Problematic internet use in the workplace

The Internet and Workplace Transformation

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 63-79

  Caplan, Scott E ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer mediated communication; Internet addiction; Loneliness; Online social interaction; Problematic internet use; Social anxiety; Social skill

Indexed keywords

EID: 85077060996     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (68)

1. American Psychiatric Association. 1994. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., and Ben-Artzi, E. 2003. Loneliness and Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior 19, 71-80.
3. Anandarajan, M. 2002. Introduction to special section on Internet abuse in the workplace. Communications of the ACM 45, 53-54.
4. Bargh, J.A., McKenna, K.Y.A., and Fitzsimmons, G.M. 2002. Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the "true self on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues 58, 33-18.
5. Beard, K.W., and Wolf, E.M. 2001. Modification in the proposed diagnostic criteria for Internet addiction. CyberPsychology and Behavior 4, 377-383.
6. Brenner, V. 1997. Psychology of computer use: XLVII. Parameters of Internet use, abuse and addiction: The first 90 days of the Internet Usage Survey. Psychological Reports 80, 879-882.
7. Caplan, S.E. 2002. Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being: Development of a theory-based cognitive-behavioral measure. Computers in Human Behavior 18, 533-575.
8. Caplan, S.E. 2003. Preference for online social interaction: A theory of problematic Internet use and psy-chosocial well-being. Communication Research 30, 625-648.
9. Caplan, S.E. 2004. Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic Internet use. Paper presented at the National Communication Association Convention in Chicago.
10. Caplan, S.E. 2005. A social skill account of problematic Internet use. Journal of Communication 55, 4, 721-736.
11. Cohen, J., and Cohen, P. 1983. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
12. Cornwell, B., and Lundgren, D. 2001. Love on the Internet: Involvement and misrepresentation in romantic relationships in cyberspace vs. realspace. Computers in Human Behavior 17, 197-211.
13. Davis, R.A. 2001. A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior 17, 187-195.
14. Davis, R.A., Flett, G.L., and Besser, A. 2002. Validation of a new measure of problematic Internet use: Implications for pre-employment screening. CyberPsychology and Behavior 5, 331-346.
15. Flaherty, L.M., Pearce, K.J., and Rubin, R.B. 1998. Internet and face-to-face communication: Not functional alternatives. Communication Quarterly 46, 250-268.
16. Griffiths, M. 1996. Internet "addiction": An issue for clinical psychology? Clinical Psychology Forum 97, 32-36.
17. Griffiths, M. 1997. Psychology of computer use: XLIII. Some comments on "Addictive use of the Internet" by Young. Psychological Reports 80, 81-82.
18. Griffiths, M. 1998. Internet addiction: Does it really exist? In J.E. Gackenbach (ed.), Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Transpersonal Implications. New York: Academic Press, 61-75.
19. Griffiths, M. 2000. Does Internet and computer "addiction" exist? Some case study evidence. CyberPsychology and Behavior 3, 211-218.
20. Griffiths, M. 2002. Occupational health issues concerning Internet use in the workplace. Work and Stress 6, 283-286.
21. Griffiths, M. 2003. Internet abuse in the workplace: Issues and concerns for employers and employment counselors. Journal of Employment Counseling 40, 87-96.
22. Hancock, J.T., and Dunham, P.J. 2001. Impression formation in computer-mediated communication revisited: An analysis of the breadth and intensity of impressions. Communication Research 28, 325-347.
23. Kandell, J.J. 1998. Internet addiction on campus: The vulnerability of college students. CyberPsychology and Behavior 1, 11-17.
24. Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., and Crawford, A. 2002. Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues 58, 49-74.
25. Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., and Scherlis, W. 1998. Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist 53, 1017-1031.
26. Kubey, R.W., Lavin, M.J., and Barrows, J.R. 2001. Internet use and collegiate academic performance decrements: Early findings. Journal of Communication 51, 366-382.
27. LaRose, R., Eastin, M.S., Gregg, J. 2001. Reformulating the Internet paradox: Social cognitive explanations of Internet use and depression. Journal of Online Behavior 1. www.behavior.net/JOB/v1n2/paradox.html.
28. La Rose, R., Mastro, D., and Eastin, M.S. 2001. Understanding Internet usage: A social-cognitive approach to uses and gratifications. Social Science Computer Review 19, 395-413.
29. Lea, M., and Spears, R. 1992. Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing 2, 321-341.
30. Leary, M.L. 1983. Understanding Social Anxiety: Social, Personality, and Clinical Perspective. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31. Leary, M.R., and Kowalski, R.M. 1995. Social Anxiety. New York: Guilford Press.
32. Lim, V.K.G. 2002. The IT way of loafing on the job: Cyberloafing, neutralizing and organizational justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior 23, 5, 675-694.
33. Lim, V.K.G., Teo, T.S.H., and Loo, G.L. 2002. How do I loaf here? Let me count the ways. Communications of the ACM 45, 66-70.
