Estimation of reference evapotranspiration using data driven techniques under limited data conditions

Modeling Earth Systems and Environment

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 1449-1461

  Pandey, P K ^a   Nyori, Topi ^a   Pandey, Vanita ^a  

^a NORTH EASTERN REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

ANNs; Data driven techniques; ER; Gamma test technique; MLNR; Reference evapotranspiration; SVMs

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; ESTIMATION METHOD; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; PENMAN-MONTEITH EQUATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;

EID: 85077927202     PISSN: 23636203     EISSN: 23636211     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40808-017-0367-z     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. 0) in arid and semiarid regions. J Agric Sci 6(3):191–200
2. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration-guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage paper no. 56. FAO, Rome
3. Aytek A (2008) Co-active neurofuzzy inference system for evapotranspiration modeling. Soft Comput 13(7):691–700 DOI: 10.1007/s00500-008-0342-8
4. Chauhan S, Shrivastava RK (2009) Performance evaluation of reference evapotranspiration estimation using climate based methods and artificial neural networks. Water Resour Manag 23(5):825–837 DOI: 10.1007/s11269-008-9301-5
5. Cortex C, Vapnik V (1995) Support vector networks. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. Mach Learn 20:273–297
6. Doglioni A, Giustolisi O, Savic DA, Webb BW (2007) An evolutionary approach to stream temperature analysis. Hydrol Process 22(3):315–326 DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6607
7. El-Baroudy I, Elshorbagy A, Carey SK, Giustolisi O, Savic DA (2010) Comparison of three data-driven techniques in modelling the evapotranspiration process. J Hydroinform 12(4):365. 10.2166/hydro.2010.029 DOI: 10.2166/hydro.2010.029
8. Eslamian SS, Gohari SA, Zareian MJ, Firoozfar A (2012) Estimating Penman Monteith reference evapotranspiration using artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm: a case study. Arabian J Sci Eng 37(4):935–994 DOI: 10.1007/s13369-012-0214-5
9. Fatemeh K (2011) Reference evapotranspiration estimation using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Masters thesis, Universiti Putra Malaysia
10. Fausett L (1994) Fundamentals of neural networks. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
11. Giustolisi O, Laucelli D (2005) Improving generalization of artificial neural networks in rainfall-runoff modeling. Hydrol Sci J 50(3):439–457 DOI: 10.1623/hysj.50.3.439.65025
12. Giustolisi O, Savic DA (2006) A symbolic data-driven technique based on evolutionary polynomial regression. J Hydroinformatics 8(3):207–222. 10.2166/hydro.2006.020
13. Giustolisi O, Simeone V (2006) Optimal design of artificial neural networks by multi-objective strategy: groundwater level predictions. Hydrol Sci J 51(3):502–523 DOI: 10.1623/hysj.51.3.502
14. Giustolisi O, Doglioni A, Savic DA, Webb BW (2007) A multi-model approach to analysis of environmental phenomena. Environ Model Softw 22(5):674–682 DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.12.026
15. Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H (1989) Multilayer feed forward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw 2(5):359–366 DOI: 10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8
16. Huo Z, Feng S, Kang S, Dai X (2012) Artificial neural network models for reference evapotranspiration in an arid area of northwest China. J Arid Environ 82:81–90 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.01.016
17. Kale MU, Nagdeve MB, Bagade SJ (2013) Estimation of evapotranspiration with ANN technique. J Indian Water Resour Soc 33(1):23–29
18. Karimaldini F, Shui L (2012) Daily evapotranspiration modeling from limited weather data by using neuro-fuzzy computing technique. J Irrig Drain Eng 138:21–34. 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000343 DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000343
19. Karimaldini F, Shui LT, Abdollahi M, Khalili N (2010) Deciding the embedding nonlinear model dimensions and data size prior to daily reference evapotranspiration modeling. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 4(11):5668–5674
