How organisations promoting vaccination respond to misinformation on social media: a qualitative investigation

BMC Public Health

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2019, Pages

  Steffens, Maryke S ^a   Dunn, Adam G ^a,b   Wiley, Kerrie E ^c   Leask, Julie ^c  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c University of Sydney   (Australia)

Author keywords

Anti vaccination movement; Health communication; Health promotion; Immunisation; Misinformation; Public health; Qualitative methods; Social media; Vaccination

Indexed keywords

AUSTRALIA; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL MEDIA; VACCINATION;

AUSTRALIA; COMMUNICATION; HUMANS; ORGANIZATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL MEDIA; VACCINATION;

EID: 85073757091     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7659-3     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Jack C. Lexicon of lies: terms for problematic information. Data & Society; 2017. Available from: https://datasociety.net/output/lexicon-of-lies/. Accessed 10 July 2018.
2. Fox S. The social life of health information: Pew Research Center; 2011. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media//Files/Reports/2011/PIP_Social_Life_of_Health_Info.pdf. Accessed 10 Nov 2018
3. Jones AM, Omer SB, Bednarczyk RA, Halsey NA, Moulton LH, Salmon DA. Parents' source of vaccine information and impact on vaccine attitudes, beliefs, and nonmedical exemptions. Adv Prev Med. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/932741.
4. Freeman B, Potente S, Rock V, McIver J. Social media campaigns that make a difference: what can public health learn from the corporate sector and other social change marketers? Public Health Res Pract. 2015;25(2):e2521517. https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp2521517.
5. Moorhead SA, Hazlett DE, Harrison L, Carroll JK, Irwin A, Hoving C. A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(4):e85. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1933.
6. Buchanan R, Beckett RD. Assessment of vaccination-related information for consumers available on Facebook. Health Inf Libr J. 2014;31(3):227-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12073.
7. Keelan J, Pavri-Garcia V, Tomlinson G, Wilson K. YouTube as a source of information on immunization: a content analysis. JAMA. 2007;298(21):2482-4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.21.2482.
8. Sharma M, Yadav K, Yadav N, Ferdinand KC. Zika virus pandemic-analysis of Facebook as a social media health information platform. Am J Infect Control. 2017;45(3):301-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2016.08.022.
9. Betsch C, Renkewitz F, Betsch T, Ulshofer C. The influence of vaccine-critical websites on perceiving vaccination risks. J Health Psychol. 2010;15(3):446-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105309353647.
10. Shao C, Ciampaglia GL, Varol O, Yang K-C, Flammini A, Menczer F. The spread of low-credibility content by social bots. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):4787. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06930-7.
11. Steffens MS, Dunn AG, Leask J. Meeting the challenges of reporting on public health in the new media landscape. Aust J Rev. 2017;39(2):119-32.
12. Smith N, Graham T. Mapping the anti-vaccination movement on Facebook. Inf Commun Soc. 2017:1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1418406.
13. Kata A. Anti-vaccine activists, web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm-an overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement. Vaccine. 2012;30(25):3778-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.112.
14. Royal Society for Public Health. Moving the needle: promoting vaccination uptake across the life course: Royal Society for Public Health; 2018. Available from: https://www.rsph.org.uk/uploads/assets/uploaded/f8cf580a-57b5-41f4-8e21de333af20f32.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2019
15. Broniatowski DA, Jamison AM, Qi S, Alkulaib L, Chen T, Benton A, et al. Weaponized health communication: twitter bots and Russian trolls amplify the vaccine debate. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(10):1378. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304567.
16. Larson HJ, Wilson R, Hanley S, Parys A, Paterson P. Tracking the global spread of vaccine sentiments: the global response to Japan's suspension of its HPV vaccine recommendation. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014;10(9):2543-50. https://doi.org/10.4161/21645515.2014.969618.
17. Larson HJ. The biggest pandemic risk? Viral misinformation. Nature. 2018;562(7727):309. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-07034-4.
18. Zimet GD, Rosberger Z, Fisher WA, Perez S, Stupiansky NW. Beliefs, behaviors and HPV vaccine: Correcting the myths and the misinformation. Prev Med. 2013;57(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.05.013.
19. Omer SB, Salmon DA, Orenstein WA, deHart MP, Halsey N. Vaccine refusal, mandatory immunization, and the risks of vaccine-preventable diseases. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(19):1981-8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0806477.
