-
2
-
-
33744797104
-
Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews
-
Buscemi N, Hartling L, Vandermeer B, Tjosvold L, Klassen TP. Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews. J Clinl Epidemiol. 2006;59(7):697-703.
-
(2006)
J Clinl Epidemiol.
, vol.59
, Issue.7
, pp. 697-703
-
-
Buscemi, N.1
Hartling, L.2
Vandermeer, B.3
Tjosvold, L.4
Klassen, T.P.5
-
3
-
-
3042617663
-
Reviewing measures of outcome: reliability of data extraction
-
Haywood KL, Hargreaves J, White R, Lamb SE. Reviewing measures of outcome: reliability of data extraction. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004;10(2):329-337.
-
(2004)
J Eval Clin Pract
, vol.10
, Issue.2
, pp. 329-337
-
-
Haywood, K.L.1
Hargreaves, J.2
White, R.3
Lamb, S.E.4
-
4
-
-
20444408797
-
High prevalence but low impact of data extraction and reporting errors were found in Cochrane systematic reviews
-
Jones AP, Remmington T, Williamson PR, Ashby D, Smyth RL. High prevalence but low impact of data extraction and reporting errors were found in Cochrane systematic reviews. J Clinl Epidemiol. 2005;58(7):741-742.
-
(2005)
J Clinl Epidemiol
, vol.58
, Issue.7
, pp. 741-742
-
-
Jones, A.P.1
Remmington, T.2
Williamson, P.R.3
Ashby, D.4
Smyth, R.L.5
-
5
-
-
75749115955
-
Systematic review data extraction: cross-sectional study showed that experience did not increase accuracy
-
Horton J, Vandermeer B, Hartling L, Tjosvold L, Klassen TP, Buscemi N. Systematic review data extraction: cross-sectional study showed that experience did not increase accuracy. J Clinl Epidemiol. 2010;63(3):289-298.
-
(2010)
J Clinl Epidemiol.
, vol.63
, Issue.3
, pp. 289-298
-
-
Horton, J.1
Vandermeer, B.2
Hartling, L.3
Tjosvold, L.4
Klassen, T.P.5
Buscemi, N.6
-
6
-
-
34547202143
-
Data extraction errors in meta-analyses that use standardized mean differences
-
Gotzsche PC, Hrobjartsson A, Maric K, Tendal B. Data extraction errors in meta-analyses that use standardized mean differences. JAMA. 2007;298(4):430-437.
-
(2007)
JAMA
, vol.298
, Issue.4
, pp. 430-437
-
-
Gotzsche, P.C.1
Hrobjartsson, A.2
Maric, K.3
Tendal, B.4
-
7
-
-
84923303095
-
Innovations in data collection, management, and archiving for systematic reviews
-
Li T, Vedula SS, Hadar N, Parkin C, Lau J, Dickersin K. Innovations in data collection, management, and archiving for systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(4):287-294.
-
(2015)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.162
, Issue.4
, pp. 287-294
-
-
Li, T.1
Vedula, S.S.2
Hadar, N.3
Parkin, C.4
Lau, J.5
Dickersin, K.6
-
8
-
-
79960218580
-
Finding what works in health care
-
eds., Washington (DC), National Academies Press (US) Copyright 2011 by the National Academy of Sciences, All rights reserved
-
Institute of Medicine Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness R. In: Eden J, Levit L, Berg A, Morton S, eds. Finding what works in health care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US) Copyright 2011 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. 2011.
-
(2011)
Standards for Systematic Reviews
-
-
Morton, S.1
Eden, J.2
Levit, L.3
Berg, A.4
-
9
-
-
85070113987
-
A randomized trial provided new evidence on the accuracy and efficiency of traditional vs electronically annotated abstraction approaches in systematic reviews
-
Li T, Saldanha IJ, Jap J, et al. A randomized trial provided new evidence on the accuracy and efficiency of traditional vs electronically annotated abstraction approaches in systematic reviews. J Clinl Epidemiol. 2019;115(11):77-89.
