Dynamic models for exploring the resilience in territorial scenarios

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2020, Pages

  Assumma, Vanessa ^a   Bottero, Marta ^a   Datola, Giulia ^a   De Angelis, Elena ^a   Monaco, Roberto ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Decision making; Dynamic models; Scenario planning; Urban resilience

Indexed keywords

ACTION PLAN; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ECOSYSTEM RESILIENCE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; EXPLORATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; SCENARIO ANALYSIS; TERRITORIAL PLANNING; URBAN AREA; URBAN PLANNING;

EID: 85077579470     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20711050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su12010003     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. Collins, A. The Global Risks Report 2019 14th Edition Insight Report. 2019. Available online: http: //www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risks_Report_2019.pdf (accessed on 16 December 2019).
2. Gencer, E.A.; For, A.H.; Government, L. A Handbook for Local Government Leaders Making Cities Resilient-My City is Getting Ready! Making Cities Resilient-My City is Getting Ready! UNISDR: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
3. Bottero, M.; Caprioli, C.; Cotella, G.; Santangelo, M. Sustainable Cities: A Reflection on Potentialities and Limits based on Existing Eco-Districts in Europe. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5794.
4. Datola, G.; Bottero, M.; De Angelis, E. How Urban Resilience Can Change Cities: A System Dynamics Model Approach. In Proceedings of the Computational Science and Its Applications-ICCSA 2019; Misra, S., Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Stankova, E., Korkhov, V., Torre, C., Rocha, A.M.A.C., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O., Tarantino, E., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Germany, 2019; pp. 108-122.
5. UNISDR. The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction: The Challenge for Science. R. Soc. Meet. Note. 2015. Available online: https://royalsociety.org/~/media/policy/Publications/2015/300715-meeting-note%20- sendai-framework.pdf (accessed on 16 December 2019).
6. United Nations. International Strategy for Disaster Reduction Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations. 2015. Available online: https://www.unisdr.org/files/1037_ hyogoframeworkforactionenglish.pdf (accessed on 16 December 2019).
7. Desouza, K.C.; Flanery, T.H. Designing, planning, and managing resilient cities: A conceptual framework. Cities 2013, 35, 89-99.
8. Chelleri, L.; Waters, J.J.; Olazabal, M.; Minucci, G. Resilience trade-offs: Addressing multiple scales and temporal aspects of urban resilience. Environ. Urban. 2015, 27, 181-198.
9. Sharifi, A.; Yamagata, Y. Resilience-Oriented Urban Planning. In Proceedings of the Lecture Notes in Energy; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018.
10. Mushir, S. Urban Resilience Planning: A Way to Respond to Uncertainties-Current Approaches and Challenges. In Making Cities Resilient; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019.
11. Pejic Bach, M.; Tustanovski, E.; Ip, A.W.H.; Yung, K.L.; Roblek, V. System dynamics models for the simulation of sustainable urban development: A review and analysis and the stakeholder perspective. Kybernetes 2019.
12. Pagano, A.; Pluchinotta, I.; Giordano, R.; Petrangeli, A.B.; Fratino, U.; Vurro, M. Dealing with Uncertainty in Decision-Making for Drinking Water Supply Systems Exposed to Extreme Events. Water Resour. Manag. 2018, 32, 2131-2145.
13. Tan, Y.; Jiao, L.; Shuai, C.; Shen, L. A system dynamics model for simulating urban sustainability performance: A China case study. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 199, 1107-1115.
14. Pluchinotta, I.; Pagano, A.; Giordano, R.; Tsoukiàs, A. A system dynamics model for supporting decision-makers in irrigation water management. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 223, 815-824.
15. Schwarz, N.; Haase, D.; Seppelt, R. Omnipresent sprawl? A review of urban simulation models with respect to urban shrinkage. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 2010, 37, 265-283.
16. Coutu, D.L. How resilience works. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2002, 80, 46-56.
17. Luthans, F.; Vogelgesang, G.R.; Lester, P.B. Developing the Psychological Capital of Resiliency. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 2006, 5, 25-44.
