Confounding and collinearity in regression analysis: a cautionary tale and an alternative procedure, illustrated by studies of British voting behaviour

Quality and Quantity

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 1957-1976

  Johnston, Ron ^a   Jones, Kelvyn ^a   Manley, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Collinearity; Confounding; Regression analysis; Voting behaviour

Indexed keywords

EID: 85033554056     PISSN: 00335177     EISSN: 15737845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-017-0584-6     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Allison, P.: Multiple Regression: A Primer. Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks (1999)
2. Allison, P.: When can you safely ignore multicollinearity? Statistical Horizons Blog, 10 September. http://statisticalhorizons.com/multicollinearity (2012). Accessed 6 Sept 2017
3. Baguley, T.: Multicollinearity and collinearity in (in multiple regression)—a tutorial. Psychological Statistics Blog 9 November. http://psychologicalstatistics.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/multicollinearity-and-collinearity-in.html#!/ (2013). Accessed 6 Sept 2017
4. Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A.: The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Personal. Soc. Psychol. 51(6), 1173–1182 (1986)
5. Clarke, H.D., Sanders, D., Stewart, M.C., Whiteley, P.: Performance Politics and the British Voter. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)
6. Clarke, H.D., Goodwin, M., Whiteley, P.: Brexit: Why Britain Voted to leave the European Union. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017)
7. Evans, G., Chzhen, K.: Re-evaluating the valence model of political choice. Polit. Sci Res Methods 4(2), 199–220 (2016)
8. Fox, J.: Regression Diagnostics. SAGE, London (1991)
9. Franzosi, R.: Outside and inside the regression “black box” from exploratory to interior data analysis. Qual. Quant. 28(1), 21–53 (1994)
10. Goodwin, M., Heath, O.: The 2016 referendum, Brexit and the left behind: an aggregate-level analysis of the result. Polit. Q. 87(3), 323–332 (2016)
11. Goodwin, M., Milazzo, C.: UKIP: Inside the Campaign to Redraw the Map of British Politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)
12. Hayes, A.F.: Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. The Guilford Press, New York (2013)
13. Imai, K., Keele, L., Tingley, D.: A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychol. Methods 15, 309–334 (2010)
14. Imai, K., Keele, L., Tingley, D., Yamamoto, T.: Unpacking the black box of causality: learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 105(4), 765–789 (2011)
15. Johnston, R.J., Jones, K., Burgess, S., Propper, C., Sarker, R., Bolster, A.: Scale, factor analyses, and neighborhood effects. Geogr. Anal. 36(4), 350–368 (2004)
16. Johnston, R.J., Pattie, C.J., Jones, K., Manley, D.: Was the 2016 United States presidential contest a deviating election? Continuity and change in the electoral map—or “plus ca change plus c’est la mème géographie”? J. Elect. Public Opin. Parties (2017). doi:10.1080/17457289.2017.1354004
17. Jones, K., Johnston, R.J., Manley, D.: Uncovering interactions in multivariate contingency tables: a multi-level modelling exporatory approach. Methodol. Innov. 9(1), 1–17 (2016)
18. Kennedy, P.: A Guide to Econometrics, 6th edn. Blackwell Publishing, Malden (2008)
19. King, G.: How not to lie with statistics: avoiding common mistakes in quantitative political science. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 30(3), 666–687 (1986)
20. Kish, L.: Some statistical problems in research design. Am. Sociol. Rev. 24(4), 328–338 (1959)
21. MacKinnon, D.P.: Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York (2008)
22. Massy, W.F.: Principal components regression in exploratory statistical research. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 60, 234–256 (1965)
23. Moon, G., Gould, M., Jones, K., Brown, T., Duncan, C., Twigg, L., Subramanian, S.V., Litvia, A., Iggulden, P.: Epidemiology: An Introduction. Open University Press, Buckingham (2000)
24. Morabia, A.: History of the modern epidemiological concept of confounding. J. Epidemiol. Commun. Health 65(2), 297–300 (2011)
25. O’Brien, R.: Dropping highly collinear variables from a model: why is it typically not a good idea? Soc. Sci. Q. (2016). doi:10.1111/ssuq.12273
26. Office for National Statistics: 2011 Census Glossary of Terms. Office for National Statistics, London (2014)
27. Riddell, J.B.: On structuring a migration model. Geogr. Anal. 2(4), 403–409 (1970)
28. Rosenberg, M.: The Logic of Survey Analysis. Basic Books, New York (1968)
29. Sanint, L.R.: Applying principal components regression analysis to time series demand estimation. Agric. Econ. Res. 34(3), 21–27 (1982)
30. Shipley, B.: Cause and Correlation in Biology: A User’s Guide to Path Analysis, Structural Equations and Causal Inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)
31. VanderWeele, T.J.: Explanation in Causal Inference: Methods for Mediation and Interaction. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)
32. VanderWheele, T.J., Ding, P.: Sensitivity analysis in observational research: introducing the E-value. Ann. Intern. Med. (2017). doi:10.72326/M16-2607
33. VanderWheele, T.J., Shpitser, I.: On the definition of a confounder. Ann. Stat. 41(1), 196–200 (2013)