How to decarbonize the transport sector?

Energy Policy

Volumn 61, Issue , 2013, Pages 562-573

  Van der Zwaan, Bob ^a,b,c   Keppo, Ilkka ^a,d   Johnsson, Filip ^e  

^a TNO   (Netherlands)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^e CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

CO2 emissions abatement; Hydrogen versus electricity; Transportation and Climate change

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE POLICY SCENARIOS; ELECTRIC TRANSPORTATION; ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION; EMISSIONS ABATEMENTS; HYDROGEN DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS; HYDROGEN INFRASTRUCTURE; HYDROGEN-FUELED VEHICLES; POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTIONS;

CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE MODELS; COSTS; ELECTRICITY; EMISSION CONTROL; HYDROGEN; INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES; INVESTMENTS; TRANSPORTATION;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; CLIMATE CHANGE; ELECTRIC VEHICLE; EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY PLANNING; ENERGY USE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; HYDROGEN; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM;

EUROPE;

EID: 84881666036     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.118     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Anderson K., Bows A. Reframing the climate change challenge in light of post-2000 emission trends. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 2008, 366(1882):3863-3882.
2. Bakker S. The car industry and the blow-out of the hydrogen hype. Energy Policy 2010, 38(11):6540-6544.
3. Bakker S., van Lente H., Engels R. Competition in a technological niche: the cars of the future. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 2012, 24(5):421-434.
4. Barreto L., Makihira A., Riahi K. The hydrogen economy in the 21st century: a sustainable development scenario. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2003, 28(3):267-284.
5. Burke, A., H. Zhao, 2012. Energy Saving and Cost Projections for Advanced Hybrid, Battery Electric, and Fuel Cell Vehicles in 2015-2030, Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-12-05, Institute for Transportation Studies, UC Davis, California.
6. Concawe, 2008. Well to Wheels Analysis of Future Automotive Fuels and Powertrains in the European Context, CONCAWE, EUCAR and JRC.
7. DOE, 2011a. Revised Portable Power Fuel Cell Targets, US Department of Energy, Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Record, Record # 11009.
8. DOE, 2011b. Fuel Cell System Cost 2011, US Department of Energy, Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Record, Record # 11012.
9. EC, 2011a, A Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2011) 112, European Commission, Brussels, 8 March 2011.
10. EC, 2011b, Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area - Towards a Competitive and Resource Efficient Transport System. White Paper, COM(2011) 144, European Commission, Brussels, 28 March 2011.
11. EPA, 2010, Interim Joint Technical Assessment Report: Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards for Model Years 2017-2025, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, US Environmental Protection Agency, US Department of Transportation, California Environmental Protection Agency.
12. Forest C.E., Stone P.H., Sokolov A., Allen M.R., Webster M.D. Quantifying uncertainties in climate system properties with the use of recent climate observations. Science 2002, 295(5552):113-117.
13. GEA Global Energy Assessment 2012, Cambridge University Press, IIASA (Laxenburg, Austria).
14. 2 emissions: carbon dioxide capture or renewables, taxes or subsidies?. The Energy Journal 2006, 27(3):25-48.
15. 2 abatement over the very long term. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 2012, 17(1/2):137-148.
16. Göransson L., Karlsson S., Johnsson F. Integration of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles in a regional wind-thermal power system. Energy Policy 2010, 38:5482-5492.
17. Grahn, M., 2009. Cost-effective Fuel and Technology Choices in the Transportation Sector in a future Carbon Constrained World, Ph.D. thesis, Chalmers University, Sweden.
18. Greene D.L., Duleep K.G. Bootstrapping a Sustainable North American PEM Fuel Cell Industry: Could a Federal Acquisition Program Make a Difference?, ORNL/TM-2008/183 2008, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
19. Greene D.L., Plotkin S.E. Energy futures for the US transport sector. Energy Policy 2001, 29:1255-1270.
20. Greene D.L., German J., Delucchi M.A. Fuel economy: the case for market failure. Reducing Climate Impacts of the Transportation Sector 2008, Springer Science+Business Media. http://www.springer.com/, D. Sperling, J.S. Cannon (Eds.).
21. Greene D.L., Leiby P.N., James B., Perez J., Melendez M., Milbrandt A., Unnasch S., Hooks M. Analysis of the transition to hydrogen fuel cell vehicles & the potential hydrogen energy infrastructure requirements, ORNL/TM-2008/30 2008, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, directed by S. Gronich. S. McQueen (Ed.).
22. Grübler, A., Energy transitions research: insights and cautionary tales. Energy Policy 50, 2012, 8-16.
23. Gül, T., 2008. An Energy-Economic Scenario Analysis of Alternative Fuels for Transport. Ph.D. Thesis No. 17888, ETH Zürich, Switzerland.
24. Hedenus F., Karlsson S., Azar C., Sprei F. Cost-effective energy carriers for transport - the role of the energy supply system in a carbon-constrained world. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35:4638-4651.
25. Höhne N., Taylor C., Elias R., Den Elzen M., Riahi K., Chen C., Rogelj J., Grassi G., Wagner F., Levin K., Massetti E., Xiusheng Z. National GHG emissions reduction pledges and 2°C: Comparison of studies. Climate Policy 2012, 12(3):356-377.
26. 2: Moving Toward Sustainability 2009, International Energy Agency, Paris.
