Decision making for sustainable urban energy planning: an integrated evaluation framework of alternative solutions for a NZED (Net Zero-Energy District) in Turin

Land Use Policy

Volumn 78, Issue , 2018, Pages 803-817

  Becchio, Cristina ^a   Bottero, Marta Carla ^a   Corgnati, Stefano Paolo ^a   Dell'Anna, Federico ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Co benefit; Cost benefit analysis; Energy refurbishment; Net Zero Energy District; Socio economic impact

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; EUROPEAN UNION; SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN PLANNING;

ITALY; PIEDMONT [ITALY]; TORINO [PIEDMONT]; TURIN;

EID: 85053762815     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.048     Document Type: Article

References (144)

1. Anselin, L., Models in space and time. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Studies in Operational Regional Science, 4, 1988, Springer, Dordrecht, 137–168, 10.1007/978-94-015-7799-1_10.
2. Araújo, C., Almeida, M., Bragança, L., Barbosa, J.A., Cost–benefit analysis method for building solutions. Appl. Energy 173 (2016), 124–133, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.005.
3. Asdrubali, F., Baldinelli, G., Bianchi, F., Sambuco, S., A comparison between environmental sustainability rating systems LEED and ITACA for residential buildings. Build. Environ. 86 (2015), 98–108, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.01.001.
4. Autorità dell'energia elettrica e gas, 2016. [Online] http://www.autorita.energia.it/it/index.htm, (Accessed 6 April 2016).
5. Awadh, O., Sustainability and green building rating systems: LEED, BREEAM, GSAS and Estidama critical analysis. J. Build. Eng. 11 (2017), 25–29, 10.1016/j.jobe.2017.03.010.
6. Azari, R., Garshasbi, S., Amini, P., Rashed-Ali, H., Mohammadi, Y., Multi-objective optimization of building envelope design for life cycle environmental performance. Energy Build. 126 (2016), 524–534, 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.054.
7. Babaizadeh, H., Haghighi, N., Asadi, S., Broun, R., Riley, D., Life cycle assessment of exterior window shadings in residential buildings in different climate zones. Build. Environ. 90 (2015), 168–177, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.03.038.
8. Ballarini, I., Corgnati, S.P., Corrado, V., Use of reference buildings to assess the energy saving potentials of the residential building stock: the experience of TABULA project. Energy Policy 68 (2014), 273–284, 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.027.
9. Baltagi, B.H., Chang, Y.-J., Incomplete panels. J. Econ. 62 (1994), 67–89, 10.1016/0304-4076(94)90017-5.
10. Barthelmes, V., Becchio, C., Bottero, M., Corgnati, S., Cost-optimal analysis for the definition of energy design strategies: the case of a nearly-zero energy building. Valori e valutazioni 16 (2016), 61–76.
11. Bateman, I.J., Turner, R.K., Valuation of the environment, methods and techniques: the contingent valuation method. Sustainable Environmental Economics and Management: Principles and Practice, 1993, Belhaven Press, London.
12. Becchio, C., Corgnati, S.P., Ballarini, I., Corrado, V., Energy saving potential by retrofitting residential buildings in Europe. REHVA J. 6 (2012), 34–38.
13. Becchio, C., Corgnati, S.P., Fabrizio, E., Monetti, V., Seguro, F., Application of the LEED PRM to an Italian existing building. Energy Procedia 62 (2014), 141–149, 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.12.375.
14. Becchio, C., Corgnati, S.P., Delmastro, C., Fabi, V., Lombardi, P., The role of nearly-zero energy buildings in the definition of post-carbon cities. Energy Procedia 78 (2015), 687–692.
15. Becchio, C., Bottero, M., Corgnati, S.P., Dell'Anna, F., A MCDA-based approach for evaluating alternative requalification strategies for a Net-Zero Energy District (NZED). Zopounidis, C., Doumpos, M., (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2017, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, New York, 189–211.
16. Becchio, C., Bottero, M.C., Casasso, A., Corgnati, S.P., Dell'Anna, F., Piga, B., Sethi, R., Energy, economic and environmental modelling for supporting strategic local planning. Procedia Eng. 205 (2017), 35–42, 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.931.
