Grand challenges in the science of wind energy

Science

Volumn 366, Issue 6464, 2019, Pages

  Veers, Paul ^a   Dykes, Katherine ^b   Lantz, Eric ^a   Barth, Stephan ^c   Bottasso, Carlo L ^d   Carlson, Ola ^e   Clifton, Andrew ^f   Green, Johney ^a   Green, Peter ^a   Holttinen, Hannele ^g   Laird, Daniel ^a   Lehtomäki, Ville ^h   Lundquist, Julie K ^a,i   Manwell, James ^j   Marquis, Melinda ^k   Meneveau, Charles ^l   Moriarty, Patrick ^a   Munduate, Xabier ^m   Muskulus, Michael ⁿ   Naughton, Jonathan ^o   Pao, Lucy ^p   Paquette, Joshua ^q   Peinke, Joachim ^c,r   Robertson, Amy ^a   Rodrigo, Javier Sanz ^m   Sempreviva, Anna Maria ^b   Smith, J Charles ^s   Tuohy, Aidan ^t   Wiser, Ryan ^u   more..

^a NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY   (United States)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^c ForWind Center for Wind Energy Research   (Germany)

^d TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^e CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^f WindForS Wind Energy Research Cluster   (Germany)

^g Recognis Oy   (Finland)

^h Kjeller Vindteknikk Oy   (Finland)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^j University of Massachusetts   (United States)

^k NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^l Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

^m CENER   (Spain)

ⁿ NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^o UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

^p UCB 450   (United States)

^q SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

^r UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

^s Reston   (United States)

^t ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^u LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRICITY; ENGINEERING; OPTIMIZATION; PHYSICS; ROTATION; UNDERPINNING; WIND POWER;

ARTICLE; ELECTRICITY; PHYSICS; WIND POWER; REVIEW;

