Dynamic assessment of urban economy-environment-energy system using system dynamics model: A case study in Beijing

Environmental Research

Volumn 164, Issue , 2018, Pages 70-84

  Wu, Desheng ^a,b   Ning, Shuang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^b STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Economy environment energy; Geographic Information System; System dynamics

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC GROWTH; ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING; GIS; POLICY MAKING; URBAN ECONOMY;

ARTICLE; CHINA; ECONOMICS; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY RESOURCE; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; INVESTMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL MODEL; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN AREA; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC MODEL; THEORETICAL MODEL;

BEIJING [CHINA]; CHINA;

BEIJING; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MODELS, ECONOMIC; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 85042367616     PISSN: 00139351     EISSN: 10960953     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.029     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Anand, S., Vrat, P., Dahiya, R.P., Application of a system dynamics approach for assessment and mitigation of CO2 emissions from the cement industry. J. Environ. Manag. 79:4 (2006), 383–398.
2. Bai, Y., Kaneko, I., Kobayashi, H., et al. A geographic information system (GIS)-based approach to adaptation to regional climate change: a case study of Okutama-machi, Tokyo, Japan. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 19:5 (2014), 589–614.
3. Basso, F., Bove, E., Dumontet, S., et al. Evaluating environmental sensitivity at the basin scale through the use of geographic information systems and remotely sensed data: an example covering the Agri basin (Southern Italy). Catena 40:1 (2000), 19–35.
4. Cinderby, S., Geographic information systems (GIS) for participation: the future of environmental GIS?. Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 11:3 (1999), 304–315.
5. Damjan, K., Peter, G., A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development. Resour. Conserv. Recyl. 43 (2005), 189–208.
6. Guan, D., Gao, W., Watari, K., et al. Land use change of Kitakyushu based on landscape ecology and Markov model. J. Geogr. Sci. 18:4 (2008), 455–468.
7. Hanley, N.D., McGregor, P.G., Swales, J.K., et al. The impact of a stimulus to energy efficiency on the economy and the environment: a regional computable general equilibrium analysis. Renew. Energy 31:2 (2006), 161–171.
8. Khan, R., Jhariya, D.C., Land use land cover change detection using remote sensing and geographic information system in Raipur Municipal Corporation Area, Chhattisgarh. SSARSC Int. J. Geo Sci. Geo Inform. 3:1 (2016), 1–4.
9. Lahmer, W., Becker, A., Mueller-Wohlfeil, D.I., et al. A GIS-Based Approach for Regional Hydrological Modelling, 254, 1999, IAHS Publication (International Association of Hydrological Sciences), 33–43.
10. Lazzaretto, A., Toffolo, A., Energy, economy and environment as objectives in multi-criterion optimization of thermal systems design. Energy 29:8 (2004), 1139–1157.
11. Lenzen, M., Dey, C.J., Economic, energy and greenhouse emissions impacts of some consumer choice, technology and government outlay options. Energy Econ. 24:4 (2002), 377–403.
12. Li, F.J., Dong, S.C., Li, F., A system dynamics model for analyzing the eco-agriculture system with policy recommendations. Ecol. Model. 227 (2012), 34–45.
13. Li, G.C., Huang, G.H., Lin, Q.G., et al. Development of a GHG-mitigation oriented inexact dynamic model for regional energy system management. Energy 36:5 (2011), 3388–3398.
14. Li, Z.W., Zeng, G.M., Zhang, H., et al. The integrated eco-environment assessment of the red soil hilly region based on GIS—a case study in Changsha City, China. Ecol. Model. 202:3 (2007), 540–546.
15. Lin, S.J., Lu, I.J., Lewis, C., Grey relation performance correlations among economics, energy use and carbon dioxide emission in Taiwan. Energy Policy 35:3 (2007), 1948–1955.
16. Lu, C.Y., Gu, W., Dai, A.H., et al. Assessing habitat suitability based on geographic information system (GIS) and fuzzy: a case study of Schisandra sphenanthera Rehd. et Wils. in Qinling Mountains, China. Ecol. Model. 242 (2012), 105–115.
17. Mallick, R.B., Jacobs, J.M., Miller, B.J., et al. 2016. Framework to use CMIP5, system dynamics, and Monte Carlo analysis to quantify the impact of climate change on pavements. In: Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, p. 16-2620.
18. Mollalo, A., Alimohammadi, A., Shirzadi, M.R., et al. Geographic information system‐based analysis of the spatial and spatio‐temporal distribution of Zoonotic Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Golestan Province, North‐East of Iran. Zoonoses Public Health 62:1 (2015), 18–28.
19. Mundaca, L., Román, R., Cansino, J.M., Towards a green energy economy? A macroeconomic-climate evaluation of Sweden's CO2 emissions. Appl. Energy 148 (2015), 196–209.
20. Naill, R.F., A system dynamics model for national energy policy planning. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 8:1 (1992), 1–19.
21. Oliveira, C., Antunes, C.H., A multiple objective model to deal with economy–energy–environment interactions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 153:2 (2004), 370–385.
22. Rahman, M.R., Shi, Z.H., Chongfa, C., Soil erosion hazard evaluation—an integrated use of remote sensing, GIS and statistical approaches with biophysical parameters towards management strategies. Ecol. Model. 220:13 (2009), 1724–1734.
23. Rahmani, M.A., Zarghami, M., The use of statistical weather generator, hybrid data driven and system dynamics models for water resources management under climate change. J. Environ. Inform., 25(1), 2015.
24. Ranjan, A.K., Vallisree, S., Singh, R.K., Role of geographic information system and remote sensing in monitoring and management of urban and watershed environment: overview. J. Remote Sens. GIS 7 (2016), 1–14.
25. Rosenzweig, C., Elliott, J., Deryng, D., et al. Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111:9 (2014), 3268–3273.
26. Rozman, Č Pažek, K., Prišenk, J., et al. System dynamics model for policy scenarios of organic farming development. Organizacija 45:5 (2012), 212–218.
27. Simoes, S., Fortes, P., Seixas, J., et al. Assessing effects of exogenous assumptions in GHG emissions forecasts–a 2020 scenario study for Portugal using the Times energy technology model. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 94 (2015), 221–235.
28. Song, G., Li, Z., Yang, Y., et al. Assessment of ecological vulnerability and decision-making application for prioritizing roadside ecological restoration: a method combining geographic information system, Delphi survey and Monte Carlo simulation. Ecol. Indic. 52 (2015), 57–65.
29. Stepp, M.D., Winebrake, J.J., Hawker, J.S., et al. Greenhouse gas mitigation policies and the transportation sector: the role of feedback effects on policy effectiveness. Energy Policy 37:7 (2009), 2774–2787.
30. Tahri, M., Hakdaoui, M., Maanan, M., The evaluation of solar farm locations applying geographic information system and multi-criteria decision-making methods: case study in Southern Morocco. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 51 (2015), 1354–1362.
31. Walters, J.P., Javernick-Will, A.N., Long-term functionality of rural water services in developing countries: a system dynamics approach to understanding the dynamic interaction of factors. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49:8 (2015), 5035–5043.
32. Wu, K.S., Huo, X., Zhu, G.H., Relationships between esophageal cancer and spatial environment factors by using geographic information system. Sci. Total Environ. 393:2 (2008), 219–225.