17. Becchio, C., Bottero, M., Corgnati, S.P., Dell'Anna, F., Evaluating health benefits of urban energy retrofitting: an application for the city of Turin. Bisello, A., Vettorato, D., Laconte, P., Costa, S., (eds.) SMart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions. Results of SSPCR 2017, 2018, Springer, 10.1007/978-3-319-75774-2_20.
18. Becchio, C., Bertoncini, M., Boggio, A., Bottero, M., Corgnati, S.P., Dell'Anna, F., The impact of users’ lifestyle in zero-energy and emission buildings: an application of cost-benefit analysis. Calabrò F., Della Spina, L., Bevilacqua, C., (eds.) New Metropolitan Perspectives. ISHT 2018. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol. 100, 2019, Springer, Cham.
19. Beria, P., Maltese, I., Mariotti, I., Comparing cost benefit and multi-criteria analysis: the evaluation of neighbourhoods’ sustainable mobility. Eur. Trans. Res. Rev. 3 (2012), 137–152.
20. Bertazzi, A., Fumagalli, E., Lo Schiavo, L., The use of customer outage cost surveys in policy decision-making: the Italian experience in regulating quality of electricity supply. 18th CIRED, International Conference on Electricity Distribution, 2005.
21. Bisello, A., Grilli, G., Balest, J., Stellin, G., Ciolli, M., Co-benefits of smart and sustainable energy district projects: an overview of economic assessment methodologies. International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions, 2017, Springer, Cham.
22. Boardman, A.E., Greenberg, D.H., Vining, A.R., Weimer, D.L., Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice. 2012, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
23. Bodano, F., Talarico, A., Involucro edilizio e manutenzione. Ingaramo, L., (eds.) Social Housing: modelli e processi integrati per valutare la sostenibilità 2015, Celid, Turin.
24. Borchiellini, R., Corgnati, S., Becchio, C., Delmastro, C., Bottero, M., Dell'Anna, F., Acquaviva, A., Bottaccioli, L., Patti, E., Bompard, E., Pons, E., Estebsari, A., Verda, V., Santarelli, M., Leone, P., Lanzini, A., The energy center initiative at Politecnico di Torino: practical experiences on energy efficiency measures in the municipality of Torino. Int. J. Heat Technol., 35, 2017, 10.18280/ijht.35sp0128.
25. Bottero, M., A multi-methodological approach for assessing sustainability of urban projects. Manag. Environ. Urban Projects 26 (2015), 138–154.
26. Bottero, M., Bravi, M., Valutazione dei benefici connessi al risparmio energetico degli edifici: un approccio econometrico. GEAM 3 (2014), 15–24.
27. Bottero, M., Ferretti, V., Mondini, G., Valori ambientali, equità intergenerazionale e sostenibilità: una riflessione a partire dall'Analisi Costi Benefici. Valori e Valutazioni 9 (2012), 91–106.
28. Bottero, M., Comino, E., Duriavig, M., Ferretti, V., Pomarico, S., The application of a Multicriteria Spatial Decision Support System (MCSDSS) for the assessment of biodiversity conservation in the Province of Varese (Italy). Land Use Policy 30 (2013), 730–738.
29. Bottero, M., D'Alpaos, C., Dell'Anna, F., Boosting investments in buildings energy retrofit: the role of incentives. Calabrò F., Della Spina, L., Bevilacqua, C., (eds.) New Metropolitan Perspectives. ISHT 2018. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol. 101, 2019, Springer, Cham.
30. BPIE,. Principles for Nearly Zero-Energy Buildings: Paving the Way for Effective Implementation of Policy Requirements. 2011, Buildings Performance Institute, Europe, Brussels.
31. Brans, J.P., Lingenierie de la decision. Elaboration dinstruments daide a la decision. Methode PROMETHEE, Instruments et Perspectives Davenir. 1982, Universite Laval, Quebec, 183–214.
32. BRE Global, BREEAM International New Construction, Technical Manual SD233 – Issue: 1.0, 2016. 2016.
33. Buso, T., Dell'Anna, F., Becchio, C., Bottero, M.C., Corgnati, S.P., Of comfort and cost: examining indoor comfort conditions and guests’ valuations in Italian hotel rooms. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 32 (2017), 94–111.