EID: 85074117909     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.aau2027     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. UN, World Population Prospects 2017 (2017); https://population.un.org/wpp/DVD/Files/2_Indicators%20(Probabilistic%20Projections)/UN_PPP2017_Output_PopTot.xls.
2. BNEF, NEO 2018 presentation at CSIS (2018); https://about. bnef.com/blog/neo-2018-presentation-csis/.
3. International Energy Agency (IEA), "World energy outlook 2018" (Tech. Rep., IEA, 2018); www.iea.org/weo2018/.
4. BNEF, "New energy outlook 2019" (2019); https://about. bnef.com/new-energy-outlook/.
5. BP Energy Economics, "BP Energy Outlook: 2018 edition" (2018); www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/en/corporate/pdf/energy-economics/energy-outlook/bp-energy-outlook-2018.pdf.
6. DNV GL, "Energy transition outlook 2018: A global and regional forecast of the Energy transition to 2050" (2018); https://eto.dnvgl.com/2018/.
7. Global Wind Energy Council, "51.3 GW of global wind capacity installed in 2018" (2019); https://gwec.net/51-3-gw-ofglobal-wind-capacity-installed-in-2018/.
8. T. Mai, E. Lantz, M. Mowers, R. Wiser, "The value of wind technology innovation: Implications for the U.S. power system, wind industry, electricity consumers, and environment" (Tech. Rep. NREL/TP-6A20-70032, NREL, 2017); www.nrel.gov/docs/fy17osti/70032.pdf.
9. International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), "Global energy transformation: A roadmap to 2050" (IRENA, 2018); www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2018/Apr/IRENA_Report_GET_2018.pdf.
10. M. Ahlstrom et al., The evolution of the market: Designing a market for high levels of variable generation. IEEE Power Energy Mag. 13, 60-66 (2015). doi: 10.1109/MPE.2015.2458755
11. B. Kroposki et al., Achieving a 100% Renewable Grid: Operating Electric Power Systems with Extremely High Levels of Variable Renewable Energy. IEEE Power Energy Mag. 15, 61-73 (2017). doi: 10.1109/MPE.2016.2637122
12. T. Ackermann et al., Paving the Way: A Future Without Inertia Is Closer Than You Think. IEEE Power Energy Mag. 15, 61-69 (2017). doi: 10.1109/MPE.2017.2729138
13. E. Pursiheimo, H. Holttinen, T. Koljonen, Inter-sectoral effects of high renewable energy share in global energy system. Renew. Energy 136, 1119-1129 (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.09.082
14. M. B. Milligan et al., Alternatives No More: Wind and Solar Power Are Mainstays of a Clean, Reliable, Affordable Grid. IEEE Power Energy Mag. 13, 78-87 (2015). doi: 10.1109/MPE.2015.2462311
15. "Converter dominated" refers to a grid system largely composed of converter-based generation technologies (such as wind and solar) that convert ac to dc, which can then be fed to the larger system via dc transmission or inverted back to ac to feed a larger ac system.
16. A. Betz, Wind-Energie und ihre Ausnutzung durch Windmuuhlen (Univ. of Goettingen Press, 1926).
17. R. Wiser, M. Bolinger, "2017 wind technologies market report" (DOE Tech. Rep. DOE/EE-1798, 2018); www.energy.gov/eere/wind/downloads/2017-wind-technologies-market-report.
18. E. Lantz, R. Wiser, M. Hand, "IEA wind task 26: The past and future cost of wind energy" (Tech. Rep. NREL/TP-6A20-53510, NREL, 2012); www.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/53510.pdf.
19. Lazard, "Lazard's levelized cost of energy analysis-version 11.0" (Tech. Rep., Lazard, 2018); www.lazard.com/media/450337/lazard-levelized-cost-of-energy-version-110.pdf.
20. P. Donohoo-Vallett, "Revolutionnow: The future arrives for five clean energy technologies-2016 update" (DOE, 2016); www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2016/09/f33/Revolutiona %CC%82%E2%82%ACNow%202016%20Report_2.pdf.
21. P. S. Veers et al., Trends in the design, manufacture and evaluation of wind turbine blades. Wind Energy 6, 245-259 (2003). doi: 10.1002/we.90
22. P. Jamieson, Innovation in Wind Turbine Design (Wiley, 2011).
23. S. Scott et al., Effects of aeroelastic tailoring on performance characteristics of wind turbine systems. Renew. Energy 114, 887-903 (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.06.048
24. P. Bortolotti, C. L. Bottasso, A. Croce, L. Sartori, Integration of Multiple Passive Load Mitigation Technologies by Automated Design Optimization-The Case Study of a Medium-Size Onshore Wind Turbine. Wind Energy 22, 65-79 (2019). doi: 10.1002/we.2270
25. G. van Kuik, J. Peinke, Eds. Long-Term Research Challenges in Wind Energy-A Research Agenda by the European Academy of Wind Energy (vol. 6 of Research Topics in Wind Energy Series, Springer, 2016).
