Qualitative story completion: A method with exciting promise

Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2019, Pages 1479-1496

  Braun, Virginia ^a   Clarke, Victoria ^b   Hayfield, Nikki ^b   Moller, Naomi ^c   Tischner, Irmgard ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^c OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Data collection; Innovative; Qualitative methods; Story completion

Indexed keywords

EID: 85082164507     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_14     Document Type: Chapter

References (60)

1. Bazeley P. The evolution of a project involving an integrated analysis of structured qualitative and quantitative data: from N3 to NVivo. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2002;5(3):229-43.
2. Bazeley P. The contribution of computer software to integrating qualitative and quantitative data and analyses. Res Sch. 2006;13(1):64-74. Mid-South Educational Research Association. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Pat_Bazeley/publication/253326153_The_ Contribution_of_Computer_Software_to_Integrating_Qualitative_and_Quantitative_Data_ and_Analyses/links/548233cd0cf2f5dd63a89882/The-Contribution-of-Computer-Software-to-Integrating-Qualitative-and-Quantitative-Data-and-Analyses.pdf. 6 Dec 2017
3. Bazeley P. Analysing mixed methods data. In: Andrew S, Halcomb EJ, editors. Mixed methods research for nursing and the health sciences. Oxford: Blackwell; 2009. p. 84-118.
4. Bazeley P, Kemp L. Mosaics, triangles, and DNA: metaphors for integrated analysis in mixed methods research. J Mixed Methods Res. 2012;6(1):55-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811419514.etrieved from http://jmmr.sagepub.com. 5 Dec 2017
5. Benner P. From novice to expert. Manlo Park: Addison-Wesley; 1984.
6. Bergman M. The straw men of the qualitative-quantitative divide and their influence on mixed method research. In: Bergman M, editor. Advances in mixed method research. London: Sage; 2008. p. 11-21.
7. Brannen J. Research note. The study of sensitive topics. Sociol Rev. 1988;36:552-63.
8. Bryman A. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qual Res. 2006;6(1):97-113. London: Sage
9. Bryman A. Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. J Mixed Methods Res. 2007;1(1):8-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906290531. Sage Publications. Retrieved from http://jmmr.sagepub.com. 5 Dec 2017
10. Bryman A. Social research methods. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
11. Campbell DT, Fiske DW. Convergent and discriminate validation by multitrait multidimensional matrix. Psychol Bull. 1956;56:81-105.
12. Cipriani R. Sociologia cualitativa. Las historias de vida como metodología científica. Buenos Aires: Editorial Biblos; 2013.
13. Cohen Orantes I. El concepto de integración, Revista de la CEPAL n° 15. Chile: ONU-Santiago; 1981. p. 149-59. Retrieved from http://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/10232/015149159_es.pdf?sequence=1. 7 Nov 2017
14. Comisión Europea. Libro Verde de la Innovación. Luxembourg; 1995. Retrieved from http://sid.sal.es/idocs/F8/FDO11925/libroverde.pdf. 24 Nov 2017.
15. Creswell J. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approach. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2018.
16. Creswell J, Felters M, Ivankova N. Designing a mix-methods study in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(1):7-12.
17. Denzin N. The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: Praeger; 1978.
18. Denzin N, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage; 2005.
19. Dogan M, Pahre R. Las nuevas ciencias sociales. La imaginación creadora. México: Grijalbo; 1993.
20. Fetters M, Curry L, Creswell JW. Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health ServRes. 2013;48(6 Pt2):2134-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117.
21. Fielding N. Triangulation and mixed methods designs: data integration with new research technologies. J Mixed Methods Res. 2012;6:124-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437101.ublished online 30 Mar 2012. Retrieved from http://mmr.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/03/28/1558689812437101. 5 Nov 2017
22. Fielding N, Fielding JL. Linking data: the articulation of qualitative and quantitative methods in social research. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1986.
23. Fielding J, Fielding N. Synergy and synthesis: integrating qualitative and quantitative data. In: Alasuutari P, Bickma L, Brannen J, editors. The sage handbook of social research methods. London: Sage; 2008. p. 1-30. Retrieved from http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/231711/3/Brannen% 20handbook%20chapter%2033%20for%20OA%20.pdf. 6 Dec 2017.
24. Fielding N, Schreier M. On the compatibility between qualitative and quantitative research methods. Forum Qual Soc Res. 2001;2(1):1-13. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.hp/fqs/article/%20view/965/2106, Retrieved 5 Feb 2018.
25. Giorgi A. Psychology as a human science. New York: Harper & Row; 1970.
26. Glaser BG. Theoretical sensitivity. Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley: Sociology Press; 1978.
27. Grbich C. Integrated methods in health research. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Research methods in health: foundations for evidence-based practices. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 361-74.
28. Green S. What do you mean "What's wrong with her?": stigma and the lives of families of children with disabilities. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(8):1361-74.
29. Greene J. Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2007.
30. Guba EG. The alternative paradigm dialog. In: Guba EG, editor. The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park: Sage; 1990. p. 17-30. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.ar/books?hl=es&lr=&id=1ypH-OeV94C&oi=fnd&pg=PA9&dq=Guba+EG.+The+alternative+paradigm+dialog.+In:+Guba+EG,+editor.+The+Paradigm+Dialog.+Newbury+Park,+CA:+Sage%3B+1990. +pp.+17%E2%80%9330.&ots=ISo03viJUE&sig=36uGVUTI8g-iZqN873zWSj6jgF0#v= onepage&q&f= false. 5 Nov 2017.
