Using mixed methods in research related to work and family

The Work and Family Handbook: Multi-Disciplinary Perspectives and Approaches

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 587-606

  Neal, Margaret B ^a   Hammer, Leslie B ^a   Morgan, David L ^a  

^a PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85084596826     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203885383-38     Document Type: Chapter

References (72)

1. Agazio, J. G., Ephraim, P. M., Flaherty, N. B., & Gurney, C. A. (2002). Health promotion in active-duty military women with children. Women & Health, 35(I), 65-82.
2. Branncn, J. (1992). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Anoverview. In J.Brannen(Ed.), Qualitative and quantitative research (pp. 3-38). Brookfield, VT: Avebury.
3. Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. (1989). Multimethod research: A synthesis of styles. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4. Bridges: Mixed Methods Network for Behavioral, Social and Health Sciences, http://www.fiu.edu/~bridges/.
5. Brink, B., & de la Rey, C. (2001). Work-family interaction strain: Coping strategies used by successful women in the public, corporate and self-employed sectors of the economy. South A frican Journal of Psychology, 31, 55-61.
6. Bryman, A. (1984). The debate about quantitative and qualitative methods: A question of method or epistemology. British Journal of Sociology, 35, 75-92.
7. Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and quality in social research. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
8. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validity in the multitrait-multimcthod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
9. Caracelli, V. J., & Greene, J. C. (1997). Crafting mixed-method evaluation designs. In J. C. Greene & V. J. Caraeelli (Eds.), Advances in mixed methods evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms (pp. 19-32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Chusid, H., & Cochran, L. (1989). Meaning of career change from the perspective of family roles and dramas. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36(1), 34-41.
11. Cook, T. D., & Reichardt, C. S. (1979). Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12. Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Creswell, J. W., Piano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L. & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Curbow, B., McDonnell, K., Spratt, K., Griffin, J., & Agnew, J. (2003). Development of the work-family interface scale. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 18, 310-330.
15. Currall, S. C, & Towler, A. J. (2003). Research methods in management and organizational research: Toward integration of qualitative and quantitative techniques. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 513-526). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. London: Routledge.
17. Dorfman, L. T. (2002). Stayers and leavers: Professors in an era of no mandatory retirement. Educational Gerontology, 28, 15-133.
18. Eby, L. T, Casper, W. J., Lockwood, A., Bordeaux, C. & Brinley, A. (2005). Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1980-2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 124-197.
19. Erzberger, C, & Kelle, U. (2003). Making inferences in mixed methods: The rules of integration. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 457-490). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Erzberger, C, & Prein, G. (1997). Triangulation: Validity and empirically based hypothesis construction. Quality & Quantity, 2, 141-154.
21. Franklin, C. (1996). Learning to teach qualitative research: Reflections of a quantitative researcher. In M. B. Sussman & J. F. Gilgun (Eds.), The methods and methodologies of qualitative family research (pp. 241-274). New York: Haworth.
22. Gage, N. (1989). The paradigm wars and their aftermath: A “historical’' sketch of research and teaching since 1989. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 4-10.
23. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: DeGruyter.
24. Greene, J. C & Caracelli, V. J. (1997). Defining and describing the paradigm issue in mixed method evaluation. In J. C. Greene & V. J. Caracelli (Eds.), Advances in mixed methods evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms (pp. 5-18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25. Greene, J. C, & Caracelli, V. J. (2003). Making paradigmatic sense of mixed methods practice. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 91-110). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Greene, J. C, Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255-274.
27. Grzywacz, J. G., Almeida, D. M., & McDonald, D. A. (2002). Work-family spillover and daily reports of work and family stress in the adult labor force. Family Relations, 51, 28-36.
28. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. W. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative methods. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Hawkins, A. J., Roberts, T., Christiansen, S. L., & Marshall, C. M. (1994). An evaluation of a program to help dual-earner couples share the second shift. Family Relations, 43, 213-220.
30. Heymann, J. (2000). The widening gap: Why America’s working families are in jeopardy-and what can be done about it. New York: Basic Books.
31. Hunter, A., & Brewer, J. (2003). Multimethod research in sociology. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 577-594). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Ingersoll-Dayton, B., Neal, M., & Hammer, L. (2001). Aging parents helping adult children: The experience of the sandwiched generation. Family Relations, 50, 262-271.
33. Ingersoll-Dayton, B., Neal, MB., Ha, J., & Hammer, L. B. (2003a). Redressing inequity in parent care among siblings. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 201-212.
34. Ingersoll-Dayton, B., Neal, M. B., Ha, J., & Hammer, L. B. (2003b). Collaboration among siblings providing care for older parents. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 40(3), 51-66.
35. Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602-611.