26. K. Dykes et al., "Results of IEA Wind TCP workshop on a grand vision for wind energy technology" (IEA Wind TCP Task 11, Tech. Rep. NREL/TP-5000-72437, NREL, 2019); www.nrel.gov/docs/fy19osti/72437.pdf.
27. Many technology innovation pathways, including concepts such as airborne wind turbines, were discussed and documented in the International Energy Agency Grand Wind Workshop report. Progress on the grand challenges is essential to enabling such technology configurations. However, the focus of this article is on major breakthroughs, even with power plants comprising standard horizontal-axis wind turbines.
28. J. Mann, The spatial structure of neutral atmospheric surface-layer turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 273, 141-168 (1994). doi: 10.1017/S0022112094001886
29. J. C. Kaimal, J. C. Wyngaard, Y. Izumi, O. R. Coté, Spectral characteristics of surface-layer turbulence. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 98, 563-589 (1972). doi: 10.1002/qj.49709841707
30. P. S. Veers, "Three-dimensional wind simulation" (Report no. SAND-88-0152C, CONF-890102-9, Sandia National Laboratories, 1988); https://prod-ng.sandia.gov/techlibnoauth/access-control.cgi/1988/880152.pdf.
31. J. C. Wyngaard, Toward Numerical Modeling in the "Terra Incognita". J. Atmos. Sci. 61, 1816-1826 (2004). doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(2004)0611816:TNMITT2.0.CO;2
32. X. G. Larsén, E. L. Petersen, S. E. Larsen, Variation of boundary-layer wind spectra with height. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 144, 2054-2066 (2018). doi: 10.1002/qj.3301
33. J. S. Sanz Rodrigo et al., Mesoscale to microscale wind farm modeling and evaluation. WIREs Energy Environ. 6, e214 (2017). doi: 10.1002/wene.214
34. J. Mann et al., Complex terrain experiments in the New European Wind Atlas. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 375, 20160101 (2017). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0101; pmid: 28265025
35. D. A. Rajewski et al., Crop Wind Energy Experiment (CWEX): Observations of Surface-Layer, Boundary Layer, and Mesoscale Interactions with a Wind Farm. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 94, 655-672 (2013). doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00240.1
36. X. Han, D. Liu, C. Xu, W. Z. Shen, Atmospheric stability and topography effects on wind turbine performance and wake properties in complex terrain. Renew. Energy 126, 640-651 (2018). doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.03.048
37. J. A. Lee et al., Improving Wind Predictions in the Marine Atmospheric Boundary Layer through Parameter Estimation in a Single-Column Model. Mon. Weather Rev. 145, 5-24 (2017). doi: 10.1175/MWR-D-16-0063.1
38. M. Calaf, C. Meneveau, J. Meyers, Large eddy simulations of fully developed wind-turbine array boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 22, 015110 (2010). doi: 10.1063/1.3291077
39. N. G. Nygaard, A. C. Newcombe, Wake behind an offshore wind farm observed with dual-Doppler radars. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1037, 072008 (2018);.doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1037/7/072008
40. R. J. A. M. Stevens, C. Meneveau, Flow Structure and Turbulence in Wind Farms. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 49, 311-339 (2017). doi: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010816-060206
41. D. W. Keith et al., The influence of large-scale wind power on global climate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 16115-16120 (2004). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406930101; pmid: 15536131
42. A. C. Fitch et al., Local and Mesoscale Impacts of Wind Farms as Parameterized in a Mesoscale NWP Model. Mon. Weather Rev. 140, 3017-3038 (2012). doi: 10.1175/MWR-D-11-00352.1
43. P. J. H. Volker, J. Badger, A. N. Hahmann, S. Ott, The Explicit Wake Parametrisation V1.0: A wind farm parametrisation in the mesoscale model WRF. Geosci. Model Dev. 8, 3715-3731 (2015). doi: 10.5194/gmd-8-3715-2015
44. A. Armstrong et al., Ground-level climate at a peatland wind farm in Scotland is affected by wind turbine operation. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 044024 (2016). doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/044024
45. J. C. Y. Lee, J. K. Lundquist, Evaluation of the wind farm parameterization in the Weather Research and Forecasting model (version 3.8.1) with meteorological and turbine power data. Geosci. Model Dev. 10, 4229-4244 (2017). doi: 10.5194/gmd-10-4229-2017
46. A. Platis et al., First in situ evidence of wakes in the far field behind offshore wind farms. Sci. Rep. 8, 2163 (2018). doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20389-y; pmid: 29391440
