment of written work of recently arrived immigrant ESL students. Language Testing 21: 284-304.
3. ARG (2002) Assessment for Learning: 10 principles. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge, Assessment Reform Group.
4. Bachman, L. F. and Palmer, A. S. (1996) Language Testing in Practice: designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5. Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, policy and practice 5: 7-74.
6. Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan 80: 139-48.
7. Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (2003). In praise of educational research: formative assessment. British Educational Research Journal 29: 623-37.
8. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B. and Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box:assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan 86: 8-21.
9. Brindley, G. (2001). Outcomes-based assessment in practice: some examples and emerging insights. Language Testing 18: 393-407.
10. Brookhart, S. (2003). Developing measurement theory for classroom assessment purposes and uses. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 22(4): 5-12.
11. Brookhart, S. (2005). Research on formative classroom assessment. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, April.
12. Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Assessment: principles and classroom practice. White Plains, NY: Longman/Pearson Education.
13. Brown, J. D. and Hudson, T. (1998). The alternatives in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly 32: 653-75.
14. Butler, Y. G. and Lee J. (2010). The effects of self-assessment among young learners of English. Language Testing 27: 5-31.
15. Cheng, L., Rogers, T. and Hu, H. (2004). ESL/EFL instructors’ classroom assessment practices: Purposes, methods, and procedures. Language Testing 21: 360-89.
16. Cheng, L., Watanabe, Y. and Curtis, A. (eds), (2003). Washback in Language Testing: research contexts and methods. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Colby-Kelly, C. (2010). Using ‘assessment for learning’ practices with pre-university level ESL students: a mixed methods study of teacher and student performance and beliefs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University.
18. Colby-Kelly, C. and Turner, C. E. (2007). AFL research in the L2 classroom and evidence of usefulness:Taking formative assessment to the next level. Canadian Modern Language Review 64: 9-38.
19. Coombe, C., Folse, K. and Hubley, N. (2007) A Practical Guide to Assessing English Language Learners. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
20. Council of Europe (2001) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Cumming, A. (2009). Language assessment in education: tests, curricula, and teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 29: 90-100.
22. Davison, C. (2004). The contradictory culture of teacher-based assessment: ESL teacher assessment practices in Australian and Hong Kong secondary schools. Language Testing 21: 305-34.
23. Davison, C. (2007) Views from the chalkface: School-based assessment in Hong Kong. Language Assessment Quarterly 4: 37-68.
24. Davison, C. and Leung, C. (2009). Current issues in English language teacher-based assessment. TESOL Quarterly 43: 393-415.
25. Fox, J. (2008) Alternative assessment. In E. Shohamy and N. H. Hornberger (eds), Encyclopedia of Language and Education, Vol. 7. Language Testing and Assessment, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Springer Science + Business, 97-109.
26. Fox, J. and Hartwick, P. (2011) Taking a diagnostic turn: reinventing the portfolio in an English for academic purposes (EAP) classroom. In D. Tsagari and I. Csepes (eds), Classroom-Based Language Assessment. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
27. Fulcher, G. (2010a) Language Testing Resources Website. languagetesting.info/features/afl/formative.html (accessed 22/11/10).
28. Fulcher, G. (2010b) Practical Language Testing. London, UK: Hodder Education.
29. Fulcher, G. and Davidson, F. (2007) Language Testing and Assessment: an advanced resource book. London, UK: Routledge.
30. Gardner, J. (2006) Assessment and Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
31. Genesee, F. and Upshur, J. A. (1996) Classroom-based Evaluation in Second Language Education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. Gottlieb, M. (2006) Assessing English Language Learners: bridges from language proficiency to academic achievement.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
33. Guiver, C. (producer) (2010) Afl and APP: What’s going on with assessment (video). www.teachers.tv/videos/afl-and-app-what-is-going-on-with-assessment (accessed 22/11/10).
34. Hamp-Lyons, L. and Condon, W. (2000) Assessing the Portfolio: principles for practice, theory, and research.Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
35. Harlen, W. (2006). On the relationship between assessment for formative and summative purposes. In J. Gardner (ed.), Assessment and Learning. London: SAGE Publications.
36. Harlen, W. and Winter, J. (2004). The development of assessment for learning: Learning from the case of science and mathematics. Language Testing 21: 390-408.
37. Hasselgreen, A. (2005). Assessing the language of young learners. Language Testing 22: 337-54.
38. Ioannou-Georgiou, S. and Pavlou, P. (2003) Assessing Young Learners. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
39. James, M. (2006). Assessment, teaching and theories of Learning. In J. Gardner (ed.), Assessment and Learning. London, UK: SAGE Publications.
