Claiming insufficient knowledge

Human Communication Research

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 562-588

  Beach, Wayne A ^a   Metzger, Terri R ^b  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031499879     PISSN: 03603989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1997.tb00410.x     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Atkinson, J. M. (1992). Displaying neutrality: Formal aspects of informal court proceedings. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 199-211). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
2. Atkinson, J. M., & Drew, P. (1979). Order in court: The organization of verbal interaction in judicial settings. London: Macmillan.
3. Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. London: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bavelas, J. B. (1983). Situations that bad to disqualification. Human Communication Research, 9, 130-145.
5. Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Chovil, N., & Mullett, J. (1990). Equivocal communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6. Beach, W. A. (Ed.). (1989). Sequential organization of conversational activities. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53, 85-246.
7. Beach, W. A. (1990). Orienting to the phenomenon. In J. Anderson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 13 (pp. 216-244). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Beach, W. A. (1993). Transitional regularities for "casual" "Okay" usages. Journal of Pragmatics, 19, 325-352.
9. Beach, W. A. (1995). Preserving and constraining options: "Okays" and "official" priorities in medical interviews. In G. H. Morris & R. Cheneil (Eds.), Talk of the clinic (pp. 259-289). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Beach, W. A. (1996). Conversations about illness: Family preoccupations with bulimia. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Berger, C. R., & Bradac, J. J. (1982). Language and social knowledge: Uncertainty in interpersonal relations. London: Edward Arnold.
12. Berger, C. R., & Gudykunst, W. B. (1991). Uncertainty and communication. In B. Dervin & M. Voight (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (Vol. 10, pp. 21-66). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
13. Bergman, J. R. (1992). Veiled morality: Notes on discretion in psychiatry. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interactions in institutional settings (pp.137-162). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
14. Button, G. (1992). Answers as interactional products: Two sequential practices used in job interviews. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interactions in institutional settings (pp. 212-231). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
15. Chovil, N. (1994). Equivocation as an interactional event. In W. R. Cupach & B. H. Spitzberg (Eds.), The dark side of interpersonal communication (pp. 105-123). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Clayman, S. (1992). Footing in the achievement of neutrality: The case of news-interview discourse. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interactions in institutional settings (pp. 163-198). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17. Davidson, J. (1984). Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 102-128). London: Cambridge University Press.
18. Drew, P. (1984). Speakers' reportings in invitation sequences. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 129-151). London: Cambridge University Press.
19. Drew, P. (1992). Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: The case of a trial for rape. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interactions in institutional settings (pp. 470-520). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
20. Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interactions in institutional settings (pp. 3-65). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21. Drummond, K., & Hopper, R. (1993). Back channels revisited: Acknowledgment tokens and speaker incipiency. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26, 179-194.
22. Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (Eds.). (1992). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
23. Frankel, R. (1995). Some answers about questions in clinical encounters. In G. H. Morris & R. J. Cheneil (Eds.), Talk of the clinic: Explorations in the analysis of medical and therapeutic discourse (pp. 233-258). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Goodwin, C. (1987). Forgetfulness as an interactive resource. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 115-131.
25. Greatbatch, D. (1992). On the management of disagreement between news interviewees. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interactions in institutional settings (pp. 268-301). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
26. Gudykunst, W. (1995). The uncertainty reduction and anxiety-uncertainty reduction theories of Berger, Gudhkunst, and Associates. In D. P. Cushman & B. Kovacic (Eds.), Watershed research traditions in human communication theory (pp. 67-100). Albany: State University of New York Press.
27. Heath, C. (1992). The delivery and reception of diagnosis in the general-practice consultation. In P Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interactions in institutional settings (pp. 235-267). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
28. Heritage, J. (1984a). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299-345). London: Cambridge University Press.
