메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2020, Pages 354-362

Adjudication rather than experience of data abstraction matters more in reducing errors in abstracting data in systematic reviews

Author keywords

accuracy; adjudication; data abstraction; errors; experience; systematic review

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STUDENT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85079376463     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17592887     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1396     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (15)

References (18)
  • 2
    • 33744797104 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews
    • Buscemi N, Hartling L, Vandermeer B, Tjosvold L, Klassen TP. Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews. J Clinl Epidemiol. 2006;59(7):697-703.
    • (2006) J Clinl Epidemiol. , vol.59 , Issue.7 , pp. 697-703
    • Buscemi, N.1    Hartling, L.2    Vandermeer, B.3    Tjosvold, L.4    Klassen, T.P.5
  • 3
    • 3042617663 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reviewing measures of outcome: reliability of data extraction
    • Haywood KL, Hargreaves J, White R, Lamb SE. Reviewing measures of outcome: reliability of data extraction. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004;10(2):329-337.
    • (2004) J Eval Clin Pract , vol.10 , Issue.2 , pp. 329-337
    • Haywood, K.L.1    Hargreaves, J.2    White, R.3    Lamb, S.E.4
  • 4
    • 20444408797 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • High prevalence but low impact of data extraction and reporting errors were found in Cochrane systematic reviews
    • Jones AP, Remmington T, Williamson PR, Ashby D, Smyth RL. High prevalence but low impact of data extraction and reporting errors were found in Cochrane systematic reviews. J Clinl Epidemiol. 2005;58(7):741-742.
    • (2005) J Clinl Epidemiol , vol.58 , Issue.7 , pp. 741-742
    • Jones, A.P.1    Remmington, T.2    Williamson, P.R.3    Ashby, D.4    Smyth, R.L.5
  • 5
    • 75749115955 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Systematic review data extraction: cross-sectional study showed that experience did not increase accuracy
    • Horton J, Vandermeer B, Hartling L, Tjosvold L, Klassen TP, Buscemi N. Systematic review data extraction: cross-sectional study showed that experience did not increase accuracy. J Clinl Epidemiol. 2010;63(3):289-298.
    • (2010) J Clinl Epidemiol. , vol.63 , Issue.3 , pp. 289-298
    • Horton, J.1    Vandermeer, B.2    Hartling, L.3    Tjosvold, L.4    Klassen, T.P.5    Buscemi, N.6
  • 6
    • 34547202143 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Data extraction errors in meta-analyses that use standardized mean differences
    • Gotzsche PC, Hrobjartsson A, Maric K, Tendal B. Data extraction errors in meta-analyses that use standardized mean differences. JAMA. 2007;298(4):430-437.
    • (2007) JAMA , vol.298 , Issue.4 , pp. 430-437
    • Gotzsche, P.C.1    Hrobjartsson, A.2    Maric, K.3    Tendal, B.4
  • 7
    • 84923303095 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Innovations in data collection, management, and archiving for systematic reviews
    • Li T, Vedula SS, Hadar N, Parkin C, Lau J, Dickersin K. Innovations in data collection, management, and archiving for systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(4):287-294.
    • (2015) Ann Intern Med , vol.162 , Issue.4 , pp. 287-294
    • Li, T.1    Vedula, S.S.2    Hadar, N.3    Parkin, C.4    Lau, J.5    Dickersin, K.6
  • 8
    • 79960218580 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Finding what works in health care
    • eds., Washington (DC), National Academies Press (US) Copyright 2011 by the National Academy of Sciences, All rights reserved
    • Institute of Medicine Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness R. In: Eden J, Levit L, Berg A, Morton S, eds. Finding what works in health care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US) Copyright 2011 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. 2011.
    • (2011) Standards for Systematic Reviews
    • Morton, S.1    Eden, J.2    Levit, L.3    Berg, A.4
  • 9
    • 85070113987 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A randomized trial provided new evidence on the accuracy and efficiency of traditional vs electronically annotated abstraction approaches in systematic reviews
    • Li T, Saldanha IJ, Jap J, et al. A randomized trial provided new evidence on the accuracy and efficiency of traditional vs electronically annotated abstraction approaches in systematic reviews. J Clinl Epidemiol. 2019;115(11):77-89.
    • (2019) J Clinl Epidemiol , vol.115 , Issue.11 , pp. 77-89
    • Li, T.1    Saldanha, I.J.2    Jap, J.3
  • 10
    • 84856091594 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effectiveness of intervention programs in preventing falls: a systematic review of recent 10 years and meta-analysis
    • 188.e13-188
    • Choi M, Hector M. Effectiveness of intervention programs in preventing falls: a systematic review of recent 10 years and meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012;13(2):188.e13-188.e21.
    • (2012) J Am Med Dir Assoc , vol.13 , Issue.2
    • Choi, M.1    Hector, M.2
  • 11
    • 84931849550 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effects of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 antibodies in adults with hypercholesterolemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    • Navarese EP, Kolodziejczak M, Schulze V, et al. Effects of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 antibodies in adults with hypercholesterolemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(1):40-51.
    • (2015) Ann Intern Med , vol.163 , Issue.1 , pp. 40-51
    • Navarese, E.P.1    Kolodziejczak, M.2    Schulze, V.3
  • 12
    • 84857211646 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    • Fong DY, Ho JW, Hui BP, et al. Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2012;344:e70.
    • (2012) BMJ (Clin Res Ed) , vol.344
    • Fong, D.Y.1    Ho, J.W.2    Hui, B.P.3
  • 14
    • 84997207684 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evaluating Data Abstraction Assistant, a novel software application for data abstraction during systematic reviews: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    • Saldanha IJ, Schmid CH, Lau J, et al. Evaluating Data Abstraction Assistant, a novel software application for data abstraction during systematic reviews: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Sys Rev. 2016;5(1):196.
    • (2016) Sys Rev , vol.5 , Issue.1
    • Saldanha, I.J.1    Schmid, C.H.2    Lau, J.3
  • 15
    • 78951486893 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Disagreements in meta-analyses using outcomes measured on continuous or rating scales: observer agreement study
    • Tendal B, Higgins JPT, Juni P, et al. Disagreements in meta-analyses using outcomes measured on continuous or rating scales: observer agreement study. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2009;b3128:339.
    • (2009) BMJ (Clin Res Ed) , vol.b3128 , pp. 339
    • Tendal, B.1    Higgins, J.P.T.2    Juni, P.3
  • 16
    • 84959544337 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials
    • Marshall IJ, Kuiper J, Wallace BC. RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials. J Am Med Infor Assoc. 2016;23(1):193-201.
    • (2016) J Am Med Infor Assoc , vol.23 , Issue.1 , pp. 193-201
    • Marshall, I.J.1    Kuiper, J.2    Wallace, B.C.3
  • 17
    • 84963999519 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Machine learning to assist risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews
    • Millard LA, Flach PA, Higgins JP. Machine learning to assist risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews. Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45(1):266-277.
    • (2016) Int J Epidemiol , vol.45 , Issue.1 , pp. 266-277
    • Millard, L.A.1    Flach, P.A.2    Higgins, J.P.3
  • 18
    • 84881264761 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study
    • Hartling L, Ospina M, Liang Y, et al. Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2009;b4012:339.
    • (2009) BMJ (Clin Res Ed). , vol.b4012 , pp. 339
    • Hartling, L.1    Ospina, M.2    Liang, Y.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.