Using systematic reviews and evidence-based software engineering with masters students

13th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, EASE 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Oates, Briony J ^a   Capper, Graham ^a  

^a TEESSIDE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Assessment; Evidence based software engineering; Feedback; Research methods; Systematic review; Teaching

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING RESEARCH; FEEDBACK; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; TEACHING;

ASSESSMENT; EVIDENCE BASED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; EVIDENCE BASED SOFTWARE ENGINEERINGS (EBSE); LITERATURE REVIEWS; QUANTITATIVE DATA; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TEACHING RESEARCHES;

STUDENTS;

EID: 85086058770     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.14236/ewic/ease2009.10     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Dybå, T., Kitchenham, B. A., & Jorgensen, M. (2005). Evidence-based software engineering for practitioners. IEEE Software, 22(1), 58-65.
2. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
3. HEFCE. (2008). National Student Survey. Retrieved 9 January 2009, from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/learning/nss/
4. Janzen, D. S., & Ryoo, J. (2008). Seeds of evidence: Integrating evidence-based software engineering. Proceedings of 21st Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, pp. 223-230.
5. Jørgensen, Dybå, T., & Kitchenham, B. A. (2005). Teaching evidence-based software engineering to university students. Proceedings of 11th IEEE International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS 2005) 19-22 Sept. 2005.
6. Kitchenham, B. A. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Technical report (No. TR/SE-0401ISSN:1353-7776): Keele University.
7. Kitchenham, B. A. (2007). Keynote: Current State of Evidence-Based Software Engineering. Proceedings of EASE 2007 (Empirical Assessment of Software Engineering), Keele.
8. Lunsford, R. (1997). When less is more: Principles for responding in the disciplines. In Elbow, M. S. P. (Ed.), Writing to Learn: Strategies for Assigning and Responding to Writing Across the Disciplines. Jossey-Bass,.San Francisco, CA:.
9. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2004). Rethinking formative assessment in HE: a theoretical model and seven principles of good feedback practice. In Juwah D. C., Macfarlane-Dick B., Matthew D., Nicol D. & Smith B. (Eds.), Enhancing Student Learning Through Effective Formative Feedback. The Higher Education Academy, York.
10. Oates, B. J. (2006). Researching Information Systems and Computing. Sage, London.
11. Petty, G. (2006). Evidence-Based Teaching: A Practical Approach. Nelson Thornes, Cheltenham, Glos. UK.
12. Rainer, A., Hall, T. & Baddoo, N. (2006), A preliminary empirical investigation of the use of evidence-based software engineering by under-graduate students, in ‘Proceedings of EASE 2006: Evaluation & Assessment in Software Engineering’, pp. 99–107.
13. Runeson, P., Andersson, C., Thelin, T., Andrews, A., & Berling, T. (2006). What do we know about defect detection methods? IEEE Software, 23(3), 82-90.
14. Torchiano, M., & Morisio, M. (2004). Overlooked aspects of COTS-based development. IEEE Software, 21(2), 88-90.
15. Kitchenham, B. (2004) ‘Procedures for performing systematic reviews’, Keele University, technical report, TR/SE-0401-ISSN:1353-7776. Also available at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/infsof (retrieved 2 Nov 2007).
16. Runeson, P. Andersson, C, Thelin, T. Andrews, A., Berling, T. (2006), ‘What do we know about defect detection methods?’, IEEE Software, 23(3) (May/June), pp 82-90.
17. Torchiano, M. & Morisio, M. (2004), ‘Overlooked aspects of COTS-based development’, IEEE Software, 21(2) (March/April), pp 88-93.