34. Canesi, R., D'Alpaos, C., Marella, M., Foreclosed homes market in Italy: bases of value. Int. J. Hous. Sci. Appl. 40:3 (2016), 201–209.
35. Canesi, R., D'Alpaos, C., Marella, M., Forced sale values vs. market values in Italy. J. Real Estate Lit. 24:2 (2016), 377–401.
36. CEN, Energy Performance of Buildings – Economic Evaluation Procedure for Energy Systems in Buildings, EN 15459:2007. 2007.
37. Chen, H., Lee, W.L., Wang, X., Energy assessment of office buildings in China using China building energy codes and LEED 2.2. Energy Build. 86 (2015), 514–524, 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.10.034.
38. Collier, F., Hambling, J., Kernaghan, S., Kovacevic, B., Miller, R., Payá Pérez, A., Richardson, E., MacMillan, S., Tomorrow's cities: a framework to assess urban resilience. Urban Des. Plann. 167 (2013), 79–91.
39. Colson, G., Bruyn, C.D., Models and methods in multiple objectives decision making. Math. Comput. Modell. 12 (1989), 1201–1211.
40. Comino, E., Bottero, M., Pomarico, S., Rosso, M., Exploring the environmental value of ecosystem services for a river basin through a spatial multicriteria analysis. Land Use Policy 36 (2014), 381–395.
41. Comino, E., Bottero, M., Pomarico, S., Rosso, M., The combined use of Spatial Multicriteria Evaluation and stakeholders analysis for supporting the ecological planning of a river basin. Land Use Policy 58 (2016), 183–195.
42. Copenhagen Economics, Multiple Benefits of Investing in Energy Efficient Renovation of Buildings: Impact on Public Finances. 2012, Renovate Europe Copenhagen.
43. Copiello, S., Achieving affordable housing through energy efficiency strategy. Energy Policy 85 (2015), 288–298, 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.06.017.
44. Copiello, S., Bonifaci, P., Green housing: toward a new energy efficiency paradox?. Cities 49 (2015), 76–87, 10.1016/j.cities.2015.07.006.
45. CTI, Gestione e valorizzazione delle ceneri di combustione nella filiera Legno-Energia. [Online], 2009 (Accessed 6 April 2016) http://www.cti2000.it/solidi/Relazione%20conclusiva%20BIOCEN.pdf.
46. de Ayala, A., Galarraga, I., Spadaro, J.V., The price of energy efficiency in the Spanish housing market. Energy Policy 94 (2016), 16–24, 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.032.
47. Del Bo, C.F., Fiorio, C.V., Florio, M., Shadow wages for the EU regions. Fisc. Stud. 32 (2011), 109–143.
48. DG Energy, Energy Trends up to 2050. [Online], 2014 (Accessed 6 April 2016) https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/trends_to_2050_update_2013.pdf.
49. DGR 46-11968, Deliberazione della Giunta Regionale 4 agosto 2009, n. 46-11968. Bollettino Ufficiale Regione Piemonte Parte I-II, 4° supplemento al numero 31-7 agosto 2009. 2009.
50. Du, K., Lin, B., Comments on “Using latent variable approach to estimate Chinas economy-wide energy rebound effect over 1954-2010” by Shuai Shao, Tao Huang and Lili Yang. Energy Policy 86 (2015), 219–221, 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.07.006.
51. EN 15459, Energy Performance of Buildings – Economic Evaluation Procedure for Energy Systems in Buildings. Brussels, 2007.
52. EPRI, Methodological Approach for Estimating the Benefits and Costs of Smart Grid Demonstration Projects. 2010, U.S. Department of Energy, Palo Alto.
53. EU, Directive 2010/31/ EU of the European parliament and of the council of 19 may 2010 on the energy performance of buildings (recast). Off. J. Eur. Union 3 (2010), 124–146.
54. EU, 244/2012, Commission Delegated Regulation No 244/2012 of 16 January 2012 Supplementing Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Energy Performance of Buildings by Establishing a Comparative Methodology Framework for Calculating Cost-Optimal Levels of Minimum Energy Performance Requirements for Buildings and Building Elements. 2012.
55. European Commission, Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis of Major Projects. In the Context of EC Regional Policy. 1997, Directorate-General XVI.