27. IEA-ETP International Energy Agency (IEA) 2010, OECD, Energy Technology Perspectives (ETP), Paris, France.
28. IEA-ETP International Energy Agency (IEA) 2012, OECD, Energy Technology Perspectives (ETP), Paris, France.
29. IEA-WEO International Energy Agency (IEA) 2010, OECD, World Energy Outlook (WEO), Paris, France.
30. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, Working Group III, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2005, Cambridge University Press.
31. IPCC, 2007, Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report, Working Groups I, II and III, Fourth Assessment Report, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland.
32. 2011, Chalmers University. F. Johnsson (Ed.).
33. 2 capture and storage. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology 2011, 1:1-15.
34. Keppo, I. and B.C.C. van der Zwaan, The impact of uncertainty in forcing targets and CO2 storage availability on long-term climate change mitigation. Environmental Modelling and Assessment 2012, 17(1): 177-191.
35. 2 capture from ambient air. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2012, 109(33):13156-13162. August 14.
36. Loulou R. ETSAP-TIAM: the TIMES integrated assessment model, Part II: mathematical formulation. Computational Management Science 2008, 5(1-2):41-66.
37. Loulou R., Labriet M. ETSAP-TIAM: the TIMES integrated assessment model, Part I: model structure. Computational Management Science 2008, 5(1-2):7-40.
38. McCollum D., Yang C., Yeh S., Ogden J. Deep greenhouse gas reduction scenarios for California-strategic implications from the CA-TIMES energy-economic systems model. Energy Strategy Reviews 2012, 1:19-32.
39. McKinsey, 2010, The role of battery electric vehicles, Plug-in Hybrids and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles. Available from http://ec.europa.eu/research/fch/pdf/a_portfolio_of_power_trains_for_europe_a_fact_based__analysis.pdf.
40. Meyer P.E., Winebrake J.J. Modeling technology diffusion of complementary goods: the case of hydrogen vehicles and refueling infrastructure. Technovation 2009, 29:77-91.
41. Nakicenovic N. The automobile road to technological change: diffusion of the automobile as a process of technological substitution. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 1986, 29(4):309-340.
42. O'Neill B.C., Riahi K., Keppo I. Mitigation implications of midcentury targets that preserve long-term climate policy options. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2010, 107(3):1011-1016.
43. 2 reduction targets. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4:327-340.
44. Pacala S., Socolow R. Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science 2004, 305:968-972.
45. Plotkin S., Stephens T., McManus W. Vehicle Technology Deployment Pathways: An Examination of Timing and Investment Constraints, Transportation Energy Futures Report Series, Prepared for the U.S 2013, Department of Energy by Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, DOE/GO-102013-3708.
46. Pol, M., S. Brunsting, 2011, Car Owners' Perceptions and Attitudes on Innovative Vehicles. Energy research Centre of the Netherlands, Report ECN-E--11-068.
47. Rivera-Tinoco R., Schoots K., van der Zwaan B.C.C. Learning curves for solid oxide fuel cells. Energy Conversion and Management 2012, 57:86-96.
48. Rösler, H., J.J.C. Bruggink and I.J. Keppo, 2011, Design of a European sustainable hydrogen model: model structure and data sources, ECN-E-11-041, available at August 2011, Petten, The Netherlands. http://www.ecn.nl/.
49. Rösler, H., B.C.C. van der Zwaan, I.J. Keppo, J.J.C. Bruggink, 2013.Two Types of Transportation: Electricity versus Hydrogen under Stringent Climate Change Control, mimeo.
50. 2-constraint: a general equilibrium analysis. Energy Policy 2006, 34(9):975-985.
51. Schäfer A., Heywood J.B., Jacoby H.D., Waitz I.A. Transportation in a Climate-Constrained World 2009, MIT Press.
52. Schoots K., Kramer G.J., van der Zwaan B.C.C. Technology learning for fuel cells: an assessment of past and potential cost reductions. Energy Policy 2010, 38:2887-2897.
53. Sperling D., Lutsey N. Energy Efficiency in Passenger Transportation 2009, 39. National Academy of Engineering, USA, The Bridge, 2, June.
54. Struben J., Sterman J.D. Transition challenges for alternative fuel vehicle and transportation systems. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2008, 35:1070-1097.
55. Syri S., Lehtilä A., Ekholm T., Savolainen I., Holttinen H., Peltola E. Global energy and emissions scenarios for effective climate change mitigation-deterministic and stochastic scenarios with the TIAM model. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2008, 2(2):274-285.
56. 2 control. Law & Policy 2005, 27(2):348-378.
57. Uyterlinde, M.A., C.B. Hanschke, P. Kroon, 2005, Duurzame innovatie in het wegverkeer. Een evaluatie van vier transitiepaden voor het thema Duurzame Mobiliteit, Report ECN-E--08-076, Energy research Centre of the Netherlands, Petten.
58. Victor D. Global warming: why the 2°C goal is a political delusion. Nature 2009, 459(7249):909.
59. van Vuuren D.P., Stehfest E., den Elzen M.G.J., Kram T., van Vliet J., Deetman S., Isaac M., Klein Goldewijk K., Hof A., Mendoza Beltran A., Oostenrijk R., van Ruijven B. RCP2.6: exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature change below 2°C. Climatic Change 2011, 109:95-116.
60. Yang C., Ogden J. Determining the lowest-cost hydrogen delivery mode. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2007, 32(2):268-286.
61. Yeh S., McCollum D. Optimizing the transportation climate mitigation wedge. Sustainable Transportation Energy Pathways 2011, Institute for Transportation Studies, UC Davis, California, Chapter10. J. Ogden, L. Anderson (Eds.).
62. 2 storage and leakage. Climatic Change 2009, 93(3/4):285-309.
63. 2 capture and storage with leakage in an energy-climate model. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 2009, 14(2):135-148.
64. 2 transportation. Applied Energy 2011, 8:3821-3831.