34. Mahatanankoon, P., Anandarajan, M., and Igbaria, M. 2004. Development of a measure of personal Web usage in the workplace. CyberPsychology and Behavior 7, 93-104.
35. McKenna, K.Y.A., and Bargh, J.A. 1999. Causes and consequences of social interaction on the Internet: A conceptual framework. Media Psychology 1, 249-269.
36. McKenna, K.Y.A., and Bargh, J.A. 2000. Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75, 681-694.
37. McKenna, K.Y.A., Greene, A.S., and Gleason, M.E.J. 2002. Relationship formation on the Internet: What's the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues 58, 9-31.
38. Morahan-Martin, J. 1999. The relationship between loneliness and Internet use and abuse. CyberPsychology and Behavior 2, 431-140.
39. Morahan-Martin, J., and Schumacher, P. 2000. Incidence and correlates of pathological Internet use among college students. Computers in Human Behavior 16, 13-29.
40. Morahan-Martin, J., and Schumacher, P. 2003. Loneliness and social uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior 19, 659-671.
41. Noonan, R.J. 1998. The psychology of sex: A mirror from the Internet. In J. Gackenbach (ed). Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Transpersonal Implications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 143-168.
42. Papacharissi, Z., and Rubin, A.M. 2000. Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 44, 175-196.
43. Pratarelli, M.E., Browne, B.L., and Johnson, K. 1999. The bits and bytes of computer/Internet addiction: A factor analytic approach. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 31, 305-314.
44. Ramirez, A., Jr., Walther, J.B., Burgoon, J.K., and Sunnafrank, M. 2002. Information-seeking strategies, uncertainty, and computer-mediated communication: Toward a conceptual model. Human Communication Research 28, 213-228.
45. Reicher, S.D., Spears, R., and Postmes, T. 1995. Effects of public and private self-awareness on deindividuation and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43, 503-513.
46. Sanders, C.E., Field, T.M., Diego, M., and Kaplan, M. 2000. The relationship of Internet use to depression and social isolation among adolescents. Adolescence 35, 237-242.
47. Schlenker, B.R., and Leary, M.R. 1982. Social anxiety and self-preservation: A conceptualization and model. Psychological Bulletin 92, 641-669.
48. Schlenker, B.R., and Leary, M.R. 1985. Social anxiety and communication about the self. Journal of Language and Psychology 4, 171-193. (Invited paper for a special issue.)
49. Shaffer, H.J., Hall, M.N., Vanderbilt, J. 2000. "Computer addiction": A critical consideration. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 70, 162-168.
50. Shapira N.A., Goldsmith T.D., Keck, P.E., Jr., Khosla, U.M., and McElroy S.L. 2000. Psychiatric features of individuals with problematic Internet use. Journal of Affective Disorders 57, 267-272.
51. Shapira, N.A., Lessing, M.C., Goldsmith, T.D., Szabo, S.T., Lazortiz, M., Gold, M.S., and Stein, D.J. 2003. Problematic Internet use: Proposed classification and diagnostic criteria. Depression and Anxiety 17, 207-216.
52. Shotton, M.A. 1991. The costs and benefits of computer addiction. Behaviour and Information Technology 10, 219-230.
53. Spears, R., and Lea, M. 1992. Social influence and the influence of the "social" in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (ed.), Contexts of Computer-Mediated Communication. London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf, 30-65.
54. Spears, R., and Lea, M. 1994. Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research 21, 427-459.
55. Spears, R., Postmes, T., and Lea, M. 2002. The power of influence and the influence of power in virtual groups: A SIDE look at CMC and the Internet. Journal of Social Issues 58, 91-108.
56. Surratt, C.G. 1999. Netaholics? The Creation of a Pathology. Commack, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
57. Tidwell, L.C., and Walther, J.B. 2002. Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research 28, 317-348.
58. Turkle, S. 1995. Life on the Screen. New York: Simon and Schuster.
59. Wallace, P.M. 1999. The Psychology of the Internet. New York: Cambridge University Press.
60. Walther, J.B. 1993. Impression development in computer-mediated interaction. Western Journal of Communication 57, 381-398.
61. Walther, J.B. 1996. Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research 23, 3-43.
62. Walther, J.B., and Burgoon, J.K. 1992. Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research 19, 50-88.
63. Walther, J.B., and Parks, M.R. 2002. Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication relationships. In M.L. Knapp, J.A. Daly, and G.R. Miller (eds.), The Handbook of Interpersonal Communication. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64. Young, K.S. 1996. Psychology of computer use: XI. Addictive use of the Internet: A case study that breaks the stereotype. Psychological Reports 79, 899-902.
65. Young, K.S. 1998a. Caught in the Net: How to Recognize the Signs of Internet Addiction and a Winning Strategy for Recovery. New York: John Wiley.
66. Young, K.S. 1998b. Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. CyberPsychology and Behavior 1, 237-244.
67. Young, K.S., and Case, C.J. 2004. Internet abuse in the workplace: New trends in risk management. CyberPsychology and Behavior 7, 105-111.
68. Young, K. S, and Rogers, R.C. 1998. The relationship between depression and Internet addiction. CyberPsychology and Behavior 1, 25-28.