Can authors’ position in the ascription be a measure of dominance?

Scientometrics

Volumn 121, Issue 3, 2019, Pages 1527-1547

  Peidu, Ch ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELHI   (India)

Author keywords

Authorship; Authorship ordering; By line; Dominance co efficiency; Dominance Index

Indexed keywords

EID: 85074594559     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03254-1     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bhattacharya, Surajit. (2010). Authorship issue explained. Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery, 43(2), 233–234.
2. Boxenbaum, H., Pivinski, F., & Ruberg, S. J. (1987). “Publication rates of pharmaceutical scientists: Application of the waring distribution. Drug Metabolism Reviews, 18, 553–571.
3. Cattell, R. B., & Drevdahl, J. E. (1955). A comparison of the personality profile (16 P.F.) of eminent researchers with that of eminent teachers and administrators, and of the general population. British Journal of Psychology, 46(Nov), 248–261.
4. Clement, T. P. (2014). Authorship matrix: A rational approach to quantify individual contributions and responsibilities in multi-author Scientific articles. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20, 345–361. 10.1007/s11948-013-9454-3.
5. Colman, A. M., Dhillion, D., & Coulthard, B. (1995). “A bibliometric evaluation of the research performance of British University Politics Departments: Publications in leading journals. Scientometrics, 32, 49–66.
6. Cozzarelli, N. R. (2004). Responsible authorship of papers in PNAS. PNAS, 101(29), 10495.
7. CASRAI. CRediT. https://www.casrai.org/credit.html. Accessed 15 July 2019.
8. Dance, A. (2012). Who’s on first? Nature, 498(Sept), 591–593.
9. de Beaver, D., & Rosen, R. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration: Part I-The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1, 65–84.
10. de Beaver, D., & Rosen, R. (1979a). “Studies in scientific collaboration: Part II–scientific co-authorship, research productivity and visibility in the French scientific elite, 1799–1830. Scientometrics, 1, 133–149.
11. de Beaver, D., & Rosen, R. (1979b). Studies in scientific collaboration: Part III–professionalization and the natural history of modern scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1, 231–245.
12. de Price, D. J. S., & Beaver, D. (1966). Collaboration in an invisible college. American Psychologist, 21, 1011–1018.
13. Dizon, L. B., & Sadorra, M. S. M. (1995). Pattern of publication by the staff of an International Fisheries Research Center. Scientometrics, 32, 67–75.
14. Egghe, Leo, Rousseau, Ronald, & Van Hooydonk, Guido. (2000). Methods for accrediting publications to authors or Countries: Consequences for evaluation studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(2), 145–157.
15. Ellwein, L. B., Khachab, M., & Waldman, R. H. (1989). Assessing research productivity: Evaluating journal publication across academic departments. Academic Medicine, 64, 319–325.
16. EPA. (2016). “Scientific integrity: Best practices for designating authorship.” https://www.epa.gov/osa/authorship-best-practices.
17. Greene, M. (2007). The demise of the lone author. Nature, 450(7173), 1165.
18. Holcombe, A. O. (2019). “Contributorship, not authorship: Use credit to indicate who did what.” PsyArXiv. April 18. 10.3390/publications7030048.
19. Huth, J. Edward. (1986). Guidelines on authorship of medical papers. Annals of Internal Medicine, 104, 269–274.
20. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26, 1–18.
21. Laudel, Grit. (2002). What do we measure by authorship? Research Evaluation, 11(1), 3–15.
22. Lukovits, I., & Vinkler, P. (1995). Correct credit distribution: A model for sharing credit among co-authors. Social Indicators Research, 36, 91–98.
23. McNutt, M. K., et al. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. PNAS, 115(11), 2557–2560.
24. Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
25. Mesnard, L. (2017). Attributing credit to coauthors in academic publishing: The 1/n rule, parallelization, and team bonuses. European Journal of Operation Research, 260, 778–788.
26. Osborne, J. W., & Holland, A. (2009). What is authorship, and what should it be? A survey of prominent guidelines for determining authorship in scientific publications. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14, 15.
27. Ponomariov, B., & Boardman, C. (2016). What is co-authorship? Scientometrics (Sept.). 10.1007/s11192-016-2127-7.
28. Regaldo, A. (1995). Multiauthor papers on the rise. Science, 268, 25.
29. Riesenberg, D., & Lundberg, G. D. (1990). The order of authorship: Who’s on first? JAMA, 264(14), 1857.
30. Sato, W. (2016). Scientists’ personality, values, and well-being. SpringerPlus, 5, 613.
31. Sauermann, H., & Haeussler, C. (2017). Authorship and contribution disclosures. Science Advances, 3(11), e1700404.
32. Smith, M. (1958). The trend toward multiple authorship in psychology. American Psychologist, 13, 596–599.
33. Trueba, F. J., & Guerrero, J. A. (2004). A robust formula to credit authors for their publications. Scientometrics, 60, 59–67.
34. Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multi-authored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018.
35. Van Hooydonk, G. (1997). Fractional counting of multi-authored publications: Consequences for the impact of authors. JASIST, 48, 944–945.
36. Vinkler, P. (2000). Evaluation of the publication activity of research teams by means of scientometric indicator. Current Science, 79, 602–612.
37. Vinkler, P. (2010). Research contribution and share of credit of individual authors. The evaluation of research by scientometric indicators. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
38. Waltman, L. (2012). An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 700–711.