The urge to publish more and its consequences

DARU, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Abdollahi, Mohammad ^a   Gasparyan, Armen Yuri ^b,c,d   Saeidnia, Soodabeh ^a  

^a TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b Council Mem of the European Assoc of Science Edi ^*  (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^d RUSSELLS HALL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; DRUG INDUSTRY; EDITORIAL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; PATIENT SAFETY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EID: 84903353208     PISSN: 15608115     EISSN: 20082231     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2008-2231-22-53     Document Type: Editorial

References (15)

1. Self-correction in biomedical publications and the scientific impact. Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Akazhanov NA, Kitas GD, Croat Med J 2014 55 61 72
2. Visibility of retractions: a cross-sectional one-year study. Decullier E, Huot L, Samson G, Maisonneuve H, BMC Res Notes 2013 6 238
3. Code of ethics for the national pharmaceutical system: Codifying and compilation. Salari P, Namazi H, Abdollahi M, Khansari F, Nikfar S, Larijani B, Araminia B, J Res Med Sci 2013 18 442 448
4. Observance of ethical codes in selecting supervisor by postgraduate students. Bayrami Z, Abdollahi M, J Med Ethics Hist Med 2011 4 1
5. Conflicts of interest in biomedical publications: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Akazhanov NA, Kitas GD, Croat Med J 2013 54 600 608
6. Cases Available at: http://publicationethics.org/cases [Last accessed: June 10, 2014]
7. Retraction guidelines Available at: http://www.publicationethics.org/ files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf [Last accessed: June 10, 2014]
8. Fischer P, New Research Misconduct Policies NSF Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/oig/session.pdf [Last accessed: June 10, 2014]
9. Falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism: the unholy trinity of scientific writing. Zietman AL, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013 87 225 227
10. Peers nip misconduct in the bud. Koocher GP, Keith-Spiegel P, Nature 2010 466 438 440
11. What to do if you suspect plagiarism Available at: http:// publicationethics.org/files/u7140/plagiarism%20A.pdf [Last accessed: June 10, 2014]
12. What to do if you suspect fabricated data Available at: http://publicationethics.org/files/u7140/Fabricated%20data%20A.pdf [Last accessed: June 10, 2014]
13. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Beall J, Nature 2012 489 179
14. Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics. Bornmann L, Marx W, Gasparyan AY, Kitas GD, Rheumatol Int 2012 32 1861 1867
15. Science for the benefits of all: The way from idea to product. Maqbool F, Bahadar H, Abdollahi M, J Med Hypotheses Ideas 2014 8 74 77