47. S. K. Siedersleben et al., Micrometeorological Impacts of Offshore Wind Farms as seen in Observations and Simulations. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 124012 (2018). doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaea0b
48. M. Z. Jacobson, C. L. Archer, Saturation wind power potential and its implications for wind energy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 15679-15684 (2012). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1208993109; pmid: 23019353
49. A. S. Adams, D. W. Keith, Are global wind power resource estimates overstated? Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 015021 (2013). doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015021
50. A. C. Fitch, J. K. Lundquist, J. B. Olson, Mesoscale Influences of Wind Farms throughout a Diurnal Cycle. Mon. Weather Rev. 141, 2173-2198 (2013). doi: 10.1175/MWR-D-12-00185.1
51. J. K. Lundquist, K. K. DuVivier, D. Kaffine, J. M. Tomaszewski, Costs and consequences of wind turbine wake effects arising from uncoordinated wind energy development. Nat. Energy 4, 26-34 (2019). doi: 10.1038/s41560-018-0281-2
52. K. B. Karnauskas, J. K. Lundquist, L. Zhang, Southward shift of the global wind energy resource under high carbon dioxide emissions. Nat. Geosci. 11, 38-43 (2018). doi: 10.1038/s41561-017-0029-9
53. C. L. Archer et al., Meteorology for coastal/offshore wind energy in the United States: Recommendations and research needs for the next 10 years. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 95, 515-519 (2014). doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00108.1
54. C. Meneveau, Big wind power: Seven questions for turbulence research. J. Turbul. 20, 2-20 (2019). doi: 10.1080/14685248.2019.1584664
55. M. L. Aitken, R. M. Banta, Y. L. Pichugina, J. K. Lundquist, Quantifying wind turbine wake characteristics from scanning remote sensor data. J. Oceanic Atmos. Technol. 31, 765-787 (2014). doi: 10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00104.1
56. A. Peña, C. B. Hasager, M. Badger, R. J. Barthelmie, F. Bingöl, J.-P. Cariou, S. Emeis, S. T. Frandsen, M. Harris, I. Karagali, S. E. Larsen, J. Mann, T. Mikkelsen, M. Pitter, S. C. Pryor, A. Sathe, D. Schlipf, C. Slinger, R. Wagner, "Remote sensing for wind energy" (DTU Wind Energy-E-Report-0084, Denmark Technical University, 2015); https://orbit.dtu.dk/files/111814239/DTU_Wind_Energy_Report_E_0084.pdf.
57. A. Clifton et al., IEA Wind Task 32: Wind Lidar Identifying and Mitigating Barriers to the Adoption of Wind Lidar. Remote Sens. 10, 406 (2018). doi: 10.3390/rs10030406
58. B. D. Hirth, J. L. Schroeder, W. S. Gunter, J. G. Guynes, Measuring a Utility-Scale Turbine Wake Using the TTUKa Mobile Research Radars. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 29, 765-771 (2012). doi: 10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00039.1
59. R. Menke, N. Vasiljevi?, K. S. Hansen, A. N. Hahmann, J. Mann, Does the wind turbine wake follow the topography? A multi-lidar study in complex terrain. Wind Energy Sci. 3, 681-691 (2018). doi: 10.5194/wes-3-681-2018
60. N. Wildmann, N. Vasiljevic, T. Gerz, Wind turbine wake measurements with automatically adjusting scanning trajectories in a multi-Doppler lidar setup. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 11, 3801-3814 (2018). doi: 10.5194/amt-11-3801-2018
61. C. B. Hasager et al., Remote Sensing Observation Used in Offshore Wind Energy. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 1, 67-79 (2008). doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2008.2002218
62. A. M. Sempreviva, R. J. Barthelmie, S. C. Pryor, Review of Methodologies for Offshore Wind Resource Assessment in European Seas. Surv. Geophys. 29, 471-497 (2008). doi: 10.1007/s10712-008-9050-2
63. S. E. Haupt, R. Kotamarthi, Y. Feng, J. D. Mirocha, E. Koo, R. Linn, B. Kosovic, B. Brown, A. Anderson, M. J. Churchfield, C. Draxl, E. Quon, W. Shaw, L. Berg, R. Rai, B. L. Ennis, "Second year report of the atmosphere to electrons mesoscale to microscale coupling project: Nonstationary modeling techniques and assessment" (PNNL-26267, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2017); www.pnnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-26267.pdf.
64. S. Lee, M. Churchfield, P. Moriarty, J. Jonkman, J. Michalakes, "Atmospheric and wake turbulence impacts on wind turbine fatigue loadings: Preprint" (Conference Paper NREL/CP-5000-53567, NREL, 2011); www.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/53567.pdf.