40. James, M. and Pedder, D. (2006). Professional learning as a condition for assessment for learning. In J. Gardner (ed.), Assessment and Learning. London, UK: SAGE Publications.
41. Lantolf, J. and Poehner, M. (2008). Dynamic assessment. In E. Shohamy and N. H. Hornberger (eds), Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Vol. 7. Language testing and assessment, 2nd edn, New York:Springer Science + Business, 273-84.
42. Leung, C. (2004). Developing formative teacher assessment: knowledge, practice and change. Language Assessment Quarterly 1: 19-41.
43. Leung, C. and Lewkowicz, J. (2006). Expanding horizons and unresolved conundrums: Language testing and assessment. TESOL Quarterly 40: 211-34.
44. Leung, C. and Scott, C. (2009). Formative assessment in language education policies: Emerging lessons from Wales and Scotland. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 29: 64-79.
45. Little, D. (2005). The Common European Framework and the European Language Portfolio: Involving learners and their judgements in the assessment process. Language Testing 22: 321-36.
46. Llosa, L. (2007). Validating a standards-based classroom assessment of English proficiency: a multitraitmultimethod approach. Language Testing 24: 489-515.
47. Lynch, B. (2001). Rethinking assessment from a critical perspective. Language Testing 18: 351-72.
48. McNamara, T. (1996) Measuring Second Language Performance. London, UK: Longman.
49. McNamara, T. and Roever, C. (2006) Language Testing: the social dimension. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
50. Malone, M. (2008). Training in language assessment. In E. Shohamy and N. H. Hornberger (eds), Encyclopedia of Language and Education, Vol. 7. Language testing and assessment, 2nd edn. New York, NY:Springer Science + Business, 225-39.
51. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (ed.), Educational measurement, 3rd edn. New York, NY: Macmillan, 13-103.
52. Moss, P. A. (1996). Enlarging the dialogue in educational measurement: voices from interpretive research traditions. Educational Researcher 25: 20-28.
53. Moss, P. (2003). Reconceptualizing validity for classroom assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices 22: 13-25.
54. O’Malley, J. M. and Valdez Pierce, L. (1996). Authentic assessment for English language learners: Practical approaches for teachers. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
55. Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N. and Glaser, R. (eds), (2001). Knowing What Students Know: the science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
56. Rea-Dickins, P. (2001). ‘Mirror, mirror on the wall.' Identifying processes of classroom assessment. Language Testing 18: 429-62.
57. Rea-Dickins, P. (2004). Understanding teachers as agents of assessment. Language Testing 21: 249-58.
58. Rea-Dickins, P. (2006). Currents and eddies in the discourse of assessment: A learning-focused interpretation. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 16: 163-88.
59. Rea-Dickins, P. (2008). Classroom-based language assessment. In E. Shohamy and N. H. Hornberger (eds), Encyclopedia of Language and Education, Vol. 7. Language testing and Assessment, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Springer Science + Business, 257-71.
60. Rea-Dickins, P. and Gardner, S. (2000). Snares or silver bullets: Disentangling the construct of formative assessment. Language Testing 17: 215-44.
61. School-Based Assessment Projects in Hong Kong (2010). sba.edu.hku.hk/new_sba/index.html (accessed 22/11/10).
62. Scotland’s National Assessment Resource (2010). www.ltscotland.org.uk/learningteachingandassessment (accessed 22/11/10).
63. Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R.W. Tyler (ed.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation.Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, 39-83.
64. Shephard, L. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher 29: 4-14.
65. Taylor, L. (2009). Developing assessment literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 29: 21-36.
66. Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) (2006) PreK-12 English Language Proficiency Standards. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
67. Turner, C. E. (2006). Professionalism and high stakes test: Teachers’ perspectives when dealing with educational change introduced through provincial exams. TESL Canada Journal 23: 54-76.
68. Turner, C. E. (2009). Examining washback in second language education contexts: A high stakes provincial exam and the teacher factor in classroom practice in Quebec secondary schools. International Journal on Pedagogies and Learning 5: 103-23.
69. Turner, C. E., Tan, M. and Deschambault, E. (2010). ‘Development and field-testing of the writing task for Quebec’s Secondary Five provincial ESL exit exams: Using the washback effect to create an assessment bridge. Poster presented at the Canadian Association of Applied Linguistics (CAAL), Montreal, June.
70. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
71. Wall, D. (2000). The impact of high-stakes testing on teaching and learning: Can this be predicted or controlled? System 28: 499-509.
72. World Language Assessment in Wisconsin (2010). www.ecb.org/worldlanguageassessment/index.htm (accessed 22/11/10).
73. Yin, M. (2010). Understanding classroom language assessment through teacher thinking research. Language Assessment Quarterly 7: 175-94.