The Impact of Uncertainty in Climate Targets and CO2 Storage Availability on Long-Term Emissions Abatement

Environmental Modeling and Assessment

Volumn 17, Issue 1-2, 2012, Pages 177-191

  Keppo, Ilkka ^a   van der Zwaan, Bob ^a,b,c  

^a TNO   (Netherlands)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS); Climate change; Energy system modeling; Mitigation target; Storage potential; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

CARBON CAPTURE; CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; DECISION MAKING; EMISSION CONTROL; FOSSIL FUELS; FUEL STORAGE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STOCHASTIC PROGRAMMING; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CARBON DIOXIDE CAPTURE AND STORAGE; CO2 EMISSION REDUCTION; EMISSIONS ABATEMENTS; ENERGY SYSTEM MODEL; ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENT; INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT; STORAGE POTENTIAL; UNCERTAINTY;

CLIMATE MODELS;

BOTTOM-UP APPROACH; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; CARBON STORAGE; CLIMATE CHANGE; FOSSIL FUEL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84855357577     PISSN: 14202026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10666-011-9283-1     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Deffeyes, K. S. (2005). Beyond oil: The view from Hubbert's peak. Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
2. Forest, C. E., Stone, P. H., Sokolov, A., Allen, M. R., & Webster, M. D. (2002). Quantifying uncertainties in climate system properties with the use of recent climate observations. Science, 295(5552), 113-117.
3. Fuss, S., Szolgayova, W., Obersteiner, M., & Gusti, M. (2008). Investment under market and climate policy uncertainty. Applied Energy, 85(8), 708-721.
4. GEA, Global Energy Assessment, IIASA (2011). Laxenburg, Austria, forthcoming.
5. 2 emissions: Carbon dioxide capture or renewables, taxes or subsidies? The Energy Journal, 27(3), 25-48.
6. Hendriks, C., Graus, W., & van Bergen, F. (2004). Global carbon dioxide storage potential and costs. Ecofys and TNO-NITG, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
7. Herzog, H., Caldeira, K., & Reilly, J. (2003). An issue of permanence: Assessing the effectiveness of temporary carbon storage. Climatic Change, 59(3), 293-310.
8. Huijts, N. M. A., Midden, C. J. H., & Meijnders, L. (2007). Social acceptance of carbon dioxide storage. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2780-2789.
9. IEA-ETP, International Energy Agency (IEA), OECD (2010). Energy Technology Perspectives (ETP), Paris, France.
10. IEA-WEO, International Energy Agency (IEA), OECD (2010). World Energy Outlook (WEO), Paris, France.
11. IPCC (2005). IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Metz, B., Davidson, O., de Coninck, H. C., M., Loos, and L. A. Meyer (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 442.
12. IPCC (2007). Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R. K and Reisinger, A. (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 104.
13. Kanudia, A., & Loulou, R. (1998). Robust responses to climate change via stochastic MARKAL: The case of Quebec. European Journal of Operational Research, 106(1), 15-30.
14. Keppo, I., O'Neill, B. C., & Riahi, K. (2007). Probabilistic temperature change projections and energy system implications of greenhouse gas emission scenarios. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(7), 936-961.
15. Keppo, I., & Strubegger, M. (2010). Short term decisions for long term problems-The effect of foresight on model based energy systems analysis. Energy- The International Journal, 35(5), 2033-2042.
16. Labriet, M., Loulou, R., & Kanudia A. (2008). Is a 2 degrees Celsius warming achievable under high uncertainty? Analysis with the TIMES integrated assessment model. Technical report, G200830, GERAD. Montréal, Canada.
17. Loulou, R., Remme, U., Kanudia, A., Lehtilä, A., & Goldstein G. (2005). Documentation for the TIMES Model, PART II. Energy Technology Systems Analysis Programme (ETSAP), [available at: http://www. etsap. org/documentation. asp].
18. Loulou, R., & Labriet, M. (2008). ETSAP-TIAM: The TIMES integrated assessment model Part I: Model structure. Computational Management Science, 5(1-2), 7-40.
19. Loulou, R. (2008). ETSAP-TIAM: The TIMES integrated assessment model. Part II: Mathematical formulation. Computational Management Science, 5(1-2), 41-66.
20. Loulou, R., Labriet, M., & Kanudia, A. (2009). Deterministic and stochastic analysis of alternative climate targets under differentiated cooperation regimes. Energy Economics, 31(Supplement 2), S131-S143.
21. Martinsen, D., Krey, V., Markewitz, P., & Vögele, S. (2006). A time step energy process model for Germany. Model structure and results. Energy Studies Review, 14(1), 35-57.
22. Mattsson, N. (2002). Introducing uncertain learning in an energy system model: a pilot study using GENIE. International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 18(2, 3, 4), 253-264.
23. Messner, S., Golodnikov, A., & Gritsevskii, A. (1996). A stochastic version of the dynamic linear programming model MESSAGE III. Energy - The International Journal, 21(9), 775-784.
24. Nyqvist B. (2005). Limited foresight in a linear cost minimisation model of the global energy system. Gotherburg: Master's Thesis in Complex Adaptive Systems, Physical Resource Theory, Chalmers University of Technology.
25. O'Neill, B. C., Riahi, K., & Keppo, I. (2010). Mitigation implications of midcentury targets that preserve long-term climate policy options. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(3), 1011-1016.
26. Riahi, K., Rubin, E. S., & Schrattenholzer, L. (2004). Prospects for carbon capture and sequestration technologies assuming their technological learning. Energy, 29(9-10), 1309-1318.
27. Syri, S., Lehtilä, A., Ekholm, T., Savolainen, I., Holttinen, H., & Peltola, E. (2008). Global energy and emissions scenarios for effective climate change mitigation-Deterministic and stochastic scenarios with the TIAM model. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2(2), 274-285.
28. van der Zwaan, B. C. C., & Gerlagh, R. (2006). Climate sensitivity uncertainty and the necessity to transform global energy supply. Energy, 31(14), 2571-2587.
29. 2 storage and leakage. Climatic Change, 93(3/4), 285-309.
30. 2 capture and storage with leakage in an energy-climate model. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 14(2), 135-148.
31. 2 storage. Environmental Science and Technology, 37(16), 3476-3483.