56. European Commission, Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects. 2003, Commission for the European Communities, DG Regional Policy, Brussels.
57. European Commission, Consultation on the Future “EU 2020” Strategy: Commission Working Document. [Online], 2009 (Accessed 6 April 2016) http://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/eu2020_en.pdf.
58. European Commission, Energy Roadmap 2050. [Online], 2012 (Accessed 6 April 2016) https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/2012_energy_roadmap_2050_en_0.pdf.
59. European Commission, Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects: Structural Funds, Cohesion Fund and Instrument for Pre-Accession. 2014, Directorate-General for Regional Policy, Brussels.
60. European Commission, Horizon 2020 Work Programme 2018–2020. 10. Secure, Clean and Efficient Energy. [Online], 2017 (Accessed 21 January 2018) http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2018-2020/main/h2020-wp1820-energy_en.pdf.
61. Fang, X., Bianchi, M.V., Christensen, C., Monetization of thermal comfort in residential buildings. ACEEE 2012 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, 2012, 64–75.
62. Ferreira, M., Almeida, M., Benefits from energy related building renovation beyond costs, energy and emissions. Energy Procedia 78 (2015), 2397–2402, 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.199.
63. Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M., Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. 2005, Springer, New York.
64. Florio, M., Sirtori, E., The Social Cost of Capital: Recent Estimates for the EU Countries. 2013 (Accessed 21 January 2016) http://ssrn.com/abstract=2723379.
65. François, C., Gondran, N., Nicolas, J.P., Parsons, D., Environmental assessment of urban mobility: combining life cycle assessment with land-use and transport interaction modelling—application to Lyon (France). Ecol. Indic. 72 (2017), 597–604, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.014.
66. Fregonara, E., Analisi dei costi in ottica life Cycle Thinking. Fregonara, E., (eds.) Valutazione sostenibilità progetto, 2015, Francoangeli, Milan, 99–165.
67. Fregonara, E., Rolando, D., Semeraro, P., Vella, M., The impact of Energy Performance Certificate level on house listing prices. First evidence from Italian real estate. Aestimum 65 (2014), 143–163.
68. Fuerst, F., McAllister, P., Nanda, A., Wyatt, P., Does energy efficiency matter to home-buyers? An investigation of EPC ratings and transaction prices in England. Energy Econ. 48 (2015), 145–156, 10.1016/j.eneco.2014.12.012.
69. Ghafghazi, S., Sowlati, T., Sokhansanj, S., Melin, S., A multicriteria approach to evaluate district heating system options. Appl. Energy 87 (2010), 1134–1140, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.06.021.
70. Giordano, V., Onyeji, I., Fulli, G., Jiménez, M.S., Filiou, C., Guidelines for Conducting a Cost-Benefit Analysis of Smart Grid Projects. Reference Report by the Joint Research Center of the European Commission. Pattern., 2012.
71. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Slowinski, R., Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 129 (2001), 1–47.
72. Greening, L.A., Greene, D.L., Difiglio, C., Energy efficiency and consumption — the rebound effect — a survey. Energy Policy 28 (2000), 389–401, 10.1016/s0301-4215(00)00021-5.
73. GSE, Ritiro dedicato. [Online], 2016 (Accessed 6 April 2016) http://www.gse.it/it/Ritiro%20e%20scambio/Ritiro%20dedicato/Pages/default.aspx.
74. Hong, T., Koo, C., Kim, H., Seon Park, H., Decision support model for establishing the optimal energy retrofit strategy for existing multi-family housing complexes. Energy Policy 66 (2014), 157–169, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.057.
75. Howden-Chapman, P., Crane, J., Matheson, A., Viggers, H., Cunningham, M., Blakely, T., O'Dea, D., Cunningham, C., Woodward, A., Saville-Smith, K., Baker, M., Waipara, N., Retrofitting houses with insulation to reduce health inequalities: aims and methods of a clustered, randomised community-based trial. Soc. Sci. Med. 61 (2005), 2600–2610, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.049.
76. IEA, Evaluating the co-benefits of low-income energy efficiency programmes. Report from Dublin Workshop, International Energy Agency, 2011.
77. IEA, Spreading the Net: the Multiple Benefits of Energy Efficiency Improvements. 2012, International Energy Agency, Paris.
