Ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous catheter survival in ED patients with difficult access

American Journal of Emergency Medicine

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-7

  Dargin, James M ^a   Rebholz, Casey M ^a   Lowenstein, Robert A ^a   Mitchell, Patricia M ^a   Feldman, James A ^a  

^a BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CATHETER INFECTION; CATHETER OCCLUSION; CATHETER THROMBOSIS; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; EMERGENCY WARD; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NERVE INJURY; PHLEBITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME; VASCULAR PATENCY; VEIN CATHETERIZATION;

ADULT; AGED; CATHETERIZATION, CENTRAL VENOUS; CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 71649107636     PISSN: 07356757     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Juvin P., Blarel A., Fabienne B., et al. Is peripheral line placement more difficult in obese than in lean patients?. Anesth Analg 96 (2003) 1218
2. Constantino T.G., Parikh A.K., Satz W.A., et al. Ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous access versus traditional approaches in patients with difficult intravenous access. Ann Emerg Med 46 5 (2005) 456-461
3. Chinnock B., Thornton S., and Hendey M. Predictors of success in nurse-performed ultrasound-guided cannulation. J Emerg Med 33 4 (2007) 401-405
4. McGee D.M., and Gould M.K. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med 348 12 (2003) 1123-1133
5. Keyes L.E., Frazee B.W., Snoey E.R., et al. Ultrasound-guided brachial and basilic vein cannulation in emergency department patients with difficult intravenous access. Ann Emerg Med 34 6 (1999) 711-714
6. Mills C.N., Otto L., Stone M.B., et al. Ultrasonographically guided insertion of a 15-cm catheter into the deep brachial or basilic vein in patients with difficult intravenous access. Ann Emerg Med 50 1 (2007) 68-72
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. MMWR 51 RR-10 (2002) 1-30
8. Catney M.R., Hills S., Wakefield B., et al. Relationship between peripheral intravenous catheter dwell time and the development of phlebitis and infiltration. J Infus Nurs 24 5 (2001) 332-341
9. Tagalakis V., Kahn S.R., Libman M., et al. The epidemiology of peripheral vein infusion thrombophlebitis: a critical review. Am J Med 113 (2002) 146-151
10. Homer L.D., and Holmes K.R. Risk associated with 72- and 96-hour peripheral intravenous catheter dwell times. J Infus Nurs 21 5 (1998) 301-305
11. White S.A. Peripheral intravenous therapy-related phlebitis rates in an adult population. J Infus Nurs 24 1 (2001) 19-24
12. Smith B. Peripheral intravenous catheter dwell times: a comparison of 3 securement methods for implementation of a 96-hour scheduled change protocol. J Infus Nurs 29 1 (2006) 14-17
13. Adhikari S., Blaivas M., and Morrison D. Comparison of infection rates among ultrasound guided and blindly placed peripheral intravenous lines[abstract]. Acad Emerg Med 14 5 (2007) S100