29. Heritage, J. (1984b). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
30. Heritage, J. (1990, July). Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry. Paper presented at the International Pragmatics Conference, Barcelona, Spain.
31. Heritage, J. (1990-1991). Meaning and strategy: Observations on constraints in interaction analysis. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 24, 311-322.
32. Hewitt, J. P., & Stokes, R. (1972). Disclaimers. In J. G. Manis & B. N. Meltzer (Eds.), Symbolic interaction (pp. 308-320). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
33. Hopper, R. (1990). Sequential ambiguity in phone openings: "What are you doin." Communication Monographs, 56, 240-252.
34. Hopper, R. (1992). Telephone conversation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
35. Jacoby, S., & Ochs, E. (1995). Co-construction: An introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 171-184.
36. Jefferson, G. (1980a). End of grant report on conversation in which "troubles" or "anxieties" are expressed (HR480 5/2). London: Social Science Research Council.
37. Jefferson, G. (1980b). On "trouble-premonitory" response to inquiry. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 153-185.
38. Jefferson, G. (1981). Caveat speaker: A preliminary exploration of shift implicative recipiency in the articulation of topic (Final report). The Netherlands: Social Science Research Council. (mimeo)
39. Jefferson, G. (1988). On the sequential organization of troubles talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems, 35, 418-441.
40. Levinson, S. C. (1980). Speech act theory: The state of the art. Language and linguistics teaching: Abstracts, 13, 5-24.
41. Levinson, S. C. (1981). The essential inadequacies of speech act models of dialogue. In H. Parret, M. Sbisa, & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Possibilities and limitations of pragmatics (pp. 473-492). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
42. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
43. Levinson, S. C. (1992). Activity types and language. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interactions in institutional settings (pp. 66-100). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
44. Mandelbaum, J. (1989). Interpersonal activites in conversational storytelling. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53, 114-126.
45. Mandelbaum, J., & Pomerantz, A. (1991). What drives social action? In K. Tracy (Ed.), Understanding face-to-face interaction: Issues linking goals and discourse (pp. 151-166). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46. Metzger, T. R., & Beach, W. A. (1996). Preserving alternative versions: Interactional techniques for organizing courtroom cross-examination. Communication Research, 23, 749-765.
47. Pomerantz, A. (1980). Telling my side: "Limited access" as a "fishing" device. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 186-198.
48. Pomerantz, A. (1984a). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in converstation analysis (pp. 57-101). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
49. Pomerantz, A. (1984b). Giving a source or basis: The practice in conversation of telling "how I know." Journal of Pragmatics, 8, 607-625.
50. Pomerantz, A. (1984c). Pursuing a response. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 152-163). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
51. Pomerantz, A. (1990). Conversation analytic claims. Communication Monographs, 57, 231-235.
52. Sacks, H. (1992a). Lectures of conversation (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
53. Sacks, H. (1992b). Lectures of conversation (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
54. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
55. Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70, 1075-1095.
56. Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of "uh huh" and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 71-93). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
57. Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 28-52). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
58. Schegloff, E. A. (1986). The routine as achievement. Human Studies, 9, 111-152.
59. Schegloff, E. A. (1988). Presequences and indirection: Applying speech act theory to ordinary conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 55-62.
60. Schegloff, E. A. (1991). Reflections or talk and social structure. In D. Boden & D. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure (pp. 44-70). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
61. Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1295-1345.
62. Schegloff, E. A. (1995). Discourse as an interactional achievement III: The omnirelevance of interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 185-212.
63. Schutz, A. (1967). Common sense and scientific interpretation of human interaction. In Collected papers I: The problem of social reality (pp. 3-47). The Hague, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
64. Streeck, J. (1980). Speech acts in interaction: A critique of Searle. Discourse Processes, 3, 133-154.
65. Tracy, K. (Ed.). (1991). Understanding face-to-face interaction: Issues linking goals and discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
66. Turner, R. (1971). Words, utterances and activities. In J. Douglas (Ed.), Understanding everyday life (pp. 169-187). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.