78. IEA, Energy Conservation and Low Carbon District Heating in Turin, Energy Technology Perspectives 2016. Chapter 4, 2016, OECD/ IEA, Paris, 202–205.
79. ilSole24ore, Lexicon dell'economia reale. [Online], 2016 http://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/impresa-e-territori/2016-05-11/piemonte-163128.shtml?uuid=ADp5ToF.
80. Invidiata, A., Ghisi, E., Life-cycle energy and cost analyses of window shading used to improve the thermal performance of houses. J. Clean. Prod. 133 (2016), 1371–1383.
81. IPCC, Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change., 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
82. ISO 14040:2006, Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Principles and Framework, ISO/TC 207/S05. 2006.
83. ISO 14044:2006, Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Requirements and Guidelines. 2006.
84. ISO 15686:2008, Building and Constructed Assets – Service-life Planning – Part 5: Life Cycle Costing, ISO/TC 59/CS 14. 2008.
85. ISTAT, Retribuzioni contrattuali per tipo di contratto. [Online], 2017 (Accessed 7 November 2017) http://dati.istat.it/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=DCSC_RETRCONTR1C.
86. Janssen, R., Staniaszek, D., How Many Jobs? A Survey of the Employment Effects of Investment in Energy Efficiency of Buildings. 2012, The Energy Efficiency Industrial Forum, Brussels.
87. Kalaycıoğlu, E., Yılmaz, A.Z., A new approach for the application of nearly zero energy concept at district level to reach EPBD recast requirements through a case study in Turkey. Energy Build. 152 (2017), 680–700, 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.07.040.
88. Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H., Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. 1976, Wiley, New York Reprinted, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
89. Kennedy, S., Sgouridis, S., Rigorous classification and carbon accounting principles for low and Zero Carbon Cities. Energy Policy 39 (2011), 5259–5268, 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.038.
90. Kılkış Ş., Energy system analysis of a pilot net-zero exergy district. Energy Convers. Manag. 87 (2014), 1077–1092, 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.05.014.
91. Kylili, A., Fokaides, P.A., European smart cities: the role of zero energy buildings. Sustain. Cities Soc. 15 (2015), 86–95, 10.1016/j.scs.2014.12.003.
92. Lee, B., Pourmousavian, N., Hensen, J.L.M., Full-factorial design space exploration approach for multi-criteria decision making of the design of industrial halls. Energy Build. 117 (2016), 352–361, 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.09.028.
93. Lesage, J.P., Pace, R.K., Introduction. Advances in Econometrics Spatial and Spatiotemporal Econometrics 1–32. 2009, 10.1016/s0731-9053(04)18013-4.
94. Li, J., Lin, B., Rebound effect by incorporating endogenous energy efficiency: a comparison between heavy industry and light industry. Appl. Energy 200 (2017), 347–357, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.087.
95. Liddell, C., Morris, C., Fuel poverty and human health: a review of recent evidence. Energy Policy 38 (2010), 2987–2997, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.037.
96. Liddell, C., Morris, C., Lagdon, S., Kirklees Warm Zone: The Project and its Impacts on Well-Being. 2011, University of Ulster, Coleraine.
97. Lombardi, P., Abastante, F., Torabi Moghadam, S., Toniolo, I., Multicriteria spatial decision support systems for future urban energy retrofitting scenarios. Sustainability, 9(7), 2017, 1252.
98. Marique, A.-F., Reiter, S., A simplified framework to assess the feasibility of zero-energy at the neighbourhood/community scale. Energy Build. 82 (2014), 114–122, 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.07.006.
99. Marique, A., Penders, M., Reiter, S., From zero-energy building to zero-energy neighbourhood: urban form and mobility matter. Proceedings of the International PLEA Conference 2013, 2013.
100. Markandya, A., Richardson, J., The Earthscan Reader in Environmental Economics. 1992, Earthscan Publications, London.
101. Mendelsohn, R., Hellerstein, D., Huguenin, M., Unsworth, R., Brazee, R., Measuring hazardous waste damages with panel models. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 22 (1992), 259–271, 10.1016/0095-0696(92)90032-r.
102. Ministry of Economic Development of Italy, Italy's National Energy Strategy: for a More Competitive and Sustainable Energy. [Online], 2013 (Accessed 6 April 2016) http://www.encharter.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Energy_policies_and_legislation/Italy_2013_National_Energy_strategy_ENG.pdf.
