A review of the current concerns about misconduct in medical sciences publications and the consequences

DARU, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2020, Pages 359-369

  Mousavi, Taraneh ^a   Abdollahi, Mohammad ^a  

^a TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Consequences; Medical sciences; Misconduct; Publications

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; ETHICS; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; MEDLINE; OFFENDER; PEER REVIEW; PUBLISHING; REVIEW; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; SCOPUS; SKILL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; WEB OF SCIENCE; WRITING; BOOK; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PUBLICATION;

AUTHORSHIP; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; BOOKS; HUMANS; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EID: 85079756878     PISSN: 15608115     EISSN: 20082231     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40199-020-00332-1     Document Type: Review

References (72)

1. Rank, S.J.C. country rankings. 2019; Available from: https://www.scimagojr.com/countryrank.php?year=2018.
2. Dalmeet Singh Chawla. Hyperauthorship: global projects spark surge in thousand-author papers. 2019; Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03862-0?utm_source=Nature+Briefing&utm_campaign=2401df965b-briefing-dy-20191216&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_c9dfd39373-2401df965b-44590041.
3. Larijani B, Niaz K, Pourabbasi A, Khan F, Spoor J, Abdollahi M. Not only Iranian rise in science marred by fraud: misconduct is a global problem. EXCLI J. 2017;16:1099–102.
4. Gasparyan AY, Nurmashev B, Voronov AA, Gerasimov AN, Koroleva AM, Kitas GD. The pressure to publish more and the scope of predatory publishing activities. J Korean Med Sci. 2016;31(12):1874–8.
5. Rawat S, Meena S. Publish or perish: where are we heading? Journal of research in medical sciences: the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. 2014;19(2):87–9.
6. Mahmoudi M, Ameli S, Moss S. The urgent need for modification of scientific ranking indexes to facilitate scientific progress and diminish academic bullying. Bioimpacts. 2020;10(1):5–7.
7. Edwards MA, Roy S. Academic research in the 21st century: maintaining scientific integrity in a climate of perverse incentives and Hypercompetition. Environ Eng Sci. 2017;34(1):51–61.
8. Khadem-Rezaiyan M, Dadgarmoghaddam M. Research misconduct: a report from a developing country. Iran J Public Health. 2017;46(10):1374–8.
9. Mavrogenis, A.F., et al., Fraud in Publishing, in Medical Writing and Research Methodology for the Orthopaedic Surgeon. 2018, Springer. p. 1–8.
10. Chawla, D.S. Russian journals retract more than 800 papers after ‘bombshell’ investigation. 2020; Available from: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/01/russian-journals-retract-more-800-papers-after-bombshell-investigation.
11. Alison McCook. Springer, BMC retracting nearly 60 papers for fake reviews and other issues. 2016; Available from: http://retractionwatch.com/2016/11/01/springer-bmc-retracting-nearly-60-papers-for-fake-reviews-and-other-issues/.
12. McDonald RJ, et al. Effects of author contribution disclosures and numeric limitations on authorship trends. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85(10):920–7.
13. Zastrow, M., More south Korean academics caught naming kids as co-authors. 2019.
14. Tim Albert, E.W. How to handle authorship disputes: a guide for new researchers Available from: https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/how-handle-authorship-disputesa-guide-new-researchers.
15. Ivan Oransky “A new form of plagiarism:” When researchers fake co-authors’ names. 2019; Available from: https://retractionwatch.com/2019/04/23/a-new-form-of-plagiarism-when-researcher-fake-co-authors-names/.
16. Alison McCook. A new way to fake authorship: submit under a prominent name, then say it was a mistake. 2016; Available from: https://retractionwatch.com/2016/11/28/new-way-fake-authorship-submit-prominent-name-say-mistake/.
17. Ivan Oransky. Iranian mathematicians latest to have papers retracted for fake email addresses to get better reviews. 2012; Available from: https://retractionwatch.com/2012/09/24/iranian-mathematicians-latest-to-have-papers-retracted-for-fake-email-addresses-to-get-better-reviews/.
18. Ivan Oransky. Retraction count grows to 35 for scientist who faked emails to do his own peer review. 2012; Available from: https://retractionwatch.com/2012/09/17/retraction-count-for-scientist-who-faked-emails-to-do-his-own-peer-review-grows-to-35/#more-9761.
19. Dalmeet Singh Chawla. Medical journal retracts study over fake review, authorship concerns. 2016; Available from: https://retractionwatch.com/2016/11/02/medical-journal-retracts-study-over-fake-review-authorship-concerns/.
