Variation in use and outcomes related to midline catheters: Results from a multicentre pilot study

BMJ Quality and Safety

Volumn 28, Issue 9, 2019, Pages 714-720

  Chopra, Vineet ^a,b,c   Kaatz, Scott ^d   Swaminathan, Lakshmi ^e   Boldenow, Tanya ^f   Snyder, Ashley ^a,b,c   Burris, Rachel ^a,c   Bernstein, Steve J ^a,b,c   Flanders, Scott ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b VA ANN ARBOR HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^c Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium   (United States)

^d HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^e Beaumont Hospital Dearborn   (United States)

^f St Joseph Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

Appropriateness; continuous quality improvement; decision making; healthcare quality improvement; Midline Catheter; patient safety; Vascular Access

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOODSTREAM INFECTION; CATHETER COMPLICATION; CATHETER INFECTION; CATHETER OCCLUSION; CATHETER REMOVAL; CLINICAL OUTCOME; COHORT ANALYSIS; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DEVICE REMOVAL; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PILOT STUDY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; ADVERSE EVENT; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERIZATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; MICHIGAN; MULTICENTER STUDY;

CATHETER-RELATED INFECTIONS; CATHETERIZATION, CENTRAL VENOUS; HUMANS; INPATIENTS; MICHIGAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT, HEALTH CARE; PILOT PROJECTS; PRACTICE PATTERNS, PHYSICIANS'; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 85063135494     PISSN: 20445415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008554     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Anderson NR. Midline catheters: the middle ground of intravenous therapy administration. J Infus Nurs 2004;27:313-21.
2. Infusion Nurses Society. Infusion nursing standards of practice, 2016. Available: http://wwwins1org/ DefaultaspxTabID=251&productId=113266 [Accessed 12 Oct 2018].
3. Moureau N, Sigl G, Hill M. How to establish an effective midline program: a case study of 2 hospitals. J Assoc Vascular Access 2015;20:179-88.
4. Dawson RL. Midline catheters: an essential tool in CLABSI reduction. infection control today. Available: https://www. infe ctio ncon trol today. com/ clabsi/ midline-catheters-essential-toolclabsi-reduction [Accessed 24 Jun 2018].
5. Adams DZ, Little A, Vinsant C, et al. The midline catheter: a clinical review. J Emerg Med 2016;51:252-8.
6. Paje D, Conlon A, Kaatz S, et al. Patterns and predictors of short-term peripherally inserted central catheter use: a multicenter prospective cohort study. J Hosp Med 2018;13:76-82.
7. Gibson C, Connolly BL, Moineddin R, et al. Peripherally inserted central catheters: use at a tertiary care pediatric center. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013;24:1323-31.
8. Campagna S, Gonella S, Zerla PA, et al. The risk of adverse events related to Extended-Dwell peripheral intravenous access. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:1-3.
9. Xu T, Kingsley L, DiNucci S, et al. Safety and utilization of peripherally inserted central catheters versus midline catheters at a large academic medical center. Am J Infect Control 2016;44:1458-61.
10. Swaminathan L, Flanders S, Rogers M, et al. Improving PICC use and outcomes in hospitalised patients: an interrupted time series study using magic criteria. BMJ Qual Saf 2018;27:271-8.
11. Smith SN, Moureau N, Vaughn VM, et al. Patterns and predictors of peripherally inserted central catheter occlusion: the 3P-O study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2017;28:749-56.
12. Chopra V, Smith S, Swaminathan L, et al. Variations in peripherally inserted central catheter use and outcomes in Michigan hospitals. JAMA Intern Med 2016;176:548-51.
13. Chopra V, Kaatz S, Grant P, et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism following peripherally inserted central catheter exchange: an analysis of 23,000 hospitalized patients. Am J Med 2018;131:651-60.
14. O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis 2011;52:e162-93.
15. Zamanian K, Collins S. New appropriate use guidelines and their impact on the U.S. vascular access device market. Medical Devices Online 2016.
16. Goetz AM, Miller J, Wagener MM, et al. Complications related to intravenous midline catheter usage. A 2-year study. J Intraven Nurs 1998;21:76-80.
17. Chopra V, Flanders SA, Saint S, et al. The Michigan appropriateness guide for intravenous catheters (magic): results from a Multispecialty panel using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. Ann Intern Med 2015;163(6 Suppl):S1-40.
18. Moureau N, Chopra V. Indications for peripheral, midline and central catheters: summary of the magic recommendations. Br J Nurs 2016;25:S15-24.
19. Ventura R, O'Loughlin C, Vavrik B. Clinical evaluation of a securement device used on midline catheters. Br J Nurs 2016;25:S16-22.
20. Chopra V, Anand S, Krein SL, et al. Bloodstream infection, venous thrombosis, and peripherally inserted central catheters: reappraising the evidence. Am J Med 2012;125:733-41.