103. Moras, L., Esperienze italiane di teleriscaldamento. 2013, IUAV, Venezia.
104. Munda, G., Measuring sustainability: a multi-criterion framework. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 7 (2005), 117–134.
105. Nguyen, B.K., Altan, H., Comparative review of five sustainable rating systems. Procedia Eng. 21 (2011), 376–386, 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2029.
106. Nicholls, J., Lawlor, E., Neitzert, E., Goodspeed, T., A Guide to Social Return on Investment. 2012, Matter & Co., London.
107. Oppio, A., Corsi, S., Mattia, S., Tosini, A., Exploring the relationship among local conflicts and territorial vulnerability: the case study of Lombardy Region. Land Use Policy 43 (2015), 239–247, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.006.
108. Oppio, A., Giordano, G., Arcidiacono, A., A multi-methodological evaluation approach for assessing the impact of neighbourhood quality on public health. Epidemiologia e Prevenzione 40 (2016), 249–256.
109. Pace, R., Barry, R., Gilley, O.W., Sirmans, C., A method for spatial–temporal forecasting with an application to real estate prices. Int. J. Forecast. 16 (2000), 229–246, 10.1016/s0169-2070(99)00047-3.
110. Palmquist, R.B., Estimating the demand for the characteristic of housing. Rev. Econ. Stat. 66 (1984), 394–404.
111. Pearce, D., Atkinson, G., Mourato, S., Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment: Recent Developments. 2006, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.
112. Pels, J., de Nie, D., Kiel, J., Utilization of ashes from biomass combustion and gasification. 14th European Biomass Conference Exhibition, 2005.
113. Pikas, E., Kurnitski, J., Thalfeldt, M., Koskela, L., Cost-benefit analysis of nZEB energy efficiency strategies with on-site photovoltaic generation. Energy 128 (2017), 291–301.
114. Politecnico di Milano, Costi di produzione di energia elettrica da fonti rinnovabili. 2012, Politecnico di Milano, Milan.
115. Popescu, D., Bienert, S., Schützenhofer, C., Boazu, R., Impact of energy efficiency measures on the economic value of buildings. Appl. Energy 89 (2012), 454–463, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.08.015.
116. Protocollo ITACA, Area 2 – Sostenibilità energetica e ambientale. [Online], 2016 (Accessed 1 April 2016) http://www.itaca.org/valutazione_sostenibilita.asp.
117. Regione Piemonte, Prezzario per Opere e Lavori Pubblici dela Regione Piemonte. [Online], 2015 (Accessed 6 April 2016) http://www.regione.piemonte.it/oopp/prezzario/index15.htm.
118. Ristimäki, M., Säynäjoki, A., Heinonen, J., Junnila, S., Combining life cycle costing and life cycle assessment for an analysis of a new residential district energy system design. Energy 63 (2013), 168–179.
119. Rosen, S., Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. J. Polit. Econ. 82 (1974), 34–55.
120. Rosso, M., Bottero, M., Pomarico, S., La Ferlita, S., Comino, E., Integrating multicriteria evaluation and stakeholders analysis for assessing hydropower projects. Energy Policy 67 (2014), 870–881, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.007.
121. Roy, B., Bouyssou, D., Aide multicritére à la décision: méthodes et cas. 1993, Economica, Collection Gestion, Paris.
122. Shi, W., Lee, L.-F., Spatial dynamic panel data models with interactive fixed effects. J. Econom. 197 (2017), 323–347, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2016.12.001.
123. Shih, Y.-H., Tseng, C.-H., Cost-benefit analysis of sustainable energy development using life-cycle co-benefits assessment and the system dynamics approach. Appl. Energy 119 (2014), 57–66, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.12.031.
124. Sidler, O., EURECO: End-Use Metering Campaign in 400 Households of the European Community Assessment of the Potential Electricity Savings. [Online], 2002 (Accessed 6 April 2016) http://www.eerg.it/resource/pages/it/Progetti_-_MICENE/finalreporteureco2002.pdf.