20. Alison McCook. A journal waited 13 months to reject a submission. Days later, it published a plagiarized version by different authors. 2018; Available from: http://retractionwatch.com/2018/08/02/a-journal-waited-13-months-to-reject-a-submission-days-later-it-published-a-plagiarized-version-by-different-authors/.
21. Angeli Mehta. Is publishing in the chemical sciences gender biased? 2019; Available from: https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/rsc-report-finds-publishing-pipeline-hinders-women/4010608.article.
22. Alison McCook. How to spot a “citation cartel”. 2017; Available from: https://retractionwatch.com/2017/01/18/spot-citation-cartel/.
23. Didari T, Abdollahi M. Ethical priority setting for successful publishing by iranian scientists. J Korean Med Sci. 2018:33(49).
24. Abdollahi M, Gasparyan AY, Saeidnia S. The urge to publish more and its consequences. Daru: journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. 2014;22(1):53–3.
25. Ataie-Ashtiani B. World map of scientific misconduct. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018;24(5):1653–6.
26. Wallace MB, Siersema PD. Ethics in publication. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82(3):439–42.
27. Asghari MH, Moloudizargari M, Abdollahi M. Study break: misconduct in research and publication: a dilemma that is taking place. Iran Biomed J. 2017;21(4):203–4.
28. Stavale R, Ferreira GI, Galvão JAM, Zicker F, Novaes MRCG, Oliveira CM, et al. Research misconduct in health and life sciences research: a systematic review of retracted literature from Brazilian institutions. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):e0214272.
29. Gandevia S. Publication pressure and scientific misconduct: why we need more open governance. Spinal Cord. 2018;56(9):821–2.
30. Agnes Grudniewicz, D.M., Kelly D. Cobey and 32 co-authors,. Predatory journals: no definition, no defence. 2019; Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03759-y.
31. McCook, A. Authorship for sale: some journals willing to add authors to papers they didn’t write. 2017; Available from: https://retractionwatch.com/2017/09/13/authorship-sale-journals-willing-add-authors-papers-didnt-write/.
32. McCook, A. 7 signs a scientific paper’s authorship was bought. 2016; Available from: https://retractionwatch.com/2016/10/24/seven-signs-a-paper-was-for-sale/.
33. Chawla, D.S. Predatory-journal papers have little scientific impact. 2020; Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00031-6?utm_source=Nature+Briefing&utm_campaign=6792bd51b5-briefing-dy-20200114&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_c9dfd39373-6792bd51b5-44590041.
34. Kamat PV. Citation mania: the good, the bad, and the ugly. ACS Energy Letters. 2019;4(2):471–2.
35. Nordkvelle Y. The academic boycott of South Africa debate: science and social practice. Stud High Educ. 1990;15(3):253–75.
36. Sansom C. The ghost of Saddam and UN sanctions. The Lancet Oncology. 2004;5(3):143–5.
37. Kokabisaghi F, Miller AC, Bashar FR, Salesi M, Zarchi AAK, Keramatfar A, et al. Impact of United States political sanctions on international collaborations and research in Iran. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(5):e001692.
38. Mozafari M. Iran and science publishing in the post-sanctions era. Lancet. 2016;387(10029):1721–2.
39. Kokabisaghi F. Assessment of the effects of economic sanctions on Iranians' right to health by using human rights impact assessment tool: a systematic review. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018;7(5):374–93.
40. Arie S. Unintended consequences of sanctions against Iran. BMJ. 2013;347:f4650.
41. Clarification of COPE advice to editors on Geopolitical intrusions on editorial decisions. 2019; Available from: https://publicationethics.org/news/clarification-cope-advice-editors-geopolitical-intrusions-editorial-decisions.
42. Neema PK. Dishonesty in medical research and publication and the remedial measures. Ann Card Anaesth. 2018;21(2):111–3.
43. Corsetti M, Whorwell P. The global impact of IBS: time to think about IBS-specific models of care? Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2017;10(9):727–36.
44. Hawkes N. GlaxoSmithKline pays $3bn to settle dispute over rosiglitazone and other drugs. Bmj. 2011;343(nov07 2):d7234–4.
45. GlaxoSmithKline to Pay $3bn in US Drug Fraud Scandal.; Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-18673220.
46. Rao TSS, Andrade C. The MMR vaccine and autism: sensation, refutation, retraction, and fraud. Indian J Psychiatry. 2011;53(2):95–6.
47. BMJ: Wakefield Paper Alleging Link between MMR Vaccine and Autism Fraudulent. 2011; Available from: https://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/blog/bmj-wakefield-paper-alleging-link-between-mmr-vaccine-and-autism-fraudulent.
48. Johansen ME. Gabapentinoid use in the United States 2002 through 2015. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(2):292–4.
49. Rhee, T.G. and J.S. Ross, Association between industry payments to physicians and Gabapentinoid prescribing. JAMA Intern Med, 2019.