18. Holling, C.S. Resilience and Stability. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1973, 4, 1-23.
19. Fiksel, J. Designing Resilient, Sustainable Systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 5330-5339.
20. Hollnagel, E.;Woods, D.; Leveson, N. Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006.
21. Carpenter, S.;Walker, B.; Anderies, J.M.; Abel, N. From Metaphor to Measurement: Resilience of What to What? Ecosystems 2001, 4, 765-781.
22. Folke, C.; Carpenter, S.; Elmqvist, T.; Gunderson, L.; Holling, C.S.; Walker, B. Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. AMBIO 2002, 31, 437-441.
23. Walker, B.; Holling, C.S.; Carpenter, S.R.; Kinzig, A. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecol. Soc. 2004, 9. Available online: https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/ art5/ (accessed on 16 December 2019).
24. Nelson, D.R.; Adger,W.N.; Brown, K. Adaptation to Environmental Change: Contributions of a Resilience Framework. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2007, 32, 395-419.
25. Tanner, T.; Mitchell, T.; Polack, E.; Guenther, B. Urban Governance for Adaptation: Assessing Climate Change Resilience in Ten Asian Cities. IDS Work. Pap. 2009, 315, 1-47.
26. Tyler, S.; Moench, M. A framework for urban climate resilience. Clim. Dev. 2012, 4, 311-326.
27. Ahern, J. From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landsc. Urban. Plan. 2011, 100, 341-343.
28. Wilkinson, C. Social-ecological resilience: Insights and issues for planning theory. Plan. Theory 2012, 11, 148-169.
29. Coaffee, J. Risk, resilience, and environmentally sustainable cities. Energy Policy 2008, 36, 4633-4638.
30. Cutter, L.S.; Barnes, L.; Berry, M.; Burton, C.; Evans, E.; Tate, E.; Webb, J.; Carolina, S. Community and Regional Resilience: Perspectives from Hazards, Disasters, and Emergency Management. Geography 2008, 1, 2301-2306.
31. Gaillard, J.C. Vulnerability, capacity and resilience: Perspectives for climate and development policy. J. Int. Dev. 2010, 22, 218-232.
32. Meerow, S.; Newell, J.P.; Stults, M. Defining urban resilience: A review. Landsc. Urban. Plan. 2016, 147, 38-49.
33. Godschalk, D.R. Urban Hazard Mitigation: Creating Resilient Cities. Nat. Hazards Rev. 2003, 4, 136-143.
34. Batty, M. The size, scale, and shape of cities. Science. 2008, 319, 769-771.
35. Klein, R.J.T.; Nicholls, R.J.; Thomalla, F. Resilience to natural hazards: How useful is this concept? Environ. Hazards 2003, 5, 35-45.
36. Adger, W.N. Social and ecological resilience: Are they related? Prog. Hum. Geogr. 2000, 24, 347-364.
37. Pendall, R.; Foster, K.A.; Cowell, M. Resilience and regions: Building understanding of the metaphor. Cambr. J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 2010, 3, 71-84.
38. Sharifi, A.; Yamagata, Y. Principles and criteria for assessing urban energy resilience: A literature review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 60, 1654-1677.
39. Leichenko, R. Climate change and urban resilience. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2011, 3, 164-168.
40. Pierce, J.C.; Budd, W.W.; Lovrich, N.P. Resilience and sustainability in US urban areas. Environ. Politic 2011, 20, 566-584.
41. Sharifi, A.; Yamagata, Y. Major Principles and Criteria for Development of an Urban Resilience Assessment Index. In Proceedings of the International Conference and Utility Exhibition on Green Energy for Sustainable Development (ICUE), Pattaya City, Thailand, 19-21 March 2014; pp. 1-5.
42. Holling, C.S. Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2003, 4, 1-23.
43. Cutter, S.L.; Barnes, L.; Berry, M.; Burton, C.; Evans, E.; Tate, E.; Webb, J. A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2008, 18, 598-606.