125. Sørnes, K., Sartori, I., Fredriksen, E., Martinsson, F., Romero, A., Rodriguez, F., Schneuwly, P., Nearly Zero Energy Neighborhoods – Final Report on Common Definition for nZEB Renovation., 2014, ZenN - Nearly Zero Energy Neighborhoods, Göteborg.
126. Sorrell, S., Dimitropoulos, J., The rebound effect: microeconomic definitions, limitations and extensions. Ecol. Econ. 65 (2008), 636–649, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.013.
127. Strantzali, E., Aravossis, K., Decision making in renewable energy investments: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 55 (2016), 885–898, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.021.
128. Theodorou, S., Florides, G., Tassou, S., The use of multiple criteria decision making methodologies for the promotion of RES through funding schemes in Cyprus, A review. Energy Policy 38 (2010), 7783–7792, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.038.
129. Threlfall, A., Understanding the Costs and Benefits of Fuel Poverty Interventions: a Pragmatic Economic Evaluation From Greater Manchester. 2011, Greater Manchester Public Health Practice Unit, Manchester.
130. Todorović M.S., BPS, energy efficiency and renewable energy sources for buildings greening and zero energy cities planning. Energy Build. 48 (2012), 180–189, 10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.01.027.
131. Tourkolias, C., Mirasgedis, S., Damigos, D., Diakoulaki, D., Employment benefits of electricity generation: a comparative assessment of lignite and natural gas power plants in Greece. Energy Policy 37 (2009), 4155–4166, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.015.
132. Tripathy, M., Joshi, H., Panda, S.K., Energy payback time and life-cycle cost analysis of building integrated photovoltaic thermal system influenced by adverse effect of shadow. Appl. Energy 208 (2017), 376–389.
133. UNI, Prestazioni energetiche degli edifici - Parte 4: Utilizzo di energie rinnovabili e di altri metodi di generazione per la climatizzazione invernale e per la produzione di acqua calda sanitaria, UNI/TS 11300-4:2012. 2012.
134. UNI, Prestazioni energetiche degli edifici - Parte 2: Determinazione del fabbisogno di energia primaria e dei rendimenti per la climatizzazione invernale, per la produzione di acqua calda sanitaria, per la ventilazione e per l'illuminazione in edifici non residenziali, UNI/TS 11300-2:2014. 2014.
135. Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Herrero, S.T., Building synergies between climate change mitigation and energy poverty alleviation. Energy Policy 49 (2012), 83–90.
136. Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Tirado Herrero, S., Butcher, A., Employment Impacts of a Large-Scale Deep Building Energy Retrofit Programme in Hungary. 2010, Central European University, Budapest.
137. Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Tirado Herrero, S., Dubash, N.K., Lecocq, F., Measuring the co-benefits o climate change mitigation. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 39 (2014), 549–582.
138. US Green Building Council (USGBC), LEED Projects and Case Study Directory. [Online], 2016 (Accessed 1 April 2016) http://www.usgbc.org/LEED/Project/CertifiedProjectList.aspx.
139. USEPA, Indoor Air Facts No. 4 (revised) Sick Building Syndrome. [Online], 1991 (Accessed 22 January 2018) http://www.epa.gov/iaq/pubs/sbs.html.
140. Vitiello, S., Flego, G., Setti, A., Fulli, G., Liotta, S., Alessandroni, S., Esposito, L., Parisse, D., Transport. 2015, European Commission. Joint Research Centre. Institute for Energy and (Bruxelles), European Automobile Manufacturers Association.
141. Wang, X., Chen, Y., Sui, P., Gao, W., Qin, F., Wu, X., Xiong, J., Efficiency and sustainability analysis of biogas and electricity production from a large-scale biogas project in China: an emergy evaluation based on LCA. J. Clean. Prod. 65 (2014), 234–245, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.001.
142. Wang, X., Lu, M., Mao, W., Ouyang, J., Zhou, B., Yang, Y., Improving benefit-cost analysis to overcome financing difficulties in promoting energy-efficient renovation of existing residential buildings in China. Appl. Energy 141 (2015), 119–130, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.001.
143. Wei, T., Liu, Y., Estimation of global rebound effect caused by energy efficiency improvement. Energy Econ. 66 (2017), 27–34, 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.05.030.
144. Zeleny, M., Multiple Criteria Decision Making. 1982, McGraw-Hill, New York.