65. H. A. Madsen, N. N. Sørensen, C. Bak, N. Troldborg, G. Pirrung, Measured aerodynamic forces on a full scale 2MW turbine in comparison with EllipSys3D and HAWC2 simulations. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1037, 022011 (2018). doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1037/2/022011
66. J. G. Schepers et al., Final results from the EU project AVATAR: Aerodynamic modelling of 10 MW wind turbines. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1037, 022013 (2018). doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1037/2/022013
67. M. A. Sprague, S. Boldyrev, P. Fischer, R. Grout, W. I. Gustafson Jr., R. Moser, "Turbulent flow simulation at the exascale: Opportunities and challenges workshop," 4 to 5 August 2015 (NREL/TP-2C00-67648, DOE, 2017); www.nrel.gov/docs/fy17osti/67648.pdf.
68. J. C. Heinz, N. N. Sørensen, F. Zahle, Fluid-structure interaction computations for geometrically resolved rotor simulations using CFD. Wind Energy 19, 2205-2221 (2016). doi: 10.1002/we.1976
69. A. R. Stäblein, M. H. Hansen, G. Pirrung, Fundamental aeroelastic properties of a bend-twist coupled blade section. J. Fluids Structures 68, 72-89 (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2016.10.010
70. A. R. Stäblein, M. H. Hansen, D. R. Verelst, Modal Properties and Stability of Bend-Twist Coupled Wind Turbine Blades. Wind Energy Sci. 2, 343-360 (2017). doi: 10.5194/wes-2-343-2017
71. R. Riva, S. Cacciola, C. L. Bottasso, Periodic Stability Analysis of Wind Turbines Operating in Turbulent Wind Conditions. Wind Energy Sci. 1, 177-203 (2016). doi: 10.5194/wes-1-177-2016
72. A. Morató, S. Sriramula, N. Krishnan, J. Nichols, Ultimate loads and response analysis of a monopile supported offshore wind turbine using fully coupled simulation. Renew. Energy 101, 126-143 (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.08.056
73. L. Suja-Thauvin, J. R. Krokstad, E. E. Bachynski, Critical assessment of non-linear hydrodynamic load models for a fully flexible monopile offshore wind turbine. Ocean Eng. 164, 87-104 (2018). doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.06.027
74. J. Jonkman, Dynamics of Offshore Floating Turbines-Model Development and Verification. Wind Energy 12, 459-492 (2009). doi: 10.1002/we.347
75. J. Jose, S. J. Choi, K. E. Giljarhus, O. T. Gudmestad, A comparison of numerical simulations of breaking wave forces on a monopile structure using two different numerical models based on finite difference and finite volume methods. Ocean Eng. 137, 78-88 (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.03.045
76. A. Natarajan, Influence of second-order random wave kinematics on the design loads of offshore wind turbine support structures. Renew. Energy 68, 829-841 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.02.052
77. B. T. Paulsen, H. Bredmose, H. B. Bingham, N. G. Jacobsen, Forcing of a bottom-mounted circular cylinder by steep regular water waves at finite depth. J. Fluid Mech. 755, 1-34 (2014). doi: 10.1017/jfm.2014.386
78. R. Worsnop, J. K. Lundquist, G. H. Bryan, R. Damiani, W. Musial, Gusts and Shear Within Hurricane Eyewalls Can Exceed Offshore Wind-Turbine Design Standards. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 6413-6420 (2017). doi: 10.1002/2017GL073537
79. E. Kim, L. Manuel, M. Curcic, S. S. Chen, C. Phillips, P. Veers, "On the use of coupled wind, wave, and current fields in the simulation of loads on bottom-supported offshore wind turbines during hurricanes" (DOE/GO-102015-4798 2016, Tech. Rep. NREL/TP-5000-65283, NREL, 2016); www.nrel. gov/docs/fy16osti/65283.pdf.
80. T. Han, G. McCann, T. A. Mücke, K. Freudenreich, How can a wind turbine survive a tropical cyclone? Renew. Energy 70, 3-10 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.02.014
81. J. N. Sørensen, W. Z. Shen, X. Munduate, Analysis of wake states by a full?field actuator disc model. Wind Energy 1, 73-88 (1998). doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1824(199812)1:273: AID-WE123.0.CO;2-L
82. C. Lienard, R. Boisard, C. Daudin, "Aerodynamic behavior of a floating offshore wind turbine," AIAA SciTech 2019 Forum, San Diego, CA, 7 to 11 January 2019; doi: 10.2514/6.2019-1575
83. B. Koo, A. J. Goupee, R. W. Kimball, K. F. Lambrakos, Model Tests for a Floating Wind Turbine on Three Different Floaters. J. Offshore Mech. Arctic Eng. 136, 020907 (2014). doi: 10.1115/1.4024711
84. D. S. Cousins, Y. Suzuki, R. E. Murray, J. R. Samaniuk, A. P. Stebner, Recycling glass fiber thermoplastic composites from wind turbine blades. J. Clean. Prod. 209, 1252-1263 (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.286