-
(2019)
J Clinl Epidemiol
, vol.115
, Issue.11
, pp. 77-89
-
-
Li, T.1
Saldanha, I.J.2
Jap, J.3
-
10
-
-
84856091594
-
Effectiveness of intervention programs in preventing falls: a systematic review of recent 10 years and meta-analysis
-
188.e13-188
-
Choi M, Hector M. Effectiveness of intervention programs in preventing falls: a systematic review of recent 10 years and meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012;13(2):188.e13-188.e21.
-
(2012)
J Am Med Dir Assoc
, vol.13
, Issue.2
-
-
Choi, M.1
Hector, M.2
-
11
-
-
84931849550
-
Effects of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 antibodies in adults with hypercholesterolemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
-
Navarese EP, Kolodziejczak M, Schulze V, et al. Effects of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 antibodies in adults with hypercholesterolemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(1):40-51.
-
(2015)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.163
, Issue.1
, pp. 40-51
-
-
Navarese, E.P.1
Kolodziejczak, M.2
Schulze, V.3
-
12
-
-
84857211646
-
Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
-
Fong DY, Ho JW, Hui BP, et al. Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2012;344:e70.
-
(2012)
BMJ (Clin Res Ed)
, vol.344
-
-
Fong, D.Y.1
Ho, J.W.2
Hui, B.P.3
-
13
-
-
84957546834
-
Omega-3 fatty acids for depression in adults
-
Cd004692
-
Appleton KM, Sallis HM, Perry R, Ness AR, Churchill R. Omega-3 fatty acids for depression in adults. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2015(11):Cd004692.
-
(2015)
Cochrane Database Sys Rev
, Issue.11
-
-
Appleton, K.M.1
Sallis, H.M.2
Perry, R.3
Ness, A.R.4
Churchill, R.5
-
14
-
-
84997207684
-
Evaluating Data Abstraction Assistant, a novel software application for data abstraction during systematic reviews: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
-
Saldanha IJ, Schmid CH, Lau J, et al. Evaluating Data Abstraction Assistant, a novel software application for data abstraction during systematic reviews: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Sys Rev. 2016;5(1):196.
-
(2016)
Sys Rev
, vol.5
, Issue.1
-
-
Saldanha, I.J.1
Schmid, C.H.2
Lau, J.3
-
15
-
-
78951486893
-
Disagreements in meta-analyses using outcomes measured on continuous or rating scales: observer agreement study
-
Tendal B, Higgins JPT, Juni P, et al. Disagreements in meta-analyses using outcomes measured on continuous or rating scales: observer agreement study. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2009;b3128:339.
-
(2009)
BMJ (Clin Res Ed)
, vol.b3128
, pp. 339
-
-
Tendal, B.1
Higgins, J.P.T.2
Juni, P.3
-
16
-
-
84959544337
-
RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials
-
Marshall IJ, Kuiper J, Wallace BC. RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials. J Am Med Infor Assoc. 2016;23(1):193-201.
-
(2016)
J Am Med Infor Assoc
, vol.23
, Issue.1
, pp. 193-201
-
-
Marshall, I.J.1
Kuiper, J.2
Wallace, B.C.3
-
17
-
-
84963999519
-
Machine learning to assist risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews
-
Millard LA, Flach PA, Higgins JP. Machine learning to assist risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews. Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45(1):266-277.
-
(2016)
Int J Epidemiol
, vol.45
, Issue.1
, pp. 266-277
-
-
Millard, L.A.1
Flach, P.A.2
Higgins, J.P.3
-
18
-
-
84881264761
-
Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study
-
Hartling L, Ospina M, Liang Y, et al. Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2009;b4012:339.
-
(2009)
BMJ (Clin Res Ed).
, vol.b4012
, pp. 339
-
-
Hartling, L.1
Ospina, M.2
Liang, Y.3
|