44. Tompkins, E.L.; Amundsen, H. Perceptions of the effectiveness of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in advancing national action on climate change. Environ. Sci. Policy 2008, 11, 1-3.
45. Wang, L.; Xue, X.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, X. Exploring the Emerging Evolution Trends of Urban Resilience Research by Scientometric Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 10, 2181.
46. Pizzo, B. Problematizing resilience: Implications for planning theory and practice. Cities 2015, 43, 133-140.
47. Letcher, R.A.K.; Jakeman, A.J.; Barreteau, O.; Borsuk, M.E.; ElSawah, S.; Hamilton, S.H.; Henriksen, H.J.; Kuikka, S.; Maier, H.R.; Rizzoli, A.E.; et al. Selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management. Environ. Model. Softw. 2013, 47, 159-181.
48. Neuwirth, C.; Peck, A.; Simonovíc, S.P. Modeling structural change in spatial system dynamics: ADaisyworld example. Environ. Model. Softw. 2015, 47, 159-181.
49. Bala, B.K.; Arshad, F.M.; Noh, K.M. System Dynamics. Modelling and Simulation; Springer: Singapore, 2017; ISBN 978-981-10-2043-8.
50. Forrester, J.W. Industrial Dynamics; M.I.T. Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1964.
51. Forrester, J.W. Principles of Systems; System Dynamics Series; Productivity Press: Portland, OR, USA, 1990; ISBN 9780915299874.
52. Thompson, B.P.; Bank, L.C. Use of system dynamics as a decision-making tool in building design and operation. Build. Environ. 2010, 45, 1006-1015.
53. Swart, J. A system dynamics approach to predator-prey modeling. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 1990, 6, 94-99.
54. Crookes, D.; Blignaut, J. Predator-prey analysis using system dynamics: An application to the steel industry. S. Afr. J. Econ. Manag. Sci. 2016, 19, 733-746.
55. Guan, D.; Gao, W.; Su, W.; Li, H.; Hokao, K. Modeling and dynamic assessment of urban economy-resource-environment system with a coupled system dynamics-Geographic information system model. Ecol. Indic. 2011, 11, 1333-1344.
56. Güneralp, B.; Seto, K.C. Environmental impacts of urban growth from an integrated dynamic perspective: A case study of Shenzhen, South China. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2008, 18, 720-735.
57. Yao, H.; Shen, L.; Tan, Y.; Hao, J. Simulating the impacts of policy scenarios on the sustainability performance of infrastructure projects. Autom. Constr. 2011, 20, 1060-1069.
58. Yuan, H.; Chini, A.R.; Lu, Y.; Shen, L. A dynamic model for assessing the effects of management strategies on the reduction of construction and demolition waste. Waste Manag. 2012, 32, 521-531.
59. Blumberga, A. System Dynamics for Environmental Engineering Students; Riga Technical University: Riga, Latvia, 2011; ISBN 9789934819629.
60. Egilmez, G.; Tatari, O. A dynamic modeling approach to highway sustainability: Strategies to reduce overall impact. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2012, 46, 1086-1096.
61. Shepherd, S.P. A review of system dynamics models applied in transportation. Transportmetrica B 2014, 2, 83-105.
62. Yu, C.; Chen, C.; Lin, C.; Liaw, S. Development of a system dynamics model for sustainable land use management. J. Chin. Inst. Eng. 2003, 26, 607-618.
63. Park, M.; Kim, Y.; Lee, H.S.; Han, S.; Hwang, S.; Choi, M.J. Modeling the dynamics of urban development project: Focusing on self-sufficient city development. Math. Comput. Model. 2013, 57, 2082-2093.
64. Wu, D.; Ning, S. Dynamic assessment of urban economy-environment-energy system using system dynamics model: A case study in Beijing. Environ. Res. 2018, 164, 70-84.
65. Kunc, M.; Mortenson, M.J.; Vidgen, R. A computational literature review of the field of System Dynamics from 1974 to 2017. J. Simul. 2018, 12, 115-127.
