Contrastive rhetoric

Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 375-391

  Kaplan, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85084891024     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410612700-31     Document Type: Chapter

References (56)

1. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press.
3. Bernhardt, E. B., & Kamil, M. L. (1995). Interpreting relationships between L1 and L2 reading: Consolidating the linguistic threshold and the linguistic interdependence hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 15-34.
4. Berkenkotter, C, & Huckin, T. (1993). Rethinking genre for a sociocognitive perspective. Written Communication, 10(4), 475-509.
5. Berman, R. & Slobin, D. (Eds.). (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Bickner, R., & Peyasantiwong, P. (1988). Cultural variation in reflective writing. In A. Purves (Ed.), Writing across languages and cultures (pp. 160-174). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7. Bloom, A. (1981). The linguistic shaping of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1988). Politeness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Burrough-Boenisch, J. (2002). Culture and conventions: Writing and reading Dutch scientific English. Utrecht, The Netherlands: LOT.
10. Chomsky, N. (1981). Principles and parameters in syntactic theory. In N. Hornstein & D. Lightfoot (Eds.), Explanation in linguistics: The logical problem of language acquisition (pp. 32-75) London: Longman.
11. Clark, U. (2001). War words: Language, history and the disciplining of English. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
12. Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second language writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Connor, U., & Kaplan, R. B. (Eds.). (1986). Writing across languages: Analysis ofL2 text. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
14. Crismore, A., & Vande Kopple, W. (1988). Readers' learning from prose: The effects of hedges. Written Communication5,184-202.
15. Elman, J. L. (1993) Learning and development in neural networks: The importance of starting small. Cognition, 48,71-99.
16. Enkvist, N. E. (1997). Why we need contrastive rhetoric. Alternation, 4(1), 188-206.
17. Gass, S. (2002). An interactionist perspective on second language acquisition. In R. B. Kaplan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics. (pp. 170-181). New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 375-406.
19. Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. B. (1996). On the writing of science and the science of writing: Hedging in science text and elsewhere. In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (Eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 151-167). Berlin: de Gruyter.
20. Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Theory and practice of writing: An applied linguistic perspective. London: Longman.
21. Hinds, J. (1975). Korean discourse types. In H. Sohn (Ed.), Korean language (pp. 81-90). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
22. Hinds, J. (1976). Aspects of Japanese discourse structure. Tokoy: Kaitakusha.
23. Hinds, J. (1983). Contrastive rhetoric. Text 3(2), 183-195.
24. Hinds, J. (1984). Retention of information using a Japanese style of presentation. Studies in Language, 8(1), 45-69.
25. Hinds, J. (1987). Reader versus writer responsibility: A new typology. In U. Connor & R. B. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text (pp. 141-152). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
26. Janney, R., Arndt, H. (1993). Universality and relativity in cross-cultural politeness research: A historical perspective. Multilingual, 12,13-50.
27. Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in inter-cultural education. Language Learning, 16,1-20.
28. Kaplan, R. B. (1983). An introduction to the study of written text: The –discourse compact.— In R. B. Kaplan, A. d'Anglejan, J. R. Cowan, B. Kachru, & G. R. Tucker (Eds.), Annual review of applied linguistics (pp. 138-151). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
29. Kaplan, R. B. (1988). Contrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes toward a theory of contrastive rhetoric. In A. C. Purves (Ed.), Writing across languages and cultures: Issues in contrastive rhetoric. (pp. 275-304). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
30. Kaplan, R. B. (1991). Contrastive rhetoric. In W. Bright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of linguistics (Vol. 1-4; pp. 302-303). New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Kaplan, R. B. (2000). Contrastive rhetoric and discourse analysis: Who writes what to whom? When? In what circumstances? In S. Sarangi & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Discourse and social life, (pp. 82-101). London: Pearson Education.
32. Kaplan, R. B. (2003). Contrastive rhetoric. In W. Frawley (Ed.), Oxford, international encyclopedia of linguistics. (Vol. 4, pp. 236-239) (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Kellerman, E. (1995). Crosslinguistic influence: Transfer to nowhere. In W. Grabe, C. Ferguson, R. B. Kaplan, M. Swain, G. R. Tucker, & H. G. Widdowson (Eds.), Annual review of applied linguistics, 15: A broad survey of the entire field of applied linguistics (pp. 125-150). New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. Kintsch, W. (1994). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed.; pp. 951-995). Newark, NJ: International Reading Association.
35. Leki, I. (1991). Twenty-five years of contrastive rhetoric: Text analysis and writing pedagogies. TESOL Quarterly25, 123-144.
36. Li, X. (1996). –Good writing— in cross-cultural context. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
37. Mauranen, A. (1993). Cultural differences in academic rhetoric. Frankfurt am Main, Germany Lang.
38. Murray, D.E. (2001).Whose –standard—? What Ebonics debate tells us about language, power, and pedagogy. In J. E. Alatis & A.-H. Tan (Eds.), Language in our time: Bilingual education and official English, Ebonics and Standard English, immigration and the Unz initiative (pp. 281-291). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
39. Nawwab, I.I. (2002). Berlin to Makkah: Muhammad Asad's journey into Islam. Saudi Aramco World 53(1), 6-32.
40. Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2002). Identity and language learning. In R. B. Kaplan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics, (pp. 115-123). New York: Oxford University Press.
41. Odlin, T. (2002). Language transfer and cross-linguistic studies: Relativism, universalism and the native language. In R. B. Kaplan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 253-261). New York: Oxford University Press.
42. Ostler, S. (1987). English in parallels: A comparison of English and Arabic prose. In U. Connor & R. Kaplan, (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
43. Panetta, C. G. (Ed.). (2001). Contrastive rhetoric revisited and redefined. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
44. Poole, D. (2002). Discourse analysis and applied linguistics. In R. B. Kaplan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 73-84). New York: Oxford University Press.
45. Ramanathan, V., & Kaplan, R. B. (2000). Genres, authors, discourse communities: Theory and application for (L1 and) L2 writing instructors. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 171-191.
46. Red, D. L. (2001). Adults learning to read in a second script: What we've learned. In J. E. Alatis & A.-h. Tan (Eds.), Language in our time: Bilingual education and official English, Ebonics and Standard English, immigration and the Unz initiative (pp. 2-18). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
47. Sa'adeddin, M. A. (1989). Text development and Arabic-English negative interference. Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 36-51.
48. Schuchalter, J. (in press). Literature, representation, and the negotiation of cultural lacunae. In H. Schröder (Ed.), Lacunaology: Studies in intercultural communication.
49. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language fluency. Applied Linguistics. 11,129-156.
50. Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. In W. Grabe, C. Ferguson, R. B. Kaplan, G. R. Tucker, H. G. Widdowson, & J. Yalden (Eds.), Annual review of applied linguistics, 13: Issues in second language teaching and learning. (pp. 206-226). New York: Cambridge University Press.
51. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52. Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language and Society, 5,1-23.
53. Steiner, G. (1978). On difficulty. In On Difficulty and Other Essays (pp. 18-47). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
54. Van Dijk, T. A. (1983). Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 1-4). London: Academic Press.
55. Van Dijk, T A. (Ed.). (1997). Discourse in the language classroom studies: An interdisciplinary approach. (Vol. 1-2). London Sage.
56. Yoshikawa, M. (1978). Some Japanese and American cultural characteristics. In M. H. Prosser (Ed.), The cultural dialogue: An introduction to intercultural communication (pp. 220-230). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.