Authorship and contribution disclosures

Science Advances

Volumn 3, Issue 11, 2017, Pages

  Sauermann, Henry ^a,b,c   Haeussler, Carolin ^d  

^a EUROPEAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PASSAU   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOPTING POLICY; BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS; CONCEPTUAL MODEL; CONVENTIONAL APPROACH; SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES; SURVEY DATA; TEAM MEMBERS; TEAM SIZE;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

BIBLIOMETRICS; PUBLISHING; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESEARCH; WRITING;

AUTHORSHIP; BIBLIOMETRICS; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 85041892797     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23752548     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1700404     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. S. Wuchty, B. F. Jones, B. Uzzi, The increasing dominance of teams in the production of knowledge. Science 316, 1036–1039 (2007).
2. P. Stephan, How Economics Shapes Science (Harvard University Press, 2012).
3. S. M. Fiore, Interdisciplinarity as teamwork: How the science of teams can inform team science. Small Group Res. 39, 251–277 (2008).
4. B. A. Weinberg, J. Owen-Smith, R. F. Rosen, L. Schwarz, B. M. Allen, R. E. Weiss, J. Lane, Science funding and short-term economic activity. Science 344, 41–43 (2014).
5. B. Maciejovsky, D. V. Budescu, D. Ariely, The researcher as a consumer of scientific publications: How do name-ordering conventions affect inferences about contribution credits? Market. Sci. 28, 589–598 (2009).
6. A. Marušić, L. Bošnjak, A. Jerončić, A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines. PLOS ONE 6, e23477 (2011).
7. C. Haeussler, H. Sauermann, Credit where credit is due? The impact of project contributions and social factors on authorship and inventorship. Res. Policy 42, 688–703 (2013).
8. D. Rennie, V. Yank, L. Emanuel, When authorship fails: A proposal to make contributors accountable. JAMA 278, 579–585 (1997).
9. T. Bates, A. Anić, M. Marušić, A. Marušić, Authorship criteria and disclosure of contributions: Comparison of 3 general medical journals with different author contribution forms. JAMA 292, 86–88 (2004).
10. M. Biagioli, in Scientific Authorship—Credit and Intellectual Property in Science, M. Biagioli, P. Galison, Eds. (Routledge, 2003), pp. 253–279.
11. J. Bohannon, Who’s afraid of peer review? Science 342, 60–65 (2013).
12. V. Yank, D. Rennie, Disclosure of researcher contributions: A study of original research articles in The Lancet. Ann. Intern. Med. 130, 661–670 (1999).
13. L. Allen, J. Scott, A. Brand, M. Hlava, M. Altman, Publishing: Credit where credit is due. Nature 508, 312–313 (2014).
14. M. Engers, J. S. Gans, S. Grant, S. P. King, First-author conditions. J. Polit. Econ. 107, 859–883 (1999).
15. ICMJE, http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html (Archived prior versions: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/archives/) (2010), vol. 2010.
16. S. Wood, in Heartwire News, https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/708781 (2009).
17. R. H. Moorman, P. M. Podsakoff, A meta-analytic review and empirical test of the potential confounding effects of social desirability response sets in organizational behavior research. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 65, 131–149 (1992).
18. E. von Hippel, Task partitioning: An innovation process variable. Res. Policy 19, 407–418 (1990).
19. S. Shibayama, Y. Baba, J. P. Walsh, Organizational design of university laboratories: Task allocation and lab performance in Japanese bioscience laboratories. Res. Policy 44, 610–622 (2015).
20. B. H. Hamilton, J. A. Nickerson, H. Owan, Team incentives and worker heterogeneity: An empirical analysis of the impact of teams on productivity and participation. J. Polit. Econ. 111, 465–497 (2003).
21. C. Haeussler, L. Jiang, J. Thursby, M. Thursby, Specific and general information sharing among competing academic researchers. Res. Policy 43, 465–475 (2014).
22. F. Lissoni, F. Montobbio, L. Zirulia, Inventorship and authorship as attribution rights: An enquiry into the economics of scientific credit. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 95, 49–69 (2013).
23. J. Owen-Smith, Managing laboratory work through skepticism: Processes of evaluation and control. Am. Sociol. Rev. 66, 427–452 (2001).
24. R. K. Merton, The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (University of Chicago Press, 1973).
25. M. Ross, F. Sicoly, Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 37, 322–336 (1979).
26. E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations (Free Press, ed. 5, 2003).
27. N. Lacetera, L. Zirulia, The economics of scientific misconduct. J. Law Econ. 27, 568–603 (2011).
28. C. Prendergast, The provision of incentives in firms. J. Econ. Lit. 37, 7–63 (1999).
29. J. S. Lerner, P. E. Tetlock, Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychol. Bull. 125, 255–275 (1999).
30. M. D. Alicke, Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychol. Bull. 126, 556–574 (2000).
31. A. Marušić, T. Bates, A. Anić, M. Marušić, How the structure of contribution disclosure statements affects validity of authorship: A randomized study in a general medical journal. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 22, 1035–1044 (2006).
32. J. E. Hirsch, An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 16569–16572 (2005).
33. R. Bonney, J. L. Shirk, T. B. Phillips, A. Wiggins, H. L. Ballard, A. J. Miller-Rushing, J. K. Parrish, Next steps for citizen science. Science 343, 1436–1437 (2014).
34. J. N. Cummings, S. Kiesler, Organization theory and the changing nature of science. J. Organ. Des. 3, 1–16 (2014).
35. H. Sauermann, M. Roach, Increasing web survey response rates in innovation research: An experimental study of static and dynamic contact design features. Res. Policy 42, 273–286 (2013).
36. G. Laudel, Collaboration and reward: What do we measure by co-authorships? Res. Eval. 11, 3–15 (2002).
37. M. K. Wagner, A. Dodds, M. B. Bundy, Psychology of the Scientist: LXVII. Assignment of authorship credit in psychological research. Psychol. Rep. 74, 179–187 (1994).
38. B. Latour, S. Woolgar, Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts (Sage, 1979).