66. Lotka, A.J. Contribution to the Energetics of Evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 8, 1747.
67. Turner, M.G.; Gardner, R.H. Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015; ISBN 978-1-4939-2793-7.
68. Monaco, R. Introduzione ai Modelli Matematici Nelle Scienze Territoriali/Roberto Monaco, Giorgia Servente; Quaderni di matematica per le scienze applicate 2; Celid: Torino, Italy, 2011; ISBN 978-88-7661-927-4.
69. Finotto, F.; Monaco, R.; Servente, G. Un modello per la valutazione di energia biologica in un sistema ambientale. Sci. Reg. 2010, 9, 61-84.
70. Pelorosso, R.; Gobattoni, F.; Menconi, M.E.; Vizzari, M.; Grohmann, D.; Ripa, M.; Leone, A. Landscape development scenario analysis by PANDORAmodel: An application in Umbria Region (Italy). In Proceedings of the International Conference of Agricultural Engineering CIGR-AgEng2012: Agriculture and Engineering for a Healthier Life, Valencia, Spain, 8-12 July 2012. CIGR-AgEng.
71. Gobattoni, F.; Groppi, M.; Monaco, R.; Pelorosso, R. New Developments and Results for Mathematical Models in Environment Evaluations. Acta Appl. Math. 2014, 132, 321-331.
72. Monaco, R. A mathematical model for territorial integrated evaluation. In Smart Evaluation and Integrated Design in Regional Development; Brunetta, G., Ed.; Ashgate: Farnham, UK, 2015; pp. 97-106, ISBN 9781472445834.
73. Assumma, V.; Bottero, M.; Monaco, R. Landscape Economic Value for Territorial Scenarios of Change: An Application for the Unesco Site of Langhe, Roero and Monferrato. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2016, 223, 549-554.
74. Assumma, V.; Bottero, M.; Monaco, R. Landscape Economic Attractiveness: An Integrated Methodology for Exploring the Rural Landscapes in Piedmont (Italy). Land 2019, 8, 105.
75. Assumma, V.; Bottero, M.; Monaco, R.; Soares, A.J. An integrated evaluation model for shaping future resilient scenarios in multi-pole territorial systems. Environ. Territ. Model. Plan. Des. 2018, 4, 17-24.
76. Assumma, V.; Bottero, M.; Monaco, R.; Soares, A.J. An integrated evaluation methodology to measure ecological and economic landscape states for territorial transformation scenarios: An application in Piedmont (Italy). Ecol. Indic. 2019, 105, 156-165.
77. Monaco, R.; Rabino, G.A. A Stochastic Treatment of a Dynamic Model for an Interacting Cities System. In Mathematical Modelling in Science and Technology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1984.
78. Bottero, M. Assessing the economic aspects of landscape. In Landscape Indicators: Assessing and Monitoring Landscape Quality; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 167-192, ISBN 9789400703650.
79. Brunetta, G.; Salizzoni, E.; Bottero, M.; Monaco, R.; Assumma, V. Measuring resilience for territorial enhancement: An experimentation in Trentino. Valori e Valutazioni 2018, 20, 69-78.
80. Goodwin, R.M. A Growth Cycle. In Essays in Economic Dynamics; Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK, 1982; pp. 165-170, ISBN 978-1-349-05504-3.
81. Weber, L. A Contribution to Goodwin's Growth Cycle Model from a System Dynamics Perspective. In Proceedings of the 23rd International System Dynamics Conference, Boston, MA, USA, 17-23 July 2005; pp. 17-21.
82. Hannon, B.; Ruth, M. Modeling Dynamic Biological Systems. In Modeling Dynamic Biological Systems; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 3-28, ISBN 978-3-319-05614-2.
83. Ford, F.A. Modeling the Environment: An Introduction to System Dynamics Models of Environmental Systems; Environmental Studies; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1999; ISBN 9781559636001.
84. Dalimov, R.; Gappar, N. Limit Cycle, Trophic Function and the Dynamics of Intersectoral Interaction. Curr. Res. J. Econ. Theory 2010, 2, 32-40.
85. Ilmola, L. Approaches to Measurement of Urban Resilience. In Urban Resilience; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016.