85. Grid formation involves supporting the fundamental structure of an electric grid system. This includes serving as a reliable voltage source for ac or dc systems and providing frequency signals for ac systems.
86. C. Shapiro, P. Bauweraerts, J. Meyers, C. Meneveau, D. F. Gayme, Model-based receding horizon control of wind farms for secondary frequency regulation. Wind Energy 20, 1261-1275 (2017). doi: 10.1002/we.2093
87. V. Gevorgian, Y. Zhang, E. Ela, Investigating the Impacts of Wind Generation Participation in Interconnection Frequency Response. IEEE Trans. Sustainable Energy 6, 1004-1012 (2015). doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2014.2343836
88. J. W. van Wingerden, L. Y. Pao, J. Aho, P. Fleming, "Active Power Control of Waked Wind Farms." Proc. IFAC World Congress, Toulouse, France, (2017), pp. 4570-4577. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.378
89. P. M. O. Gebraad et al., Wind plant power optimization through yaw control using a parametric model for wake effects-a CFD simulation study. Wind Energy 19, 95-114 (2014). doi: 10.1002/we.1822
90. P. Fleming et al., Full-Scale Field Test of Wake Steering. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 854, 012013 (2017). doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/854/1/012013
91. P. Fleming et al., A simulation study demonstrating the importance oflarge-scale trailing vortices in wake steering. Wind Energy Sci. 3, 243-255 (2018). doi: 10.5194/wes-3-243-2018
92. J. Annoni et al., A Wind direction estimation using SCADA data with consensus-based optimization. Wind Energy Sci. 4, 355-368 (2019). doi: 10.5194/wes-2018-60
93. S. Raach, S. Boersma, B. Doekemeijer, J.-W. van Wingerden, P. W. Cheng, Lidar-based closed-loop wake redirection in high-fidelity simulation. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1037, 032016 (2018). doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1037/3/032016
94. P. A. Fleming, J. Aho, P. Gebraad, L. Pao, Y. Zhang, "Computational fluid dynamics simulation study of active power control in wind plants" in Proc. American Control Conf. (IEEE, 2016), pp. 1413-1420;.doi: 10.1109/ACC.2016.7525115
95. M. Vali, V. Petrovi?, G. Steinfeld, L. Y. Pao, M. Kühn, An active power control approach for wake-induced load alleviation in a fully developed wind farm boundary layer. Wind Energy Sci. 4, 139-161 (2019). doi: 10.5194/wes-4-139-2019
96. D. Pattabiraman, R. H. Lasseter, T. M. Jahns, "Comparison of grid following and grid forming control for a high inverter penetration power system," in 2018 IEEE Power Energy Society General Meeting (IEEE, 2018);.doi: 10.1109/PESGM.2018.8586162
97. P. Fairley, "Can synthetic inertia from wind power stabilize grids?" IEEE Spectrum (2016); https://spectrum.ieee.org/energywise/energy/renewables/can-synthetic-inertiastabilize-power-grids.
98. Q. P. Zheng, J. Wang, A. L. Liu, Stochastic Optimization for Unit Commitment-A Review. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 30, 1913-1924 (2015). doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2355204
99. D. Molzahn et al., A Survey of Distributed Optimization and Control Algorithms for Electric Power Systems. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 8, 2941-2962 (2017). doi: 10.1109/TSG.2017.2720471
100. H. Holttinen et al., "Design and operation of power systems with large amounts of wind power" (Final summary report, IEA Wind Task 25, IEA, 2016); www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/technology/2016/T268.pdf.
101. N. Helistö, J. Kiviluoma, H. Holttinen, J. D. Lara, B.-M. Hodge, Including operational aspects in the planning of power systems with large amounts of variable generation: A review of modelling approaches. WIREs Energy Environ. 8, e341 (2019). doi: 10.1002/wene.341
102. L. Göransson, F. A. Johnsson, A comparison of variation management strategies for wind power integration in different electricity system contexts. Wind Energy 21, 837-854 (2018). doi: 10.1002/we.2198
103. M. D. Wilkinson et al., The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3, 160018 (2016). doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18; pmid: 26978244
104. A. M. Sempreviva et al., Taxonomy and metadata for wind energy research & development. Version 1, Zenodo (2017). doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.1199489
105. European Technology & Innovation Platform on Wind Energy (ETIP Wind) Steering Committee, "When wind goes digital" (ETIP Wind, 2014); https://etipwind.eu/news/wind-goes-digital/.
106. C. E. Concolato, L. M. Chen, Data science: A new paradigm in the age of big-data science and analytics. New Math. Nat. Computation 13, 119-143 (2017). doi: 10.1142/S1793005717400038