Contrastive rhetoric and discourse analysis: Who writes what to whom? When? In what circumstances?

Discourse and Social Life

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 82-101

  Kaplan, Robert B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85069284807     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (98)

1. Atkinson, D. (1999) Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675-1975. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
2. Baumgardner, R. (1987) Utilizing Pakistani newspaper English to teach grammar. World Englishes. 6, 241-252
3. Baumgardner, R. (1992) 'To Shariat or not to Shariat?' Bilingual functional shifts in Pakistani English. World Englishes. 1 1, 129-140
4. Berkenkotter, C. and T. Huckin (1993) Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective. Written Communication. 10(4), 475-509
5. Berman, R. and D. Slobin (eds) (1994) Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
6. Biber, D. (1988) Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
7. Biber, D. (1992) On the complexity of discourse complexity: A multidimensional analysis. Discourse Processes. 15, 1 33-163
8. Biber, D. (1995) Cross-linguistic Patterns of Register Variation: A Multi-dimensional Comparison of English, Tuvaluan, Korean, and Somali. Oxford: Oxford University Press
9. Bickner, R. and P. Peyasantiwong (1988) Cultural variation in reflective writing. In A. Purves (ed.) Writing across Languages and Cultures. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 160-174
10. Bloch, J. (1989) Toward a theory of contrastive rhetoric: The relationship between English and Chinese. Paper presented at the Pennsylvania State Conference on Rhetoric and Composition. July
11. Burrough-Boenisch, J. (1998) Righting English that's gone Dutch. Antwerp: Standaard Uitgeverij
12. Campbell, K. (1989) Structural patterns in Chinese and English persuasive discourse. Paper presented at the Pennsylvania State Conference on Rhetoric and Composition. July
13. Cantor, S. (1994) Writer involvement in abstract writing: An analysis of theme in English and Chinese abstracts. Los Angeles: Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California. M.A. Screening paper
14. Chang, S.-J. (1983) English and Korean. In R.B. Kaplan et al. (eds) Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 3. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 85-98
15. Cheng, P. (1985) An analysis of contrastive rhetoric: English and Chinese expository prose, pedagogical implications, and strategies for the ESL teacher in a ninth grade curriculum. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University. Ph.D. Diss
16. Chimombo, M. (1988) Readability of subject texts: Implications for ESL teaching in Africa. Paper presented at the Annual TESOL Conference, Chicago. March
17. Chomsky, N. (1981) Principles and parameters in syntactic theory. In N. Hornstein and D. Lightfoot (eds) Explanation in Linguistics: The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition. London: Longman
18. Clyne, M.G. (1987) Cultural differences in the organization of academic texts: English and German. Journal of Pragmatics. 1 1 (2), 211-247
19. Connor, U. (1989) A contrastive study of persuasive business correspondence: American and Japanese. In S.J. Bruno (ed.) Global Implications for Business Communications; Theory, Technology, and Practice. Houston, TX: School of Business and Public Administration, University of Houston-Clear Lake. [Proceedings of the 53rd National and 1 5th International Convention of Associations of Business Communication.]
20. Connor, U. (1996) Contrastive Rhetoric: Cross-cultural Aspects of Second-language Writing. New York: Cambridge University Press
21. Cook, V. (1988) Chomsky's Universal Grammar: An Introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
22. Dantas-Whitney, M. and W. Grabe (1992) A comparison of Portuguese and English newspaper editorials. Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University
23. Daoud, M. (1991) The process of EST discourse: Arabic and French native speakers' recognition of rhetorical relationships in engineering texts. Los Angeles: University of California. Ph.D. Diss
24. Deacon, T.W. (1997) The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Brain. New York: Norton
25. Donald, M. (1991) Origins of the Modern Mind: Three Stages in the Evolution of Culture and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
26. Dunkleblau, H.S. (1990) A contrastive study of the organizational structure and stylistic elements of Chinese and English expository texts by Chinese high school students. (Unpublished paper.)