50. Han D, et al. Retracted: eliciting broadly neutralizing antibodies against HIV-1 that target gp41 MPER. Retrovirology. 2012;9(2):P362.
51. Lokireddy S, Wijesoma IW, Bonala S, Wei M, Sze SK, McFarlane C, et al. Myostatin is a novel tumoral factor that induces cancer cachexia. Biochem J. 2012;446(1):23–36.
52. McCook, A. Weizmann bans grad students from researcher’s lab over “serious misconduct”. 2017; Available from: http://retractionwatch.com/2017/07/19/weizmann-bans-grad-students-researchers-lab-serious-misconduct/.
53. Andrew P. Han. New York psychiatry researcher charged with embezzlement, faces jail time. 2017; Available from: https://retractionwatch.com/2017/11/29/new-york-psychiatry-researcher-charged-embezzlement-faces-jail-time/.
54. Campos-Varela I, Ruano-Ravina A. Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors. Gac Sanit. 2019;33(4):356–60.
55. Khajedaluee M. Research misconduct: cause of decrease in validity and reliability of researches results and the scientific community. Razavi International Journal of Medicine. 2018;6(2):1–2.
56. Donato L, Scimone C, Rinaldi C, D'Angelo R, Sidoti A. Retraction note: non-coding RNAome of RPE cells under oxidative stress suggests unknown regulative aspects of retinitis pigmentosa etiopathogenesis. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):14012.
57. Xiong C, et al. RETRACTED ARTICLE: image-based reversible data hiding algorithm toward big multimedia data. Multimed Tools Appl. 2018; 77 (12): 15997–7.
58. Xu Q, Liu SQ, Niu JH, Luo RX, Zhang J, Zhang PF, et al. RETRACTED: a new technique for extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia. J Surg Res. 2016;204(2):452–9.
59. McCook A. A cancer researcher said she collected blood from 98 people. It was all her own. 2018; Available from: http://retractionwatch.com/2018/05/14/cancer-researcher-said-she-collected-blood-from-98-people-it-was-all-her-own/.
60. Xu L, Tang H, el-Naggar AK, Wei P, Sturgis EM. Genetic variants in DNA double-strand break repair genes and risk of salivary gland carcinoma: a case-control study. PLoS One. 2015; 10 (6): e0128753–3.
61. Alison McCook. Does the Mediterranean diet prevent heart attacks? NEJM retracts (and replaces) high-profile paper. 2018; Available from: https://retractionwatch.com/2018/06/13/does-the-mediterranean-diet-prevent-heart-attacks-nejm-retracts-and-replaces-high-profile-paper/.
62. Estruch R, et al. Retraction and republication: primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with a Mediterranean diet. N Engl J med 2013;368:1279-90. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(25):2441–2.
63. Rhinn H, Fujita R, Qiang L, Cheng R, Lee JH, Abeliovich A. Integrative genomics identifies APOE ε4 effectors in Alzheimer's disease. Nature. 2013;500(7460):45–50.
64. Megan Scudellari. Columbia biologists “deeply regret” nature retraction, after postdoc faked 74 panels in 3 papers. 2015; Available from: http://retractionwatch.com/2015/06/17/columbia-biologists-deeply-regret-nature-retraction-after-postdoc-faked-74-panels-in-3-papers/.
65. Dalmeet Singh ChawlaCategories. Harvard researcher’s PhD revoked, former group earns three more retractions. 2016; Available from: http://retractionwatch.com/2016/07/13/harvard-researchers-phd-revoked-former-group-earns-three-more-retractions/.
66. AIDS vaccine fraudster sentenced to nearly 5 years in prison and to pay back $7 million. 2015; Available from: http://retractionwatch.com/2015/07/01/aids-vaccine-fraudster-sentenced-to-nearly-5-years-in-prison-and-pay-back-7-million/.
67. Valastyan S, Reinhardt F, Benaich N, Calogrias D, Szász AM, Wang ZC, et al. A pleiotropically acting microRNA, miR-31, inhibits breast cancer metastasis. Cell. 2009;137(6):1032–46.
68. Other shoe drops for MIT cancer researcher Robert Weinberg as Cell retraction appears. 2015; Available from: http://retractionwatch.com/2015/04/03/other-shoe-drops-for-mit-cancer-researcher-robert-weinberg-as-cell-retraction-appears/.
69. Andrew Grey, et al. Check for publication integrity before misconduct. 2020; Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03959-6?utm_source=Nature+Briefing&utm_campaign=4f610c1a9f-briefing-dy-20200108&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_c9dfd39373-4f610c1a9f-43517141.
70. Ivan Oransky. Journal retracts 16-year-old paper based on debunked autism-vaccine study. 2018; Available from: http://retractionwatch.com/2018/10/16/journal-retracts-16-year-old-paper-based-on-debunked-autism-vaccine-study/.
71. Oransky I. Andrew Wakefield’s fraudulent paper on vaccines and autism has been cited more than a thousand times. These researchers tried to figure out why. 2019; Available from: https://retractionwatch.com/2019/11/18/andrew-wakefields-fraudulent-paper-on-vaccines-and-autism-has-been-cited-more-than-a-thousand-times-these-researchers-tried-to-figure-out-why/.
72. Tanne JH. Pfizer pays record fine for off-label promotion of four drugs. BMJ. 2009;339:b3657.