86. Saaty, T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process; McGraw Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1980; ISBN 0070543712.
87. Elsawah, S.; Pierce, S.A.; Hamilton, S.H.; van Delden, H.; Haase, D.; Elmahdi, A.; Jakeman, A.J. An overview of the system dynamics process for integrated modelling of socio-ecological systems: Lessons on good modelling practice from five case studies. Environ. Model. Softw. 2017, 93, 127-145.
88. Norton, J. An introduction to sensitivity assessment of simulation models. Environ. Model. Softw. 2015, 69, 166-174.
89. Bottero, M.; Ferretti, V.; Mondini, G. Calculating composite indicators for sustainability. In The Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 20-35.
90. Bottero, M.; Datola, G.; Monaco, R. Exploring the resilience of urban systems using fuzzy cognitive maps. In International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 338-353.
91. Sušnik, J.; Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia, L.; Savic, D.; Kapelan, Z. Integrated System Dynamics Modelling for water scarcity assessment: Case study of the Kairouan region. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 440, 290-306.
92. Becchio, C.; Bottero, M.; Corgnati, S.; Dell'Anna, F. Decision making for sustainable urban energy planning: An integrated evaluation framework of alternative solutions for a NZED (Net Zero-Energy District) in Turin. Land Use Policy 2018, 78, 803-817.
93. Caprioli, C.; Bottero, M.; Pellegrini, M. An Agent-Based Model (ABM) for the Evaluation of Energy Redevelopment Interventions at District Scale: An Application for the San Salvario Neighborhood in Turin (Italy). In International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; ISBN 9783030243012.
94. Dell'Anna, F.; Bravi, M.; Marmolejo-Duarte, C.; Bottero, M.C.; Chen, A. EPC Green Premium in Two Different European Climate Zones: A Comparative Study between Barcelona and Turin. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5605.
95. Shafiei, E.; Stefansson, H.; Asgeirsson, E.I.; Davidsdottir, B.; Raberto, M. Integrated Agent-based and System Dynamics Modelling for Simulation of Sustainable Mobility. Transp. Rev. 2013, 33, 44-70.
96. Pelorosso, R.; Gobattoni, F.; Geri, F.; Leone, A. PANDORA 3.0 plugin: A new biodiversity ecosystem service assessment tool for urban green infrastructure connectivity planning. Ecosyst. Serv. 2017, 26, 476-482.
97. Giordano, G.; Altafini, C. Qualitative and quantitative responses to press perturbations in ecological networks. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11378.
98. Elmqvist, T.; Andersson, E.; Frantzeskaki, N.; McPhearson, T.; Gaffney, O.; Takeuchi, K.; Folke, C. Sustainability and resilience for transformation in the urban century. Nat. Sustain. 2019, 2, 267-273.
99. Jakeman, A.J.; Letcher, R.A.; Norton, J.P. Ten iterative steps in development and evaluation of environmental models. Environ. Model. Softw. 2006, 21, 602-614.
100. Luna-Reyes, L.F.; Andersen, D.L. Collecting and analyzing qualitative data for system dynamics: Methods and models. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 2003, 19, 271-296.
101. Lane, D.C. Formal theory building for the avalanche game: Explaining counter-intuitive behavior of a complex system using geometrical and human behavioural/physiological effects. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 2008, 25, 521-542.
102. Hovmand, P.F.; Andersen, D.; Rouwette, E.; Richardson, G.; Rux, K.; Calhoun, A. Group Model-Building 'Scripts' as a Collaborative Planning Tool. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 2012, 29, 179-193.
103. Assumma, V.; Bottero, M.; Datola, G.; Angelis, E.; Monaco, R. Come esplorare la resilienza nei sistemi urbani e territoriali? Una panoramica sui modelli dinamici (How to explore resilience in urban and territorial systems? An overview on dynamic models). In Proceedings of the 40th AISRE Conference, Beyond the crises: Renewal, Reconstruction and Local Development, L'Aquila, Italy, 16-18 September 2019, in press.