Information seeking and interpersonal outcomes using the internet

Uncertainty, Information Management, and Disclosure Decisions: Theories and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 67-84

  Ramirez, Artemio ^a   Walther, Joseph B ^b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85075314178     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203933046-12     Document Type: Chapter

References (37)

1. Afifi, W. A., & Metts, S. (1998). Characteristics and consequences of expectation violations in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 365-392.
2. Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
3. Barnes, S. B. (2001). Online connections: Internet interpersonal relationships.Cresskill, N J: Hampton Press.
4. Berger, C. R., & Kellermann, K. (1983). To ask or not to ask: Is that a question? In R. Bostrom (Ed.), Communication yearbook 7 (pp. 342-368). Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
5. Burgoon, J. K. (1993). Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12, 13-21.
6. Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1984). The fundamental topoi of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 193-214.
7. Carr, C., Choi, S., DeAndrea, D., Kim, J., Tong, S. T., Van Der Heide, B., & Walther, J. B. (2008, May). Interaction of interpersonal, peer, and media influence sources online: A research agenda for technology convergence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Montreal.
8. Cornwell, B., & Lundgren, D. C. (2001). Love on the Internet: Involvement and misrepresentation in romantic relationships in cyberspace vs. realspace. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 197-211.
9. Culnan, M. J., & Markus, M. L. (1987). Information technologies. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 420-443). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10. David, C., Cappella, J. N., & Fishbein, M. (2006). The social diffusion of influence among adolescents: Group interaction in a chat room environment about antidrug advertisements. Communication Theory, 16, 118-140.
11. Duck, S. (2008). A past and a future for relationship research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 189-200.
12. Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Selfpresentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-M ediated Communication, 11. Retrieved January 10, 2008, from http://jcmc. indiana.edu/volll/issue2/ellison.html
13. Eysenbach, G., & Kohler, C. (2002). How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the World Wide Web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. British Medical Journal, 324, 573-577.
14. Flanagin, A. J. (2007). Commercial markets as communication markets: Uncertainty reduction through mediated information exchange in online auctions. New Media & Society, 9, 401-423.
15. Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Heino, R. D. (2006). Self-presentation in online personals:The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in Internet dating. Communication Research, 33, 1-26.
16. Jacobson, D. (1999). Impression formation in cyberspace: Online expectations and offline experiences in text-based virtual communities. Journal of Computer-M ediated Communication, 5. Retrieved March 22, 2006, from http://jcmc. indiana.edu/vol5/issuel/jacobson.html
17. Madden, M., Fox, S., Smith, A., & Vitak, J. (2007, December 16). Digital footprints:Online identity management and search in the age of transparency. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved December 20, 2007, from http:// www.pewinternet.org
18. Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2000, April). Lurker demographics: Counting the silent. Proceedings of CHI 2000 Conference, The Hague, Netherlands (pp. 73-80). New York: Addison-Wesley/ACM Press.
19. Pratt, L., Wiseman, R. L., Cody, M. J., & Wendt, P. F. (1999). Interrogative strategies and information exchange in computer-mediated communication. Communication Quarterly, 47,46-66.
20. Ramirez, Jr., A., Walther, J., Burgoon, J. K., & Sunnafrank, M. (2002). Information seeking strategies, uncertainty, and computer-mediated communication: Towards a conceptual approach. Human Communication Research, 28, 213-228.
21. Ramirez, Jr., A., & Wang, Z. (2008). When on-line meets off-line: An expectancy violation theory perspective on modality switching. Journal of Communication, 58, 20-39.
22. Ramirez, Jr., A., & Zhang, S. (2007). When online meets offline: The effect of modality switching on relational communication. Communication Monographs, 74, 287-310.
23. Ramirez, Jr., A., Zhang, S., McGrew, K., & Lin, S.-F. (2007). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction: A comparison of participant-observer perspectives. Communication Monographs, 74, 492-516.
24. Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Friedman, E., & Kuwabara, K. (2000). Reputation systems. Communications of the ACM, 43, 45-48.
25. Roberts, L. D., & Parks, M. R. (1999). The social geography of gender-switching in virtual environments on the Internet. Information, Communication, and Society, 2, 521-540.
26. Seabrook, J. (1997). Deeper: A two-year odyssey in cyberspace. New York: Simon & Schuster.
27. Sundar, S. S., & Nass, C. (2001). Conceptualizing sources in online news. Journal of Communication, 51, 52-72.
28. Tidwell, L., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluation: Getting to know one another one bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 26, 317-348.
29. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 381-391.
30. Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52-89.
31. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
32. Walther, J. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication:Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2538-2557.
33. Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computermediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529-563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Walther, J. B., Slovacek, C., & Tidwell, L. C. (2001). Is a picture worth a thousand words? Photographic images in long term and short term virtual teams. Communication Research, 28, 105-134.
35. Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Hamel, L., & Shulman, H. (in press). Self-generated versus other-generated statements and impressions in computermediated communication: A test of warranting theory using Facebook. Communication Research.
36. Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S., Westerman, D., & Tong, S. T. (2008). The role of friends’ behavior on evaluations of individuals’ Facebook profiles: Are we known by the company we keep? Human Communication Research, 34, 28-49.
37. Westerman, D. K., Van Der Heide, B., Klein, K. A., & Walther, J. B. (2008). How do people really seek information about others? Information seeking across Internet and traditional communication channels. Journal of Computer-M ediated Communication, 13, 751-767. Retrieved June 4, 2008, from http://www.black well-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j. 1083-6101.2008.00418.x