36. Johnson, B., & Turner, L. A. (2003). Data collection strategies in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 297-320). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Krüger, H., & Baldus, B. (1999). Work, gender and the life course: Social construction and individual experience. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 24, 355-379.
38. Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1944). The controversy over detailed interviews: An offer for negotiation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 8, 38-60.
39. Maxcy, S. J. (2003). Pragmatic threads in mixed methods research in the social sciences: The search for multiple modes of inquiry and the end of the philosophy of formalism. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 51-90). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Maxwell, J. A., & Loomis, D. M. (2003). Mixed methods design: An alternative approach. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 241-272). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. McKeown, B., & Thomas, D. (1988). Q methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42. Mertens, D. (2003). Mixed methods and the politics of human research: The transformative-emancipatory perspective. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 135-166). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.
44. Moen, P. (Ed.). (2003). It’s about time: Couples and careers. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
45. Moghaddam, F. M., Walker, B. R., & Harré, R. (2003). Cultural distance, levels of abstraction, and the advantages of mixed methods. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 111-134). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Qualitative research methods series 16. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47. Morgan, D. L. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research. Qualitative Health Research, 8, 362-376.
48. Morgan, D. L. (forthcoming). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49. Morse, J. M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative triangulation. Nursing Research, 40, 120-123.
50. Morse, J. M. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 189-208). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51. Neal, M. B., & Hammer, L. B. (in press). Working couples caring for children and aging parents: Effects on work and well-being. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52. Newman, I., Ridenour, C. S., Newman, C, & Demarco, G. M. P., Jr. (2003). A typology of research purposes and its relationship to mixed methods. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 167-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Teddlie, C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 351-384). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54. Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2, 1-28.
55. Petter, S. C, & Gallivan, M. J. (2004). Toward a framework for classifying and guiding mixed method research in information systems. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Available at: http://csdl.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2004/2056/08/205680257a.pdf.
56. Rallis, S. F., & Rossman, G. B. (2003). Mixed methods in evaluation contexts: A pragmatic framework. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 491-512). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57. Rocco, T. S., Bliss, L. A., Gallagher, S., & Pérez-Prado, A. (2003a). Taking the next step: Mixed methods research in organizational systems. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 21, 19-29.
58. Rocco, T. S., Bliss, L. A., Gallagher, S. Pérez-Prado, A., Alacaci. C, Dwyer, E. S., Fine, J. C, & Pappamihiel, N. E. (2003b). The pragmatic and dialectical lenses: Two views of mixed methods use in education. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 595-615). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
59. Rossman, G. B., & Wilson, B. L. (1985). Numbers and words: Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a single large scale evaluation. Evaluation Review, 9, 627-643.
60. Ruderman, M. N., Ohlott, P. J., Panser, K., & King, S. N. (2002). Benefits of multiple roles for managerial women. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 369-386.
61. Sandclowski, M. (2003). Tables or tableaux? The challenges of writing and reading mixed methods studies. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 321-350). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62. Shaffer, M. A., & Harrison, D. A. (2001). Forgotten partners of international assignments: Development and test of a model of spouse adjustment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 238-254.
63. Shulha, L. M., & Wilson, R. J. (2003). Collaborative mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 639-670). Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.
64. Sieber, S. D. (1973). The integration of fieldwork and survey methods. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1335-1359.
65. Smith, J. K.,. & Heshusius, L. (1986). Closing down the conversation: The end of the qualitative-quantitative debate among educational inquirers. Educational Researcher, 154-12.
66. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
67. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
68. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003a). Preface. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. ix-xv). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
69. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003b). The past and future of mixed methods research: From data triangulation to mixed model designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 671-701). Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.
70. Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., & Sechrest, L. (1966). Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally.
71. Winston, P., Angel, R., Burton, L., Cherlin, A., Moffitt, R. & Wilson, W. J. (1999). Welfare, children, and families: A three city study; overview and design report. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Available at www.jhu.edu/~welfare/welfare_publication.html.
72. Zimmerman, T. S., Haddock, S. A., Current, L. R., & Ziemba, S. (2003). Intimate partnership: Foundation to the successful balance of family and work. American Journal of Family Therapy, 31, 107-124.