On quantitizing

Journal of Mixed Methods Research

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 208-222

  Sandelowski, Margarete ^a   Voils, Corrine I ^b   Knafl, George ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Mixed methods research; Qualitative data; Quantitizing

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650562272     PISSN: 15586898     EISSN: 15586901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1558689809334210     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Berg, B.L. (1989). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
2. Boyatzis, R.E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Campbell, D.T. (1978). Qualitative knowing in action research. In E. S. Overman (Ed.), Methodology and epistemology for social science: Selected papers (pp. 360-376). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
5. Clayton, D.K., Rogers, S., & Stuifbergen, A. (1999). Answers to unasked questions: Writing in the margins. Research in Nursing & Health, 22, 512-522.
6. Cohen, J. (1983). The cost of dichotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 249-253.
7. Collins, C.C., & Dressler, W.W. (2008). Cultural consensus and cultural diversity: A mixed methods investigation of human service providers' models of domestic violence. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(4), 362-387.
8. Driscoll, D.L., Appiah-Yeboah, A., Salib, P., & Rupert, D.J. (2007). Merging qualitative and quantitative data in mixed methods research: How to and why not. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology, 3, 19-28.
9. Edwards, D.J., Dattilio, F.M., & Bromley, D.B. (2004). Developing evidence-based practice: The role of case-based research. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 589-597.
10. Emerson, R.M., Fretz, R.I., & Shaw, L.L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Evans, J., Lambert, T.W., & Goldacre, M.J. (2005). Postal surveys of doctors' careers: Who writes comments and what do they write about? Quality & Quantity, 39, 217-239.
12. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13. Greene, J. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Gubrium, J.F., & Holstein, J.A. (1997). The new language of qualitative method. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Hammersley, M. (2008). Questioning qualitative inquiry: Critical essays. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Hanson, B. (2008). Wither qualitative/quantitative? Grounds for methodological convergence. Quality & Quantity, 42, 97-111.
17. Holliday, A. (2002). Doing and writing qualitative research. London: Sage.
18. Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S.E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277-1288.
19. Lanigan, R.L. (1994). Capta versus data: Method and evidence in communicology. Human Studies, 17, 109-130.
20. Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.
21. LeCompte, M.D., & Schensul, J.J. (1999). Analyzing & interpreting ethnographic data. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
22. Love, K., Pritchard, C., Maguire, K., McCarthy, A., & Paddock, P. (2005). Qualitative and quantitative approaches to health impact assessment: An analysis of the political and philosophical milieu of the multi-method approach. Critical Public Health, 15, 275-289.
23. Martin, A. (2004). Can't any body count? Counting as an epistemic theme in the history of human chromosomes. Social Studies of Science, 34, 923-948.
24. Maxwell, J.A. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 279-300.
25. Maynard, D.W., & Schaeffer, N.C. (2000). Toward a sociology of social scientific knowledge: Survey research and ethnomethodology's asymmetric alternates. Social Studies of Science, 30, 323-370.
26. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Miller, S. (2003). Impact of mixed methods and design on inference quality. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 423-455). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Miller, S.I., & Gatta, J.L. (2006). The use of mixed methods models and designs in the human sciences: Problems and prospects. Quality & Quantity, 40, 595-610.
29. Mol, A. (2002). Cutting surgeons, walking patients: Some complexities involved in comparing. In J. Law & A. Mol (Eds.), Complexities: Social studies of knowledge practices (pp. 218-257). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
30. Mol, A., & Law, J. (2002). Complexities: An introduction. In J. Law & A. Mol (Eds.), Complexities: Social studies of knowledge practices (pp. 1-22). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
31. Moran-Ellis, J., Alexander, V.D., Cronin, A., Dickinson, M., Fielding, J., Sleney, J., et al. (2006). Triangulation and integration: Processes, claims and implications. Qualitative Research, 6, 45-59.
32. Onwuegbuzie, A.J., & Teddlie, C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 351-383). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Plano Clark, V.L., & Creswell, J.W. (2008). The mixed methods reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Poirier, S., & Ayres, L. (1997). Endings, secrets, and silences: Overreading in narrative inquiry. Research in Nursing & Health, 20, 551-557.
35. Poland, B.D. (2002). Transcription quality. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context & method (pp. 629-649). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Quine, W.V. (1969). Ontological relativity and other essays. New York: Columbia University Press.
37. Ryan, G.W., & Bernard, H.R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 769-802). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Sandelowski, M. (2001). Real qualitative researchers do not count: The use of numbers in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 24, 230-240.
39. Sandelowski, M. (2003). Tables or tableaux? Writing and reading mixed methods studies. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 321-350). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Sandelowski, M., & Bustamante, R. (1986). Cesarean birth outside the natural childbirth culture. Research in Nursing & Health, 9, 81-88.
41. Schwandt, T.A. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 189-213). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. The American Psychologist, 54, 93-105.
43. Sivesind, K.H. (1999). Structured, qualitative comparison: Between singularity and single-dimensionality. Quality & Quantity, 33, 361-380.
44. Spradley, J.P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Ft. Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
45. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2006). A general typology in research designs featuring mixed methods. Research in the Schools, 13, 12-28.
47. Tufte, E. (2006). Beautiful evidence. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
48. Valsiner, J. (2000). Data as representations: Contextualizing qualitative and quantitative research strategies. Social Science Information, 39, 99-113.
49. Vogt, W.P. (2008, August 27). Quantitative versus qualitative is a distraction: Variations on a theme by Brewer & Hunter (2006). Methodological Innovations Online, 3(1). Retrieved February 10, 2009, from http://erdt.plymouth.ac.uk/mionline/public_html/viewarticle.php?id=71
50. Wolcott, H.F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.