31. Hubbard G, Backett-Milburn K, Kemmer D. Working with emotion: issues for the researcher in fieldwork and teamwork. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2001;4(2):119-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/136455701750158886.etrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gill_Hubbard/pubication/248988604_Working_with_emotion_Issues_for_the_researcher_in_fieldwork_and_teamwork/links/53ce90b80cf24377a65dcd94.pdf. 6 Dec 2017
32. Husserl E. Idéia de fenomenologia. Lisboa: Edições; 2001, p. 70.
33. Huston AC. Mixed methods in studies of social experiments for parents in poverty. In: Weisner TS, editor. Discovering successful pathways in children's development: mixed methods in the study of childhood and family life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2005. p. 305-15.
34. Ivankova N, Kawamura Y. Emerging trends in the utilization of integration designs in the social, behavioral and health sciences. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, editors. The sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2010. p. 581-611.
35. Jick TD. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action. Adm Sci Q. 1979; 24:602-11.
36. Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie A. Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res. 2004;33(7):14-26. Published by: American Educational Research Association. Retrieved from http://mintlinz.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/83256376/Johnson%20Mixed% 20methods%202004.pdf. 6 Nov 2017
37. Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie A, Turner L. Toward a definition of mixed methods research. J Mixed Methods Res. 2007;1(2):112-33. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/R_Johnson3/publication/235413072_Toward_a_Definition_of_Mixed_Methods_Research_Journal_of_Mixed_ethods_Research_1_112-133/links/55d0cd5308ae6a881385e669.pdf. 6 Nov 2017
38. Jones N, Summer A. Does mixed methods research matter to understanding childhood well-being?. WeD Working Paper 40. ESRC. Research Group on Wellbeing in Developing Countries. December. Bath: University of Bath-UK; 2007. p. 1-36. Retrieved from http://www.bath.ac.k/soc-pol/welldev/research/workingpaperpdf/wed40.pdf. 12 Oct 2017.
39. Kelle U. Sociological explanations between micro and macro and the integration of qualitative and quantitative methods. Forum Qual Soc Res. 2001;2:1-22. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/966/2109, etrieved 5 Feb 2018.
40. Kwan M-P. Is GIS for women? Reflections on the critical discourse in the 1990s. Gend Place Cult. 2002;9:271-9.
41. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1985.
42. Maxwell J. Using numbers in qualitative research. Qual Inq. 2010;16:475-82. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1077800410364740. 5 Nov 2017
43. May K. Conocimiento abstracto: un caso a favor de la magia en el método. In: En Morse J, editor. Asuntos críticos en los métodos de investigación cualitativa. Medellín: Editorial Universidad de Antioquia; 2006. p. 14-27.
44. Moran-Ellis J, Alexander VD, Cronin A, Dickinson M, Fielding J, Sleney J, Thomas H. Following a thread-an approach to integrating multi-method data sets, paper given at ESRC Research Methods Program, Methods Festival Conference, Oxford. 2004 July.
45. Moran-Ellis J, Alexander VD, Cronin A, Dickinson M, Fielding J, Sleney J, Thomas H. Triangulation and integration: processes, claims and implications. Qual Res. 2006;6(1):45-59.
46. Morse J, editor. Asuntos críticos en los métodos de investigación cualitativa. Colombia: Editorial Universidad de Antioquia; 2003.
47. Morse J, Field P. Qualitative research methods health professionals 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks/ London/New Delhi: Sage; 1995.
48. Pawson R. Quality and quantity, agency and structure, mechanism and context, dons and cons. BMS Bull Methodologie Sociol. 1995;47:5-48.
49. Punch K. Introduction to social research quantitative and qualitative approaches. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2005.
50. Ray M. La riqueza de la fenomenología: preocupaciones filosóficas, teóricas y metodológicas. In: En Morse J, editor. Asuntos críticos en los métodos de investigación cualitativa. Colombia: Editorial Universidad de Antioquia; 2003. p. 140-57.
51. Rodríguez Herrera A, Alvarado Uriarte H. Claves de la innovación social en América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL; 2008. Retrieved from http://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/2536/S0800540.pdf?sequence=1. 24 Nov 2017
52. Sandelowski M, Voils CI, Knafl G. On quantitizing. J Mixed Method Res. 2009;3:208-22.
53. Shih F. Triangulation in nursing research. J Adv Nurs. 1998;28:631-41. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00716.x/full. 5 Nov 2017
54. Smith J, Hershusius L. Closing down the conversation: the end of the quantitative-qualitative debate among educational enquirers. Educ Res. 1986;15:4-12.
55. Sotolongo Codina P, Delgado Díaz C. La revolución contemporánea del saber y a complejidad social. Buenos Aires: CLACSO; 2006.
56. de Souza Minayo MC. Los conceptos estructurantes de la investigación cualitativa. Salud colectiva. 2010;6 (3, sep./dic.):251-261. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.ar/pdf/sc/v6n3/v6n3a02.df. 7 Dec 2017.
57. Tonon G. Qualitative studies in quality of life methodology and practice. Social Indicators Research Series, vol. 55. Dordretch; 2015.
58. Webb EJ, Campbell DT, Schwartz RD, Secherst L. Unobtrusive measures: non-reactive research in the social sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally; 1966.
59. Wolcott HF. Transforming qualitative data: description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994.
60. Wright Mills C. La imaginación Sociológica. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica; 1961.