27. Edelman, G. (1992) Bright Air, Brilliant Fire. New York: Basic Books
28. Eggington, W.G. (1990) Contrastive analysis of Aboriginal English prose. In W. Walton and W. Eggington (eds) Language: Maintenance, Power and Education in Australian Aboriginal Contexts. Darwin: Northern Territory University Press: 151-159
29. Elman, J.L., E. Bates, M. Johnson, A. Karmiloff-Smith, D. Parisi, and K. Plenkett (1996) Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book
30. Enginarlar, H. (1990) A contrastive analysis of writing in Turkish and English of Turkish high school students. Turkey: Hacettepe University. Ph.D. Diss
31. Enkvist, N.E. (1997) Why we need contrastive rhetoric. Alternation. 4(1): 1 88-206
32. Ertelt-Vieth, A. (1990) Kulturvergleichende Analyse von Verhalten, Sprache und Bedeutungen im Moskauer Alltag. Beitrag zu einer empirisch, kontrastiv und semiotisch ausgerichteten Landeswissenschaft. [Beitriige zur Slavistik, Vol. 1 1.] Frankfurt am Main
33. Ferris, D. (1991) Syntactic and lexical characteristics of ESL student writing: A multidimensional study. Los Angeles: University of Southern California. Ph.D. Diss
34. Ferris, D. (1992) Cross-cultural variation in ESL students' responses to an essay prompt. Sacramento, CA: California State University
35. Ferris, D. (1993) The design of an automatic analysis program for L2 text research: Necessity and feasibility. Journal of Second Language Writing. 2(2): 119-129
36. Ferris, D. (1994a) Lexical and syntactic features of ESL writing by students at different levels of proficiency. TESOL Quarterly. 28(2): 414-420
37. Ferris, D. (1994b) Rhetorical strategies in student persuasive writing: Differences between native and non-native English speakers. Research in the Teaching of English. 28(1): 45-65
38. Ferris, D. and J.S. Hedgcock (1998) Teaching ESL Composition: Purpose, Process, and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
39. Folman, S. and U. Connor (1992) Intercultural rhetorical differences in composing a research paper. Paper presented at the International Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages Conference, Vancouver, BC. March
40. Folman, S. and G. Sarig (1990) Intercultural rhetorical differences in meaning construction. Communication and Cognition. 23(1): 45-92
41. Grabe, W. and R.B. Kaplan (1996) Theory and Practice of Writing: An Applied Linguistic Perspective. London: Longman
42. Grabe, W. et al. (eds) (1999) Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19. New York: Cambridge University Press
43. Halliday, M.A.K. (1993) Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education. 5: 93-116
44. Halliday, M.A.K. and R. Hasan (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman
45. Hatim, B. (1991) The pragmatics of argumentation in Arabic: The rise and fall of a text type. TEXT. 1 1: 189-199
46. Hinds, J. (1987) Reader versus writer responsibility. In U. Connor and R.B. Kaplan (eds) Writing across Languages: Analysis of L2 text. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley: 1 41-152
47. Hinds, J. (1990) Inductive, deductive, quasi-inductive: Expository writing in Japanese, Korean, Chinese and Thai. In Connor, U. and A. Johns (eds) Coherence in Writing: Research and Pedagogical Perspectives. Alexandria, VA: TESOL
48. Hoey, M. (1991) Patterns of Lexis in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press
49. lndrasutra, C. (1988) Narrative styles in the writing of Thai and American students. In A. Purves (ed.) Writing across Languages and Cultures. Newbury Park, CA: Sage: 206-226
50. Kachru, B.B. (ed.) (1992) The Other Tongue: English across Cultures. 2nd edn. Urban, IL: University of Illinois Press
51. Kachru, Y. (1983) English and Hindi. In R.B. Kaplan et al. (eds) Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, vol. 3. Rowley, MA: Newbury House: 78-84
52. Kamberelis, G. (1995) Genre as institutionally informed social practice. Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues. 6: 1 15-170
53. Kamhi-Stein, L. (1995) The effect of strategy instruction on the summarization strategies of native speakers of Spanish in university-level general education courses. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California. Ph.D. Diss
54. Kaplan, R.B. (1966) Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning. 16: 1-20
55. Kaplan, R.B. (1972) The Anatomy of Rhetoric: Prolegomena to a Functional Theory of Rhetoric. Philadelphia: The Center for Curriculum Development
56. Kaplan, R.B. (1988) Process vs. product: Problem or strawman? Lenguas Modernas. 15: 35-44
57. Kaplan, R.B. (1991) On applied linguistics and discourse analysis. In W. Grabe et al. (eds) Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, IL New York: Cambridge University Press, 199-204
58. Kaplan, R.B. (in preparation). English-the Accidental Language of Science? In U. Ammon (ed.) Effects of the Dominance of English as a Language of Science on the non-English Language Communities. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
59. Kaplan, R.B. et al. (eds) (1983) Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 3. Rowley, MA: Newbury House
60. Kasper, G. (ed.) (1996) The Development of Pragmatic Competence. [Special issue of Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 1 8(2).]
61. Kellerman, E. (1995) Crosslinguistic influence: Transfer to nowhere. In W. Grabe et al. (eds) Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, vol. 15. New York: Cambridge University Press: 1 25-150
62. Kowal, K. (1994) Contrastive rhetoric and rhetorical theory: Some prolegomena to an eclectic philosophy of language. Paper presented at the CCCC Conference. Chicago. March
63. Leap, W.L. (1983) English and Native American languages. In R.B. Kaplan et al. (eds) Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 3. Rowley, MA: Newbury House: 24-37
64. Leki, I. (1991) Twenty-five years of contrastive rhetoric: The state of the Art. TESOL Quarterly. 25(1): 1 23-143
65. Li Xiao-ming (1996) 'Good Writing' in Cross-cultural Context. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press
66. Lux, P. (1991) Discourse styles of Anglo and Latin American college student writers. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University. Ph.D. Diss
67. Lux, P. and W. Grabe (1991) Multivariate approaches to contrastive rhetoric. Lenguas Modernas. 18: 1 33-1 60
68. Manoliu-Manea, M. (1995) Discourse and Pragmatic Constraints on Grammatical Choices: A Grammar of Surprises. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science
69. Mauranen, A. (1993) Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. [Scandinavian University Studies in the Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol. 4.)