20. Betsch C, Brewer NT, Brocard P, Davies P, Gaissmaier W, Haase N, et al. Opportunities and challenges of web 2.0 for vaccination decisions. Vaccine. 2012;30(25):3727-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.02.025.
21. Capurro D, Cole K, Echavarria MI, Joe J, Neogi T, Turner AM. The use of social networking sites for public health practice and research: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(3):e79. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2679.
22. Dube E, MacDonald NE. Vaccination resilience: building and sustaining confidence in and demand for vaccination. Vaccine. 2017;35(32):3907-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.06.015.
23. Orr D, Baram-Tsabari A, Landsman K. Social media as a platform for health-related public debates and discussions: the Polio vaccine on Facebook. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2016;5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-016-0093-4.
24. Neiger BL, Thackeray R, Burton SH, Thackeray CR, Reese JH. Use of twitter among local health departments: an analysis of information sharing, engagement, and action. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(8):e177. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2775.
25. Park H, Reber BH, Chon MG. Tweeting as Health Communication: Health Organizations' Use of Twitter for Health Promotion and Public Engagement. J Health Commun. 2016;21(2):188-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1058435.
26. Ramanadhan S, Mendez SR, Rao M, Viswanath K. Social media use by community-based organizations conducting health promotion: a content analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2013;13:1129. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6655.
27. Shan LC, Panagiotopoulos P, Regan Á, De Brún A, Barnett J, Wall P, et al. Interactive communication with the public: qualitative exploration of the use of social media by food and health organizations. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2015;47(1):104-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.09.004.
28. Thackeray R, Neiger BL, Smith AK, Van Wagenen SB. Adoption and use of social media among public health departments. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:242. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-242.
29. Dumbrell D, Steele R. Twitter and health in the Australian context: What types of information are health-related organizations tweeting? 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; 2013. p. 2666-75. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2013.578.
30. Mergel I. Social media adoption and resulting tactics in the U.S. federal government. Gov Inf Q. 2013;30(2):123-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.12.004.
31. Sensis. Sensis Social Media Report 2016. Melbourne: Sensis; 2016. 1 June 2016. Available from: https://www.sensis.com.au/asset/PDFdirectory/Sensis_Social_Media_Report_2016.PDF. Accessed 10 Nov 2018
32. Lowbridge CP, Leask J. Risk communication in public health. NSW Public Health Bull. 2011;22(1-2):34. https://doi.org/10.1071/NB10055.
33. Veil SR, Buehner T, Palenchar MJ. A work-in-process literature review: incorporating social media in risk and crisis communication. J Conting Crisis Man. 2011;19(2):110-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2011.00639.x.
34. Covello VT. Best practices in public health risk and crisis communication. J Health Commun. 2003;8(Suppl 1):5-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/713851971.
35. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman B, Burgess R, editors. Analyzing qualitative data. London and New York: Routledge; 1994. p. 179-94.
36. Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Red Methodol. 2013;13:117. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-117.
37. Ritchie J, Spencer L, O'Connor W. Carrying out qualitative analysis. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. Qualitative research practice. London: Sage; 2003. p. 219-62.
38. Maxwell JA, Mittapalli K. Realism as a Stance for Mixed Methods Research. In: Abbas T, Charles T, editors. SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2010. p. 145.
39. Carter N, Bryant-Lukosius D, DiCenso A, Blythe J, Neville AJ. The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014;41(5):545. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547.
40. Nyhan B, Reifler J. Does correcting myths about the flu vaccine work? An experimental evaluation of the effects of corrective information. Vaccine. 2015;33(3):459-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.11.017.
41. Nyhan B, Reifler J, Richey S, Freed GL. Effective messages in vaccine promotion: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2014;133(4):e835. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-2365.
42. Leask J. Should we do battle with antivaccination activists? Public Health Res Pract. 2015;25(2):e2521515. https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp2521515.
