Agreements and disagreements in a computer-mediated discussion

Research on Language and Social Interaction

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 315-345

  Baym, Nancy K ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030524898     PISSN: 08351813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2904_2     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Allen, R. C. (1985). Speaking of soap operas. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.
2. Basso, K. (1974). The ethnography of writing. In R. Bauman & J. Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp. 425-432). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
3. Baym, N. (1995). The emergence of community in computer-mediated communication. In S. Jones (Ed.), Cybersodety: Computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 138-163). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Biber, D. (1986). Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings. Language, 62, 384-414.
5. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
6. Chafe, W. (1982). Integration and involvement in speaking, writing and oral literature. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 35-54). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
7. Danet, B. (1993). Books, letters, documents: The changing materiality of texts in late print culture [On-line]. Available: msdanet@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il.
8. Ebben, M. (1993, October). Women on the net: An exploratory study of gender dynamics on the soc.women computer network. Paper presented at the meeting of the Organization for the Study of Communication, Language and Gender, Tempe, AZ.
9. Ferrara, K., Brunner, H., & Whittemore, G. (1991). Interactive written discourse as an emergent register. Written Communication, 8, 8-34.
10. Goffman, E. (1967). On face-work. In Interaction ritual (pp. 5-46). New York: Pantheon.
11. Goffman, E. (1981). Footing. In Forms of talk (pp. 124-159). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
12. Heritage, J., & Atkinson, J. M. (1984). Introduction. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 1-16). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
13. Herring, S. (1993). Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. Electronic Journal of Communication, 3(2) [on-line]. Available: comserve@ rpitsvm1.bitnet
14. Jenkins, H. (1992). Textual poachers: Television fans and parricipatory cultures. London: Routledge.
15. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspect of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
16. Kotthoff, H. (1993). Disagreement and concession in disputes: On the context sensitivity of preference structures. Language in Society, 22, 193-216.
17. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
18. Mabry, E. (in press). Frames and flames: The structure of argumentative messages of the 'net. In S. Rafaeli, M. McLaughlin, & F. Sudweeks (Eds.), Network and netplay: Virtual groups on the internet. Cambridge, MA: American Association for Artificial Intelligence Press.
19. Maltz, D. N., & Borker, R. A. (1982). A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication. In J. Gumperz (Ed.), Language and social identity (pp. 195-216). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
20. McLaughlin, M. L., Osborne, K. K., & Smith, C. B. (1995). Standards of conduct on Usenet. In S. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety: Computer-mediated community and communication (pp. 90-111), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Mulkay, M. (1985). Agreement and disagreement in conversations and letters. Text, 5, 201-227.
22. Mulkay, M. (1986). Conversations and texts. Human Studies, 9, 303-321.
23. O'Keefe, B. J. (1991). Message design logic and the management of multiple goals. In K. Tracy (Ed.), Understanding face-to-face interaction (pp. 131-150). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
24. Ong, W. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Methuen.
25. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57-101). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
26. Reid, B. (1993, August 6). Usenet readership report for July, 1993. news.lists, Usenet.
27. Selfe, C., & Meyer, P. (1991). Testing claims for on-line conferences. Written Communication, 8, 163-192.
28. Sheldon, A. (1992). Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic challenges to self-assertion and how young girls meet them. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38, 95-117.
29. Sutton, L. (1994). Using USENET: Gender, power, and silence in electronic discourse. Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 506-520). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
30. Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand. New York: Ballantine.
31. Tannen, D. (1994). Gender and discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Wilkins, H. (1991). Computer talk: Long-distance conversations by computer. Written Communication, 8, 56-78.