70. Montano-Harmon, M. (1988) Discourse features in the compositions of Mexican, English as a second language, Mexican-American/Chicano and Anglo high school students: Considerations for the formulation of educational policies. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California. Ph.D. Diss
71. Montano-Harmon, M. (1991) Discourse features of written Mexican Spanish: Current research in contrastive rhetoric and its implications. Hispania. 74: 417-425
72. Neustupny, J.V. (1997) Teaching communication or teaching interaction? Chiba University Journal. November 1997: 1-13
73. Oi, K. and T. Sato (1990) Cross-cultural rhetorical differences in letter writing: Refusal letter and application letter. Daigaku eigo kyoiku gakukai: 1 1 7-136
74. Oktar, L. (1991) A contrastive analysis of specific rhetorical relations in English and Turkish expository paragraph writing. Turkey: Ege University. Ph.D. Diss
75. Ostler, S.E. (1987) English in parallels: A comparison of English and Arabic prose. In U. Connor and R.B. Kaplan (eds) Writing across Languages: Analysis of L2 text. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley: 169-185
76. Ostler, S.E. (1992) Cultural Sensitivities: Teaching Spanish Speakers to Write in English. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green University
77. Pandharipanda, R. (1983) English and Marathi. In R.B. Kaplan et al. (eds) Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 3. Rowley, MA: Newbury House: 1 18-136
78. Penn, J.M. (1972) Linguistic Relativity versus Innate Ideas: The origin of the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis in German Thought. The Hague: Mouton. Uanua Linguarum, Series minor, 120.)
79. Ramanathan, V. and R.B. Kaplan (in preparation). Genres, authors, discourse communities: Theory and application for L2 teacher-training. [A version of this paper was presented at the TESOL Conference, Seattle, 1998.)
80. Reid, J. (1988) Quantitative differences in English prose written by Arabic, Chinese, Spanish, and English students. Ft. Collins, CO: Colorado State University. Ph.D. Diss
81. Reppen, R. and W. Grabe (1993) Spanish transfer effects in the English writing of elementary school students. Lenguas Modernas. 20: 1 13-128
82. Sa'Adeddin, M.A. (1987) Target world experiential matching: The Arabic-English translating case. Quinquireme. 10(2): 1 37-164. [University of Bath.)
83. Sa'Adeddin, M.A. (1989) Text development and Arabic-English negative interference. Applied Linguistics. 10: 36-51
84. Schmidt, R. (1990) The role of consciousness in second language fluency. Applied Linguistics. 11: 1 29-156
85. Schmidt, R. (1993) Awareness and second language acquisition. In W. Grabe et al. (eds) Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13. New York: Cambridge University Press: 206-226
86. Scollon, R. (1991) Eight legs and one elbow: Stance and structure in Chinese English compositions. Paper presented at the International Reading Association Second North American Conference on Adult and Adolescent Literacy. Banff. March
87. Scollon, R. (1997) Contrastive rhetoric, contrastive poetics, or perhaps something else? TESOL Quarterly. 31 (2): 352-358
88. Skyum-ielsen, P. and H. Schroder (eds) (1994) Rhetoric and Stylistics Today. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang
89. Soter, A. (1988) The second language learner and cultural transfer in narration. In A. Purves (ed.) Writing across Languages and Cultures. Newbury Park, CA: Sage: 378-388
90. Steiner, G. (1978) On difficulty. On Difficulty and other Essays. New York: Oxford University Press: 18-47
91. Strother, J.B. and J.M. Ulijn (1991) The ties that bind readability to writing research: Who writes the most texts? In C. Harrison and E. Ashworth (eds) Celebrating Literacy: Defending Literacy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
92. Swales, J. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
93. Tsao, F.-F. (1983) Linguistics and writing in particular languages: English and Chinese. In R.B. Kaplan et al. (eds) Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 3. Rowley, MA: Newbury House: 99-117
94. Ulijn, J.M. and J.B. Strother (1995) Communicating in Business and Technology: From Psycholinguistic Theory to International Practice. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang
95. Weasenforth, D. (1995) Rhetorical abstraction as a facet of expected response: A structural equation modeling analysis. Los Angeles: University of Southern California. Ph.D. Diss
96. Wijst, van der, P. and J.M. Ulijn (1995) Politeness in French/Dutch negotiations: The linguistic realization of politeness strategies. In K. Ehlich and J. Wagner (eds) The Discourse of Business Negotiations. Berlin: Monton de Gruyter: 313-348
97. Yoshikawa, M. (1978) Some Japanese and American cultural characteristics. In M.H. Prosser (ed.) The Cultural Dialogue: An Introduction to Intercultural Communication. Boston: Houghton Mifflin: 220-230
98. Youmans, M. (1995) Communicative rights and responsibilities in an east Los Angeles barrio: An analysis of epistemic modal use. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California. Ph.D. Diss