43. Schmid P, Betsch C. Effective strategies for rebutting science denialism in public discussions. Nat Hum Behav. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0632-4.
44. Crawford K. Following you: disciplines of listening in social media. Continuum. 2009;23(4):525-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310903003270.
45. Vraga EK, Bode L. Using expert sources to correct health misinformation in social media. Sci Commun. 2017;39(5):621-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017731776.
46. Phillips W. The Oxygen of Amplification. Better practices for reporting on extremists, antagonists, and manipulators. Data Soc. 2018; Available from: https://datasociety.net/output/oxygen-of-amplification/. Accessed 10 Jan 2019.
47. Lewandowsky S, Ecker UKH, Seifert CM, Schwarz N, Cook J. Misinformation and its correction: continued influence and successful Debiasing. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2012;13(3):106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018.
48. Swire B, Ecker UKH, Lewandowsky S. The role of familiarity in correcting inaccurate information. J Exp Psychol Learn. 2017;43(12):1948-61. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000422.
49. Cook J, Lewandowsky S, Ecker UKH. Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0175799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175799.
50. Schmid P, MacDonald NE. Best practice guidance: how to respond to vocal vaccine deniers in public: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 2017. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/315761/Best-practice-guidance-respond-vocal-vaccine-deniers-public.pdf. Accessed 3 Feb 2019
51. Reynolds BJ. Building trust through social media. CDC's experience during the H1N1 influenza response. Mark Health Serv. 2010;30(2):18-21.
52. Grant L, Hausman BL, Cashion M, Lucchesi N, Patel K, Roberts J. Vaccination persuasion online: a qualitative study of two provaccine and two vaccine-skeptical websites. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(5):e133. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4153.
53. Simis MJ, Madden H, Cacciatore MA, Yeo SK. The lure of rationality: why does the deficit model persist in science communication? Public Underst Sci. 2016;25(4):400-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516629749.
54. Kata A. A postmodern Pandora's box: anti-vaccination misinformation on the internet. Vaccine. 2010;28(7):1709-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.022.
55. Jones M, Crow DA. How can we use the 'science of stories' to produce persuasive scientific stories? Palgrave Commun. 2017;3(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0047-7.
56. Betsch C, Ulshöfer C, Renkewitz F, Betsch T. The influence of narrative v. statistical information on perceiving vaccination risks. Med Decis Mak. 2011;31(5):742-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x11400419.
57. Shelby A, Ernst K. Story and science: how providers and parents can utilize storytelling to combat anti-vaccine misinformation. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013;9(8):1795. https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.24828.
58. Downs JS, de Bruin WB, Fischhoff B. Parents' vaccination comprehension and decisions. Vaccine. 2008;26(12):1595-607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.01.011.
59. Cawkwell P, Oshinsky D. Storytelling in the context of vaccine refusal: a strategy to improve communication and immunisation. Med Humanit. 2016;42(1):5.
60. Nicholson MS, Leask J. Lessons from an online debate about measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) immunization. Vaccine. 2012;30(25):3806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.10.072.
61. Horne Z, Powell D, Hummel JE, Holyoak KJ. Countering antivaccination attitudes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(33):10321. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1504019112.
62. Cook J, Lewandowsky S. The Debunking Handbook: University of Queensland; 2011. Report No.: ISBN 978-0-646-56812-6. Available from: http://sks.to/debunk. Accessed 10 Nov 2018
63. Betsch C, Sachse K. Debunking vaccination myths: strong risk negations can increase perceived vaccination risks. Health Psychol. 2013;32(2):146-55. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027387.
64. Doshi P. Medical response to trump requires truth seeking and respect for patients. BMJ. 2017;356. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j661.
65. Leask J, Chapman S. 'An attempt to swindle nature': press anti immunisation reportage 1993/ 1997. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1998;22(1):17-26.
66. Cary F, Gottfried J, Mitchell A. Science News and Information Today: Pew Research Center; 2017. Available from: http://www.journalism.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2017/09/PJ_2017.09.20_Science-and-News_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 10 Nov 2018
67. Bialik K, Matsa KE. Key trends in social and digital news media: Pew Research Center; 2017. Available from: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/10/04/key-trends-in-social-and-digital-news-media/. Accessed 10 Nov 2018