Ultralong Versus Standard Long Peripheral Intravenous Catheters: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasonographically Guided Catheter Survival

Annals of Emergency Medicine

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2020, Pages 134-142

  Bahl, Amit ^a   Hijazi, Mahmoud ^a   Chen, Nai Wei ^a   Lachapelle Clavette, Ludovic ^a   Price, Jacob ^a  

^a WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CATHETER COMPLICATION; CATHETER DISLODGMENT; CATHETER INFILTRATION; CATHETER OCCLUSION; CATHETER REMOVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE SAFETY; EMERGENCY WARD; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; INTERVENTIONAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDIAN SURVIVAL TIME; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURVIVAL RATE; THROMBOPHLEBITIS; VASCULAR ACCESS; AGED; CATHETERIZATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; DEVICES; ECHOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; PROCEDURES; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; TIME FACTOR; VASCULAR ACCESS DEVICE;

ADULT; AGED; CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; VASCULAR ACCESS DEVICES;

EID: 85077971105     PISSN: 01960644     EISSN: 10976760     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.11.013     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Rickard, C.M., Marsh, N., Webster, J., et al. Dressings and securements for the prevention of peripheral intravenous catheter failure in adults (SAVE): a pragmatic, randomised controlled, superiority trial. Lancet 392 (2018), 419–430.
2. Constantino, T., Parikh, A., Satz, W., et al. Ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous access versus traditional approaches in patients with difficult intravenous access. Ann Emerg Med 46 (2005), 456–461.
3. Keyes, L.E., Frazee, B.W., Snoey, E.R., et al. Ultrasound-guided brachial and basilic vein cannulation in emergency department patients with difficult intravenous access. Ann Emerg Med 34 (1999), 711–714.
4. McCarthy, M.L., Shokoohi, H., Boniface, K.S., et al. Ultrasonography versus landmark for peripheral intravenous cannulation: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med 68 (2016), 10–18.
5. Bahl, A., Hang, B., Brackney, A., et al. Standard long IV catheters versus extended dwell catheters: a randomized comparison of ultrasound-guided catheter survival. Am J Emerg Med 37 (2019), 715–721.
6. Sabri, A., Szalas, J., Holmes, K., et al. Failed attempts and improvement strategies in peripheral intravenous catheterization. Biomed Mater Eng 23 (2013), 93–108.
7. Schoenfeld, E., Shokoohi, H., Boniface, K., Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access in the emergency department: patient-centered survey. West J Emerg Med 12 (2011), 475–477.
8. Fabiani, A., Dreas, L., Sanson, G., Ultrasound-guided deep-arm veins insertion of long peripheral catheters in patients with difficult venous access after cardiac surgery. Heart Lung 46 (2017), 46–53.
9. Stone, P., Meyer, B., Aucoin, J., et al. Ultrasound-guided peripheral IV access: guidelines for practice. Am Nurse Today, 8, 2013.
10. Pandurangadu, A.V., Tucker, J., Brackney, A.R., et al. Ultrasound-guided intravenous catheter survival impacted by amount of catheter residing in the vein. Emerg Med J 35 (2018), 550–555.
11. Shah, H., Bosch, W., Thompson, K.M., et al. Intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infection. Neurohospitalist 3 (2013), 144–151.
12. Elia, F., Ferrari, G., Molino, P., et al. Standard-length catheters vs long catheters in ultrasound-guided peripheral vein cannulation. Am J Emerg Med 30 (2012), 712–716.
13. Pathak, R., Patel, A., Enuh, H., et al. The incidence of central line–associated bacteremia after the introduction of midline catheters in a ventilator unit population. Infect Dis Clin Pract 23 (2015), 131–134.
14. Chopra, V., Kaatz, S., Swaminathan, L., et al. Variation in use and outcomes related to midline catheters: results from a multicentre pilot study. BMJ Qual Saf 28 (2019), 714–720.
15. Tso, A.R., Patniyot, I.R., Gelfand, A.A., et al. Increased rate of venous thrombosis may be associated with inpatient dihydroergotamine treatment. Neurology 89 (2017), 279–283.
16. Zohourian, H., Schaubschlager, T., Lee, P., et al. Comparing incidence of thrombosis in PICC and midlines and evaluating the role of anticoagulation, site of insertion, and risk factors. J Assoc Vasc Access 24 (2019), 38–44.
17. Adhikari, S., Blaivas, M., Morrison, D., et al. Comparison of infection rates among ultrasound-guided versus traditionally placed peripheral intravenous lines. J Ultrasound Med 29 (2010), 741–747.
18. Au, A.K., Rotte, M.J., Grzybowski, R.J., et al. Decrease in central venous catheter placement due to use of ultrasound guidance for peripheral intravenous catheters. Am J Emerg Med 30 (2012), 1950–1954.
19. Bahl, A., Karabon, P., Chu, D., Comparison of venous thrombosis complications in midlines versus peripherally inserted central catheters: are midlines the safer option?. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost, 25, 2019 1076029619839150.
20. Dargin, J.M., Rebholz, C.M., Lowenstein, R.A., et al. Ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous catheter survival in ED patients with difficult access. Am J Emerg Med 28 (2010), 1–7.
21. Murayama, R., Takahashi, T., Tanabe, H., et al. Exploring the causes of peripheral intravenous catheter failure based on shape of catheters removed from various insertion sites. Drug Discov Ther 12 (2018), 170–177.
22. Adams, D., Little, A., Vinsant, C., et al. The midline catheter: a clinical review. J Emerg Med 51 (2016), 252–258.
23. Horattas, M.C., Trupiano, J., Hopkins, S., et al. Changing concepts in long-term central venous access: catheter selection and cost savings. Am J Infect Control 29 (2001), 32–40.
24. Caparas, J.V., Hu, J.P., Safe administration of vancomycin through a novel midline catheter: a randomized, prospective clinical trial. J Vasc Access 15 (2014), 251–256.