Emission certificate trade and costs under regional burden-sharing regimes for a 2°c climate change control target

Climate Change Economics

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Kober, T ^a   Van Der Zwaan, B C C ^b,c   Rosler H ^a  

^a TNO   (Netherlands)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

carbon certificate trade; Climate policy; emissions abatement; energy system; greenhouse gases; resource versus cost sharing

Indexed keywords

EID: 85073425908     PISSN: 20100078     EISSN: 20100086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S2010007814400016     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Babiker, M, J Reilly and L Viguier (2004). Is emissions trading always beneficial? The Energy Journal, 25(2), 33-56.
2. Calvin, K, M Wise, D Klein, D McCollum, M Tavoni, B van der Zwaan and D van Vuuren (2013). A multi-model analysis of the regional and sectoral roles of bioenergy in near-Term and long-Term carbon mitigation. Climate Change Economics, 4(4), 1340014.
3. Ciscar, J-C, B Saveyn, A Soria, L Szabo, D van Regemorter and T van Ierland (2013). A comparability analysis of global burden sharing GHG reduction scenarios. Energy Policy, 55, 73-81.
4. DeAngelo, B, F de la Chesnaye, R Beach, A Sommer and B Murray (2006). Methane and nitrous oxide mitigation in agriculture. The Energy Journal, 27, Special Issue: Multi-Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Climate Policy, 89-108.
5. De Cian, E and M Tavoni (2012). Do technology externalities justify restrictions on emission permit trading? Resource and Energy Economics, 34, 624-646.
6. den Elzen, MGJ, N Höhne, J van Vliet and C Ellerman (2008). Exploring comparable post-2012 reduction efforts for AnnexI countries. MNP Report 500102019/2008, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
7. den Elzen, M and N Höhne (2010). Sharing the reduction effort to limit global warming to 2C. Climate Policy, 10, 247-260.
8. Driesen, DM (2003). Does emissions trading encourage innovation?. Environmental Law Reporter, 32, Environmental Law Institute, Washington DC.
9. GEA (2012), Global Energy Assessment-Towards a Sustainable Future Cambridge UK: Cambridge, University Press
10. Hendriks, C, W Graus and FV Bergen (2004). Global carbon dioxide storage potential and costs. Ecofys in cooperation with TNO, EEP-02001, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
11. Hof, AF, MGJ den Elzen and DP van Vuuren (2008). Environmental effectiveness and economic consequences of fragmented versus universal regimes: What can we learn from model studies? International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 9(1), 39-62.
12. de Hoogwijk, M, A Faaij, B de Vries and W Turkenburg (2009). Exploration of regional and global cost-Supply curves of biomass energy from short-rotation crops at abandoned crop land and rest land under four IPCC SRES land-use scenarios. Biomass and Bioenergy, 33, 26-43.
13. IEA (2011). World energy outlook 2011. International Energy Agency, Paris.
14. IEA (2012). Energy technology perspectives 2012-Scenarios and strategies to 2050. International Energy Agency, Paris.
15. Ironmonger, D, V Jennings and B Lloyd-Smith (2000). Long term global projections of household numbers and size distributions for LINK countries and regions. Paper presented at the Project LINK meeting, Oslo, Norway on 3-6 October, 2000.
16. Jacoby, HD, MH Babiker, S Paltsev and JM Reilly (2008). Sharing the burden of GHG reductions. Report No. 167, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Cambridge, MA, USA.
17. Keppo, I and BCC van der Zwaan (2012). The impact of uncertainty in climate targets and CO2 storage availability on long-Term emissions abatement. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 17(1/2), 177-191.
18. Kriegler, E, M Tavoni, T Aboumahboub, G Luderer, K Calvin, G De Maere, V Krey, K Riahi, H Rösler, M Schaeffer and DP van Vuuren (2013). What does 2-C target? The LIMITS study on implications of Durban Platform Action scenarios. Climate Change Economics, 4(4), 1340008.
19. Loulou, R and M Labriet (2008). ETSAP-TIAM: The TIMES integrated assessment model, Part I: Model structure. Computational Management Science, 5(1-2), 7-40.
20. Loulou, R (2008). ETSAP-TIAM: The TIMES integrated assessment model, Part II: Mathematical formulation. Computational Management Science, 5(1-2), 41-66.
21. Lucas, PL, DP van Vuuren, JGJ Olivier and MGJ den Elzen (2007). Long-Term reduction potential of non-CO2 greenhouse gases. Environmental Science and Policy, 10(2), 85-103.
22. Meyer, A (2000). Contraction and Convergence. The global solution to climate change. Schumacher Briefings 5, Green books for the Schumacher society, Bristol, USA (Paperback).
23. RES2020 (2009). Monitoring and evaluation of the RES directives implementation in EU27 and policy recommendations for 2020. EU27 Synthesis Report. Available at www.RES2020.eu. Accessed on 30 September 2010.
24. Rösler, H, JJC Bruggink and IJ Keppo (2011). Design of a European sustainable hydrogen model-Model structure and data sources. Energy research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN) Report ECN-E-11-041, Petten, The Netherlands.
25. Rösler, H, BCC van der Zwaan, IJ Keppo and JJC Bruggink (2014). Electricity versus hydrogen for passenger car under stringent climate control. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessment, 5, 106-118.
26. van Sluisveld, MAE, DEHJ Gernaat, AAC Otto, M Isaak, DP vanVuuren, I Mouratiadou, S Ashina, A Garg, PR Shukla, K Calvin, S Rao, PL Lucas and J van Vliet (2013). A multimodel analysis of post-2020 mitigation efforts of five major economies. Climate Change Economics, 4(4), 1340012.
27. de Sépibus, J (2008). Linking the EU emissions trading scheme to JI, CDM and post-2012 international offsets. A legal analysis and critique of the EU ETS and the proposals for its third trading period. NCCR TRADE Working Paper No. 18.
28. Staub-Kaminski, I, A Zimmer, M Jakob and R Marschinski (2013). Climate policy in practice: A typology of obstacles and implications for integrated assessment modeling. Climate Change Economics, 5(1), 1440004.
29. Tavoni, M, E Kriegler, T Aboumahboub, K Calvin, G De Maere, J Jewell, T Kober, P Lucas, G Luderer, D McCollum, G Marangoni, K Riahi and D vanVuuren (2013). The distribution of the major economies effort in the Durban platform scenarios. Climate Change Economics, 4(4), 1340009.
30. Thrän, D, T Seidenberger, J Zeddies and R Offermann (2010). Global biomass potentials-Resources, drivers and scenario results. Energy for Sustainable Development, 14, 200-205.
31. United Nations (UN), 2011, World Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision
32. UNFCCC (2010) Cancun Agreements. Bonn Germany
33. van der Zwaan, B, H Rösler, T Kober, T Aboumahboub, K Calvin, D Gernaat, G Marangoni and D McCollum (2013). A cross-model comparison of global long-Term technology diffusion under a 2-C climate change control target. Climate Change Economics, 4(4), 1340013.
34. van der Zwaan, B, IJ Keppo and F Johnsson (2013). How to decarbonize the transport sector? Energy Policy, 61, 562-573.
35. van Vuuren, D, B Eickhout, P Lucas and M den Elzen (2006). Long-Term multi-gas scenarios to stabilise radiative forcing-Exploring costs and benefits within an integrated assessment framework. The Energy Journal, 27, Special Issue: Multi-Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Climate Policy, 201-233.
36. World Bank (2012). World development indicators and global development finance. The World Bank, May 10, 2012.