Comparing bibliometric analysis using pubmed, scopus, and web of science databases

Journal of Visualized Experiments

Volumn 2019, Issue 152, 2019, Pages

  Alryalat, Saif Aldeen S ^a   Malkawi, Lna W ^a   Momani, Shaher M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JORDAN   (Jordan)

^b KING ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Bibliometric Analysis; Bibliometry; Issue 152; Medicine; PubMed; Research; Scopus; Web of Science

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOMETRICS; FACTUAL DATABASE; HUMAN; MEDLINE;

BIBLIOMETRICS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HUMANS; PUBMED;

EID: 85072381475     PISSN: 1940087X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3791/58494     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. McGowan, J., et al. PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 75, 40-46 (2016).
2. Hood, W., and Wilson, C. The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics. Scientometrics. 52 (2), 291-314 (2001).
3. Bar-Ilan, J. Citations to the Introduction to infometrics indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics. 82 (3), 495-506 (2010).
4. Boudry, C, Baudouin, C., and Mouriaux, F. International publication trends in dry eye disease research: A bibliometric analysis. The Ocular Surface. 16 (1), 173-179 (2018).
5. Kulkarni, A. V., et al. Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. Journal of the American Medical Association. 302 (10), 1092-1096 (2009).
6. AlRyalat, S.A., Malkawi, L. International Collaboration and Openness in Jordanian Research Output: A 10-year Publications Feedback. Publishing Research Quarterly. 34 (2), 265-274 (2018).
7. Falagas, M.E., Karavasiou, A.I., Bliziotis, I.A. Estimates of global research productivity in virology. Journal of Medical Virology. 76 (2), 223-229 (2005).
8. Young, H. The ALA glossary of library and information science. Ediciones Díaz de Santos. (1983).
9. Broadus, R. Toward a definition of bibliometrics. Scientometrics. 12 (5-6), 373-379 (1987).
10. Falagas, M.E., et al. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal. 22 (2), 338-342 (2008).
11. Guz, A.N., Rushchitsky, J.J. Scopus: A system for the evaluation of scientific journals. International Applied Mechanics. 45 (4), 351 (2009).
12. Jacso, P. As we may search-comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases. CurrentScience. 89 (9), 1537-1547 (2005).
13. Li, J, et al. Citation analysis: Comparison of Web of Science, Scopus, Scifinder, And Google Scholar. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries. 7 (3), 196-217 (2010).
14. Levine-Clark, M., Kraus, J. Finding chemistry information using Google Scholar: a comparison with Chemical Abstracts Service. Science & Technology Libraries. 27 (4), 3-17 (2007).
15. Gavel, Y., Iselid, L. Web of Science and Scopus: a journal title overlap study. Online Information Review. 32 (1), 8-21 (2008).
16. Harzing, A.W., Alakangas, S. Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics. 106 (2), 787-804 (2016).
17. Aghaei Chadegani, A., et al. A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of Science and Scopus databases. (2013).
18. Testa, J. The Thomson Reuters journal selection process. Transnational Corporations Review. 1 (4), 59-66 (2009).
19. Web of Science Core Collection: Web of Science: Summary of Coverage. http://clarivate.libguides.com/woscc/coverage, accessed on May 10, 2018 (2018).
20. Burnham, J.F. Scopus database: a review. Biomedical Digital Libraries. 3 (1), 1 (2006).
21. PubMed. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed (2018).
22. Scopus. www.scopus.com (2018).
23. Web of Science. www.webofknowledge.com (2018).
24. Small, H. Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American society for Information Science and Technology. 50 (9), 799-813 (1999).
25. Cobo, M.J., et al. Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62 (7), 1382-1402 (2011).
26. World bank. http://www.worldbank.org (2018).
27. Statistical Yearbook-60th issue. (2017).
28. Mongeon, P. Paul-Hus, A. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics. 106 (1), 213-228 (2016).