Characteristics of joint displays illustrating data integration in mixed-methods nursing studies;混合方法护理研究中数据整合的联合显示特点

Journal of Advanced Nursing

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2020, Pages 676-686

  Younas, Ahtisham ^a,b   Pedersen, Maria ^c   Durante, Angela ^d  

^a MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

^b Shifa College of Nursing   (Pakistan)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

data integration; joint displays; mixed methods; nurses; nursing; nursing research; research methods

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; NURSING RESEARCH; PROCEDURES; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

DATA DISPLAY; HUMANS; NURSING RESEARCH; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 85076208782     PISSN: 03092402     EISSN: 13652648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jan.14264     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aultman, J., Baughman, K. R., & Ludwick, R. (2018). A broader understanding of care managers’ attitudes of advance care planning: A concurrent nested design. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(19–20), 3572–3582. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14531
2. Bazeley, P. (2018). Integrating analyses in mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Beck, C. T., & Harrison, L. (2016). Mixed-Methods research in the discipline of nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 39(3), 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1097/ans.0000000000000125
4. Bjartmarz, I., Jónsdóttir, H., & Hafsteinsdóttir, T. B. (2017). Implementation and feasibility of the stroke nursing guideline in the care of patients with stroke: A mixed methods study. BMC Nursing, 16(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-017-0262-y
5. Bressan, V., Bagnasco, A., Aleo, G., Timmins, F., Barisone, M., Bianchi, M., … Sasso, L. (2017). Mixed-methods research in nursing–a critical review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26(19–20), 2878–2890. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13631
6. Bryman, A. (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906290531
7. Creswell, J. W., Klassen, A. C., Plano Clark, V. L., & Smith, K. C. (2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Bethesda (Maryland): National Institutes of Health, 2013, 541–545. Retrieved from: https://www2.jabsom.hawaii.edu/native/docs/tsudocs/Best_Practices_for_Mixed_Methods_Research_Aug2011.pdf.
8. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research, (3rd ed). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
9. Cronenberg, S. (2018). Paradigm parley: A framework for the dialectic stance. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818777925
10. Curtis, K., Van, C., Lam, M., Asha, S., Unsworth, A., Clements, A., & Atkins, L. (2017). Implementation evaluation and refinement of an intervention to improve blunt chest injury management—A mixed-methods study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26(23–24), 4506–4518. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13782
11. Desborough, J., Phillips, C., Mills, J., Korda, R., Bagheri, N., & Banfield, M. (2018). Developing a positive patient experience with nurses in general practice: An integrated model of patient satisfaction and enablement. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74(3), 564–578. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13461
12. Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6pt2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
13. Fetters, M. D., & Freshwater, D. (2015). The 1 + 1 = 3 Integration Challenge. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9, 115–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815581222
14. Ginn, C. S., Mughal, M. K., Syed, H., Storteboom, A. R., & Benzies, K. M. (2017). Sustaining engagement in longitudinal research with vulnerable families: A mixed-methods study of attrition. Journal of Family Nursing, 23(4), 488–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074840717738224
15. Greenwood, N., & Habibi, R. (2014). Carer mentoring: A mixed methods investigation of a carer mentoring service. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(3), 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.06.011
16. Guetterman, T., Creswell, J. W., & Kuckartz, U. (2015). Using joint displays and MAXQDA software to represent the results of mixed methods research. In M. McCrudden, G. Schraw, & C. Buckendahl (Eds.), Use of visual displays in research and testing: Coding, interpreting and reporting data (pp. 145–176). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
17. Guetterman, T. C., Fetters, M. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. The Annals of Family Medicine, 13(6), 554–561. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1865
18. Johnson, M. J., Mueller, M., Eliason, M. J., Stuart, G., & Nemeth, L. S. (2016). Quantitative and mixed analyses to identify factors that affect cervical cancer screening uptake among lesbian and bisexual women and transgender men. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 25(23–24), 3628–3642. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13414
19. Johnson, R. E., Grove, A. L., & Clarke, A. (2017). Pillar integration process: A joint display technique to integrate data in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817743108
20. Leach, M. J., & Tucker, B. (2018). Current understandings of the research-practice gap in nursing: A mixed-methods study. Collegian, 25(2), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2017.04.008
21. Luo, S., & Kalman, M. (2018). Using summary videos in online classes for nursing students: A mixed methods study. Nurse Education Today, 71, 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.09.032
22. McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282.
23. Moffatt, S., White, M., Mackintosh, J., & Howel, D. (2006). Using quantitative and qualitative data in health services research–what happens when mixed method findings conflict? BMC Health Services Research, 6(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-28
24. Moran-Ellis, J., Alexander, V. D., Cronin, A., Dickinson, M., Fielding, J., Sleney, J., & Thomas, H. (2006). Triangulation and integration: Processes, claims and implications. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058870
25. Näsström, L., Luttik, M. L., Idvall, E., & Strömberg, A. (2017). Exploring partners’ perspectives on participation in heart failure home care: A mixed-method design. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 73(5), 1208–1219. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13216
26. Nørgaard, M. W., Pedersen, P. U., & Bjerrum, M. (2018). Understanding how patients use visualization during ablation of atrial fibrillation in reducing their experience of pain, anxiety, consumption of pain medication and procedure length: Integrating quantitative and qualitative results. Applied Nursing Research, 39, 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2017.11.026
27. O'cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2008). The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 13(2), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007074
28. Östlund, U., Kidd, L., Wengström, Y., & Rowa-Dewar, N. (2011). Combining qualitative and quantitative research within mixed method research designs: A methodological review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48(3), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.10.005
29. Pedersen, M., Overgaard, D., Andersen, I., Baastrup, M., & Egerod, I. (2018). Mechanisms and drivers of social inequality in phase II cardiac rehabilitation attendance: A convergent mixed methods study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74(9), 2181–2195. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13715
30. Pfaff, K. A., Baxter, P. E., Jack, S. M., & Ploeg, J. (2014). Exploring new graduate nurse confidence in interprofessional collaboration: A mixed methods study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(8), 1142–1152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.01.001
31. Plano-Clark, V. L. (2019). Meaningful integration within mixed methods studies: Identifying why, what, when and how. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 57, 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.01.007
32. Poudel, C., Ramjan, L., Everett, B., & Salamonson, Y. (2018). Exploring migration intention of nursing students in Nepal: A mixed-methods study. Nurse Education in Practice, 29, 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.11.012
33. Stacey, D., Carley, M., Ballantyne, B., Skrutkowski, M., Whynot, A., & Team, R. S. C. (2015). Perceived factors influencing nurses' use of evidence-informed protocols for remote cancer treatment-related symptom management: A mixed methods study. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 19(3), 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2014.11.002
34. Younas, A., Pedersen, M., & Tayaben, J. L. (2019). Review of mixed methods research in nursing: Methodological issues and future directions. Nursing Research, 68(6), 464–472. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000372
35. Younas, A., & Sundus, A. (2018). Experiences of and satisfaction with care provided by male nurses: A convergent mixed-method study of patients in medical surgical units. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74(11), 2640–2653. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13785