Genre as social action

The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 226-238

  Bazerman, Charles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85076272148     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203809068-24     Document Type: Chapter

References (67)

1. Austin, J. L. (1962) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Bakhtin, M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays M. M. Bakhtin. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
3. Bazerman, C. (1988) Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
4. Bazerman, C. (1991) ‘How natural philosophers can cooperate’, in C. Bazerman and J. Paradis (eds.) Textual Dynamics of the Professions. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 13-44.
5. Bazerman, C. (1994a) ‘Systems of genre and the enactment of social intentions’, in A. Freedman and P. Medway (eds.) Genre and the New Rhetoric. London: Taylor & Francis, pp. 79-101.
6. Bazerman, C. (ed.) (1994b) ‘Whose moment? the kairotics of intersubjectivity’, Constructing Experience. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, pp. 171-193.
7. Bazerman, C. (1999a) The Languages of Edison’s Light. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Bazerman, C. (1999b) ‘Letters and the social grounding of differentiated genres’, in D. Barton and N. Hall (eds.) Letter Writing as a Social Practice. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 15-30.
9. Bazerman, C. (2000) ‘Singular utterances: realizing local activities through typified forms in typified circumstances’, in A. Trosberg (ed.) Analysing the Discourses of Professional Genres. Amsterdam:Benjamins, pp. 25-40.
10. Bazerman, C. (2003) ‘Textual performance: where the action at a distance is?', Journal of Advanced Composition, 23 (2): 379-396.
11. Bazerman, C. (2006) ‘The writing of social organization and the literate situating of cognition: extending goody’s social implications of writing’, in D. Olson and M. Cole (eds.) Technology, Literacy and the Evolution of Society: Implications of the Work of Jack Goody. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 215-239.
12. Bazerman, C. (ed.) (2008a) Handbook of Research on Writing: History, Society, School, Individual, and Text. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
13. Bazerman, C. (2008b) ‘Theories of the middle range in historical studies of writing practice’, Written Communication, 25 (3): 298-318.
14. Bazerman, C. (2009a) ‘Genre and cognitive development’, in C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, and D. Figueiredo (eds.) Genre in a Changing World. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press and WACClearinghouse, pp. 279-294.
15. Bazerman, C. (2009b) ‘How does science come to speak in the courts? citations, intertexts, expert witnesses, consequential facts and reasoning’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 72 (1): 91-120.
16. Bazerman, C. and De los Santos, R. (2005) ‘Measuring incommensurability: are toxicology and ecotoxicology blind to what the other sees?', in R. Harris (ed.) Rhetoric and Incommensurability. West Lafayatte, IN:Parlor Press, pp. 424-463.
17. Bazerman, C., and Prior, P. (eds.) (2004) What Writing Does and How It Does It. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Bazerman, C. and Prior, P. (2005) ‘Participating in emergent socio-literate worlds: Genre, disciplinarity, interdisciplinarity’, in J. Green and R. Beach (eds.) Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Literacy Research. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English, pp. 133-178.
19. Beaufort, A. (1999) Writing in the Real World. New York: Teachers College Press.
20. Berkenkotter, C., Huckin, T., and Ackerman, J. (1991) ‘Social context and socially constructed texts: the initiation of a graduate student into a writing research community’, in C. Bazerman and J. Paradis (eds.) Textual Dynamics of the Professions. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 191-215.
21. Bhatia, V. (2004) Worlds of Written Discourse. London: Continuum.
22. Bitzer, L. (1968) ‘The rhetorical situation’, Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1: 1-14.
23. Caroll, L. (2002) Rehearsing New Roles. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
24. Ceccarelli, L. (2001) Shaping Science with Rhetoric: The Cases of Dobzhansky, Schrodinger and Wilson. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25. Cole, M. (1996) Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Devitt, A. (1991) ‘Intertextuality in tax accounting: generic, referential, and functional’, in C. Bazerman and J. Paradis (eds.) Textual Dynamics of the Professions. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 336-380.
27. Dias, P., Pare, A., Freedman, A., and Medway, P. (1999) Worlds Apart: Acting and Writing in Academic and Workplace Contexts. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., and Pearson, D. D. (1991) ‘Moving from the old to the new:research on reading comprehension instruction’, Review of Educational Research, 61: 239-264.
