Autonomy is equally important across East and West: Testing the cross-cultural universality of self-determination theory

Journal of Adolescence

Volumn 78, Issue , 2020, Pages 67-72

  Nalipay, Ma Jenina N ^a   King, Ronnel B ^b   Cai, Yuyang ^c  

^a THE EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MACAU   (Macao)

^c SHANGHAI UNIVERSITY OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS   (China)

Author keywords

Achievement; Cross cultural; Self determination theory

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT; ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BASIC NEEDS; CANADA; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HONG KONG; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JAPAN; MACAO; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEW ZEALAND; ORGANIZATION; SOUTH KOREA; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; THEORETICAL STUDY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CULTURAL FACTOR; FACTOR ANALYSIS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADOLESCENT; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNATIONALITY; MALE; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 85076260282     PISSN: 01401971     EISSN: 10959254     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bottles, K., Begoli, E., Understanding the pros and cons of big data analytics. Physician Executive 40 (2014), 6–12.
2. Browne, M.W., Cudeck, R., Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research 21:2 (1992), 230–258, 10.1177/0049124192021002005.
3. Byrne, B.M., Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. 2010, Routledge, New York and London.
4. Chao, R.K., Tseng, V., Asian and American parenting., 2nd ed. Bornstein, M., (eds.) Handbook of parenting, 2002, Earlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 59–94.
5. Cheung, G.W., Rensvold, R.B., Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 9:2 (2002), 233–255, 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.
6. Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M., An overview of self-determination theory: An organismic-dialectical perspective. Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M., (eds.) Handbook of self-determination research, 2002, University of Rochester Press, Rochester, NY, 3–33.
7. Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K.A., Marsh, E.J., Nathan, M.J., Willingham, D.T., Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 14:1 (2013), 4–58, 10.1177/1529100612453266.
8. Grolnick, W.S., Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M., Internalization within the family: The self-determination theory perspective. Grusec, J.E., Kuczynski, L., (eds.) Parenting and children's internalization of values: A handbook of contemporary theory, 1997, Wiley, New York, 135–161.
9. Gupta, V., Hanges, P.J., Dorfman, P., Cultural clusters: Methodology and findings. Journal of World Business, 2002, 10.1016/S1090-9516(01)00070-0.
10. Hatano, G., Inagaki, K., Cultural contexts of schooling revisited: A review of The Learning Gap from a cultural psychology perspective. Paris, S.G., Wellman, H.M., (eds.) Global prospects for education: Development, culture and schooling, 1998, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 79–104 https://doi.org/10.1037/10294-003.
11. Hattie, J., Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. 2009, Routledge, London and New York.
12. Hiebert, J., Manaster, A.B., Stigler, J.W., Mathematische unterrichtsaspekte der TIMSS videostudie. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education 31:6 (1999), 196–201, 10.1007/BF02652695.
13. Hu, L., Bentler, P.M., Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6:1 (1999), 1–55, 10.1080/10705519909540118.
14. Iyengar, S.I., DeVoe, S.E., Rethinking the value of choice: Considering cultural mediators of intrinsic motivation. Murphy-Berman, V., Berman, J.J., (eds.) Nebraska symposium on motivation Cross-cultural differences in perspectives on the self, Vol 49, 2003, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, 129–176.
15. Jang, H., Reeve, J., Deci, E.L., Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology 102:3 (2010), 588–600, 10.1037/a0019682.
16. Jang, H., Reeve, J., Ryan, R.M., Kim, A., Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically oriented Korean students?. Journal of Educational Psychology 101:3 (2009), 644–661, 10.1037/a0014241.
17. Jingbo, L., Elicker, J., Teacher–child interaction in Chinese kindergartens: An observational analysis. International Journal of Early Years Education, 2005, 10.1080/09669760500171139.
18. Johnston, R., Jones, K., Manley, D., Confounding and collinearity in regression analysis: A cautionary tale and an alternative procedure, illustrated by studies of British voting behaviour. Quality and Quantity 52:4 (2018), 1957–1976, 10.1007/s11135-017-0584-6.
19. King, R.B., McInerney, D.M., Pitliya, R.J., Envisioning a culturally imaginative educational psychology. Educational Psychology Review 30:3 (2018), 1031–1065, 10.1007/s10648-018-9440-z.
20. Liu, X., Flick, R., The relationship among psychological need satisfaction, class engagement, and academic performance: Evidence from China. The Journal of Education for Business, 2019, 1–10, 10.1080/08832323.2018.1541855.
21. Markus, H.R., Kitayama, S.K., Models of agency: Sociocultural diversity in the construction of action. Murphy-Berman, V., Berman, J.J., (eds.) Nebraska symposium on motivation Cross-cultural differences in perspectives on the self, Vol 49, 2003, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln & London, 1–57.
22. Martell, R.F., Lane, D.M., Emrich, C., Male-female differences: A computer simulation. 2005, American Psychologist, 10.1037/0003-066x.51.2.157.
23. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), PISA 2009 technical report., 2012, OECD Publishing, Paris.
24. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), Database: Pisa 2009. 2009.
25. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), Database: Pisa 2012. 2012.
26. Reeve, J., Teachers as facilitators: What autonomy-supportive teachers do and why their students benefit. The Elementary School Journal 106 (2006), 225–236.
27. Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L., Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55:1 (2000), 68–78, 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
28. Sirin, S.R., Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research 75:3 (2005), 417–453, 10.3102/00346543075003417.
29. Zhou, M., Ma, W.J., Deci, E.L., The importance of autonomy for rural Chinese children's motivation for learning. Learning and Individual Differences 19:4 (2009), 492–498, 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.05.003.
30. Zusho, A., Clayton, K., Culturalizing achievement goal theory and research. Educational Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.614526, 2011.