20. Kisi O (2007) Evapotranspiration modeling from climatic data using a neural computing technique. Hydrol Process 21(6):1925–1934 DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6403
21. Kisi O, Cimen M (2009) Evapotranspiration modeling using support vector machines. Hydrol Sci J 54(5):918–928 DOI: 10.1623/hysj.54.5.918
22. Kisi O, Parmar KS (2016) Application of least square support vector machine and multivariate adaptive regression spline models in long term prediction of river water pollution. J Hydrol 534:104–112 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.12.014
23. Kisi O, Parmar KS, Soni K, Demir V (2017) Modeling of air pollutants using least square support vector regression, multivariate adaptive regression spline and m5 model tree models. Air Qual Atmos Health. 10.1007/s11869-017-0477-9
24. Koutsoyiannis D (2007) Discussion of generalized regression neural networks for evapotranspir- ration modeling. J Hydrol Sci 52(4):832–835 DOI: 10.1623/hysj.52.4.832
25. Laaboudi A, Mouhouche B, Draoui B (2012) Neural network approach to reference evapotranspiration modeling from limited climatic data in arid regions. IntJ Biometeorol 56:831–841 (831–841) DOI: 10.1007/s00484-011-0485-7
26. Laucelli D, Berardi L, Doglioni A (2005) Evolutionary polynomial regression toolbox: version 1.SA. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Bari, Bari, Italy. http://www.hydroinformatics.it/prod02.htm. Accessed 24 June 2017
27. Ozbayoglu G, Ozbayoglu ME (2006) A new approach for the prediction of ash fusion temperatures: a case study using Turkishlignites. Fuel 85:545–552 DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2004.12.020
28. Pandey PK, Pandey V (2016) Evaluation of temperature-based Penman–Monteith (TPM) model under the humid environment. Model Earth Syst Environ 2:152. 10.1007/s40808-016-0204-9 DOI: 10.1007/s40808-016-0204-9
29. Pandey V, Pandey PK, Mahanta AP (2014) Calibration and performance verification of Hargreaves–Samani equation in a humid region. Irrig Drain 63:659–667 DOI: 10.1002/ird.1874
30. Pandey PK, Dabral PP, Pandey V (2016) Evaluation of reference evapotranspiration methods for the northeastern region of India. Int Soil Water Conserv Res. 10.1016/j.iswcr.2016.02.003
31. Parasuraman K, Elshorbagy A, Carey SK (2007) Modeling the dynamics of the evapotranspiration process using genetic programming. J Hydrol Eng (ASCE) 12(1):52–62 DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:1(52)
32. Parmar KS, Bhardwaj R (2015) River water prediction modeling using neural networks, fuzzy and wavelet coupled model. Water Resour Manag 29(1):17–33 DOI: 10.1007/s11269-014-0824-7
33. Shiri J, Kisi Ö., Landeras G, López JJ, Nazemi AH, Stuyt LCPM (2012) Daily reference evapotranspiration modeling by using genetic programming approach in the Basque Country (Northern Spain). J Hydrol 414–415 (302–316)
34. Shrestha NK, Shukla S (2015) Support vector machine based modeling of evapotranspiration using hydro-climatic variables in a sub-tropical environment. Agric For Meterol 200:172–184 DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.09.025
35. Traorea S, Luoa YF, Fippsa G (2016) Deployment of artificial neural network for short-term forecasting of evapotranspiration using public weather forecast restricted messages. Agric Water Manag 163:363–379 DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.10.009
36. Vapnik V (1995) The Nature of statistical learning theory. Springer-Verlag, New York DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0
37. Wang Z, Yao LI, Guo Z (2015) The estimation of reference evapotranspiration based on gamma test and gene expression programming using the weather data set from different climatic zones in China. 2015 ASABE Annual International Meeting 152188992. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/aim.20152188992
38. Wen X, Si J, He Z, Wu J, Shao H, Yu H (2015) Support-vector-machine-based models for modeling daily reference evapotranspiration with limited climatic data in extreme arid regions. Water Resour Manag 29:3195–3209 DOI: 10.1007/s11269-015-0990-2
39. Yang F, White MA, Michaelis AR, Ichii K, Hashimoto H, Votava P, Zhu A, Nemani RR (2006) Prediction of continental-scale evapotranspiration by combining MODIS and Ameri Flux data through support vector machine. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 44(11):3452–3461 DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2006.876297