29. Engestrom, Y. (1987) Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
30. Engestrom, Y. (1990) Learning, Working and Imagining: Twelve Studies in Activity Theory. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
31. Foucault, M. (1970) The Order of Things; an Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage Books (trans. anonymous).
32. Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
33. Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
34. Goffman, E. (1974) Frame Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.
35. Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
36. Goodman, K. S. (1967) ‘Reading: a psycholinguistic guessing game’, Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6: 126-135.
37. Goody, J. (1986) The Logic of Writing and the Organization of Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Hanks, W. (1996) Language and Communicative Practices. Boulder, CO: Westview.
39. Harris, R. (1981) The Language Myth. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
40. Harris, R. (1987) Reading Saussure: A Critical Commentary on the Cours de linguistique générale. London:Duckworth.
41. Herrington, J. and Curtis, M. (2000) Persons in Process: Four Stories of Writing and Personal Development in College. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
42. Kristeva, J. (1980) Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. New York: Columbia University Press.
43. Mead, G. H. (1934) Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
44. Miller, C. (1984) ‘Genre as social action’, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70: 151-167.
45. Miller, C. (1992) ‘Kairos in the rhetoric of science’, in S. P. Witte, N. Nakadate, and R. D. Cherry (eds.) A Rhetoric of Doing. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, pp. 310-327.
46. Parodi, G. (2009) ‘Written genres in university studies: evidence from a Spanish corpus in four disciplines’, in C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, and D. Figueiredo (eds.) Genre in a Changing World. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press and WAC Clearinghouse, pp. 483-501.
47. Prior, P. (1998) Writing/Disciplinarity: A Sociohistoric Account of Literate Activity in the Academy. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
48. Rizzolatti, G. and Craighero, L. (2004) ‘The mirror-neuron system’, Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27: 169-192.
49. Rogers, P. (2010) ‘The contributions of North American longitudinal studies of writing in higher education to our understanding of writing development’, in C. Bazerman, R. Krut, K. Lunsford, S. McLeod, S. Null, P. Rogers, and A. Stansell (eds.) Traditions of Writing Research. New York: Routledge, pp. 365-377.
50. Rumelhart, D. E. (1977) ‘Toward an interactive model of reading’, in S. Dornic (ed.) Attention and Performance IV. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 573-603.
51. Russell, D. R. (1997a) ‘Rethinking genre in school and society: an activity theory analysis’, Written Communication, 14: 504-554.
52. Russell, D. R. (1997b) ‘Writing and genre in higher education and workplaces’, Mind Culture and Activity, 4:224-237.
53. Sacks, H. (1995) Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell, 2 vols.
54. Saussure, F. de (1986) Course in General Linguistics, ed. C. Bally and A. Sechehaye, trans. R. Harris. LaSalle, IL:Open Court.
55. Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., and Sacks, H. (1977) ‘The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation’, Language, 53: 361-382.
56. Schutz, A. (1967) The Problem of Social Reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
57. Schutz, A. and Luckmann, T. (1973) The Structures of the Life-World. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
58. Scribner, S. and Cole, M. (1981) The Psychology of Literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59. Searle, J. (1969) Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60. Sternglass, M. S. (1997) Time to Know Them: A Longitudinal Study of Writing and Learning at the College Level. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. Swales, J. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Swales, J. (2004) Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63. Thaiss, C. and Zawacki, T. M. (2006) Engaged Writers and Dynamic Disciplines: Research on the Academic Writing Life. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook.
64. Todorov, T. (1990) Genres in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65. van Lier, L. (2004) The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective. New York:Birkhäuser.
66. Volosinov, V. N. (1973) Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67. Vygotsky, L. (1987) Thinking and Speech, ed. and trans. N. Minick. New York: Plenum.